References
- FDA [webpage on the Internet]Medical Device Reporting. Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Part 803 Available from: http://www.access-data.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfCFR/CFRSearch.cfm?CFRPart=803Accessed August 18, 2018
- Guidelines on a medical devices vigilance systemMEDDEV 2.12.1 rev 82013 Available from: http://ec.europa.eu/DocsRoom/documents/15506Accessed September 10, 2018
- UrbanRMJacobsJJTomlinsonMJGavrilovicJBlackJPeoc’hMDissemination of wear particles to the liver, spleen, and abdominal lymph nodes of patients with hip or knee replacementJ Bone Joint Surg Am200082445747710761937
- FDA [webpage on the Internet]MAUDE – Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience Available from: https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfmaude/search.cfm. Accessed July 11, 2018
- BernardTNKirkaldy-WillisWHRecognizing specific characteristics of nonspecific low back painClin Orthop Relat Res1987217266280
- SchwarzerACAprillCNBogdukNThe sacroiliac joint in chronic low back painSpine199520131377709277
- MaigneJYAivaliklisAPfeferFResults of sacroiliac joint double block and value of sacroiliac pain provocation tests in 54 patients with low back painSpine19962116188918928875721
- IrwinRWWatsonTMinickRPAmbrosiusWTAge, body mass index, and gender differences in sacroiliac joint pathologyAm J Phys Med Rehabil2007861374417304687
- SembranoJNPollyDWHow often is low back pain not coming from the back?Spine2009341E27E3219127145
- PollyDWSwoffordJWhangPGTwo-Year Outcomes from a Randomized Controlled Trial of Minimally Invasive Sacroiliac Joint Fusion vs. Non-Surgical Management for Sacroiliac Joint DysfunctionInt J Spine Surg201610 Article 28
- DenglerJDKoolsDPflugmacherR1-Year Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial of Conservative Management vs. Minimally Invasive Surgical Treatment for Sacroiliac Joint PainPain Physician201720653755028934785
- DuhonBSBitanFLockstadtHKovalskyDCherDHillenTSIFI Study GroupTriangular Titanium Implants for Minimally Invasive Sacroiliac Joint Fusion: 2-Year Follow-Up from a Prospective Multicenter TrialInt J Spine Surg201610 Article 13
- VanaclochaVHerreraJMSáiz-SapenaNRivera-PazMVerdú-LópezFMinimally Invasive Sacroiliac Joint Fusion, Radiofrequency Denervation, and Conservative Management for Sacroiliac Joint Pain: 6-Year Comparative Case SeriesNeurosurgery2018821485528431026
- MillerLERecklingWCBlockJEAnalysis of postmarket complaints database for the iFuse SI Joint Fusion System®: a minimally invasive treatment for degenerative sacroiliitis and sacroiliac joint disruptionMed Devices201367784
- CherDRecklingWCCapobiancoRImplant survivorship analysis after minimally invasive sacroiliac joint fusion using the iFuse Implant System®Med Devices (Auckl)2015848549226648762
- StejskalVDCederbrantKLindvallAForsbeckMMELISA-an in vitro tool for the study of metal allergyToxicol In Vitro199485991100020693060
- Valentine-ThonESchiwaraHWValidity of MELISA for metal sensitivity testingNeuro Endocrinol Lett2003241-2576412743534
- HallabNJLymphocyte transformation testing for quantifying metal-implant-related hypersensitivity responsesDermatitis2004152829015473335
- HallabNJMikeczKVermesCSkiporAJacobsJJDifferential lymphocyte reactivity to serum-derived metal-protein complexes produced from cobalt-based and titanium-based implant alloy degradationJ Biomed Mater Res200156342743611372061
- DeyoRAMartinBIKreuterWJarvikJGAngierHMirzaSKRevision surgery following operations for lumbar stenosisJ Bone Joint Surg Am201193211979198622048092
- MartinBIMirzaSKComstockBAGrayDTKreuterWDeyoRAReoperation rates following lumbar spine surgery and the influence of spinal fusion proceduresSpine200732338238717268274
- DenglerJDuhonBWhangPPredictors of Outcome in Conservative and Minimally Invasive Surgical Management of Pain Originating from the Sacroiliac Joint: A Pooled AnalysisSpine201742211664167328350586