References
- Skloot R. The Immortal Life of Henrietta Lacks. New York: Crown Publishers; 2010.
- Margonelli L. Eternal life. The New York Times. February 7, 2010.
- Callaway E. Deal done over HeLa cell line. Nature. 2013;500:132–133.
- Entine J. Your DNA in death: reflections on the Henrietta Lacks bioethics controversy [webpage on the Internet]. Genetic Literacy Project; 2013. Available from: http://geneticliteracyproject.org/2013/04/01/your-dna-in-death-reflections-on-the-henrietta-lacks-bioethics-controversy/. Accessed February 10, 2015.
- Skloot R. The immortal life of Henrietta Lacks, the sequel. The New York Times. March 23, 2013. Available from: http://www.nytimes.com/2013/03/24/opinion/sunday/the-immortal-life-of-henrietta-lacks-the-sequel.html. Accessed February 11, 2015.
- Hildebrandt S. Capital punishment and anatomy: history and ethics of an ongoing association. Clin Anat. 2008;21:5–14.
- Jones DG, Whitaker MI. Anatomy’s use of unclaimed bodies: reasons against continued dependence on an ethically dubious practice. Clin Anat. 2012;25:246–254.
- Royal College of Pathologists. Guidelines for the Retention of Tissue and Organs at Post-mortem Examination. London: Royal College of Pathologists; 2000.
- Nuffield Council on Bioethics. Human Tissue: Ethical and Legal Issues. London: Nuffield Council on Bioethics; 1995.
- [No authors listed]. Research based on archived information and samples. Recommendations from the Royal College of Physicians Committee on Ethical Issues in Medicine. J R Coll Physicians Lond. 1999;33:264–266.
- National Bioethics Advisory Commission. Research Involving Human Biological Materials: Ethical Issues and Policy Guidance. Rockville: National Bioethics Advisory Commission; 1999. Available from: https://bioethicsarchive.georgetown.edu/nbac/. Accessed February 11, 2015.
- Wertz DC. Archived specimens: a platform for discussion. Community Genet. 1999;2:51–60.
- Department of Health. Report of a Census of Organs and Tissues Retained by Pathology Services in England. London: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office; 2001.
- Retained Organs Commission. A Consultation Document on Unclaimed and Unidentifiable Organs and Tissue, A Possible Regulatory Framework. London: Retained Organs Commission, National Health Service; 2002.
- Jones DG, Gear R, Galvin KA. Stored human tissue: an ethical perspective on the fate of anonymous, archival material. J Med Ethics. 2003;29:343–347.
- Knoppers BM, Laberge CM. Research and stored tissues. Persons as sources, samples as persons? JAMA. 1995;274:1806–1807.
- Brady BA. Epidemiological research. In: The Ethics of Biomedical Research: An International Perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Jones DG. Use of bequeathed and unclaimed bodies in the dissecting room. Clin Anat. 1994;7:102–107.
- Medical Research Council. Human Tissue and Biological Samples for Use in Research. London: Medical Research Council; 2001.
- Bristol Royal Infirmary Inquiry. Learning from Bristol: The Report of the Public Inquiry into Children’s Heart Surgery at the Bristol Royal Infirmary 1984–1995. Bristol: Crown Copyright; 2001.
- Royal Liverpool Children’s Inquiry. The Royal Liverpool Children’s Inquiry Report. London: House of Commons; 2001.
- Jones DG, Galvin KA. Retention of body parts: reflections from anatomy. N Z Med J. 2002;115:267–269.
- Walker B. Inquiry into the Matters Arising from the Post-Mortem and Anatomical Examination Practices of the Institute of Forensic Medicine. Sydney: The Government of the State of New South Wales; 2001.
- MacDonald H. Human Remains: Episodes in Human Dissection. Melbourne: Melbourne University Press; 2005.
- Collie ND. Disclosure or Discourse? Towards a Common Conception of Consent to Research Using Surplus Clinical Tissue [master’s thesis]. Dunedin: University of Otago; 2014.
- German National Ethics Committee (Nationaler Ethikrat). Biobanks for Research. Opinion. German National Ethics Committee; 2004.
- Ministry of Health. Guidelines for the Use of Human Tissue for Future Unspecified Research Purposes. Wellington: Ministry of Health; 2007.
- Human Tissue Authority. Code of Practice 1, Consent. London: Human Tissue Authority; 2009 [updated 2014]. Available from: https://www.hta.gov.uk/code-practice-1-consent. Accessed February 23, 2015.
- OHRP – Guidance on Research Involving Coded Private Information or Biological Specimens [webpage on the Internet]. Rockville: Office for Human Research Protections; 2008. Available from: http://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/policy/cdebiol.html. Accessed October 8, 2012.
- Salvaterra E, Lecchi L, Giovanelli S, et al. Banking together. A unified model of informed consent for biobanking. EMBO Rep. 2008;9(4):307–313.
- Hansson MG, Dillner J, Bartram CR, Carlson JA, Helgesson G. Should donors be allowed to give broad consent to future biobank research? Lancet Oncol. 2006;7(3):266–269.
- Knoppers BM. Biobanking: international norms. J Law Med Ethics. 2005;33:7–14.
- Wendler D. One-time general consent for research on biological samples. BMJ. 2006;332:544–547.
- Lipworth W, Irvine R, Morrell B. Consent: a need for guidelines to reflect local considerations. Nature. 2009;461:593.
- Caulfield T, Kayet J. Broad consent in biobanking: reflections on seemingly insurmountable dilemmas. Med Law Int. 2009;10:85–100.
- Moore v Regents of the University of California. 51 Cal3d 120, 793 P2d 479,271 Cal Rptr 146 (1990), cert denied, 499 US 936 (1991).
- Greenberg, 2003 WL 21246347 (so2d, May 29, 2003).
- Hakimian R, Korn D. Ownership and use of tissue specimens for research. JAMA. 2004;292:2500–2505.
- Clayton EW, Steinberg KK, Khoury MJ, et al. Informed consent for genetic research on stored tissue samples. JAMA. 1995;274:1786–1792.
- Annas GJ, Glantz LH, Roche PA. The Genetic Privacy Act and Commentary, Guidelines for Protecting Privacy of Information Stored in Genetic Data Banks, Ethical, Legal and Social Implications of the Human Genome Project. Office of Energy Research, US Department of Energy, No DE-FG02-93ER61626; 1995. Available from: http://web.ornl.gov/sci/techresources/Human_Genome/resource/privacyact.pdf. Accessed February 23, 2015.
- Harper PS. Research samples from families with genetic diseases: a proposed code of conduct. BMJ, 1993;306:1391–1394.
- Korn D. Dangerous intersections. Issues Sci Technol. 1996;13:55–62.
- Ashburn TT, Wilson SK, Eisenstein BI. Human tissue research in the genomic era of medicine: balancing individual and societal interests. Arch Intern Med. 2000;160:3377–3384.
- Enserink M. Iceland OKs private health databank. Science. 1999;283:13.
- Lyall SA. A country unveils its gene pool and debate flares. The New York Times. February 16, 1999;Sect F:1.
- Greely HT. Iceland’s plan for genomics research: facts and implications. Jurimetrics. 2000;40:153–191.
- Gymrek M, McGuire AL, Golan D, Halperin E, Erlich Y. Identifying personal genomes by surname inference. Science. 2013;339:321–324.
- [No authors listed]. Genetic privacy. Nature. 2013;493:451.
- Bathe OF, McGuire AL. The ethical use of existing samples for genome research. Genet Med. 2009;11:712–715.
- Lin Z, Owen AB, Altman RB. Genetics. Genomic research and human subject privacy. Science. 2004;305:183.
- McGuire AL, Gibbs RA. Genetics. No longer de-identified. Science. 2006;312:370–371.
- Lowrance WW, Collins FS. Ethics. Identifiability in genomic research. Science. 2007;317:600–602.
- Annas GJ. Rules for research on human genetic variation – lessons from Iceland. N Engl J Med. 2000;342:1830–1833.
- Angius A, Melis PM, Morelli L, et al. Archival, demographic and genetic studies define a Sardinian sub-isolate as a suitable model for mapping complex traits. Hum Genet. 2001;109:198–209.
- Markow TA, Martin JF. Inbreeding and developmental stability in a small human population. Ann Hum Biol. 1993;20:389–394.
- Kriebel D, Tickner J. Reenergizing public health through precaution. Am J Public Health. 2001;91:1351–1355.
- Charnley G, Elliott ED. Risk versus precaution: environmental law and public health protection. The Environmental Law Reporter. 2002;32:10363–10366.
- Hansson MG. Building on relationships of trust in biobank research. J Med Ethics. 2005;31:415–418.
- Helgesson G, Dillner J, Carlson J, Bartram CR, Hansson MG. Ethical framework for previously collected biobank samples. Nat Biotechnol. 2007;25:973–976.
- Hansson MG. For the safety and benefit of current and future patients. Pathobiology. 2007;74:198–205.
- Dalton R. When two tribes go to war. Nature. 2004;430:500–502.
- Aamot H, Kohl CD, Richter D, Knaup-Gregori P. Pseudonymization of patient identifiers for translational research. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2013;13:75.
- Hockings E, Coyne L. Privacy and the 100,000 Genome Project. The Guardian. March 10, 2015. Available from: http://www.theguardian.com/science/political-science/2015/mar/10/privacy-and-the-100000-genome-project. Accessed March 14, 2015.
- Landry JJ, Pyl PT, Rausch T, et al. The genomic and transcriptomic landscape of a HeLa cell line. G3 (Bethesda). 2013;3:1213–1224.
- Adey A, Burton JN, Kitzman JO, et al. The haplotype-resolved genome and epigenome of the aneuploid HeLa cancer cell line. Nature. 2013;500:207–211.
- Hudson KL, Collins FS. Biospecimen policy: family matters. Nature. 2013;500:141–142.
- Hughes V. It’s time to stop obsessing about the dangers of genetic information. Slate. January 7, 2013 Available from: http://www.slate.com/articles/health_and_science/medical_examiner/2013/01/ethics_of_genetic_information_whole_genome_sequencing_is_here_and_we_need.html. Accessed February 12, 2015.
- Rodriguez LL, Brooks LD, Greenberg JH, Green ED. Research ethics. The complexities of genomic identifiability. Science. 2013;339:275–276.
- Bobrow M. Balancing privacy with public benefit. Nature. 2013;500:123.