Comparative effectiveness of open versus minimally invasive sacroiliac joint fusion

References

• SlipmanCWLipetzJSPlastarasCTFluoroscopically guided therapeutic sacroiliac joint injections for sacroiliac joint syndromeAm J Phys Med Rehabil20018042543211399003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SlipmanCWSterenfeldEBChouLHThe value of radionuclide imaging in the diagnosis of sacroiliac joint syndromeSpine199621225122548902970
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SlipmanCWSterenfeldEBChouLHThe predictive value of provocative sacroiliac joint stress maneuvers in the diagnosis of sacroiliac joint syndromeArch Phys Med Rehabil1998792882929523780
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GemmellHAJacobsonBHIncidence of sacroiliac joint dysfunction and low back pain in fit college studentsJ Manipulative Physiol Ther19901363672137851
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ChanKFMusculoskeletal pain clinic in Singapore – sacroiliac joint somatic dysfunction as cause of buttock painAnn Acad Med Singapore1998271121159588285
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• BernardTNJrKirkaldy-WillisWHRecognizing specific characteristics of nonspecific low back painClin Orthop Relat Res19872172662802951048
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KatzVSchoffermanJReynoldsJThe sacroiliac joint: a potential cause of pain after lumbar fusion to the sacrumJ Spinal Disord Tech200316969912571491
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirkaldy-WillisWHFive common back disorders: how to diagnose and treat themGeriatrics1978333233152221
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirkaldy-WillisWHHillRJA more precise diagnosis for low-back painSpine19794102109162546
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• MaigneJYAivaliklisAPfeferFResults of sacroiliac joint double block and value of sacroiliac pain provocation tests in 54 patients with low back painSpine199621188918928875721
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SchwarzerACAprillCNBogdukNThe sacroiliac joint in chronic low back painSpine19952031377709277
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SembranoJNPollyDWJrHow often is low back pain not coming from the back?Spine200934E27E3219127145
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BernardTNJrCassidyJDThe Sacroiliac Joint Syndrome: Pathophysiology, Diagnosis and ManagementNew York, NY, USARaven Press1991
   Google Scholar
• SpikerWRLawrenceBDRaichALSurgical versus injection treatment for injection-confirmed chronic sacroiliac joint painEvid Based Spine Care J20123415323526911
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• StarkJGFuentesJAFuentesTIThe history of sacroiliac joint arthrodesis: a critical review and introduction of a new techniqueCurr Orthop Pract201122545557
   Google Scholar
• AckermanSPDKimEKnightTYerbySWhat is the frequency of minimally invasive sacroiliac joint fusion annually in the United States?Paper presented at the 8th Interdisciplinary World Congress on Low Back and Pelvic PainOctober 27–31, 2013Dubai
   Google Scholar
• Al-KhayerAHegartyJHahnDPercutaneous sacroiliac joint arthrodesis: a novel techniqueJ Spinal Disord Tech20082135936318600147
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DjurasovicMGlassmanSDDimarJR2ndDoes fusion status correlate with patient outcomes in lumbar spinal fusion?Spine20113640440921325934
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LaslettMAprillCNMcDonaldBProvocation sacroiliac joint tests have validity in the diagnosis of sacroiliac joint painArch Phys Med Rehabil20068787416731225
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SlinkardNAgelJSwiontkowskiMFDocumentation of outcomes for sacroiliac joint fusion: does prior spinal fusion influence the outcome?Eur Spine J2013222318232423975440
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vassarstats.net [homepage on the Internet]Richard Lowry, Vassar CollegePoughkeepsie, NY1998–2014 Available from www.vassarstats.netLast accessed January 31, 2014
   Google Scholar
• HochbergYA sharper Bonferroni procedure for multiple tests of significanceBiometrika198875800802
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BuchowskiJMKebaishKMSinkovVFunctional and radiographic outcome of sacroiliac arthrodesis for the disorders of the sacroiliac jointSpine J2005552052816153580
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KhuranaAGuhaARMohantyKPercutaneous fusion of the sacroiliac joint with hollow modular anchorage screws: clinical and radiological outcomeJ Bone Joint Surg Br20099162763119407297
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• RudolfLSacroiliac joint arthrodesis – MIS technique with titanium implants: report of the first 50 patients and outcomesOpen Orthop J2012649550223284593
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• RudolfLMIS fusion of the SI joint: Does prior lumbar spinal fusion affect patient outcomes?Open Orthop J2013716316823730380
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• WiseCLDallBEMinimally invasive sacroiliac arthrodesis: outcomes of a new techniqueJ Spinal Disord Tech20082157958419057252
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CopayAGGlassmanSDSubachBRMinimum clinically important difference in lumbar spine surgery patients: a choice of methods using the Oswestry Disability Index, Medical Outcomes Study questionnaire Short Form 36, and pain scalesSpine J2008896897418201937
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GatchelRJMayerTGChouRWhat does/should the minimum clinically important difference measure? A reconsideration of its clinical value in evaluating efficacy of lumbar fusion surgeryClin J Pain20122838739722395333
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LauridsenHHHartvigsenJMannicheCResponsiveness and minimal clinically important difference for pain and disability instruments in low back pain patientsBMC Musculoskelet Disord200678217064410
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CarreonLYBratcherKRCananCEDifferentiating minimum clinically important difference for primary and revision lumbar fusion surgeriesJ Neurosurg Spine20121810210623157276
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ElgafyHSemaanHBEbraheimNAComputed tomography findings in patients with sacroiliac painClin Orthop200138211211811153977
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HaKYLeeJSKimKWDegeneration of sacroiliac joint after instrumented lumbar or lumbosacral fusion: a prospective cohort study over five-year follow-upSpine2008331192119818469692
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MasonLWChopraIMohantyKThe percutaneous stabilisation of the sacroiliac joint with hollow modular anchorage screws: a prospective outcome studyEur Spine J201322102325233123686478
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CummingsJJrCapobiancoRAMinimally invasive sacroiliac joint fusion: one-year outcomes in 18 patientsAnn Surg Innov Res201371224040944
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• SachsDCapobiancoRMinimally invasive sacroiliac joint fusion: one-year outcomes in 40 patientsAdv Orthop2013201353612823997957
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• CarreonLYGlassmanSDHowardJFusion and nonsurgical treatment for symptomatic lumbar degenerative disease: a systematic review of Oswestry Disability Index and MOS Short Form-36 outcomesSpine J2008874775518037354
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PollockRLakkolSBudithiCEffect of psychological status on outcome of posterior lumbar interbody fusion surgeryAsian Spine J2012617818222977697
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• WebsterBSVermaSPranskyGSOutcomes of workers’ compensation claimants with low back pain undergoing intradiscal electrothermal therapySpine20042943544115094540
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CampbellPWynne-JonesGMullerSThe influence of employment social support for risk and prognosis in nonspecific back pain: a systematic review and critical synthesisInt Arch Occup Environ Health20128611913722875173
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MrozTENorvellDCEckerEFusion versus nonoperative management for chronic low back pain: do sociodemographic factors affect outcome?Spine201136S75S8621952191
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LedonioCGPollyDWJrSwiontkowskiMFMinimally invasive versus open sacroiliac joint fusion: are they similarly safe and effective? Clin Orthop Relat ResJune2014472618311838
   Google Scholar