A Comparison of the Preclinical Performance of the Echelon™+ Stapler with Thunderbird Reloads to Two Commercial Endoscopic Surgical Staplers

References

• Gaidry AD, Tremblay L, Nakayama D, et al. The history of surgical staplers: a combination of Hungarian, Russian, and American innovation. Am J Surg. 2019;85(6):563–566. doi:10.1177/000313481908500617
   Google Scholar
• Saji H, Okada M, Tsuboi M, et al. Segmentectomy versus lobectomy in small-sized peripheral non-small-cell lung cancer (JCOG0802/WJOG4607L): a multicentre, open-label, Phase 3, randomised, controlled, non-inferiority trial. Lancet. 2022;399(10335):1607–1617. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(21)02333-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee H-J, Hyung WJ, Yang HKet al. Short-Term Outcomes of a Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Laparoscopic Distal Gastrectomy with D2 Lymphadenectomy to Open Distal Gastrectomy for Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer (KLASS-02-RCT). LWW; 2019.s
   Google Scholar
• Heath D, Complications arising from staple lines and anastomotes in bariatric surgery: why they happen and how to avoid them.
   Google Scholar
• Hwa Han S, Gracia C, Mehran A, et al. Improved outcomes using a systematic and evidence-based approach to the laparoscopic roux-en-Y gastric bypass in a single academic institution. Am J Surg. 2007;73(10):955–958. doi:10.1177/000313480707301004
   Google Scholar
• Carrasquilla C, English WJ, Esposito P, et al. Total stapled, total intra-abdominal (TSTI) laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: one leak in 1000 cases. Obes Surg. 2004;14(5):613–617. doi:10.1381/096089204323093372
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yano M, Yokoi K, Numanami H, et al. Complications of bronchial stapling in thoracic surgery. World J Surg. 2014;38(2):341–346. doi:10.1007/s00268-013-2292-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chekan E, Whelan RL. Surgical Stapling Device–Tissue Interactions: What Surgeons Need to Know to Improve Patient Outcomes. Medical Devices. Vol. 7. Auckland: NZ; 2014:305.
   Google Scholar
• Mansour AM, El-Nashar O, El-Nahas AR, et al. pd13-11 endovascular-gia stapler device malfunction during laparoscopic nephrectomy: a comprehensive analysis of the FDA-manufacturer and user facility device experience (Maude) Database. Urol J. 2014;191(4S):e356–e356. doi:10.1016/j.juro.2014.02.996
   Google Scholar
• Riggs MK, Bohm MR, Mountain PJ. Examining relationships between device complexity and failure modes of minimally invasive surgical staplers. In: ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition. American Society of Mechanical Engineers; 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Matsuzawa F, Homma S, Yoshida T, et al. Serosal laceration during firing of powered linear stapler is a predictor of staple malformation. Surg Innov. 2017;24(6):590–597. doi:10.1177/1553350617733350
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fegelman E, Knippenberg S, Schwiers M, et al. Evaluation of a powered stapler system with gripping surface technology on surgical interventions required during laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech. 2017;27(5):489–494. doi:10.1089/lap.2016.0513
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park J, Suh S-W, Kim MK, et al. Less pain and reduced risk of early postoperative ileus after clipless versus conventional laparoscopic appendectomy. surgical laparoscopy. Endosc. Percutaneous Tech. 2019;29(6):543–547. doi:10.1097/SLE.0000000000000721
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rawlins L, Johnson BH, Johnston SS et al. Comparative Effectiveness Assessment of Two Powered Surgical Stapling Platforms in Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy: A Retrospective Matched Study. Medical Devices. Vol. 13. Auckland: NZ; 2020:195.
   Google Scholar
• Yeo E, Thompson J, Hanseman D, et al. Increased staple loading pressures and reduced staple heights in laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy reduce intraoperative bleeding. Surgery. 2021;169(5):1110–1115. doi:10.1016/j.surg.2020.10.045
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fortin SP, Johnston SS, Chaudhuri R et al. Incidence, predictors, and economic burden of circular anastomotic complications in left-sided colorectal reconstructions involving manual circular staplers. J Med Econ. 2021;241.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elariny H, González H, Wang B. Tissue thickness of human stomach measured on excised gastric specimens from obese patients. Surg Technol Int. 2005;14:119–124.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Henninger DD, Jones J, Clymer JW. Tighter formed staples produce stronger sealing against luminal leakage. Med Dev Diagn Eng. 2017;2:48–51.
   Google Scholar
• Pleil JD, Ariel Geer Wallace M, Davis MD, et al. The physics of human breathing: flow, timing, volume, and pressure parameters for normal, on-demand, and ventilator respiration. J Breath Res. 2021;15(4):042002. doi:10.1088/1752-7163/ac2589
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rojatkar P, E henderson C, Hall S, et al. A novel powered circular stapler designed for creating secure anastomoses. Med Devices Diagn Eng. 2017;2(2):94–100. doi:10.15761/MDDE.1000123
   Google Scholar
• Clapp B, Schrodt A, Ahmad MVet al. Stapler malfunctions in bariatric surgery: an analysis of the MAUDE database. JSLS. J Soc Laparoendosc Surg. 2022;26:1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang ZF, Vandewalle JA, Clymer JW et al. Improving performance and access to difficult-to-reach anatomy with a powered articulating stapler. Medical Devices Evidence Res. 2022;2022:329–339.
   Google Scholar
• Baker RS, Foote J, Kemmeter P, et al. The science of stapling and leaks. Obes Surg. 2004;14(10):1290–1298. doi:10.1381/0960892042583888
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chekan EG, Cummings JF, Mabe I, et al. Thickness of Cadaveric Human Lung Tissue. Surg Technol Int. 2016;29:207–213.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bonnet B, Tabiai I, Rakovich G, et al. Air leaks: stapling affects porcine lungs biomechanics. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2022;125:104883. doi:10.1016/j.jmbbm.2021.104883
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Takamochi K, Oh S, Miyasaka Y, et al. Prospective randomized trial comparing buttressed versus nonbuttressed stapling in patients undergoing pulmonary lobectomy. J Thorac Cardiovasc. 2014;62(08):696–704. doi:10.1055/s-0033-1363295
   Google Scholar
• Kuroda H, Sugita Y, Nakanishi K, et al. Favorable clinical application for segmental bronchial closure based on experiment results. J Thorac Dis. 2019;11(6):2267. doi:10.21037/jtd.2019.06.18
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Travis WD, Dacic S, Wistuba I, et al. IASLC multidisciplinary recommendations for pathologic assessment of lung cancer resection specimens after neoadjuvant therapy. J Thorac Oncol. 2020;15(5):709–740. doi:10.1016/j.jtho.2020.01.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fegelman EJ. Comment on: comparison of endostapler performance in challenging tissue applications. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2013;9(3):421–422. doi:10.1016/j.soard.2013.01.011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Makanyengo SO, Thiruchelvam D. Literature review on the incidence of primary stapler malfunction. Surg Innov. 2020;27(2):229–234. doi:10.1177/1553350619889274
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang R, Gagner M. A thickness calibration device is needed to determine staple height and avoid leaks in laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. Obes Surg. 2015;25(12):2360–2367. doi:10.1007/s11695-015-1705-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fortin SP, Petraiuolo W, Cafri G, et al. Comparison of clinical outcomes of gripping surface technology staple reloads versus standard staple reloads used with manual linear surgical staplers. Evidence Res. 2022;2022:385–399.
   Google Scholar
• Johnston SS BH, Chakke Det al. Retrospective comparison of clinical and economic outcomes of non-donor patients undergoing radical nephrectomy using one of two different linear stapler technologies for transection of the renal vessels: fixed-height gripping surface reloads vs variable-height reloads. medical devices. Evidence Res. 2022;2022:317–328.
   Google Scholar
• Park SY, Kim DJ, Mo Nam C, et al. Clinical and economic benefits associated with the use of powered and tissue-specific endoscopic staplers among the patients undergoing thoracoscopic lobectomy for lung cancer. J Med Econ. 2019;22(12):1274–1280. doi:10.1080/13696998.2019.1634081
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murakami M, Muto M, Nakagawa S, et al. Successful laparoscopy-assisted en bloc resection of bulky omental malignant lymphoma involving the ascending colon and multiple lymph node metastases: report of a technically demanding case in a pediatric patient. Asian J Endoscopic Surgery. 2022;15(4):836–840. doi:10.1111/ases.13081
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kryzauskas M, Degutyte A, Abeciunas V, et al. Experimental study of mechanical integrity testing in stapled large bowel: methylene blue leak test is not inferior to air leak test. Visc Med. 2021;37(3):189–197. doi:10.1159/000510660
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wise A, Rector J, Orr K, et al. Measuring staple line security and compression uniformity with an advanced endoscopic powered stapler. Open Access J Surg. 2021;7(2):1–5.
   Google Scholar
• Miller DL, Roy S, Kassis ES, et al. Impact of powered and tissue-specific endoscopic stapling technology on clinical and economic outcomes of video-assisted thoracic surgery lobectomy procedures: a retrospective, observational study. Adv Ther. 2018;35(5):707–723. doi:10.1007/s12325-018-0679-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roy S, Yoo A, Yadalam S, et al. Comparison of economic and clinical outcomes between patients undergoing laparoscopic bariatric surgery with powered versus manual endoscopic surgical staplers. J Med Econ. 2017;20(4):423–433. doi:10.1080/13696998.2017.1296453
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar