Balancing innovation and medical device regulation: the case of modern metal-on-metal hip replacements

References

• KurtzSOngKLauEMowatFHalpernMProjections of primary and revision hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 2005 to 2030J Bone Joint Surg Am200789478078517403800
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WroblewskiBMTaylorGWSineyPCharnley low-friction arthro-plasty: 19 to 25-year resultsOrthopedics19921544214241565575
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meier B [webpage on the Internet]In Medicine, New Isn’t Always ImprovedThe New York Times2011 Available from: http://www.nytimes.com/2011/06/26/health/26innovate.html?pagewanted=1&_r=0Accessed April 1, 2014
   Google Scholar
• HowcroftDHeadMSteeleNBearing surfaces in the young patient: out with the old and in with the new?Curr Orthop2008223177184
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• JacobssonSADjerfKWahlströmOTwenty-year results of McKee-Farrar versus Charnley prosthesisClin Orthop Relat Res1996329supplS60S688769323
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GarbuzDSTanzerMGreidanusNVMasriBADuncanCPMetal-on-metal hip resurfacing versus large-diameter head metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty: a randomized clinical trialClin Orthop Relat Res2010468231832519697090
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EswaramoorthyVMoonotPKalairajahYBiantLCFieldREThe Metasul metal-on-metal articulation in primary total hip replacement: clinical and radiological results at ten yearsJ Bone Joint Surg Br200890101278128318827235
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• TreacyRBCMcBrydeCWPynsentPBBirmingham hip resurfacing arthroplasty: a minimum follow-up of five yearsJ Bone Joint Surg Br200587216717015736736
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• SteffenRTPanditHPPalanJThe five-year results of the Bir-mingham hip resurfacing arthroplasty: an independent seriesJ Bone Joint Surg Br200890443644118378915
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• CohenDOut of joint: the story of the ASRBMJ2011342d290521572134
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SmithAJDieppePHowardPWBlomAWNational Joint Registry for England and WalesFailure rates of metal-on-metal hip resurfacings: analysis of data from the National Joint Registry for England and WalesLancet201238098551759176623036895
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PietzchJBAquinoLMYockPGPate-CornellMELinehanJHReview of U.S. medical device regulationJ Med Dev Trans ASME200714283292
   Google Scholar
• CuttsSCarterPBHip resurfacing: a technology rebornPostgrad Med J20068297480280517148702
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FDA [webpage on the Internet]Public Meeting Orthopedic and Rehabilitation Devices Panel of the Medical Devices Advisory Committee2012 Available from: http://www.fda.gov/downloads/AdvisoryCommittees/CommitteesMeetingMaterials/MedicalDevices/MedicalDevicesAdvisoryCommittee/OrthopaedicandRehabilitation-DevicesPanel/UCM310225.pdfAccessed April 1, 2014
   Google Scholar
• FDA [webpage on the Internet]Center for Devices and Radiological Health PMA Approval LetterCenter for Devices and Radiological Health PMA Approval Letter2006 Available from: http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cftopic/pma/pma.cfm?num=p04003Accessed April 1, 2014
   Google Scholar
• FDA [webpage on the Internet]Summary of Safety and Effectiveness Data: Birmingham Hip Resurfacing System Available from: http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cftopic/pma/pma.cfm?num=p04003Accessed April 1, 2014
   Google Scholar
• HowieDWMcGeeMACostiKGravesSEMetal-on-metal resurfacing versus total hip replacement-the value of a randomized clinical trialOrthop Clin North Am200536219520115833457
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NICE [webpage on the Internet]NICE technology appraisal guidance 304. Total hip replacement and resurfacing arthroplasty for end-stage arthritis of the hip2014 Available from: https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ta304Accessed April 1, 2014
   Google Scholar
• Meier B [webpage on the Internet]Hip Implant U.S. Rejected Was Sold OverseasThe New York Times2012 Available from: http://www.nytimes.com/2012/02/15/business/hip-implant-the-fda-rejected-was-marketed-abroad.html?_r=1&hp=&pagewanted=allAccessed April 1, 2014
   Google Scholar
• BernthalNMCelestrePCStavrakisAILudingtonJCOakesDADisappointing short-term results with the DePuy ASR XL metal-on-metal total hip arthroplastyJ Arthroplasty201227453954422000575
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orthopaedic and Rehabilitation Devices Advisory Panel [webpage on the Internet]FDA Executive Summary MemorandumMetal-on-Metal Hip Implant System2012 Available from: http://www.fda.gov/downloads/AdvisoryCommittees/CommitteesMeetingMaterials/MedicalDevices/MedicalDevicesAdvisoryCommittee/Orthopaedi-candRehabilitationDevicesPanel/UCM309302.pdfAccessed April 1, 2014
   Google Scholar
• Center for Devices and Radiological Health (FDA) [webpage on the Internet]510(k) summary: DePuy ASR XL Modular Acetabular Cup System2008 Available from: http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/cdrh_docs/pdf8/K080991.pdfAccessed April 1, 2014
   Google Scholar
• ArdaughBMGravesSERedbergRFThe 510(k) ancestry of a metal-on-metal hip implantN Engl J Med201336829710023301729
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de SteigerRNHangJRMillerLNFive-year results of the ASR XL acetabular system and the ASR hip resurfacing systemJ Bone Joint Surg Am201193242287229322258775
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Center for Devices and Radiological Health [webpage on the Internet]Procedures for Handling Section 522 Postmarket Surveillance Studies2011 Available from: http://www.fda.gov/downloads/MedicalDevices/DeviceRegulationandGuidance/GuidanceDocuments/UCM268141.pdfAccessed April 1, 2014
   Google Scholar
• RoehrBFDA proposes tightening post-market oversight of medical devicesBMJ2012345e614022968864
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Center for Devices and Radiological Health [webpage on the Internet]FDA Approval Letter, PMA Application: Birmingham Hip Resurfacing System2006 Available from: http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/cdrh_docs/pdf4/p040033a.pdfAccessed April 1, 2014
   Google Scholar
• FDA [webpage on the Internet]Metal-on-Metal Hip Implants: FDA Activities Available from: http://www.fda.gov/medicaldevices/productsandmedicalprocedures/implantsandprosthetics/metalonmet-alhipimplants/ucm241769.htmAccessed April 1, 2014
   Google Scholar
• Institute of Medicine of the National AcademiesCommittee on the Public Health Effectiveness of the FDA 510(k) Clearance Process Medical Devices and the Public’s Health: The FDA 510(k) Clearance Process at 35 YearsWashington, DCThe National Academies Press2011280
   Google Scholar
• FDA [webpage on the Internet]Metal-on-Metal Hip Implants: Recalls Available from: http://www.fda.gov/medicaldevices/productsand-medicalprocedures/implantsandprosthetics/metalonmetalhipimplants/ucm241770.htmAccessed April 1, 2014
   Google Scholar
• FDA [webpage on the Internet]Class 2 Device Recall Depuy ASR Resurfacing Femoral Heads Available from: http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfres/res.cfm?id=96073Accessed April 1, 2014
   Google Scholar
• SculcoTPThe economics of new age arthroplasty: can we afford it?Orthopaedics2013111920
   Google Scholar
• Federal Register [webpage on the Internet]Effective Date of Requirement for Premarket Approval for Two Class III Preamendments Devices Available from: https://www.federalregister.gov/articles/2013/01/18/2013-01006/effective-date-of-requirement-for-premarket-approval-for-two-class-iii-preamendments-devicesAccessed April 1, 2014
   Google Scholar