Tissue response to applied loading using different designs of penile compression clamps

References

• Mazur DJ, Merz JF. Older patients’ willingness to trade off urologic adverse outcomes for a better chance at five-year survival in the clinical setting of prostate cancer. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1995;43:979–984.7657938
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirschner-Hermanns R, Jakse G. Quality of life following radical prostatectomy. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2002;43:141–151. doi:10.1016/S1040-8428(02)00026-412191736
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharpley CF, Bitsika V, Christie DRH. Understanding the causes of depression among prostate cancer patients: development of the effects of prostate cancer on lifestyle questionnaire. Psychooncology. 2009;18:162–168. doi:10.1002/pon.138218613289
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Resendes LA, McCorkle R. Spousal responses to prostate cancer: an integrative review. Cancer Invest. 2006;24:192–198. doi:10.1080/0735790050052465216537189
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paterson J. Stigma associated with postprostatectomy urinary incontinence. J Wound Ostomy Cont Nurs. 2000;27:168–173.
   Google Scholar
• Hunskaar S, Burgio K, Clark A, Lapitan M, Nelson R, Sillen U. Epidemiology of Urinary (UI) and Faecal (FI) incontinence and Pelvic Organ Prolapse (POP) In: Abrams P, Cardozo L, Khoury S, Wein A, editors. Incontinence (3rd Int. Con.). Health Publications Ltd., Jersey; 2005:255–312.
   Google Scholar
• Cottenden A, Bliss D, Fader M, et al. Management with continence products In: Abrams P, Cardozo L, Khoury S, Wein A, editors. Incontinence (3rd Int. Con.). Health Publications Ltd., Jersey; 2005 149–253.
   Google Scholar
• Macaulay M, Broadbridge J, Gage H, et al. A trial of devices for urinary incontinence after treatment for prostate cancer. BJU Int. 2015;116:432–442. doi:10.1111/bju.1301625496354
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore KN, Schieman S, Ackerman T, Dzus HY, Metcalfe JB, Voaklander DC. Assessing comfort, safety, and patient satisfaction with three commonly used penile compression devices. Urology. 2004;63:150–154. doi:10.1016/j.urology.2003.08.03414751370
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carls C, Ermer-Seltun J, Rolstad BS. Partial thickness wound resulting from use of a penile clamp to control urinary incontinence in a patient with radical prostatectomy. Poster Symp Adv Wound Care. 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Kalra S, Srinivas PR, Manikandan R. Urethral diverticulum: a potential hazard of penile clamp application for male urinary incontinence. BMJ Case Rep. 2015;1–2. doi:10.1136/bcr-2015-209957
   Google Scholar
• Armitage P, Berry G, Matthews JNS. Sec. 9.4 Latin Squares. Stat Methods Med. Res., Blackwell Scientific Publications. 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Allen V, Ryan DW, Lomax N, Murray A. Accuracy of interface pressure measurement systems. J Biomed Eng. 1993;15:344–348.8361161
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ash C, Dubec M, Donne K, Bashford T. Effect of wavelength and beam width on penetration in light-tissue interaction using computational methods. Lasers Med Sci. 2017;32:1909–1918. doi:10.1007/s10103-017-2317-428900751
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perkins MA, Osterhues MA, Farage MA, Robinson MK. A noninvasive method to assess skin irritation and compromised skin conditions using simple tape adsorption of molecular markers of inflammation. Skin Res Technol. 2001;7:227–237. doi:10.1034/j.1600-0846.2001.70405.x11737818
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perkins MA, Cardin CW, Osterhues MA, Robinson MK. A non-invasive tape absorption method for recovery of inflammatory mediators to differentiate normal from compromised scalp conditions. Skin Res Technol. 2002;8:187–193. doi:10.1034/j.1600-0846.2002.20337.x12236889
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levy A, Fader M, Bader D, Gefen A. Penile compression clamps: a model of the internal mechanical state of penile soft tissues. Neurourol Urodyn. 2016;1–6. doi:10.1002/nau.23172
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lemmens JMH, Broadbridge J, Macaulay M, et al. Physiological impact and user acceptability of penile compression devices (PCD). Int Cont Soc Annu Mtg. 2017;36:155 Florence Italy 2017 Abstr 83 Neurourol Urodynam. doi:10.1002/nau.23386
   Google Scholar
• Mayrovitz HN, Sims N. Biophysical effects of water and synthetic urine on skin. Adv Skin Wound Care. 2001;14:302–308. doi:10.1097/00129334-200111000-0001311794441
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bressel E, Reeve T, Parker D, Cronin J. Influence of bicycle seat pressure on compression of the perineum: a MRI analysis. J Biomech. 2007;40:198–202. doi:10.1016/j.jbiomech.2005.11.01716423357
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yuan J, Hoang AN, Romero CA, Lin H, Dai Y, Wang R. Vacuum therapy in erectile dysfunction – science and clinical evidence. Int J Impot Res. 2010;22:211–219. doi:10.1038/ijir.2010.420410903
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Worsley PR, Prudden G, Gower G, Bader DL. Investigating the effects of strap tension during non-invasive ventilation mask application: a combined biomechanical and biomarker approach. Med Devices Evid Res. 2016;9:409–417. doi:10.2147/MDER.S121712
   Google Scholar
• Baharestani M. et al. International review. Pressure ulcer prevention: pressure, shear, friction and microclimate in context. A consensus document. London: Wounds International, 2010P;1–25.
   Google Scholar
• Gefen A. How do microclimate factors affect the risk for superficial pressure ulcers: a mathematical modeling study. J Tissue Viability. 2011;20:81–88. doi:10.1016/j.jtv.2010.10.00221115351
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beeckman D, Schoonhoven L, Fletcher J, et al. EPUAP classification system for pressure ulcers: European reliability study. J Adv Nurs. 2007;60:682–691. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04474.x18039255
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar