Magnetic Controlled Growth Rods in the Treatment of Scoliosis: Safety, Efficacy and Patient Selection

References

• Yang S, LM A, GJ R, Skaggs DL. Early-onset scoliosis: a review of history, current treatment, and future directions. Pediatrics. 2016;137:1. doi:10.1542/peds.2015-0709
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell RM Jr., Smith MD. Thoracic insufficiency syndrome and exotic scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am Vol. 2007;89(Suppl 1):108–122. doi:10.2106/JBJS.F.00270
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Canavese F, Dimeglio A. Normal and abnormal spine and thoracic cage development. World J Orthop. 2013;4(4):167–174. doi:10.5312/wjo.v4.i4.167
   Google Scholar
• Campbell RM Jr., Smith MD, Mayes TC, et al. The characteristics of thoracic insufficiency syndrome associated with fused ribs and congenital scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am Vol. 2003;85(3):399–408. doi:10.2106/00004623-200303000-00001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pehrsson K, Larsson S, Oden A, Nachemson A. Long-term follow-up of patients with untreated scoliosis. A study of mortality, causes of death, and symptoms. Spine. 1992;17(9):1091–1096.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baulesh DM, Huh J, Judkins T, Garg S, Miller NH, Erickson MA. The role of serial casting in early-onset scoliosis (EOS). J Pediatr Orthop. 2012;32(7):658–663. doi:10.1097/BPO.0b013e318269c438
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waldron SR, Poe-Kochert C, Son-Hing JP, Thompson GH. Early onset scoliosis: the value of serial risser casts. J Pediatr Orthop. 2013;33(8):775–780. doi:10.1097/BPO.0000000000000072
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mehta MH. Growth as a corrective force in the early treatment of progressive infantile scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg Br Vol. 2005;87(9):1237–1247. doi:10.1302/0301-620X.87B9.16124
   Google Scholar
• Demirkiran HG, Bekmez S, Celilov R, Ayvaz M, Dede O, Yazici M. Serial derotational casting in congenital scoliosis as a time-buying strategy. J Pediatr Orthop. 2015;35(1):43–49. doi:10.1097/BPO.0000000000000229
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrington PR. Scoliosis in the growing spine. Pediatr Clin North Am. 1963;10:225–245. doi:10.1016/S0031-3955(16)31381-5
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Moe JH, Kharrat K, Winter RB, Cummine JL. Harrington instrumentation without fusion plus external orthotic support for the treatment of difficult curvature problems in young children. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1984;185:35–45.
   Google Scholar
• Blakemore LC, Scoles PV, Poe-Kochert C, Thompson GH. Submuscular Isola rod with or without limited apical fusion in the management of severe spinal deformities in young children: preliminary report. Spine. 2001;26(18):2044–2048. doi:10.1097/00007632-200109150-00021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klemme WR, Denis F, Winter RB, Lonstein JW, Koop SE. Spinal instrumentation without fusion for progressive scoliosis in young children. J Pediatr Orthop. 1997;17(6):734–742. doi:10.1097/01241398-199711000-00007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsirikos AI, Loughenbury PR. Single rod instrumentation in patients with scoliosis and co-morbidities: indications and outcomes. World J Orthop. 2018;9(9):138–148. doi:10.5312/wjo.v9.i9.138
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akbarnia BA, Breakwell LM, Marks DS, et al. Dual growing rod technique followed for three to eleven years until final fusion: the effect of frequency of lengthening. Spine. 2008;33(9):984–990. doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e31816c8b4e
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bellinger DC, Calderon J. Neurotoxicity of general anesthetics in children: evidence and uncertainties. Curr Opin Pediatr. 2019;31(2):267–273. doi:10.1097/MOP.0000000000000737
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caldas JC, Pais-Ribeiro JL, Carneiro SR. General anesthesia, surgery and hospitalization in children and their effects upon cognitive, academic, emotional and sociobehavioral development - a review. Paediatr Anaesth. 2004;14(11):910–915. doi:10.1111/j.1460-9592.2004.01350.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baky FJ, Milbrandt TA, Flick R, Larson AN. Cumulative anesthesia exposure in patients treated for early-onset scoliosis. Spine Deform. 2018;6(6):781–786. doi:10.1016/j.jspd.2018.05.001
   Google Scholar
• Takaso M, Moriya H, Kitahara H, et al. New remote-controlled growing-rod spinal instrumentation possibly applicable for scoliosis in young children. J Orthop Sci. 1998;3(6):336–340. doi:10.1007/s007760050062
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Akbarnia BA, Mundis GM Jr., Salari P, Yaszay B, Pawelek JB. Innovation in growing rod technique: a study of safety and efficacy of a magnetically controlled growing rod in a porcine model. Spine. 2012;37(13):1109–1114. doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e318240ff67
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheung KM, Cheung JP, Samartzis D, et al. Magnetically controlled growing rods for severe spinal curvature in young children: a prospective case series. Lancet. 2012;379(9830):1967–1974. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60112-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wick JM, Konze J. A magnetic approach to treating progressive early-onset scoliosis. AORN J. 2012;96(2):163–173. doi:10.1016/j.aorn.2012.05.008
   Google Scholar
• Joyce TJ, Smith SL, Rushton PRP, Bowey AJ, Gibson MJ. Analysis of explanted magnetically controlled growing rods from seven UK spinal centers. Spine. 2018;43(1):E16–E22. doi:10.1097/BRS.0000000000002221
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akbarnia A, Mundi G. Magnetically controlled growing rods in early onset scoliosis: indications, timing and treatment. Orthopade. 2019;48:477–485. doi:10.1007/s00132-019-03755-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munigangaiah S, Brown P, Mohamed M, Bruce CE, Trivedi JM, Davidson NT. A novel technique for the subfascial insertion of magnetically controlled growing rods - The Alder Hey technique. J Craniovertebr Junction Spine. 2018;9(4):250–253. doi:10.4103/jcvjs.JCVJS_105_18
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoon WW, Chang AC, Tyler P, Butt S, Raniga S, Noordeen H. The use of ultrasound in comparison to radiography in magnetically controlled growth rod lengthening measurement: a prospective study. Eur Spine J. 2015;24(7):1422–1426. doi:10.1007/s00586-014-3589-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stokes OM, O’Donovan EJ, Samartzis D, Bow CH, Luk KD, Cheung KM. Reducing radiation exposure in early-onset scoliosis surgery patients: novel use of ultrasonography to measure lengthening in magnetically-controlled growing rods. Spine j. 2014;14(10):2397–2404. doi:10.1016/j.spinee.2014.01.039
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dannawi Z, Altaf F, Harshavardhana NS, El Sebaie H, Noordeen H. Early results of a remotely-operated magnetic growth rod in early-onset scoliosis. Bone Joint J. 2013;95-B(1):75–80. doi:10.1302/0301-620X.95B1.29565
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoon WW, Sedra F, Shah S, Wallis C, Muntoni F, Noordeen H. Improvement of pulmonary function in children with early-onset scoliosis using magnetic growth rods. Spine. 2014;39(15):1196–1202. doi:10.1097/BRS.0000000000000383
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hickey BA, Towriss C, Baxter G, et al. Early experience of MAGEC magnetic growing rods in the treatment of early onset scoliosis. Eur Spine J. 2014;23(Suppl 1):S61–S65. doi:10.1007/s00586-013-3163-0
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jenks M, Craig J, Higgins J, et al. The MAGEC system for spinal lengthening in children with scoliosis: a NICE medical technology guidance. Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2014;12(6):587–599. doi:10.1007/s40258-014-0127-4
   Google Scholar
• Wang S, Zhang J, Qiu G, et al. Dual growing rods technique for congenital scoliosis: more than 2 years outcomes: preliminary results of a single center. Spine. 2012;37(26):E1639–E1644. doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e318273d6bf
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson W, Thakar C, Rolton DJ, Wilson-MacDonald J, Nnadi C. The use of magnetically-controlled growing rods to treat children with early-onset scoliosis: early radiological results in 19 children. Bone Joint J. 2016;98-B(9):1240–1247. doi:10.1302/0301-620X.98B9.37545
   Google Scholar
• Dahl B, Dragsted C, Ohrt-Nissen S, Andersen T, Gehrchen M. Use of a distraction-to-stall lengthening procedure in magnetically controlled growing rods: a single-center cohort study. J Orthop Surg. 2018;26(2):2309499018779833. doi:10.1177/2309499018779833
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keskinen H, Helenius I, Nnadi C, et al. Preliminary comparison of primary and conversion surgery with magnetically controlled growing rods in children with early onset scoliosis. Eur Spine J. 2016;25(10):3294–3300. doi:10.1007/s00586-016-4597-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hosseini P, Pawelek J, Mundis GM, et al. Magnetically controlled growing rods for early-onset scoliosis: a multicenter study of 23 cases with minimum 2 years follow-up. Spine. 2016;41(18):1456–1462. doi:10.1097/BRS.0000000000001561
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lebon J, Batailler C, Wargny M, et al. Magnetically controlled growing rod in early onset scoliosis: a 30-case multicenter study. Eur Spine J. 2017;26(6):1567–1576. doi:10.1007/s00586-016-4929-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teoh KH, Winson DM, James SH, et al. Magnetic controlled growing rods for early-onset scoliosis: a 4-year follow-up. Spine j. 2016;16(4 Suppl):S34–S39. doi:10.1016/j.spinee.2015.12.098
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thakar C, Kieser DC, Mardare M, Haleem S, Fairbank J, Nnadi C. Systematic review of the complications associated with magnetically controlled growing rods for the treatment of early onset scoliosis. Eur Spine J. 2018;27(9):2062–2071. doi:10.1007/s00586-018-5590-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwan KYH, Alanay A, Yazici M, et al. Unplanned reoperations in magnetically controlled growing rod surgery for early onset scoliosis with a minimum of two-year follow-up. Spine. 2017;42(24):E1410–E4. doi:10.1097/BRS.0000000000002297
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teoh KH, Winson DM, James SH, et al. Do magnetic growing rods have lower complication rates compared with conventional growing rods? Spine j. 2016;16(4 Suppl):S40–S44. doi:10.1016/j.spinee.2015.12.099
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahmad A, Subramanian T, Panteliadis P, Wilson-Macdonald J, Rothenfluh DA, Nnadi C. Quantifying the ‘law of diminishing returns’ in magnetically controlled growing rods. Bone Joint J. 2017;99-B(12):1658–1664. doi:10.1302/0301-620X.99B12.BJJ-2017-0402.R2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rolton D, Thakar C, Wilson-MacDonald J, Nnadi C. Radiological and clinical assessment of the distraction achieved with remotely expandable growing rods in early onset scoliosis. Eur Spine J. 2016;25(10):3371–3376. doi:10.1007/s00586-015-4223-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sankar WN, Skaggs DL, Yazici M, et al. Lengthening of dual growing rods and the law of diminishing returns. Spine. 2011;36(10):806–809. doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e318214d78f
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones CS, Stokes OM, Patel SB, Clarke AJ, Hutton M. Actuator pin fracture in magnetically controlled growing rods: two cases. Spine J. 2016;16(4):e287–e291. doi:10.1016/j.spinee.2015.12.020
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell P, Chun G, Kossovsky N, Amstutz HC. Histological analysis of tissues suggest that ‘metallosis’ may really be ‘plasticosis’. Proc 38th Annu Meeting Orthop Res Soc. 1992;393.
   Google Scholar
• Teoh KH, von Ruhland C, Evans SL, et al. Metallosis following implantation of magnetically controlled growing rods in the treatment of scoliosis: a case series. Bone Joint J. 2016;98-B(12):1662–1667. doi:10.1302/0301-620X.98B12.38061
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panagiotopoulou VC, Tucker SK, Whittaker RK, et al. Analysing a mechanism of failure in retrieved magnetically controlled spinal rods. Eur Spine J. 2017;26(6):1699–1710. doi:10.1007/s00586-016-4936-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rushton PRP, Smith SL, Forbes L, Bowey AJ, Gibson MJ, Joyce TJ. Force testing of explanted magnetically controlled growing rods. Spine. 2019;44(4):233–239. doi:10.1097/BRS.0000000000002806
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rushton PRP, Smith SL, Kandemir G, et al. Spinal lengthening with magnetically controlled growing rods: data from the largest series of explanted devices. Spine. 2019;45:170–176.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noordeen HM, Shah SA, Elsebaie HB, Garrido E, Farooq N, Al-Mukhtar M. In vivo distraction force and length measurements of growing rods: which factors influence the ability to lengthen? Spine. 2011;36(26):2299–2303. doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e31821b8e16
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cundy TP, Cundy WJ, Antoniou G, Sutherland LM, Freeman BJ, Cundy PJ. Serum titanium, niobium and aluminium levels two years following instrumented spinal fusion in children: does implant surface area predict serum metal ion levels? Eur Spine J. 2014;23(11):2393–2400. doi:10.1007/s00586-014-3279-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yilgor C, Efendiyev A, Akbiyik F, et al. Metal ion release during growth-friendly instrumentation for early-onset scoliosis: a preliminary study. Spine Deform. 2018;6(1):48–53. doi:10.1016/j.jspd.2017.06.005
   Google Scholar
• Wong CKH, Cheung JPY, Cheung PWH, Lam CLK, Cheung KMC. Traditional growing rod versus magnetically controlled growing rod for treatment of early onset scoliosis: cost analysis from implantation till skeletal maturity. J Orthop Surg. 2017;25(2):2309499017705022. doi:10.1177/2309499017705022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polly DW Jr., Ackerman SJ, Schneider K, Pawelek JB, Akbarnia BA. Cost analysis of magnetically controlled growing rods compared with traditional growing rods for early-onset scoliosis in the US: an integrated health care delivery system perspective. Clinicoecon Outcomes Res. 2016;8:457–465. doi:10.2147/CEOR.S113633
   Google Scholar
• Doany ME, Olgun ZD, Kinikli GI, et al. Health-related quality of life in early-onset scoliosis patients treated surgically: EOSQ scores in traditional growing rod versus magnetically controlled growing rods. Spine. 2018;43(2):148–153. doi:10.1097/BRS.0000000000002274
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aslan C, Olgun ZD, Ayik G, et al. Does decreased surgical stress really improve the psychosocial health of early-onset scoliosis patients? A comparison of traditional growing rods and magnetically-controlled growing rods patients reveals disappointing results. Spine. 2019;44(11):E656–E663. doi:10.1097/BRS.0000000000002938
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fletcher ND, McClung A, Rathjen KE, Denning JR, Browne R, Johnston CE 3rd. Serial casting as a delay tactic in the treatment of moderate-to-severe early-onset scoliosis. J Pediatr Orthop. 2012;32(7):664–671. doi:10.1097/BPO.0b013e31824bdb55
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnston CE, McClung AM, Thompson GH, Poe-Kochert C, Sanders JO; Growing Spine Study G. Comparison of growing rod instrumentation versus serial cast treatment for early-onset scoliosis. Spine Deform. 2013;1(5):339–342. doi:10.1016/j.jspd.2013.05.006
   Google Scholar
• Choudhury Z, Tsirikos AI, Marks DS. Early-onset scoliosis - presentation, assessment and treatment options. Orthop Trauma. 2017;31(6):357–363. doi:10.1016/j.mporth.2017.09.006
   Google Scholar
• Akbarnia BA, Pawelek JB, Cheung KM, et al. Traditional growing rods versus magnetically controlled growing rods for the surgical treatment of early-onset scoliosis: a case-matched 2-year study. Spine Deform. 2014;2(6):493–497. doi:10.1016/j.jspd.2014.09.050
   Google Scholar
• Agarwal A, Goswami A, Vijayaraghavan GP, et al. Quantitative characteristics of consecutive lengthening episodes in early-onset scoliosis (EOS) patients with dual growth rods. Spine. 2019;44(6):397–403. doi:10.1097/BRS.0000000000002835
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beaven A, Gardner AC, Marks DS, Mehta JS, Newton-Ede M, Spilsbury JB. Magnetically controlled growing rods: the experience of mechanical failure from a single center consecutive series of 28 children with a minimum follow-up of 2 years. Asian Spine J. 2018;12(5):794–802. doi:10.31616/asj.2018.12.5.794
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erdogan S, Polat B, Atici Y, Ozyalvac ON, Ozturk C. Comparison of the Effects of magnetically controlled growing rod and traditional growing rod techniques on the sagittal plane in the treatment of early-onset scoliosis. J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 2019;62(5):577–585. doi:10.3340/jkns.2019.0094
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCarthy RE, Luhmann S, Lenke L, McCullough FL. The Shilla growth guidance technique for early-onset spinal deformities at 2-year follow-up: a preliminary report. J Pediatr Orthop. 2014;34(1):1–7. doi:10.1097/BPO.0b013e31829f92dc
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andras LM, Joiner ER, McCarthy RE, et al. Growing rods versus Shilla growth guidance: better Cobb angle correction and T1-S1 Length increase but more surgeries. Spine Deform. 2015;3(3):246–252. doi:10.1016/j.jspd.2014.11.005
   Google Scholar
• Agarwal A, Aker A, Ahmad A. Active apex correction with guided growth technique for controlling spinal deformity in growing children: a modified SHILLA technique. Global Spine J. 2019;e-pub:1–5.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell RM Jr. VEPTR: past experience and the future of VEPTR principles. Eur Spine J. 2013;22(Suppl 2):S106–S117. doi:10.1007/s00586-013-2671-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yamaguchi KT Jr., Skaggs DL, Mansour S, et al. Are rib versus spine anchors protective against breakage of growing rods? Spine Deform. 2014;2(6):489–492. doi:10.1016/j.jspd.2014.08.007
   Google Scholar