A new device used in the restoration of kinematics after total facet arthroplasty

References

• StrömqvistBFritzellPHäggOJönssonBSandénBSwespine: the Swedish spines register: the 2012 reportEur Spine J201322495397423575657
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ChenCSFengCKChengCKTzengMJLiuCLChenWJBiomechanical analysis of the disc adjacent to posterolateral fusion with laminectomy in lumbar spineJ Spinal Disord Tech2005181586515687854
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• SearsWRSergidesIGKazemiNSmithMWhiteGJOsburgBIncidence and prevalence of surgery at segments adjacent to a previous posterior lumbar arthrodesisSpine J2011111112021168094
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SudoHOdaIAbumiKItoMKotaniYMinamiABiomechanical study on the effect of five different lumbar reconstruction techniques on adjacent-level intradiscal pressure and lamina strainJ Neurosurg Spine20065215015516925082
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MulhollandRCSenguptaDKRationale, principles and experimental evaluation of the concept of soft stabilizationEur Spine J200211 Suppl 2S198S20512384745
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• StollTMDuboisGSchwarzenbachOThe dynamic neutralization system for the spine: a multi-center study of a novel non-fusion systemEur Spine J200211 Suppl 2S170S17812384741
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ZhuQLarsonCRSjovoldSGBiomechanical evaluation of the Total Facet Arthroplasty System: 3-dimensional kinematicsSpine (Phila Pa 1976)2007321556217202893
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PhillipsFMTzermiadianosMNVoronovLIEffect of the Total Facet Arthroplasty System after complete laminectomy-facetectomy on the biomechanics of implanted and adjacent segmentsSpine J2009919610218440280
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FairbankJCPynsentPBThe Oswestry Disability IndexSpine200025222940295311074683
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WebbSBrownCVSachsBLTotal facet arthroplasty in the treatment of spinal stenosis: reports from an ongoing IDE clinical trialPoster presented at: 7th Annual SAS Global Symposium on Motion Preservation TechnologyMay 1–5, 2007Berlin, Germany
   Google Scholar
• PrejbeanuRBraneaIVermesanDVermesanHPoenaruDVWebbSThe Total Facet Arthroplasty System (TFAS) in the treatment of lumbar stenosis: medium term clinical results on 20 casesPoster presented at: 8th Annual SAS Global Symposium on Motion Preservation TechnologyMay 6–9, 2008Miami, FL
   Google Scholar
• SjovoldSGZhuQBowdenABiomechanical evaluation of the Total Facet Arthroplasty System® (TFAS®): loading as compared to a rigid posterior instrumentation systemEur Spine J20122181660167322407270
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CopayAGGlassmanSDSubachBRBervenSSchulerTCCarreonLYMinimum clinically important difference in lumbar spine surgery patients: a choice of methods using the Oswestry Disability Index, Medical Outcomes Study questionnaire Short Form 36, and pain scalesSpine J20088696897418201937
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OkudaSMiyauchiAOdaTHakuTYamamotoTIwasakiMSurgical complications of posterior lumbar interbody fusion with total facetectomy in 251 patientsJ Neurosurg Spine20064430430916619677
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WeiseLSuessOPichtTKombosTTranspedicular screw fixation in the thoracic and lumbar spine with a novel cannulated polyaxial screw systemMed Devices (Auckl)20081333922915906
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• LeeCSHwangCJLeeSWRisk factors for adjacent segment disease after lumbar fusionEur Spine J200918111637164319533182
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• VagaSBrayda-BrunoMPeronaFMolecular MR imaging for the evaluation of the effect of dynamic stabilization on lumbar intervertebral discsEur Spine J200918 Suppl 1404819396475
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MagureanuMVermesanDPrejbeanuRTransforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) – current concepts and development of a new implant to restore lordosisMed Connect2013844550
   Google Scholar
• NiosiCAZhuQAWilsonDCKeynanOWilsonDROxlandTRBiomechanical characterization of the three-dimensional kinematic behaviour of the Dynesys dynamic stabilization system: an in vitro studyEur Spine J200615691392216217663
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SchmoelzWHuberJFNydeggerTClaesLWilkeHJInfluence of a dynamic stabilisation system on load bearing of a bridged disc: an in vitro study of intradiscal pressureEur Spine J20061581276128516429291
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DelankKSGercekEKuhnSHow does spinal canal decompression and dorsal stabilization affect segmental mobility? A biomechanical studyArch Orthop Trauma Surg2010130228529219936771
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KumarABeastallJHughesJDisc changes in the bridged and adjacent segments after Dynesys dynamic stabilization system after two yearsSpine (Phila Pa 1976)200833262909291419092623
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SchaerenSBrogerIJeanneretBMinimum four-year follow-up of spinal stenosis with degenerative spondylolisthesis treated with decompression and dynamic stabilizationSpine (Phila Pa 1976)20083318E636E64218708915
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HoppeSSchwarzenbachOAghayevEBonelHBerlemannULong-term outcome after monosegmental L4/5 stabilization for degenerative spondylolisthesis with the Dynesys deviceJ Spinal Disord Tech Epub10162012
   Google Scholar
• HaddadBMakkiDKonanSParkDKhanWOkaforBDynesys dynamic stabilization: less good outcome than lumbar fusion at 4-year follow-upActa Orthop Belg20137919710323547523
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SchwarzenbachOBerlemannUStollTMDuboisGPosterior dynamic stabilization systems: DYNESYSOrthop Clin North Am200536336337215950696
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• TanJSBaileyCSDvorakMFFisherCGCriptonPAOxlandTRCement augmentation of vertebral screws enhances the interface strength between interbody device and vertebral bodySpine (Phila Pa 1976)200732333434117268265
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar