Surgical stapling device–tissue interactions: what surgeons need to know to improve patient outcomes

References

• OffodileACFeingoldDLNasarAWhelanRLArnellTDHigh incidence of technical errors involving the EEA circular stapler: a single institution experienceJ Am Coll Surg2010210333133520193897
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CollopyBTColorectal anastomotic leak rates are measures of technical skill in surgeryANZ J Surg200171950851011527258
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BakerRSFooteJKemmeterPThe science of stapling and leaksObesity surgery200414101290129815603641
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ChekanEWhelanRLFengAHDevice-tissue interactions: a collaborative communications systemAnn Surg Innov Res2013711023895104
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• KimMKParkJMChoiYSChiKCSmaller-diameter circular stapler has an advantage in Billroth I stapled anastomosis after laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomyJ Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A201222323624122166246
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernández-FernándezLTejeroETiesoAInfluence of cartridge size on the morbidity of esophagojejunal anastomosis with EEA stapling devicesDigestive Surg1995124235237
   Google Scholar
• BerrisfordRGPageRDDonnellyRJStapler design and strictures at the esophagogastric anastomosisJ Thorac Cardiovasc Surg199611111421468551759
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PetrinGRuolABattagliaGAnastomotic stenoses occurring after circular stapling in esophageal cancer surgerySurg Endosc200014767067410948307
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• YendamuriSGutierrezLOniADoes circular stapled esophagogastric anastomotic size affect the incidence of postoperative strictures?J Surg Res201116511421067773
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AhadAWTilakJReissDPilcherJImpact of gastro-jejunostomy diameter on complications and weight loss after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass over a 5-year periodPoster presented at Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons MeetingMarch 30–April 2, 2011San Antonio, Texas: Poster PO46. SAGES [webpage on the Internet] Available from: http://www.sages.org/meetings/annual-meeting/abstracts-archive/impact-of-gastro-jejunostomy-diameter-on-complications-and-weight-loss-after-roux-en-y-gastric-bypass-over-a-5-year-period/Accessed April 16, 2014
   Google Scholar
• CoriglianoNVeyrieNAbdelhalimAStephaneSLloret LinaresCBouillotJLaparoscopic degastro-gastric bypass for gastrojejunal anastomotic stricture: report of a case (video)Obes Surg2009191072.V-1034
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CottamDRFisherBSridharVAtkinsonJDallalRThe effect of stoma size on weight loss after laparoscopic gastric bypass surgery: results of a blinded randomized controlled trialObes Surg2009191131719002741
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FisherBLAtkinsonJDCottamDIncidence of gastroenterostomy stenosis in laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass using 21- or 25-mm circular stapler: a randomized prospective blinded studySurg Obes Relat Dis20073217617917331806
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GouldJCGarrenMBollVStarlingJThe impact of circular stapler diameter on the incidence of gastrojejunostomy stenosis and weight loss following laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypassSurg Endosc20062071017102016763928
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KimJSChoSYMinBSKimNKRisk factors for anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic intracorporeal colorectal anastomosis with a double stapling techniqueJ Am Coll Surg2009209669470119959036
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NguyenNTStevensCMWolfeBMIncidence and outcome of anastomotic stricture after laparoscopic gastric bypassJ Gastrointest Surg2003789971003 discussion 100314675709
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SmithCGarrenMGouldJImpact of gastrojejunostomy diameter on long-term weight loss following laparoscopic gastric bypass: a follow-up studySurg Endosc20112572164216721184107
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SuggsWJKouliWLupoviciMChauWYBrolinREComplications at gastrojejunostomy after laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: comparison between 21- and 25-mm circular staplersSurg Obes Relat Dis20073550851417686661
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• TakataMCCiovicaRCelloJPPosseltAMRogersSJCamposGMPredictors, treatment, and outcomes of gastrojejunostomy stricture after gastric bypass for morbid obesityObes Surg200717787888417894145
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• TokunagaYRyoJKitaokaAYagiTTokukaAOhsumiKJejunal pouch to avoid stricture after esophagojejunostomy with circular staplerJ Am Coll Surg1999189546646910549735
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• VignaliAFazioVWLaveryICFactors associated with the occurrence of leaks in stapled rectal anastomoses: a review of 1,014 patientsJ Am Coll Surg199718521051139249076
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HardyKJNon-suture anastomosis: the historical developmentAust N Z J Surg19906086256332202284
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• AstafievGVInvestigation of processes relating to tissue compression in suturing and stapling apparatusChirurgicheskiey Shivayushiye Apparaty196772231
   Google Scholar
• SakranNAssaliaASternbergASmaller staple height for circular stapled gastrojejunostomy in laparoscopic gastric bypass: early results in 1,074 morbidly obese patientsObes Surg201121223824321082289
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MyersSRRothermelWSJrShafferLThe effect of tissue compression on circular stapler line failureSurg Endosc20112593043304921487874
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HannaKSederCWChengelisDMcCulloughPAKrauseKShorter circular staple is height associated with lower anastomotic stricture rate in laparoscopic gastric bypassSurg Obes Relat Dis20128218118421798822
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NguyenNTDakinGNeedlemanBEffect of staple height on gastrojejunostomy during laparoscopic gastric bypass: a multicenter prospective randomized trialSurg Obes Relat Dis20106547748220870179
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ElarinyHGonzálezHWangBTissue thickness of human stomach measured on excised gastric specimens from obese patientsSurg Technol Int20051411912416525963
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• OkanoKOshimaMKakinokiKPancreatic thickness as a predictive factor for postoperative pancreatic fistula after distal pancreatectomy using an endopath staplerSurg Today201343214114722782593
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NakayamaSHasegawaSNagayamaSThe importance of precompression time for secure stapling with a linear staplerSurg Endosc20112572382238621184102
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NakamuraMUedaJKohnoHProlonged peri-firing compression with a linear stapler prevents pancreatic fistula in laparoscopic distal pancreatectomySurg Endosc201125386787120730447
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SchwaitzbergSDJonesDBDon’t get burned from lack of knowledgeAnn Surg2012256221922022750755
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FeldmanLSFuchshuberPJonesDBMischnaJSchwaitzbergSDFUSE (Fundamental Use of Surgical Energy™) Task Force. Surgeons don’t know what they don’t know about the safe use of energy in surgerySurg Endosc201226102735273922538677
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCollRJKarmaliSResoAPaolucciEShermanVThe effect of a focused instructional session on knowledge of surgical staplers in general surgery residentsJ Surg Educ200966528829120005503
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• ÇakabayBAkselBÜnalEInfluence of the stapler size used in esophagojejunostomy anastomosis: anastomotic leak and strictures after total gastrectomyTurkiye Klinikleri J Med Sci2012322428431
   Google Scholar
• McManusKGRitchieAJMcGuiganJStevensonHMGibbonsJRSutures, staplers, leaks and strictures. A review of anastomoses in oesophageal resection at Royal Victoria Hospital, Belfast 1977–1986Eur J Cardiothorac Surg199042971002184859
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KarmaliSJohnson StoklossaCSharmaABariatric surgery: a primerCan Fam Physician201056987387920841586
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BirkmeyerNJDimickJBShareDMichigan Bariatric Surgery CollaborativeHospital complication rates with bariatric surgery in MichiganJAMA2010304443544220664044
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KinghamTPPachterHLColonic anastomotic leak: risk factors, diagnosis, and treatmentJ Am Coll Surg2009208226927819228539
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MerkelSWangWYSchmidtOLocoregional recurrence in patients with anastomotic leakage after anterior resection for rectal carcinomaColorectal Dis20013315416012790981
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• BellSWWalkerKGRickardMJAnastomotic leakage after curative anterior resection results in a higher prevalence of local recurrenceBr J Surg200390101261126614515297
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NesbakkenANygaardKLundeOCOutcome and late functional results after anastomotic leakage following mesorectal excision for rectal cancerBr J Surg200188340040411260107
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacariMBalthazarEJCT of bowel wall thickening: significance and pitfalls of interpretationAJR Am J Roentgenol200117651105111611312162
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LeroyJJamaliFForbesLLaparoscopic total mesorectal excision (TME) for rectal cancer surgery: long-term outcomesSurg Endosc200418228128914691716
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MariFSGasparriniMNigriGCan a curved stapler made for open surgery be useful in laparoscopic lower rectal resections? Technique and experience of a single centreSurgeon201311Suppl 1S23S2623182656
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• DetryRJKartheuserADelriviereLSabaJKestensPJUse of the circular stapler in 1000 consecutive colorectal anastomoses: experience of one surgical teamSurgery199511721401457846617
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EdwardsDPSextonRHealdRJMoranBJLong-term results show triple stapling facilitates safe low colorectal and coloanal anastomosis and is associated with low rates of local recurrence after anterior resection for rectal cancerTech Coloproctol2007111172117357861
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• PickensAEndoscopic thoracic surgery for lung cancer: mastering tools to optimize patient outcomes2011General Surgery News [webpage on the Internet] Available from: http://www.generalsurgerynews.com/ViewArticle.aspx?d=Procedural+Breakthrough&d_id=267&i=June2011&i_id=736&a_id=17235Accessed April 16, 2014
   Google Scholar
• SakuragiTOhtekiHThe utility of BiClamp(®) for intraoperative air leakage control in video-assisted thoracic surgery for pulmonary lobectomyGen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg2012601178178322790900
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• HuntBMAyeRWProlonged air leak after lung resectionCurr Respir Med Rev201284280284
   Google Scholar
• BhatnagarNKBerndtSA solution to prolonged air leak after video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomyAnn Thorac Surg19955912602617818347
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OkerekeIMurthySCAlsterJMBlackstoneEHRiceTWCharacterization and importance of air leak after lobectomyAnn Thorac Surg20057941167117315797045
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AokiTOzekiYWatanabeMTanakaSCartilage folding method for main bronchial staplingAnn Thorac Surg1998656180018019647116
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PaulSAltorkiNKShengSThoracoscopic lobectomy is associated with lower morbidity than open lobectomy: a propensity-matched analysis from the STS databaseJ Thorac Cardiovasc Surg2010139236637820106398
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• VillamizarNRDarrabieMDBurfeindWRThoracoscopic lobectomy is associated with lower morbidity compared with thoracotomyJ Thorac Cardiovasc Surg2009138241942519619789
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SwansonSJMeyersBFGunnarssonCLVideo-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy is less costly and morbid than open lobectomy: a retrospective multiinstitutional database analysisAnn Thorac Surg20129341027103222130269
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ParkBJIs surgical morbidity decreased with minimally invasive lobectomy?Cancer J2011171182221263262
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GossotDMerluscaGTudorABoudayaMSRaduCMagdeleinatPPitfalls related to the use of endostaplers during video-assisted thoracic surgerySurg Endosc200923118919218322748
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GonzalezHAvimuktaKHallSData on file. Comparison of the number of malformed staple legs in 2–5 mm thick excised porcine stomach of the covidien Endo GIA Universal Roticulator 60 and the Ethicon Endo-Surgery Echelon FLEX 60 endoscopic linear surgical staplersWhite paperETHICON ENDO-SURGERY, INCCincinnati, Ohio2010
   Google Scholar
• AkiyoshiTUenoMFukunagaYIncidence of and risk factors for anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic anterior resection with intra-corporeal rectal transection and double-stapling technique anastomosis for rectal cancerAm J Surg2011202325926421871980
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar