110
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Research

Micro-CT imaging as a method for comparing perfusion in graduated-height and single-height surgical staple lines

, , , , , , , , & show all
Pages 267-273 | Published online: 15 Aug 2018

References

  • BakerRSFooteJKemmeterPBradyRVroegopTServeldMThe science of stapling and leaksObes Surg200414101290129815603641
  • KivisaariJVihersaariTRenvallSNiinikoskiJEnergy metabolism of experimental wounds at various oxygen environmentsAnn Surg197518168238281138632
  • SheridanWGLowndesRHYoungHLTissue oxygen tension as a predictor of colonic anastomotic healingDis Colon Rectum198730118678713677962
  • SpiekerHDietrichABleeding complications in bariatric surgery: prophylaxis and therapyChirurg201586983384026099290
  • CovidienEndo GIA™ Reload with Tri-staple™ TechnologyMansfieldMA, USA
  • CovidienFEA of Linear StaplesMansfieldMA, USA2012
  • OkamiJTokunagaTKanouTRandomized study comparing equal height staples with graduated height staples in bronchial closureAnn Thorac Surg201710431012101928551048
  • PeacockEEWound Repair3rd edPhiladelphiaSaunders1984
  • GuoSDipietroLAFactors affecting wound healingJ Dent Res201089321922920139336
  • ReinkeJMSorgHWound repair and regenerationEur Surg Res2012491354322797712
  • DargavilleTRFarrugiaBLBroadbentJAPaceSUptonZVoelckerNHSensors and imaging for wound healing: a reviewBiosens Bioelectron201341304223058663
  • KondoTIshidaYMolecular pathology of wound healingForensic Sci Int20102031–3939820739128
  • JamesDRRisFYeungTMFluorescence angiography in laparoscopic low rectal and anorectal anastomoses with pinpoint perfusion imaging – a critical appraisal with specific focus on leak risk reductionColorectal Dis201517Suppl 3162126394738
  • NowakKSandra-PetrescuFPostSHorisbergerKIschemic and injured bowel evaluation by fluorescence imagingColorectal Dis201517Suppl 3121526394737
  • ZhaoLLiuAGuoYUltra-low-dose CT coronary angiography using 128-slice dual source CT with low concentration contrast agent: initial experienceJpn J Radiol2017351272473229052025
  • BragaMVignaliAGianottiLLaparoscopic versus open colorectal surgery: a randomized trial on short-term outcomeAnn Surg2002236675976612454514
  • BraghettoMICardemilHGMandiolaBCMasiaLGGattiniSFImpact of minimally invasive surgery in the treatment of esophageal cancerArq Bras Cir Dig201427423724225626930
  • DemmyTLCurtisJJMinimally invasive lobectomy directed toward frail and high-risk patients: a case-control studyAnn Thorac Surg199968119420010421140
  • JensenEHPortschyPRChowaniecJTengMMeta-analysis of bioabsorbable staple line reinforcement and risk of fistula following pancreatic resectionJ Gastrointest Surg201317226727222948840
  • MiyakeJComparison of wound healing of intestinal anastomosis by stapling devices and by Gambee’s suture under normal and abnormal conditions in dogNihon Geka Gakkai Zasshi19878843783893295511
  • SchremlSSzeimiesRMPrantlLKarrerSLandthalerMBabilasPOxygen in acute and chronic wound healingBr J Dermatol2010163225726820394633
  • NagamachiYBlood flow and tissue reaction at skin wound closuresWorld J Surg19881256356403072774
  • HasegawaSNakayamaSHidaKKawadaKSakaiYEffect of tri-staple technology and slow firing on secure stapling using an endoscopic linear staplerDig Surg201532535336026228297
  • ContiniEGodekMLWhiffenJMBronsonDGEx vivo pneumostasis evaluation of a variable-height staple designInnovations20138428428824145973
  • NováčekVTranTNKlingeUFinite element modelling of stapled colorectal end-to-end anastomosis: advantages of variable height stapler designJ Biomech201245152693269722871347