New developments in bone-conduction hearing implants: a review

References

• BergerKWEarly bone conduction hearing aid devicesArch Otolaryngol19761025315318773357
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• MudryATjellströmAHistorical background of bone conduction hearing devices and bone conduction hearing aidsAdv Otorhinolaryngol2011711921389699
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• von BékésyGExperiments in HearingNew YorkMcGraw-Hill1960
   Google Scholar
• BrånemarkPIHanssonBOAdellROsseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw. Experience from a 10-year periodScand J Plast Reconstr Surg Suppl1977161132356184
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• HåkanssonBTjellströmARosenhallUCarlssonPThe bone-anchored hearing aid: principle design and a psychoacoustical evaluationActa Otolaryngol19851002292394061073
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• News and research in bone conduction hearing – craniofacial osseointegration [press release]MölnlyckeCochlear Bone Anchored Solutions AB2011611 Available from: http://www.cochlear.com/wps/wcm/connect/0a7aa3b7-8ad8-40ab-b288-20054c04e3e2/en-Baha-Osseo-Press-Release-2013-June-11.pdf?MOD=AJPERES&CONVERT_TO=url&CACHEID=0a7aa3b7-8ad8-40ab-b288-20054c04e3e2Accessed November 4, 2014
   Google Scholar
• Oticon MedicalOticon Medical – taking ideas further2014 Available from: http://www.oticonmedical.com/∼asset/cache.ashx?id=7229&type=14&format=webAccessed September 16, 2014
   Google Scholar
• DunCAJFaberHTFde WolfMJFMylanusEAMCremersCWRJHolMKSAssessment of more than 1,000 implanted percutaneous bone conduction devices: skin reactions and implant survivalOtol Neurotol20123319219822246385
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KiringodaRLustigLRA Meta-analysis of the complications associated with osseointegrated hearing aidsOtol Neurotol20133479079423739555
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ShiraziMMarzoSLeonettiJPerioperative complications with the bone anchored hearing aidOtolaryngol Head Neck Surg200613423623916455370
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SnikAMylanusEProopsDConsensus statements on the BAHA system: where do we stand at present?Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol2005Suppl 19521215697155
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• TjellströmAGranströmGLong-term follow-up with the bone-anchored hearing aid: a review of the first 100 patients between 1977 and 1985Ear Nose Throat J19947321121148168443
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• WazenJWycherlyBDaughertyJComplications of bone-anchored hearing devicesKompisMCaversaccioM-DImplantable Bone Conduction Hearing AidsBaselKarger Press20116372
   Google Scholar
• HoughJVernonJDormerKExperiences with implantable hearing devices and a presentation of a new deviceAnn Otol Rhinol Laryngol19869560653947005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HåkanssonBTjellströmACarlssonPPercutaneous vs transcutaneous transducers for hearing by direct bone conductionOtolaryngol Head Neck Surg19901023393442113260
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HåkanssonBThe future of bone conduction hearing devicesAdv Otorhinolaryngol20117114015221389714
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• HolMKCremersCWCoppens-SchellekensWSnikAFThe BAHA Softband. A new treatment for young children with bilateral congenital aural atresiaInt J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol200569797398015911017
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• VerhagenCVHolMKCoppens-SchellenkensWSnikAFCremersCWThe Baha Softband. A new treatment for young children with bilateral congenital aural atresiaInt J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol200872101455145918667244
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DoshiJSheehanPMcDermottALBone anchored hearing aids in children: an updateInt J Pediatric Otorhinolaryngol201276618622
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ZarowskiAJVerstraetenNSomersTRiffDOffeciersEFHeadbands, testbands and softbands in preoperative testing and application of bone-anchored devices in adults and childrenAdv Otorhinolaryngol20117112413121389712
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• HeywoodRLPatelPMJonathanDAComparison of hearing thresholds obtained with Baha preoperative assessment tools and those obtained with the osseointegrated implantEar Nose Throat J2011905E21E2721563076
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• VerstraetenNZarowskiAJSomersTRiffDOffeciersEFComparison of the audiologic results obtained with the bone-anchored hearing aid attached to the headband, the testband, and to the “snap” abutmentOtol Neurotol2009301707518957902
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HåkanssonBTjellströmARosenhallUHearing thresholds with direct bone conduction versus conventional bone conductionScand Audiol1984133136719012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The Glass Explorer Program [webpage on the internet] Available from https://www.google.com/glass/startAccessed November 17, 2014
   Google Scholar
• SiegertRMagnetic coupling of partially implantable bone conduction hearing aids without open implantsLaryngothinootologie2010896346351 German
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SiegertRPartially implantable bone conduction hearing aids without a percutaneous abutment (Otomag): technique and preliminary clinical resultsAdv Otorhinolaryngol201171414621389703
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• SiegertRKanderskeJA new semi-implantable transcutaneous bone conduction device: clinical, surgical, and audiologic outcomes in patients with congenital ear canal atresiaOtol Neurotol20133492793423770689
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HolMKSNelissenRCAgterbergMJHCremersCWRJSnikAFMComparison between a new implantable transcutaneous bone conductor and percutaneous bone-conduction hearing implantOtol Neurotol2013341071107523598702
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ReinfeldtSStenfeltSGoodTHåkanssonBBone conduction transmission from a sound field estimated by thresholds, ear canal pressure and skull vibrationsJ Acoust Soc Am200712131576158717407895
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SylvesterDCGardnerRReillyPGRankinKRaineCHAudiologic and surgical outcomes of a novel, nonpercutaneous, bone conducting hearing implantOtol Neurotol20133492292623370564
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MagliuloGTurchettaRIannellaGdi MasinoRVde VincentiisMSophono Alpha System and subtotal petrosectomy with external auditory canal blind sac closureEur Arch Otorhinolaryngol Epub682014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’NielMBRungeCLFriedlandDRKerschnerJEPatient outcomes in magnet-based implantable auditory assist devicesJAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg Epub4242014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IşeriMOrhanKSKaraAA new transcutaneous bone anchored hearing device – the Baha® Attract System: the first experience in TurkeyKulak Burun Bogaz Ihtis Derg2014242596424835899
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• KurzAFlynnMCaversaccioMKompisMSpeech understanding with a new implant technology: a comparative study with a new nonskin penetrating Baha systemBiomed Res Int2014201441620525140314
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• TjellströmAHåkanssonBThe bone-anchored hearing aid. Design principles, indications, and long-term clinical resultsOtolaryngol Clin North Am199528153727739869
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KurzACaversaccioMKompisMHearing performance with 2 different high-power sound processors for osseointegrated auditory implantsOtol Neurotol20133460461023652327
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DesmetJBJBosmanAJSnikAFMComparison of sound processing strategies for osseointegrated bone conduction implants in mixed hearing loss: multiple-channel nonlinear versus single-channel linear processingOtol Neurotol20133459860323615167
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KompisMKurzAPfiffnerFSennPArnoldACaversaccioMIs complex signal processing for bone conduction hearing aids useful?Cochlear Implants Int201415S14750
   Google Scholar
• WallbergEGranströmGTjellströmAStahlforsJImplant survival rate in bone-anchored hearing aid users: long-term resultsJ Laryngol Otol2011125111131113521774847
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DunCAde WolfMJHolMKStability, survival, and tolerability of a novel baha implant system: six-month data from a multicenter clinical investigationOtol Neurotol20113261001100721725257
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IvanoffCJSennerbyLJohanssonCRangertBLekholmUInfluence of implant diameters on the integration of screw implants. An experimental study in rabbitsInt J Oral Maxillofac Surg19972621411489151173
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PalmquistAOmarOMEspositoMLausmaaJThomsenPTitanium oral implants: surface characteristics, interface biology and clinical outcomeJ R Soc Interface2010751552719740920
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de WolfMJFBone Anchored Hearing Aid – clinical outcomes of the linear incision technique and benefit assessment [doctoral thesis]NetherlandsRadboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre2011
   Google Scholar
• HultcrantzMOutcome of the bone-anchored hearing aid procedure without skin thinning: a prospective clinical trialOtol Neurotol20113271134113921817939
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HultcrantzMLanisAA five-year follow-up on the osseointegration of bone-anchored hearing device implantation without tissue reductionOtol Neurotol20143581480148524770406
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van de BergRStokroosRJHofJRChenaultMNBone-anchored hearing aid: a comparison of surgical techniquesOtol Neurotol201031112913520019562
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• TaghaviHHåkanssonBReinfeldtSAnalysis and Design of RF power and data link using amplitude modulation of Class-E for a novel bone conduction implantIEEE Trans Biomed Eng2012593050305922907959
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HåkanssonBThe balanced electromagnetic separation transducer: a new bone conduction transducerJ Acoust Soc Am200311381882512597176
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eeg-OlofssonMHåkanssonBReinfeldtSThe bone conduction implant – first implantation, surgical and audiologic aspectsOtol Neurotol201435467968524317216
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ReinfeldtSHåkanssonBTaghaviHFredén JanssonKJEeg-OlofssonMThe bone conduction implant – clinical results of the first six patientsInt J AudiolIn Press
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HåkanssonBEeg-OlofssonMReinfeldtSStenfeltSGranströmGPercutaneous vs transcutaneous bone conduction implant system: a feasibility study on a cadaver headOtol Neurotol20082981132113918769364
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HåkanssonBReinfeldtSEeg-OlofssonMA novel bone conduction implant (BCI): Engineering aspects and pre-clinical studiesInt J Audiol20104920321520105095
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eeg-OlofssonMStenfeltSTjellströmAGranströmGTransmission of bone-conducted sound in the human skull measured by cochlear vibrationsInt J Audiol20084776176919085400
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eeg-OlofssonMStenfeltSGranströmGImplications for contralateral bone-conducted transmission as measured by cochlear vibrationsOtol Neurotol201132219219821131884
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• TaghaviHHåkanssonBReinfeldtSEeg-OlofssonMAkhshijanSFeedback analysis in percutaneous bone-conduction device and bone-conduction implant on a dry craniumOtol Neurotol20123341342022410731
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• TaghaviHHåkanssonBEeg-OlofssonMA vibration investigation of a flat surface contact to skull bone for direct bone conduction transmission in sheep skulls in vivoOtol Neurotol20133469069823632789
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eeg-OlofssonMLithAHåkanssonBEvaluation of bone tissue formation in a flat surface attachment of a bone conduction implant – a pilot study in a sheep modelAudiol Neurotol EXTRA201446276
   Google Scholar
• ReinfeldtSHåkanssonBTaghaviHEeg-OlofssonMBone conduction hearing sensitivity in normal-hearing subjects: transcutaneous stimulation at BAHA vs BCI positionInt J Audiol201453636036924588466
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SprinzlGLenarzTErnstAFirst European multicenter results with a new transcutaneous bone conduction hearing implant system: short-term safety and efficacyOtol Neurotol20133461076108323714710
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BarbaraMPerottiMGioiaBVolpiniLMoniniSTranscutaneous bone-conduction hearing device: audiological and surgical aspects in a first series of patients with mixed hearing lossActa Otolaryngol2013133101058106423768011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ManriqueMSanhuezaJManriqueRde AbajoJA new bone conduction implant: surgical technique and resultsOtol Neurotol201435221622024448280
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IhlerFVolberswLBlumJMatthiasCCanisMPreliminary functional results and quality of life after implantation of a new bone conduction hearing device in patients with conductive and mixed hearing lossOtol Neurotol201435221121524448279
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RissDArnoldnerCBaumgartnerWDIndication criteria and outcomes with the Bonebridge transcutaneous bone-conduction implantLaryngoscope Epub8202014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PlontkeSKRadetzkiFSeiwerthIIndividual computer-assisted 3D planning for surgical placement of a new bone conduction hearing deviceOtol Neurotol2014351251125724770405
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LassalettaLSanchez-CuadradoIMuñozEGavilanJRetrosigmoid implantation of an active bone conduction stimulator in a patient with chronic otitis mediaAuris Nasus Larynx201441848723722197
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MurrayMPopelkaGRMillerREfficacy and safety of an in-the mouth bone conduction device for single-sided deafnessOtol Neurotol20113243744321221045
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MurrayMMillerRHujoelPPopelkaGRLong-term safety and benefit of a new intraoral device for single-sided deafnessOtol Neurotol2011321262126921799455
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GurgelRKSheltonCThe SoundBite hearing system: patient-assessed safety and benefit studyLaryngoscope2013123112807281223856912
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SymsMJHernandezKEBone conduction hearing: device auditory capability to aid in device selectionOtolaryngol Head Neck Surg2014150586687124596234
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ZwartenkotJWSnikAFMMylanusEAMMulderJJSAmplification options for patients with mixed hearing lossOtol Neurotol20143522122624448281
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MuellerHGKillionMCAn easy method for calculating the articulationHear J1990431417
   Google Scholar
• StenfeltSHåkanssonBAir versus bone conduction: an equal loudness investigationHear Res20021671–211212117525
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MertensGDesmetJSnikAHeyningPAn experimental objective method to determine maximum output and dynamic range of an active bone conduction implant: the BonebridgeOtol Neurotol2014351126113024662632
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• StenfeltSReinfeldtSA model of the occlusion effect with bone-conducted stimulationInt J Audiol2007461059560817922349
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• TaghaviHHåkanssonBReinfeldtSA novel bone conduction implant system – analog radio frequency data and power link designProceeding of the 9th IASTED International Conference on Biomedical Engineering (BioMed 2012), Innsbruck, Austria2012327335
   Google Scholar
• Eeg-OlofssonMStenfeltSTaghaviHTransmission of bone conducted sound – correlation between hearing perception and cochlear vibrationHear Res2013306112024047594
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ReinfeldtSÖstliPHåkanssonBTaghaviHEeg-OlofssonMStudy of the feasible size of a bone conduction implant (BCI) transducer in the temporal boneOtol Neurotol2014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fredén JanssonKJHåkanssonBTaghaviHReinfeldtSEeg-OlofssonMMRI induced torque and demagnetization in retention magnets for bone conduction implantsIEEE Trans Biomed Eng20146161887189324845299
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CarlssonPHåkanssonBThe bone-anchored hearing aid: Reference quantities and functional gainEar & Hearing199718134419058036
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar