Annular closure device lowers reoperation risk 4 years after lumbar discectomy

References

• Frymoyer JW. Back pain and sciatica. N Engl J Med. 1988;318:291–300. doi:10.1056/NEJM1988020431805062961994
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vroomen PC, de Krom MC, Knottnerus JA. Predicting the outcome of sciatica at short-term follow-up. Br J Gen Pract. 2002;52:119–123.11887877
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vroomen PC, de Krom MC, Wilmink JT, Kester AD, Knottnerus JA. Lack of effectiveness of bed rest for sciatica. N Engl J Med. 1999;340:418–423. doi:10.1056/NEJM1999021134006029971865
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peul WC, van Houwelingen HC, van den Hout WB, et al. Surgery versus prolonged conservative treatment for sciatica. N Engl J Med. 2007;356:2245–2256. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa06403917538084
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kreiner DS, Hwang SW, Easa JE, et al. An evidence-based clinical guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of lumbar disc herniation with radiculopathy. Spine J. 2014;14:180–191. doi:10.1016/j.spinee.2013.08.00324239490
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spengler DM. Lumbar discectomy. Results with limited disc excision and selective foraminotomy. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1982;7:604–607.7167834
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Souza Grava AL, Ferrari LF, Defino HL. Cytokine inhibition and time-related influence of inflammatory stimuli on the hyperalgesia induced by the nucleus pulposus. Eur Spine J. 2012;21:537–545. doi:10.1007/s00586-011-2027-821947908
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asch HL, Lewis PJ, Moreland DB, et al. Prospective multiple outcomes study of outpatient lumbar microdiscectomy: should 75 to 80% success rates be the norm? J Neurosurg. 2002;96:34–44.11795712
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parker SL, Mendenhall SK, Godil SS, et al. Incidence of low back pain after lumbar discectomy for herniated disc and its effect on patient-reported outcomes. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015;473:1988–1999.25694267
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ambrossi GL, McGirt MJ, Sciubba DM, et al. Recurrent lumbar disc herniation after single-level lumbar discectomy: incidence and health care cost analysis. Neurosurgery. 2009;65:574–578; discussion 578. doi:10.1227/01.NEU.0000350224.36213.F9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abdu RW, Abdu WA, Pearson AM, Zhao W, Lurie JD, Weinstein JN. Reoperation for recurrent intervertebral disc herniation in the spine patient outcomes research trial: analysis of rate, risk factors, and outcome. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2017;42:1106–1114. doi:10.1097/BRS.000000000000208828146015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fritzell P, Knutsson B, Sanden B, Strömqvist B, Hägg O. Recurrent versus primary lumbar disc herniation surgery: patient-reported outcomes in the Swedish Spine Register Swespine. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015;473:1978–1984. doi:10.1007/s11999-014-3596-824711131
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller LE, McGirt MJ, Garfin SR, Bono CM. Association of annular defect width after lumbar discectomy with risk of symptom recurrence and reoperation: systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2018;43:E308–E315. doi:10.1097/BRS.000000000000250129176471
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kienzler JC, Klassen PD, Miller LE, et al. Three-year results from a randomized trial of lumbar discectomy with annulus fibrosus occlusion in patients at high risk for reherniation. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2019. doi:10.1007/s00701-019-03948-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klassen PD, Hes R, Bouma GJ, et al. A multicenter, prospective, randomized study protocol to demonstrate the superiority of a bone-anchored prosthesis for anular closure used in conjunction with limited discectomy to limited discectomy alone for primary lumbar disc herniation. Int J Clin Trials. 2016;3:120–131. doi:10.18203/2349-3259.ijct20162794
   Google Scholar
• Thome C, Klassen PD, Bouma GJ, et al. Annular closure in lumbar microdiscectomy for prevention of reherniation: a randomized clinical trial. Spine J. 2018;18:2278–2287. doi:10.1016/j.spinee.2018.05.00329730458
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ostelo RW, de Vet HC. Clinically important outcomes in low back pain. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2005;19:593–607. doi:10.1016/j.berh.2005.03.00315949778
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fairbank JC, Pynsent PB. The oswestry disability index. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000;25:2940–2952; discussion 2952. doi:10.1097/00007632-200011150-00017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ware JE Jr. SF-36 health survey update. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000;25:3130–3139. doi:10.1097/00007632-200012150-0000811124729
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bouma GJ, Barth M, Miller LE, et al. Challenges in the analysis of longitudinal pain data: practical lessons from a randomized trial of annular closure in lumbar disc surgery. Pain Res Treat. 2019;2019:3498603.30854236
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weinstein JN, Lurie JD, Tosteson TD, et al. Surgical versus nonoperative treatment for lumbar disc herniation: four-year results for the Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial (SPORT). Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008;33:2789–2800. doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e31818ed8f419018250
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maglinte GA, Hays RD, Kaplan RM. US general population norms for telephone administration of the SF-36v2. J Clin Epidemiol. 2012;65:497–502. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2011.09.00822269331
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ament JD, Thaci B, Yang Z, et al. Postoperative direct healthcare costs of lumbar discectomy are reduced with the use of a novel annular closure device in high-risk patients. Spine J. 2019;19:1170–1179. doi:10.1016/j.spinee.2019.02.01030776485
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ament J, Thaci B, Yang Z, et al. Cost-effectiveness of a bone-anchored annular closure device versus conventional lumbar discectomy in treating lumbar disc herniations. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2019;44:5–16. doi:10.1097/BRS.000000000000274629927860
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leven D, Passias PG, Errico TJ, et al. Risk factors for reoperation in patients treated surgically for intervertebral disc herniation: a subanalysis of eight-year SPORT data. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2015;97:1316–1325. doi:10.2106/JBJS.N.0128726290082
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim KT, Lee DH, Cho DC, Sung J-K, Kim Y-B. Preoperative risk factors for recurrent lumbar disk herniation in L5-S1. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2015;28:E571–E577. doi:10.1097/BSD.000000000000004125089673
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zhou B, Wang K, Hong X, et al. Adjacent level disc degeneration: a prognostic factor for recurrent lumbar disc herniation after transforaminal endoscopic lumbar discectomy in 409 cases. Int J Clin Exp Med. 2016;9:21854–21859.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andersen SB, Smith EC, Stottrup C, Carreon LY, Andersen MO. Smoking is an independent risk factor of reoperation due to recurrent lumbar disc herniation. Global Spine J. 2018;8:378–381. doi:10.1177/219256821773035229977723
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hakkinen A, Kiviranta I, Neva MH, Kautiainen H, Ylinen J. Reoperations after first lumbar disc herniation surgery; a special interest on residives during a 5-year follow-up. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2007;8:2. doi:10.1186/1471-2474-8-217212811
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar