Minimally important differences for Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System pain interference for individuals with back pain

References

• RileyWTRothrockNBruceBPatient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS) domain names and definitions revisions: further evaluation of content validity in IRT-derived item banksQual Life Res20101991311132120593306
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DworkinRHTurkDCFarrarJTCore outcome measures for chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendationsPain20051131–291915621359
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KimJChungHAmtmannDRevickiDACookKFMeasurement invariance of the PROMIS pain interference item bank across community and clinical samplesQual Life Res201322350150722552604
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AmtmannDCookKFJensenMPDevelopment of a PROMIS item bank to measure pain interferencePain2010150117318220554116
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PilkonisPAChoiSWReiseSPItem banks for measuring emotional distress from the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS®): depression, anxiety, and angerAssessment201118326328321697139
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CookKFO’MalleyKJRoddeyTSDynamic assessment of health outcomes: time to let the CAT out of the bag?Health Serv Res2005405 Pt 21694171116179003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WyrwichKWBullingerMAaronsonNEstimating clinically significant differences in quality of life outcomesQual Life Res200514228529515892420
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• YostKJEtonDTGarciaSFCellaDMinimally important differences were estimated for six Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System-Cancer scales in advanced-stage cancer patientsJ Clin Epidemiol201164550751621447427
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BedardGZengLLamHMeaningful change in oncology quality-of-life instruments: a systematic literature reviewExpert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res201212447548322971034
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WongKZengLZhangLMinimal clinically important differences in the brief pain inventory in patients with bone metastasesSupport Care Cancer20132171893189923411998
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NormanGRSloanJAWyrwichKWInterpretation of changes in health-related quality of life: the remarkable universality of half a standard deviationMed Care200341558259212719681
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CopayAGSubachBRGlassmanSDPollyDWJrSchulerTCUnderstanding the minimum clinically important difference: a review of concepts and methodsSpine J20077554154617448732
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• YostKJEtonDTCombining distribution- and anchor-based approaches to determine minimally important differences: the FACIT experienceEval Health Prof200528217219115851772
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EtonDTCellaDYostKJA combination of distribution- and anchor-based approaches determined minimally important differences (MIDs) for four endpoints in a breast cancer scaleJ Clin Epidemiol200457989891015504633
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de VetHCOsteloRWTerweeCBMinimally important change determined by a visual method integrating an anchor-based and a distribution-based approachQual Life Res200716113114217033901
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CellaDEtonDTLaiJSPetermanAHMerkelDECombining anchor and distribution-based methods to derive minimal clinically important differences on the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy (FACT) anemia and fatigue scalesJ Pain Symptom Manage200224654756112551804
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EdwardsRRKlickBBuenaverLSymptoms of distress as prospective predictors of pain-related sciatica treatment outcomesPain20071301–2475517156925
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• TurnerRJMcLeanPDPhysical disability and psychological distressRehabil Psychol1989344225242
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BanksSMKernsRDExplaining high rates of depression in chronic pain: a diathesis–stress frameworkPsychol Bull1996119195110
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OhayonMMSchatzbergAFUsing chronic pain to predict depressive morbidity in the general populationArch Gen Psychiatry2003601394712511171
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HamiltonMA rating scale for depressionJ Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry1960231566214399272
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HamiltonMDevelopment of a rating scale for primary depressive illnessBr J Soc Clin Psychol1967642782966080235
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• PilkonisPAYuLDoddsNEJohnstonKLMaihoeferCCLawrenceSMValidation of the depression item bank from the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS®) in a three-month observational studyJ Psychiatr Res20145611211924931848
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LiuHCellaDGershonRRepresentativeness of the patient-reported outcomes measurement information system internet panelJ Clin Epidemiol201063111169117820688473
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CleelandCMeasurement of pain by subjective reportChapmanCLoeserJAdvances in Pain Research and Therapy12Issues in Pain MeasurementNew YorkRaven Press1989391403
   Google Scholar
• RolandMMorrisRA study of the natural history of back pain. Part I: development of a reliable and sensitive measure of disability in low-back painSpine (Phila Pa 1976)1983821411446222486
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de VetHCBeckermanHTerweeCBTerluinBBouterLMDefinition of clinical differencesJ Rheumatol2006332434 author reply 43516465677
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BeatonDEBombardierCKatzJNLooking for important change/differences in studies of responsiveness. OMERACT MCID Working Group. Outcome Measures in Rheumatology. Minimal Clinically Important DifferenceJ Rheumatol200128240040511246687
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• YostKJCellaDChawlaAMinimally important differences were estimated for the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Colorectal (FACT-C) instrument using a combination of distribution- and anchor-based approachesJ Clin Epidemiol200558121241125116291468
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RevickiDHaysRDCellaDSloanJRecommended methods for determining responsiveness and minimally important differences for patient-reported outcomesJ Clin Epidemiol200861210210918177782
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ButtZWagnerLIBeaumontJLUse of a single-item screening tool to detect clinically significant fatigue, pain, distress, and anorexia in ambulatory cancer practiceJ Pain Symptom Manage2008351203017959345
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FarrarJTYoungJPJrLaMoreauxLWerthJLPooleRMClinical importance of changes in chronic pain intensity measured on an 11-point numerical pain rating scalePain200194214915811690728
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• StratfordPWBinkleyJMRiddleDLGuyattGHSensitivity to change of the Roland-Morris Back Pain Questionnaire: part 1Phys Ther19987811118611969806623
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SAS Institute IncBase SAS® 9.3 Procedures GuideCary, NCSAS Institute Inc2011
   Google Scholar
• SpitzerRLKroenkeKWilliamsJBValidation and utility of a self-report version of PRIME-MD: the PHQ primary care study. Primary Care Evaluation of Mental Disorders. Patient Health QuestionnaireJAMA1999282181737174410568646
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• TehCFZaslavskyAMReynoldsCFClearyPDEffect of depression treatment on chronic pain outcomesPsychosom Med2010721616719875633
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar