Levobupivacaine Consumption in Automated Intermittent Bolus in Ultrasound Guided Subparaneural Sciatic Nerve Catheters: A Prospective Double-Blind Randomized Trial

References

• Singelyn FJ, Aye F, Gouverneur JM. Continuous popliteal sciatic nerve block: an original technique to provide postoperative analgesia after foot surgery. Anesth Analg. 1997;84(2):383–386. doi:10.1213/00000539-199702000-00027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ilfeld BM, Morey TE, Wang RD, et al. Continuous popliteal sciatic nerve block for postoperative pain control at home: a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled study. Anesthesiology. 2002;97(4):959–965. doi:10.1097/00000542-200210000-00031
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zaric D, Boysen K, Christiansen J, et al. Continuous popliteal sciatic nerve block for outpatient foot surgery–a randomized, controlled trial. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2004;48(3):337–341. doi:10.1111/j.0001-5172.2004.0327.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White PF, Issioui T, Skrivanek GD, et al. The use of a continuous popliteal sciatic nerve block after surgery involving the foot and ankle: does it improve the quality of recovery? Anesth Analg. 2003;97:1303–1309. doi:10.1213/01.ANE.0000082242.84015.D4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Casati A, Vinciguerra F, Cappelleri G, et al. Levobupivacaine 0.2% or 0.125% for continuous sciatic nerve block: a prospective, randomized, double-blind comparison with 0.2% ropivacaine. Anesth Analg. 2004;99:919–23, table of contents. doi:10.1213/01.ANE.0000129977.44115.93
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ilfeld BM, Loland VJ, Gerancher JC, et al. The effects of varying local anesthetic concentration and volume on continuous popliteal sciatic nerve blocks: a dual-center, randomized, controlled study. Anesth Analg. 2008;107:701–707.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carvalho B, George RB, Cobb B, et al. Implementation of programmed intermittent epidural bolus for the maintenance of labor analgesia. Anesth Analg. 2016;123(4):965–971. doi:10.1213/ANE.0000000000001407
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taboada M, Rodriguez J, Bermudez M, et al. Comparison of continuous infusion versus automated bolus for postoperative patient-controlled analgesia with popliteal sciatic nerve catheters. Anesthesiology. 2009;110(1):150–154. doi:10.1097/ALN.0b013e318191693a
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jagannathan R, Niesen AD, D’Souza RS, et al. Intermittent bolus versus continuous infusion techniques for local anesthetic delivery in peripheral and truncal nerve analgesia: the current state of evidence. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2019;44:447–451. doi:10.1136/rapm-2018-100082
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taboada M, Rodriguez J, Bermudez M, et al. A “new” automated bolus technique for continuous popliteal block: a prospective, randomized comparison with a continuous infusion technique. Anesth Analg. 2008;107(4):1433–1437. doi:10.1213/ane.0b013e3181824164
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schnabel A, Meyer-Friessem CH, Zahn PK, et al. Ultrasound compared with nerve stimulation guidance for peripheral nerve catheter placement: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Br J Anaesth. 2013;111(4):564–572. doi:10.1093/bja/aet196
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perlas A, Wong P, Abdallah F, et al. Ultrasound-guided popliteal block through a common paraneural sheath versus conventional injection: a prospective, randomized, double-blind study. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2013;38(3):218–225. doi:10.1097/AAP.0b013e31828db12f
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sztain JF, Finneran JJ, Monahan AM, et al., Continuous popliteal-sciatic blocks for postoperative analgesia: traditional proximal catheter insertion superficial to the paraneural sheath versus a new distal insertion site deep to the paraneural sheath. Anesth Analg. 2018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song Y, Lee S, Paik DJ, et al. “Fat Brook” in the popliteal fossa: cadaveric and clinical investigation with magnetic resonance imaging. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2017;41(3):494–498. doi:10.1097/RCT.0000000000000549
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madison SJ, Monahan AM, Agarwal RR, et al. A randomized, triple-masked, active-controlled investigation of the relative effects of dose, concentration, and infusion rate for continuous popliteal-sciatic nerve blocks in volunteers. Br J Anaesth. 2015;114(1):121–129. doi:10.1093/bja/aeu333
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bombardieri AM, Maalouf DB, Kahn RL, et al. A comparison of two different concentrations and infusion rates of ropivacaine in perineural infusion administered at the same total dose for analgesia after foot and ankle surgery: a randomized, double blinded, controlled study. Minerva Anestesiol. 2019;85(2):139–147. doi:10.23736/S0375-9393.18.12266-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verlinde M, Hollmann MW, Stevens MF, et al. Local anesthetic-induced neurotoxicity. Int J Mol Sci. 2016;17(3):339. doi:10.3390/ijms17030339
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang S, Abrahams MS, Hurn PD, et al. Local anesthetic Schwann cell toxicity is time and concentration dependent. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2011;36(5):444–451. doi:10.1097/AAP.0b013e318228c835
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schoenmakers KP, Fenten MG, Louwerens JW, et al. The effects of adding epinephrine to ropivacaine for popliteal nerve block on the duration of postoperative analgesia: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Anesthesiol. 2015;15(1):100. doi:10.1186/s12871-015-0083-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vermeylen K, De Puydt J, Engelen S, et al. A double-blind randomized controlled trial comparing dexamethasone and clonidine as adjuvants to a ropivacaine sciatic popliteal block for foot surgery. Local Reg Anesth. 2016;9:17–24. doi:10.2147/LRA.S96073
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Baeriswyl M, Taffe P, Kirkham KR, et al. Comparison of peripheral nerve blockade characteristics between non-diabetic patients and patients suffering from diabetic neuropathy: a prospective cohort study. Anaesthesia. 2018;73(9):1110–1117. doi:10.1111/anae.14347
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolf FA, Gray AT. Sonography of the paraneural sheath of the sciatic nerve in the popliteal fossa: more than a bifurcation. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2014;39(3):260–261. doi:10.1097/AAP.0000000000000036
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neal JM, Barrington MJ, Brull R, et al. The Second ASRA practice advisory on neurologic complications associated with regional anesthesia and pain medicine: executive summary 2015. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2015;40(5):401–430. doi:10.1097/AAP.0000000000000286
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borgeat A, Blumenthal S, Lambert M, et al. The feasibility and complications of the continuous popliteal nerve block: a 1001-case survey. Anesth Analg. 2006;103(1):229–33, table of contents. doi:10.1213/01.ane.0000221462.87951.8d
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salinas FV. Location, location, location: continuous peripheral nerve blocks and stimulating catheters. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2003;28(2):79–82. doi:10.1053/rapm.2003.50033
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ilfeld BM. Continuous peripheral nerve blocks in the hospital and at home. Anesthesiol Clin. 2011;29(2):193–211. doi:10.1016/j.anclin.2011.04.003
   Google Scholar
• Bendtsen TF, Nielsen TD, Rohde CV, et al. Ultrasound guidance improves a continuous popliteal sciatic nerve block when compared with nerve stimulation. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2011;36:181–184. doi:10.1097/AAP.0b013e31820d421f
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hauritz RW, Pedersen EM, Linde FS, et al. Displacement of popliteal sciatic nerve catheters after major foot and ankle surgery: a randomized controlled double-blinded magnetic resonance imaging study. Br J Anaesth. 2016;117:220–227. doi:10.1093/bja/aew172
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fredrickson MJ, Ball CM, Dalgleish AJ. Catheter orifice configuration influences the effectiveness of continuous peripheral nerve blockade. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2011;36:470–475.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar