The Mobi-C cervical disc for one-level and two-level cervical disc replacement: a review of the literature

References

• AlvinMDAbbottEELubelskiDCervical arthroplasty: a critical review of the literatureSpine J20141492231224524704679
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• YinSYuXZhouSYinZQiuYIs cervical disc arthroplasty superior to fusion for treatment of symptomatic cervical disc disease? A meta-analysisClin Orthop Relat Res20134711904191923389804
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• XingDMaXMaJWangJMaTChenYA meta-analysis of cervical arthroplasty compared to anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for single-level cervical disc diseaseJ Clin Neurosci20132097097823375397
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OhCHYoonSHPast, present, and future of cervical arthroplastyKeio J Med2013622475223803346
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yu GaoMMLiuMLiTHuangFTangTXiangZA meta-analysis comparing the results of cervical disc arthroplasty with anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) for the treatment of symptomatic cervical disc diseaseJ Bone Joint Surg Am20139555556123515991
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BoselieTFMWillemsPCvan MamerenHde BieRABenzelECvan SantbrinkHArthroplasty versus fusion in single-level cervical degenerative disc disease: a Cochrane reviewSpine201338E1096E110723656959
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SackettDLStraussSERichardsonWSEvidence-Based Medicine: How to Practice and Teach EBMPhiladelphia, PAChurchill-Livingstone2000
   Google Scholar
• NASS Disclosure Policy. Revised March 2012North American Spine Society Available from: http://www.spine.org/Pages/PracticePolicy/EthicsProfConduct/NASSDisclosurePolicyAccessed August 1, 2014
   Google Scholar
• DavisRJKimKDHiseyMSCervical total disc replacement with the Mobi-C cervical artificial disc compared with anterior discectomy and fusion for treatment of 2-level symptomatic degenerative disc disease: a prospective, randomized, controlled multicenter clinical trial: clinical articleJ Neurosurg Spine20131953254524010901
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ParkJHRohKHChoJYRaYSRhimSCNohSWComparative analysis of cervical arthroplasty using Mobi-C® and anterior cervical discectomy and fusion using the Solis®-cageJ Korean Neurosurg Soc20084421722119096680
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GuérinPObeidIBourghliAHeterotopic ossification after cervical disc replacement: clinical significance and radiographic analysis. A prospective studyActa Orthop Belg201278808622523932
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HuppertJBeaurainJSteibJPComparison between single- and multi-level patients: clinical and radiological outcomes 2 years after cervical disc replacementEur Spine J2011201417142621336970
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• YiSShinDAKimKNThe predisposing factors for the heterotopic ossification after cervical artificial disc replacementSpine J2013131048105423541453
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• YiSKimKNYangMSDifference in occurrence of heterotopic ossification according to prosthesis type in the cervical artificial disc replacementSpine (Phila Pa 1976)2010351556156120581764
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KimSHShinHCShinDAKimKNYoon doHEarly clinical experience with the mobi-C disc prosthesisYonsei Med J20074845746417594154
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ParkJHRhimSCRohSWMid-term follow-up of clinical and radiologic outcomes in cervical total disk replacement (Mobi-C): incidence of heterotopic ossification and risk factorsJ Spinal Disord Tech20132614114522105106
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• GuérinPObeidIGilleOSagittal alignment after single cervical disc arthroplastyJ Spinal Disord Tech201225101622124426
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• BeaurainJBernardPDufourTIntermediate clinical and radiological results of cervical TDR (Mobi-C) with up to 2 years of follow-upEur Spine J20091884185019434431
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LeeSEChungCKJahngTAEarly development and progression of heterotopic ossification in cervical total disc replacementJ Neurosurg Spine201216313621999390
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BaoDMaYChenXLiHHuMGaoTPreliminary clinical study on artificial cervical disc replacement by Mobi-C prosthesisZhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi20112517073 Chinese21351614
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• JinDDYanHBZhangZMLiQCLiuBGThe application of cervical arthroplasty with Mobi-C for treatment of cervical spondylotic radiculopathyZhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi20114964564922041683
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• ParkSBKimKJJinYJKimHJJahngTAChungCKX-ray based kinematic analysis of cervical spine according to prosthesis designs: analysis of the Mobi-C, Bryan, PCM, and Prestige LPJ Spinal Disord Tech Epub1172013
   Google Scholar
• OhCHKim doYJiGYCervical arthroplasty for moderate to severe disc degeneration: clinical and radiological assessments after a minimum follow-up of 18 months – Pfirrmann grade and cervical arthroplastyYonsei Med J2014551072107924954339
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AghayevEBarlocherCSqierFFive-year results of cervical disc prostheses in the SWISSspine registryEur Spine J2013221723173023584163
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GoffinJVan CalenberghFvan LoonJIntermediate follow-up after treatment of degenerative disc disease with the Bryan cervical disc prosthesis: single level and bi-levelSpine2003292673267814673368
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ChengLNieLZhangLHouYFusion versus Bryan Cervical Disc in two-level cervical disc disease: a prospective, randomised studyInt Orthop2009331347135118956190
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PimentaLMcAfeePCCappuccinoACunninghamBWDiazRCoutinhoESuperiority of multilevel cervical arthroplasty outcomes versus single-level outcomes: 229 consecutive PCM prosthesesSpine (Phila Pa 1976)2007321337134417515823
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KeplerCKBrodtEDDettoriJRAlbertTJCervical artificial disc replacement versus fusion in the cervical spine: a systematic review comparing multilevel versus single-level surgeryEvid Based Spine Care J20123193023236310
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• ChenJWangXBaiWShenXYuanWPrevalence of heterotopic ossification after cervical total disc arthroplasty: a meta-analysisEur Spine J20122167468022134486
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WuJCHuangWCTsaiHWDifferences between 1- and 2-level cervical arthroplasty: more heterotopic ossification in 2-level disc replacement: clinical articleJ Neurosurg Spine20121659460022443547
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BhandariMBusseJWJackowskiDAssociation between industry funding and statistically significant pro-industry findings in medical and surgical randomized trialsCMAJ200417047748014970094
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SchmidtKHartACDRG Expert: a Comprehensive Reference to the DRG Classification System2012 editionEden Prairie, MNIngenix2012
   Google Scholar
• CMS.gov [homepage on the Internet]Baltimore, MDCenter for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Available from: http://www.cms.govAccessed September 22, 2014
   Google Scholar
• American Medical Association (AMA)Coding OnlineAmerican Medical Association [updated January, 2014]. Available from: https://commerce.ama-assn.org/ocm/index.jspAccessed August 1, 2014
   Google Scholar
• NandyalaSVMarquez-LaraAFinebergSJSinghKComparison between cervical total disc replacement and anterior cervical discectomy and fusion of 1 to 2 levels from 2002 to 2009Spine (Phila Pa 1976)201439535724108292
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• QureshiSAMcAnanySGozVKoehlerSMHechtACCost-effectiveness analysis: comparing single-level cervical disc replacement and single-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: clinical articleJ Neurosurg Spine20131954655424010896
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• QureshiSGozVMcAnanySHealth state utility of patients with single-level cervical degenerative disc disease: comparison of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with cervical disc arthroplastyJ Neurosurg Spine20142047547924559462
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mobi-C® Cervical Disc Prosthesis (two-level) - P110009U.S. Food and Drug Administration2014 [updated August 7, 2014]. Available from: http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/ProductsandMedicalProcedures/DeviceApprovalsandClearances/Recently-ApprovedDevices/ucm367809.htmAccessed October 31, 2014
   Google Scholar