References
- DevassyRGopalakrishnanSDe WildeRSurgical efficacy among laparoscopic ultrasonic dissectors: are we advancing safely? A review of literatureJ Obstet Gynaecol India201565529330026405398
- GreenbergJSonicision cordless ultrasonic dissection deviceRev Obstet Gynecol201362100101
- LiberatiAAltmanDGTetzlaffJThe PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaborationBMJ2009339b270019622552
- NewcombWLHopeWWSchmelzerTMComparison of blood vessel sealing among new electrosurgical and ultrasonic devicesSurg Endosc2009231909618483824
- SotiropoulosGStamopoulosPCharalampoudisPMolmentiEVoutsarakisAKouraklisGTotally laparoscopic left hepatec-tomy using the torsional ultrasonic scalpelWorld J Gastroenterol201319355929593224124341
- DesCoteauxJGPicardPPoulinECBarilMPreliminary study of electrocautery smoke particles produced in vitro and during laparoscopic proceduresSurg Endosc19961021521588932618
- OttDEMossEMartinezKAerosol exposure from an ultrasonically activated (Harmonic) deviceJ Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc19985129329454873
- PerkoZMimicaZDruzijanićNHarmonic scalpel in laparoscopic surgeryLijec Vjesn20041269–10246250 Croatian15918322
- SchneiderADoundoulakisECanSFiolkaAWilhelmDFeussnerHEvaluation of mist production and tissue dissection efficiency using different types of ultrasound shearsSurg Endosc200923122822282619466492
- WeldKJDryerSAmesCDAnalysis of surgical smoke produced by various energy-based instruments and effect on laparoscopic visibilityJ Endourol200721334735117444785
- KimFJSehrtDPompeoAMolinaWRLaminar and turbulent surgical plume characteristics generated from curved- and straight-blade laparoscopic ultrasonic dissectorsSurg Endosc20142851674167724399523
- KimFDavidSPompeoAMolinaWComparison of surgical plume among laparoscopic ultrasonic dissectors using a real-time digital quantitative technologySurg Endosc201226123408341222660839
- KimFSehrtDMolinaWPompeoAClinical use of a cordless laparoscopic ultrasonic deviceJSLS2014183e2014.001153
- MilsomJTrenchevaKMonetteSEvaluation of the safety, efficacy, and versatility of a new surgical energy device (Thunderbeat) in comparison with Harmonic ACE, LigaSure V, and EnSeal devices in a porcine modelJ Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A201222437838622364404
- SartoriPVDe FinaSColomboGLigasure versus ultracision in thyroid surgery: a prospective randomized studyLangenbecks Arch Surg2008393565565818648850
- KimFJChammasMFGewehrETemperature safety profile of laparoscopic devices: Harmonic ACE (ACE), Ligasure V (LV), and plasma trisector (PT)Surg Endosc20082261464146918027042
- PerkoZPogorelićZBilanKLateral thermal damage to rat abdominal wall after Harmonic scalpel applicationSurg Endosc200620232232416333532
- PogorelićZPerkoZDruzijanićNTomićSMrklićIHow to prevent lateral thermal damage to tissue using the Harmonic scalpel: experimental study on pig small intestine and abdominal wallEur Surg Res200943223524019556800
- DiamantisTKontosMArvelakisAComparison of monopolar electrocoagulation, bipolar electrocoagulation, ultracision, and LigasureSurg Today2006361090891316998685
- FagottiAVizzielliGFanfaniFRandomized study comparing use of Thunderbeat technology vs standard electrosurgery during laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy for gynecologic cancerJ Minim Invasive Gynecol201421344745324325899
- CopelMPerformance of Sonicision Cordless Ultrasonic Dissection Device compared to the Harmonic ACECovidien (Covidien Test Report no. 2105-10)
- ObonnaGCMishraRKDifferences between Thunderbeat, LigaSure and Harmonic scalpel energy system in minimally invasive surgeryWorld J Laparosc Surg2014714144
- SuttonPAAwadSPerkinsACLoboDNComparison of lateral thermal spread using monopolar and bipolar diathermy, the Harmonic scalpel and the LigasureBr J Surg201097342843320101674
- DružijanićNPogorelićZPerkoZMrklićITomićSComparison of lateral thermal damage of the human peritoneum using mono-polar diathermy, Harmonic scalpel and LigaSureCan J Surg201255531732122854112
- EmamTCuschieriAHow safe is high-power ultrasonic dissection?Ann Surg2003237218619112560776
- KimFJSehrtDda SilvaRDGustafsonDNogueiraLMolinaWREvaluation of emissivity and temperature profile of laparoscopic ultrasonic devices (blades and passive jaws)Surg Endosc20152951179118425159635
- TsirlineVBLauKNSwanRZEvaluation of an innovative, cordless ultrasonic dissectorSurg Innov201320552452923302577
- HashizumeMSugimachiKUenoKLaparoscopic splenectomy with an ultrasonic dissectorJ Med19923276438
- CiminoWWBondLJPhysics of ultrasonic surgery using tissue fragmentation: part IUltrasound Med Biol1996221891008928320
- SteinemannDCLammSHZerzAEfficacy and safety of combined ultrasonic and bipolar energy source in laparoscopic surgeryJ Gastrointest Surg201620101760176827456017
- Den BoerKTde JongTDankelmanJGoumaDJProblems with laparoscopic instruments: opinions of expertsJ Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A200111314915511441992
- FitzgeraldJEMalikMAhmedIA single-blind controlled study of electrocautery and ultrasonic scalpel smoke plumes in laparoscopic surgerySurg Endosc201226233734221898022
- ClementsRPalepuRIn vivo comparison of the coagulation capability of SonoSurg and Harmonic ACE on 4 mm and 5 mm arteriesSurg Endosc200721122203220617479325