Prilocaine hydrochloride 2% hyperbaric solution for intrathecal injection: a clinical review

References

• FörsterJGShort-acting spinal anesthesia in the ambulatory settingCurr Opin Anaesthesiol201427659760425211156
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SchneiderMEttlinTKaufmannMTransient neurologic toxicity after hyperbaric subarachnoid anesthesia with 5% lidocaineAnesth Analg1993765115411578141862
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• TarkkilaPHuhtalaJTuominenMTransient radicular irritation after spinal anesthesia with hyperbaric 5% lignocaineBr J Anaesth19957433283297718381
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HillerARosenbergPHTransient neurological symptoms after spinal anaesthesia with 4% mepivacaine and 0.5% bupivacaineBr J Anaesth19977933013059389845
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FreedmanJMLiDKDrasnerKJaskelaMCLarsenBWiSTransient neurologic symptoms after spinal anesthesia: an epidemiologic study of 1,863 patientsAnesthesiology19988936336419743399
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HodgsonPSLiuSSBatraMSGrasTWPollockJENealJMProcaine compared with lidocaine for incidence of transient neurologic symptomsReg Anesth Pain Med200025321822210834773
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LiuSSWarePDAllenHWNealJMPollockJEDose-response characteristics of spinal bupivacaine in volunteers. Clinical implications for ambulatory anesthesiaAnesthesiology1996896729736
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NairGSAbrishamiALermitteJChungFSystematic review of spinal anaesthesia using bupivacaine for ambulatory knee arthroscopyBr J Anaesth2009102330731519193651
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• JadadARMooreRACarrollDAssessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: is blinding necessary?Control Clin Trials19961711128721797
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• TuckerGTMatherLEClinical Pharmacokinetics of local anaestheticsClin Pharmacokinet197944241278385208
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HardmanJDLimbirdLEMolinoffRWRuddonAGGoodmanLSGilmanAThe Pharmacological Basis of TherapeuticsNew York, NYMcGraw-Hill1996338
   Google Scholar
• VastersFGEberhartLHKochTKrankePWulfHMorinAMRisk factors for prilocaine-induced methaemoglobinaemia following peripheral regional anaesthesiaEur J Anaesthesiol200623976076516723054
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CrankshawTPCitanest (Prilocaine) in spinal analgesiaActa Anaesth Scand19659s16287290
   Google Scholar
• HillmannKMSpinal prilocaineAnaesthesia19783316869626344
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RobertsonDHSpinal prilocaineAnaesthesia1978337647648
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HockingGWildsmithJAIntrathecal drug spreadBr J Anaesth200493456857815220175
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLeodGADensity of spinal anaesthetic solutions of bupivacaine, levobupivacaine and ropivacaine with and without dextroseBr J Anaesth200492454755114766715
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BachmannMPerePKairaluomaPRosenbergPHKallioHComparison of hyperbaric and plain articaine in spinal anaesthesia for open inguinal hernia repairBr J Anaesth2008101684885418922850
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SenHPurtulogluTSizlanAComparison of intrathecal hyper-baric and isobaric levobupivacaine in urological surgeryMinerva Anestesiol2010761242820125070
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FettesPHockingGPetersonMLuckJFWildsmithJAComparison of plain and hyperbaric solutions of ropivacaine for spinal anaesthesiaBr J Anaesth200594110711115516352
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kooger InfanteNEVan GesselEForsterAGamulinZExtent of hyperbaric spinal anesthesia influences the duration of spinal blockAnesthesiology20009251319132310877732
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CamponovoCFanelliAGhisiDCristinaDFanelliGA prospective, prospective, double-blinded, randomized, clinical trial comparing the efficacy of 40 mg and 60 mg hyperbaric 2prilocaine versus 60 mg plain prilocaine for intathecal anesthesia in ambulatory surgeryAnesth Analg2010111256857220529983
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RätschGNiebergallHHauensteinLReberASpinal anaesthesia in day-case surgery. Optimisation of proceduresAnaesthesist200756432232717273833
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EnkDPrienTVan AkenHMertesNMeyerJBrűsselTSuccess rate of unilateral spinal anesthesia is dependent on injection flowReg Anesth Pain Med200126542042711561261
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CasatiAFanelliGAldegheriGFrequency of hypotension during conventional or asymmetric hyperbaric spinal blockReg Anesth Pain Med199924321421910338170
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ManasseroABossolascoMUguesSBailoCLiarouCColettaGComparison of unilateral and bilateral spinal anesthesia with 2% hyperbaric prilocaine in day-case inguinal herniorraphy: a randomized controlled trialMinerva Anestesiol201480668569124226495
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GebhardtVHeroldAWeissCSamakasASchmittnerMDDosage finding for low-dose spinal anaesthesia using hyperbaric prilocaine in patients undergoing perianal outpatient surgeryActa Anaesthesiol Scand201357224925623199005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GebhardtVBeilsteinBHeroldASpinal hyperbaric prilocaine versus. mepivacaine in perianal outpatient surgeryCentral Eur J Med201496754761
   Google Scholar
• KabanOGYaziciogluDAkkayaTSayinMMSekerDGumusHSpinal anaesthesia with hyperbaric prilocaine in day-case perianal surgery: randomised controlled trialScientific World Journal2014201460837225379541
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• GuntzELatrechBTsiberidisCGouwyJKapessidouYED 50 and ED 90 of intrathecal hyperbaric 2% prilocaine in ambulatory knee arthroscopyCan J Anesth201461980180724906303
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AmbrosoliALChiarandaMFedeleLLGemmaMCedratiVCap-pelleriGARandomised controlled trial of intrathecal blockade versus peripheral nerve blockade for day-case knee arthroscopyAnaesthesia201671328028426864002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AguirreJBorgeatABühlerPMrdjenJHardmeierBBonviniJMIntrathecal hyperbaric 2% prilocaine versus 0.4% plain ropivacaine for same-day arthroscopic knee surgery: a prospective randomized, double-blind controlled studyCan J Anesth201562101055106226272719
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ManasseroAMeconiTFanelliAIs 60 mg a suitable dosage for same-day spinal prilocaine?Can J Anesth201663449549626631219
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GuntzEKapessidouYSpinal prilocaine for same-day surgery: the importance of equipotent dosesCan J Anesth201663898598627044397
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HendriksMPDe WeertCJMSnoeckMMJHuHPPluimMALGielenMJMPlain articaine or prilocaine for spinal anaesthesia in day-case knee arthroscopy: a double-blind randomized trialBr J Anaesth2009102225926319112061
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BlackASNewcombeGNPlummerJLMcLeodDHMartinDKSpinal anaesthesia for ambulatory arthroscopic surgery of the knee: a comparison of low-dose prilocaine and fentanyl with bupivacaine and fentanylBr J Anaesth2011106218318820947591
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AkcaboyZNAkcaboyETMutluNMSergerNAksuCGogusNSpinal anesthesia with low-dose bupivacaine-fentanyl combination: a good alternative for day case transurethral resection of prostate surgery in geriatric patientsRev Bras Anestesiol201262675376123176984
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KamphuisETIonescuTIKuipersPWde GierJvan VenrooijGEBoonTARecovery of storage and emptying functions of the urinary bladder after spinal anesthesia with lidocaine and with bupivacaine in menAnesthesiology19988823103169477049
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KreutzigerJFrankenbergerBLugerTJRichardSZbindenSUrinary retention after spinal anaesthesia with hyperbaric prilocaine 2% in an ambulatory settingBr J Anaesth2010104558258620338955
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PavlinDJPavlinEGGunnHCTaradayJKKoerschgenMEVoiding in patients managed with or without ultrasound monitoring of bladder volume after outpatient surgeryAnesth Analg1999891909710389784
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AwadITChungFFactors affecting recovery and discharge following ambulatory surgeryCan J Anesth200653985887216960263
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MulroyMFSalinasFVLarkinKLPolissarLAmbulatory surgery patients may be discharged before voiding after short-acting spinal and epidural anesthesiaAnesthesiology200297231531912151918
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HamplKFSchneiderMCUmmenhoferWDreweJTransient neurologic symptoms after spinal anesthesiaAnesth Analg1995816114811537486096
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HamplKFSchneiderMCParggerHGutJDreweJDrasnerKA similar incidence of transient neurologic symptoms after spinal anesthe-sia with 2% and 5% lidocaineAnesth Analg1996835105110548895284
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PollokJETransient neurologic symptoms: etiology, risk factors, and managementReg Anesth Pain Med200227658158612430108
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PollockJENeurotoxicity of intrathecal local anaesthetics and transient neurological symptomsBest Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol200317347148414529015
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• HamplKFHeinzmann-WiedmerSLuginbuehlITransient neurologic symptoms after spinal anestesia: a lower incidence with prilocaine and bupivacaine than with lidocaineAnesthesiology1988883629633
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martìnez-BourioRArzuagaMQuintanaJMIncidence of transient neurologic symptoms after hyperbaric subarachnoid anesthesia with 5% lidocaine and 5% prilocaineAnesthesiology19988836246289523804
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KönigWRuzicicDAbsence of transient radicular irritation after 5000 spinal anaesthetics with prilocaineAnaesthesia19975221821839059110
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De WeertKTraskelMGielenMSlappendelRWeberEDirksenRThe incidence of transient neurological symptoms after spinal anaesthesia with lidocaine compared to prilocaineAnaesthesia200055101020102411012500
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ØstgaardGHallaråkerOUlvesethOKFlaattenHA randomised study of lidocaine and prilocaine for spinal anaesthesiaActa Anaesthesiol Scand200044443644010757577
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EberhartLHMorinAMKrankePGeldnerGWulfHTransient neurologic symptoms after spinal anesthesia. A quantitative systematic review (meta-analysis) of randomized controlled studiesAnaesthesist20025153954612243039
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ZaricDPaceNLChristiansenCPunjasawadwongYTransient neurological symptoms (TNS) following spinal anaesthesia with lidocaine versus other local anaestheticsCochrane Database Syst Rev20032CD00300612804450
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• ZaricDChristiansenCPaceNLPunjasawadwongYTransient neurological symptoms (TNS) following spinal anaesthesia with lidocaine versus other local anaesthetics: a systematic review of randomized, controlled trialsAnaesth Analg2005100618111816
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ZaricDPaceNLTransient neurologic symptoms (TNS) following spinal anaesthesia with lidocaine versus other local anaestheticsCochrane Database Syst Rev2009152CD003006
   Google Scholar
• cebm.net [homepage on the Internet]University of Oxford: The Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine111998 [Updated by Jeremy Howick March 2009]. Available from: http://www.cebm.net/oxford-centre-evidence-based-medicine-levels-evidence-march-2009/Accessed February 26, 2017
   Google Scholar