Carotid artery stenting: current and emerging options

References

• HuntJRHunt: the role of the carotid arteries: the role of the carotid arteries, in the causation of vascular lesions of the brain, with remarks on certain special features of the symptomatology. 1914Am J Med Sci2013346650450924263078
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FisherMOcclusion of the internal carotid arteryAMA Arch Neurol Psychiatry1951653346377
   Google Scholar
• North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial CollaboratorsBeneficial effect of carotid endarterectomy in symptomatic patients with high-grade carotid stenosisN Engl J Med199132574454531852179
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MRC European Carotid Surgery Trial: interim results for symptomatic patients with severe (70%–99%) or with mild (0%–29%) carotid stenosis. European Carotid Surgery Trialists’ Collaborative GroupLancet19913378752123512431674060
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MaybergMRWilsonSEYatsuFCarotid endarterectomy and prevention of cerebral ischemia in symptomatic carotid stenosis. Veterans Affairs Cooperative Studies Program 309 Trialist GroupJAMA199126623328932941960828
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BrottTGHalperinJLAbbaraS2011 ASA/ACCF/AHA/AANN/AANS/ACR/ASNR/CNS/SAIP/SCAI/SIR/SNIS/SVM/SVS guideline on the management of patients with extracranial carotid and vertebral artery disease: executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines, and the American Stroke Association, American Association of Neuroscience Nurses, American Association of Neurological Surgeons, American College of Radiology, American Society of Neuroradiology, Congress of Neurological Surgeons, Society of Atherosclerosis Imaging and Prevention, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society of Interventional Radiology, Society of NeuroInterventional Surgery, Society for Vascular Medicine, and Society for Vascular SurgeryJ Am Coll Cardiol20115781002104421288680
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BrottTGHobsonRWHowardGCREST InvestigatorsStenting versus endarterectomy for treatment of carotid-artery stenosisN Engl J Med20103631112320505173
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IschingerTACarotid stenting: which stent for which lesion?J Interv Cardiol200114661762312053383
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• MathurADorrosGIyerSSVitekJJYadavSSRoubinGSPalmaz stent compression in patients following carotid artery stentingCathet Cardiovasc Diagn19974121371409184284
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• SerruysPWStraussBHde FeyterPUrbanPThe Wallstent: a self-expanding stentJ Invasive Cardiol19913312713410149122
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• von BirgelenCGilRRuygrokPOptimized expansion of the Wallstent compared with the Palmaz-Schatz stent: on-line observations with two- and three-dimensional intracoronary ultrasound after angiographic guidanceAm Heart J19961316106710758644583
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• QinFPanettaTFVascular stentsMooreWSAhnSSEndovascular SurgeryPhiladelphia, PASaunders201189105
   Google Scholar
• BoynePJFree grafting of traumatically displaced or resected mandibular condylesJ Oral Maxillofac Surg19894732282322921657
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CantoreGPDelfiniRMariottiniASantoroACasconePAnterior displacement of the mandible for better exposure of the distal segment of the extracranial carotid arteryActa Neurochir (Wien)1987861–256603618307
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FisherDFClagettGPParkerJIMandibular subluxation for high carotid exposureJ Vasc Surg1984167277336492304
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GutermanLRFesslerRDHopkinsLNCervical carotid revascularizationNeurosurg Clin N Am20001113948 viii10565869
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WhiteCJRameeSRCollinsTJJenkinsJSReillyJPPatelRACarotid artery stenting: patient, lesion, and procedural characteristics that increase procedural complicationsCatheter Cardiovasc Interv201382571572623630062
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NaylorARBoliaAAbbottRJRandomized study of carotid angioplasty and stenting versus carotid endarterectomy: a stopped trialJ Vasc Surg19982823263349719328
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Endovascular versus surgical treatment in patients with carotid stenosis in the Carotid and Vertebral Artery Transluminal Angioplasty Study (CAVATAS): a randomised trialLancet200135792701729173711403808
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MasJLChatellierGBeyssenBEVA-3S InvestigatorsEndarterectomy versus stenting in patients with symptomatic severe carotid stenosisN Engl J Med2006355161660167117050890
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RinglebPAAllenbergJBrückmannHSPACE Collaborative Group30 day results from the SPACE trial of stent-protected angioplasty versus carotid endarterectomy in symptomatic patients: a randomised non-inferiority trialLancet200636895431239124717027729
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• YadavJSWholeyMHKuntzREStenting and Angioplasty with Protection in Patients at High Risk for Endarterectomy InvestigatorsProtected carotid-artery stenting versus endarterectomy in high-risk patientsN Engl J Med2004351151493150115470212
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MasJLTrinquartLLeysDEVA-3S investigatorsEndarterectomy Versus Angioplasty in Patients with Symptomatic Severe Carotid Stenosis (EVA-3S) trial: results up to 4 years from a randomised, multicentre trialLancet Neurol200871088589218774745
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EcksteinHHRinglebPAllenbergJRResults of the Stent-Protected Angioplasty versus Carotid Endarterectomy (SPACE) study to treat symptomatic stenoses at 2 years: a multinational, prospective, randomised trialLancet Neurol200871089390218774746
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EderleJDobsonJFeatherstoneRLInternational Carotid Stenting Study investigatorsCarotid artery stenting compared with endarterectomy in patients with symptomatic carotid stenosis (International Carotid Stenting Study): an interim analysis of a randomised controlled trialLancet2010375971998599720189239
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BonatiLHJongenLMHallerSICSS-MRI study groupNew ischaemic brain lesions on MRI after stenting or endarterectomy for symptomatic carotid stenosis: a substudy of the International Carotid Stenting Study (ICSS)Lancet Neurol20109435336220189458
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LalBKMeschiaJFBrottTGCREST-2: guiding treatments for asymptomatic carotid diseaseEndovascular Today201397376
   Google Scholar
• VorwerkDGüntherRWStent placement in iliac arterial lesions: three years of clinical experience with the WallstentCardiovasc Intervent Radiol19921552852901423388
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ZollikoferCLAntonucciFPfyfferMArterial stent placement with use of the Wallstent: midterm results of clinical experienceRadiology199117924494562014291
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WilliamsJSMechanical devices used for carotid stentingTech Vasc Interv Radiol200032102113
   Google Scholar
• TadrosROSpyrisCTVouyoukaAGComparing the embolic potential of open and closed cell stents during carotid angioplasty and stentingJ Vasc Surg2012561899522386144
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GurbelPACallahanKPMalininAISerebruanyVLGillisJCould stent design affect platelet activation? Results of the Platelet Activation in STenting (PAST) StudyJ Invasive Cardiol2002141058458912368510
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• HongMKMintzGSLeeCWIncidence, mechanism, predictors, and long-term prognosis of late stent malapposition after bare-metal stent implantationCirculation2004109788188614967732
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• StoeckelDBonsignoreCDudaSA survey of stent designsMinim Invasive Ther Allied Technol200211413714716754063
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PierceDSRoseroEBModrallJGOpen-cell versus closed-cell stent design differences in blood flow velocities after carotid stentingJ Vasc Surg2009493602606 discussion 60619268763
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• TimaranCHRoseroEBHigueraAIlarrazaAModrallJGClagettGPRandomized clinical trial of open-cell vs closed-cell stents for carotid stenting and effects of stent design on cerebral embolizationJ Vasc Surg201154513101316. e1 discussion 131621723064
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GrunwaldIQReithWKarpKComparison of stent free cell area and cerebral lesions after unprotected carotid artery stent placementEur J Vasc Endovasc Surg2012431101422078854
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BosiersMde DonatoGDelooseKDoes free cell area influence the outcome in carotid artery stenting?Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg2007332135141 discussion 142–14317097897
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HartJPPeetersPVerbistJDelooseKBosiersMDo device characteristics impact outcome in carotid artery stenting?J Vasc Surg2006444725730 discussion 730–73117011998
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SchillingerMGschwendtnerMReimersBDoes carotid stent cell design matter?Stroke200839390590918239162
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AuricchioFContiMFerraroMRealiAEvaluation of carotid stent scaffolding through patient-specific finite element analysisInt J Numer Method Biomed Eng201228101043105523027634
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KabinejadianFCuiFZhangZHoPLeoHLA novel carotid covered stent design: in vitro evaluation of performance and influence on the blood flow regime at the carotid artery bifurcationAnn Biomed Eng20134191990200223842696
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GreilOKleinschmidtTWeissWFlow velocities after carotid artery stenting: impact of stent design. A fluid dynamics study in a carotid artery model with laser Doppler anemometryCardiovasc Intervent Radiol2005281667615602638
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Müller-HülsbeckSJahnkeTStolzmannPPaulsenFWenkeRHellerMA new concept for covered stent protected carotid angioplasty: an ex vivo studyRofo2003175121634163814661133
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• SchillingerMDickPWiestGCovered versus bare self-expanding stents for endovascular treatment of carotid artery stenosis: a stopped randomized trialJ Endovasc Ther200613331231916784318
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SzólicsASztrihaLKSzikraPSzólicsMPalkóAVörösEThe use of covered stents for the endovascular treatment of extracranial internal carotid artery stenosis: a prospective study with a 5-year follow-upEur Radiol20102071772177620033177
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FarhatniaYTanAMotiwalaACousinsBGSeifalianAMEvolution of covered stents in the contemporary era: clinical application, materials and manufacturing strategies using nanotechnologyBiotechnol Adv201331552454223305892
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SiddiquiAHChenPRIntracranial collateral anastomoses: relevance to endovascular proceduresNeurosurg Clin N Am200920327929619778700
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BrownKEUsmanAKibbeMRCarotid stenting using tapered and nontapered stents: associated neurological complications and restenosis ratesAnn Vasc Surg200923443944519128933
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ChangDWSchubartPJVeithFJZarinsCKA new approach to carotid angioplasty and stenting with transcervical occlusion and protective shunting: Why it may be a better carotid artery interventionJ Vasc Surg2004395994100215111851
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LarrazabalRKlurfanPSarmaDGunnarssonTSurgical exposure of the carotid artery for endovascular interventional proceduresActa Neurochir (Wien)2010152353754419806304
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SamaniegoEADabusGRajuRTsoukasAILinfanteIIntracranial angioplasty and stenting through direct carotid punctureJ Neuroimaging201323220721022082129
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DumontTMMokinMWachMMUnderstanding risk factors for perioperative ischemic events with carotid stenting: is patient age over 80 years or is unfavorable arch anatomy to blame?J Neurointerv Surg20146321922423685755
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LamRCLinSCDeRubertisBHynecekRKentKCFariesPLThe impact of increasing age on anatomic factors affecting carotid angioplasty and stentingJ Vasc Surg200745587588017466784
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LinSCTrocciolaSMRheeJAnalysis of anatomic factors and age in patients undergoing carotid angioplasty and stentingAnn Vasc Surg200519679880416200468
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ChakhtouraEYHobsonRW2ndGoldsteinJIn-stent restenosis after carotid angioplasty-stenting: incidence and managementJ Vasc Surg2001332220225 discussion 225–22611174771
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BendokBRRoubinGSKatzenBTCutting balloon to treat carotid in-stent stenosis: technical noteJ Invasive Cardiol200315422723212668854
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• HeckDResults of cutting balloon angioplasty for carotid artery in-stent restenosis in six patients: description of the technique, long-term outcomes, and review of the literatureJ Neurointerv Surg200911485021994106
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ShahQAGeorgiadisALSuriMFRodriguezGJQureshiAICutting balloon angioplasty for carotid in-stent restenosis: case reports and review of the literatureJ Neuroimaging200818442843218333838
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SetacciFSirignanoPde DonatoGCarotid highly-calcified de novo stenosis and cutting-balloon angioplasty: a tool to prevent haemodynamic depression?J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino)2009503357364
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MontorsiPGalliSRavagnaniPMDrug-eluting balloon for treatment of in-stent restenosis after carotid artery stenting: preliminary reportJ Endovasc Ther201219673474223210870
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SangiorgiGRomagnoliEBiondi-ZoccaiGCommentary: drug-eluting balloons for carotid in-stent restenosis: can this technology deliver the goods?J Endovasc Ther201219674374823210871
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RitterMATheismannKSchmiedelMRingelsteinEBDittrichRVascularization of carotid plaque in recently symptomatic patients is associated with the occurrence of transcranial microembolic signalsEur J Neurol20132081218122123163829
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GrayWAHopkinsLNYadavSARCHeR Trial CollaboratorsProtected carotid stenting in high-surgical-risk patients: the ARCHeR resultsJ Vasc Surg200644225826816890850
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IyerSSWhiteCJHopkinsLNBEACH InvestigatorsCarotid artery revascularization in high-surgical-risk patients using the Carotid WALLSTENT and FilterWire EX/EZ: 1-year outcomes in the BEACH Pivotal GroupJ Am Coll Cardiol200851442743418222352
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MatsumuraJSGrayWChaturvediSYamanouchiDPengLVertaPResults of carotid artery stenting with distal embolic protection with improved systems: Protected Carotid Artery Stenting in Patients at High Risk for Carotid Endarterectomy (PROTECT) trialJ Vasc Surg2012554968976. e522236885
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AngeliniAReimersBDella BarberaMCerebral protection during carotid artery stenting: collection and histopathologic analysis of embolized debrisStroke200233245646111823652
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HenryMAmorMHenryICarotid stenting with cerebral protection: first clinical experience using the PercuSurge GuardWire systemJ Endovasc Surg19996432133110893133
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ReimersBCorvajaNMoshiriSCerebral protection with filter devices during carotid artery stentingCirculation20011041121511435330
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SchlüterMTüblerTSteffensJCMatheyDGSchoferJFocal ischemia of the brain after neuroprotected carotid artery stentingJ Am Coll Cardiol20034261007101313678921
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• VosJAvan den BergJCErnstSMCarotid angioplasty and stent placement: comparison of transcranial Doppler US data and clinical outcome with and without filtering cerebral protection devices in 509 patientsRadiology2005234249349915616120
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• TouzéETrinquartLChatellierGMasJLSystematic review of the perioperative risks of stroke or death after carotid angioplasty and stentingStroke20094012e683e69319892997
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EskandariMKNajjarSFMatsumuraJSKibbeMRMoraschMDTechnical limitations of carotid filter embolic protection devicesAnn Vasc Surg200721440340717368834
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LianXLiuWLiMRisk factors and complications associated with difficult retrieval of embolic protection devices in carotid artery stentingCardiovasc Intervent Radiol2012351434821387123
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• TallaritaTRabinsteinAACloftHAre distal protection devices ‘protective’ during carotid angioplasty and stenting?Stroke20114271962196621566230
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KimYWKangDHHwangJHParkJHwangYHKimYSRescue strategy for acute carotid stent thrombosis during carotid stenting with distal filter protection using forced arterial suction thrombectomy with a reperfusion catheter of the Penumbra System: a technical noteActa Neurochir (Wien)201315581583158823689967
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CasserlyIPAbou-CheblAFathiRBSlow-flow phenomenon during carotid artery intervention with embolic protection devices: predictors and clinical outcomeJ Am Coll Cardiol20054681466147216226169
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GrayWAYadavJSVertaPThe CAPTURE registry: results of carotid stenting with embolic protection in the post approval settingCatheter Cardiovasc Interv200769334134817171654
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• StingeleRBergerJAlfkeKSPACE investigatorsClinical and angiographic risk factors for stroke and death within 30 days after carotid endarterectomy and stent-protected angioplasty: a subanalysis of the SPACE studyLancet Neurol20087321622218242141
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ZahnRIschingerTHochadelMArbeitsgemeinschaft Leitende Kardiologische KrankenhausärzteCarotid artery stenting in octogenarians: results from the ALKK Carotid Artery Stent (CAS) RegistryEur Heart J200728337037517158826
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MetzgerDCEmbolic protection in carotid artery stenting: new optionsTech Vasc Interv Radiol2011142869421550511
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• IyerVde DonatoGDelooseKThe type of embolic protection does not influence the outcome in carotid artery stentingJ Vasc Surg200746225125617664102
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ThéronJCosgroveRMelansonDEthierREmbolization with temporary balloon occlusion of the internal carotid or vertebral arteriesNeuroradiology19862832462533725012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WholeyMHFinolEWholeyMScottiCMVerdinelliIHow effective are distal embolic protection filters in carotid stenting? Clinical and benchtop testing resultsAm J Cardiol200596Suppl 7A77H
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PowellRJAlessiCNolanBComparison of embolization protection device-specific technical difficulties during carotid artery stentingJ Vasc Surg2006441566116828426
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D’ErcoleLQuarettiPCionfoliNPatient dose during carotid artery stenting with embolic-protection devices: evaluation with radiochromic films and related diagnostic reference levels according to factors influencing the procedureCardiovasc Intervent Radiol201336232032923150118
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ParodiJCFerreiraLMSicardGLa MuraRFernandezSCerebral protection during carotid stenting using flow reversalJ Vasc Surg200541341642215838474
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AnselGMHopkinsLNJaffMRInvestigators for the ARMOUR Pivotal TrialSafety and effectiveness of the INVATEC MO.MA proximal cerebral protection device during carotid artery stenting: results from the ARMOUR pivotal trialCatheter Cardiovasc Interv20107611820222019
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BersinRMStabileEAnselGMA meta-analysis of proximal occlusion device outcomes in carotid artery stentingCatheter Cardiovasc Interv20128071072107822454248
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MontorsiPCaputiLGalliSMicroembolization during carotid artery stenting in patients with high-risk, lipid-rich plaque. A randomized trial of proximal versus distal cerebral protectionJ Am Coll Cardiol201158161656166321982309
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NikasDReithWSchmidtAProspective, multicenter European study of the GORE flow reversal system for providing neuroprotection during carotid artery stentingCatheter Cardiovasc Interv20128071060106822644906
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• StabileERubinoPMontorsiPClamping intolerance during proximal protected carotid artery stentingCatheter Cardiovasc Interv2013821606123494846
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PinterLRiboMLohCSafety and feasibility of a novel transcervical access neuroprotection system for carotid artery stenting in the PROOF StudyJ Vasc Surg20115451317132321658889
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GoodeSDHoggardNMacdonaldSEvansDHClevelandTJGainesPAAssessment of reverse flow as a means of cerebral protection during carotid artery stent placement with diffusion-weighted and transcranial Doppler imagingJ Vasc Interv Radiol201324452853323462063
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castro-AfonsoLHAbudLGRoloJGFlow reversal versus filter protection: a pilot carotid artery stenting randomized trialCirc Cardiovasc Interv20136555255924084627
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BrewsterLPBeaulieuRCorriereMACarotid revascularization outcomes comparing distal filters, flow reversal, and endarterectomyJ Vasc Surg201154410001004 discussion 1004–100521871772
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ZahnRIschingerTMarkBArbeitsgemeinschaft Leitende Kardiologische Krankenhausärzte (ALKK)Embolic protection devices for carotid artery stenting: is there a difference between filter and distal occlusive devices?J Am Coll Cardiol200545111769177415936604
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• StabileEEspositoGOperator’s experience is the most efficient embolic protection device for carotid artery stentingCirc Cardiovasc Interv20136549649724129932
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AuricchioFContiMFerraraAMorgantiSRealiAPatient-specific finite element analysis of carotid artery stenting: a focus on vessel modelingInt J Numer Method Biomed Eng201329664566423729192
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DzierwaKPieniazekPTekieliLCarotid artery stenting according to the “tailored CAS” algorithm performed in the very elderly patients: the thirty day outcomeCatheter Cardiovasc Interv201382568168823825008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MathiesenEBBønaaKHJoakimsenOEcholucent plaques are associated with high risk of ischemic cerebrovascular events in carotid stenosis: the tromsø studyCirculation2001103172171217511331258
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ClairDGHopkinsLNMehtaMEMPiRE Clinical Study InvestigatorsNeuroprotection during carotid artery stenting using the GORE flow reversal system: 30-day outcomes in the EMPiRE Clinical StudyCatheter Cardiovasc Interv201177342042920853365
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ClarkDJLessioSO’DonoghueMSchainfeldRRosenfieldKSafety and utility of intravascular ultrasound-guided carotid artery stentingCatheter Cardiovasc Interv200463335536215505835
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WehmanJCHolmesDRJrEckerRDIntravascular ultrasound identification of intraluminal embolic plaque material during carotid angioplasty with stentingCatheter Cardiovasc Interv200668685385717086527
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FuchsMHeiderPPelisekJPoppertHEcksteinHHEx vivo characterization of carotid plaques by intravascular ultrasonography and virtual histology: concordance with real plaque pathomorphologyJ Cardiovasc Surg (Torino) Epub12102013
   Google Scholar