Physician preference items: what factors matter to surgeons? Does the vendor matter?

References

• BurnsLRLawrenceDSammutSHealthcare innovation across sectors: convergences and divergencesBurnsLRThe Business of Healthcare Innovation Chap. 8Cambridge, UKCambridge University Press2012515563
   Google Scholar
• CassakDAbbott Vascular: the now-ready-for-prime time playerIn Vivo20042252529
   Google Scholar
• CassakDBuilding billion-dollar businesses: an interview with Robert CroceIn Vivo2005232736
   Google Scholar
• KeuschLLinKHealthcare: Medical Devices – Annual Cardiac Rhythm Management SurveyNew York, NYGoldman Sachs2001
   Google Scholar
• SchnellerESmeltzerLStrategic Management of the Health Care Supply ChainSan FranciscoJossey-Bass2006
   Google Scholar
• BurnsLRThe Health Care Value ChainSan FranciscoJossey-Bass2002
   Google Scholar
• Government Accountability OfficeMedicare: Lack of Price Transparency May Hamper Hospitals’ Ability to Be Prudent Purchasers of Implantable Medical DevicesGAO-12-126Washington, DCGAO2012 Available from: http://www.gao.gov/assets/590/587688.pdfAccessed December 10, 2017
   Google Scholar
• DeJohnPThe last frontier: saving on M.D. preference itemsHosp Mater Manag2005301911
   Google Scholar
• InstituteECRIWasting Millions By Making Purchases Based Solely on Physician Preference? Not in My Hospital!Plymouth Meeting, PAECRI Institute2009
   Google Scholar
• DonahoeGKingGEstimates of Medical Device Spending in the United StatesWashington, DCAdvamed2012 Available from: https://www.mcguirewoods.com/news-resources/publications/mwc/advamed-medical-device-spending.pdfAccessed December 20, 2017
   Google Scholar
• Statista [webpage on the Internet]Medical devices expenditure as a share of total U.S. health expenditures from 1989 to 2013The Statistics Portal2017 Available from: https://www.statista.com/statistics/498842/medical-devices-expenditure-as-share-of-us-health/Accessed on August 24, 2017
   Google Scholar
• WeissAElixhauserATrends in Operating Room Procedures in U.S. Hospitals, 2001–2011. Statistical Brief #171Washington, DCAgency for Healthcare Research and Quality2014
   Google Scholar
• BelattiDPugelyAPhisitkulPAmendolaACallaghanJTotal joint arthroplasty: trends in Medicare reimbursement and implant pricesJ Arthroplasty2014291539154424736291
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MontgomeryKSchnellerEHospitals’ strategies for orchestrating selection of physician preference itemsMilbank Q200785230733517517118
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WilsonNSchnellerEMontgomeryKBozicKHip and knee implants: current trends and policy considerationsHealth Aff (Millwood)20082761587159818997215
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LernerJFoxDNelsonTReissJThe consequence of secret prices: the politics of physician preference itemsHealth Aff (Millwood)20082761560156518997212
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RobinsonJCValue-based purchasing for medical devicesHealth Aff (Millwood)20082761523153118997208
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McIlhargeyB webpage on the InternetContracting for physician-preference itemsJ Healthc Contract2017 Available from: http://www.jhconline.com/contracting-for-physician-preference-items.htmlAccessed August 31, 2017
   Google Scholar
• BurnsLRLeeABradlowEAntonacciASurgeon evaluation of suture and endo-mechanical productsJ Surg Res200714122023317629973
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HsuMWiseFOrthopedics: Unique Market Dynamics Drive Steady GrowthNew YorkBear Stearns2004
   Google Scholar
• ScannellJBedellLOrthopaedics: Company Pricing Power Rests with Sticky Surgeons. Summary of Quantitative Switching SurveyNew York, NYSanford Bernstein & Co2008
   Google Scholar
• ScannellJBedellLOrthopaedics: Surgeon Switching, Loyalty, and Patterns of Product Use. Part 1of Detailed Survey ResultsNew York, NYSanford Bernstein & Co2008
   Google Scholar
• ScannellJBedellLOrthopaedics: Future of Surgeon Switching and Ortho Pricing Power. Part 2 of Detailed Survey ResultsNew York, NYSanford Bernstein & Co2008
   Google Scholar
• NudellBMBMET, SYK and ZMH: Price Transparency is a Major Threat. Downgrading BMET; Lower ZMH Target to $62 and SYK to $44New YorkSanford Bernstein and Co2006
   Google Scholar
• PaulyMVBurnsLRPrice transparency for medical devicesHealth Aff (Millwood)20082761544155318997210
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OlsonSObremskeyWBozicKHealthcare technology: physician collaboration in reducing the surgical costClin Orthop Relat Res20134711854186423404417
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GrennanMSwansonATransparency and Negotiated Prices: The Value of Information in Hospital-Supplier Bargaining. Working PaperPhiladelphiaWharton School2016
   Google Scholar
• SharkeyPSethuramanVHozackWRothmanRStiehlJFactors influencing choice of implants in total hip arthroplasty and total knee arthroplastyJ Arthroplasty199914328128710220180
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Premier [webpage on the Internet]Physician preference: balancing cost and qualityEconomic Outlook2001 Available from: https://issuu.com/premiercs/docs/public_eo_sept_2011_final_webAccessed August 24, 2017
   Google Scholar
• SiddelKHospitals losing on physician preference itemsOR Manager201228112
   Google Scholar
• MiksicMReicinGYikARomanDHospital Supplies & Medical Technology: 2005 Orthopaedic SurveyNew YorkMorgan Stanley2005
   Google Scholar
• SinghJKwohCKBoudreauRLeeG-CIbrahimSHospital volume and surgical outcomes after elective hip/knee arthroplasty: a risk-adjusted analysis of a large regional databaseArthritis Rheum20116382531253921656509
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pennsylvania Health Care Cost Containment CommissionTotal Hip and Knee ReplacementsHarrisburg, PAPHC42005
   Google Scholar
• Pennsylvania Health Care Cost Containment CommissionKnee and Hip Replacements: 2013 DataHarrisburg, PAPHC42015
   Google Scholar
• KaltonGCompensating for Missing DataAnn Arbor, MIInstitute for Social Research1983
   Google Scholar
• Tomaskovic-DeveyDLeiterJThompsonSOrganizational survey nonresponseAdm Sci Q1994394439457
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HikmetNChenSKAn investigation into low mail survey responses of information technology users in health care organizationsIntl J Med Inform2003722934
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RogelbergSGStantonJMUnderstanding and dealing with organizational survey nonresponseOrgan Res Methods2007102195209
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HockenberryJWeigelPAuerbachACramPFinancial payments by orthopedic device makers to orthopedic surgeonsArch Intern Med2011171191759176522025434
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• SteinbrookRIndustry payments to physicians: lessons from orthopedic surgeryArch Intern Med2011171191765176622025435
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• LopezJAhmedRBaeSA new culture of transparency: industry payments to orthopedic surgeonsOrthopedics201639610581062
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FDA510(k) ClearancesSilver Spring, MDUS Food and Drug Administration Available from: http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/ProductsandMedicalProcedures/DeviceApprovalsandClearances/510kClearances/Accessed December 10, 2017
   Google Scholar
• MeadeAWWatsonAMKroustalisCMAssessing common methods bias in organizational researchPaper presented at: 22nd Annual Meeting of the Society for Industrial and Organizational PsychologyNew York2007
   Google Scholar