Technical and radiological image quality comparison of different liquid crystal displays for radiology

Francina EM Dams2 Department of Radiology, Albert Schweitzer Hospital, Dordrecht, The NetherlandsCorrespondence[email protected]

K Y Esther Leung1 Medical Physics and Technology, Albert Schweitzer Hospital, Dordrecht, The Netherlands

Pieter HM van der Valk2 Department of Radiology, Albert Schweitzer Hospital, Dordrecht, The Netherlands

Marc CJM Kock2 Department of Radiology, Albert Schweitzer Hospital, Dordrecht, The Netherlands

Jeroen Bosman1 Medical Physics and Technology, Albert Schweitzer Hospital, Dordrecht, The Netherlands

Sjoerd P Niehof1 Medical Physics and Technology, Albert Schweitzer Hospital, Dordrecht, The Netherlands

Pages 371-377 | Published online: 31 Oct 2014

Cite this article
CrossMark

Full Article
Figures & data
References
Citations
Metrics
Licensing
Reprints & Permissions
View PDF PDF

References

BreedenWKNorweckJTACR technical standard for electronic practice of medical imaging Available from: http://www.scribd.com/doc/89893486/ACR-Technical-Standard-for-Electronic-Practice-of-Medical-ImagingAccessed September 29, 2014
Google Scholar
FukushimaHIkedaMIshigakiTUsamiHShimamotoKInfluence of liquid crystal display monitors on observer performance for detection of diffuse pulmonary disease on chest radiographsRadiat Med200725521121717581709
PubMedGoogle Scholar
YamadaTSuzukiAUchiyamaNOhuchiNTakahashiSDiagnostic performance of detecting breast cancer on computed radiographic (CR) mammograms: comparison of hard copy film, 3-megapixel liquid-crystal-display (LCD) monitor and 5-megapixel LCD monitorEur Radiol200818112363236918491108
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
SaundersRSSameiEBakerJComparison of LCD and CRT displays based on efficacy for digital mammographyAcad Radiol200613111317132617070449
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
SameiEPoollaAUlisseyMJLewinJMDigital mammography: comparative performance of color LCD and monochrome CRT displaysAcad Radiol200714553954617434067
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
KurokiHKatayamaRSakaguchiTMaedaTMorishitaJHayabuchiNEvaluation of image quality using the normalized-rank approach for primary class liquid-crystal display (LCD) monitors with different colors and resolutionNihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi201066111423143121099172
PubMedGoogle Scholar
SimLMantheyKEsdailePBensonMComparison of computer display monitors for computed radiography diagnostic application in a radiology PACSAustralas Phys Eng Sci Med200427314815015580844
PubMedGoogle Scholar
TakahashiKMorishitaJHiwasaTComparison of detectability of a simple object with low contrast displayed on a high-brightness color LCD and a monochrome LCDRadiol Phys Technol20103217818420821093
PubMedGoogle Scholar
GeijerHGeijerMForsbergLKheddacheSSundPComparison of color LCD and medical-grade monochrome LCD displays in diagnostic radiologyJ Digit Imaging200720211412117340227
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
SimLMantheyKStuckeySComparison of performance of computer display monitors for radiological diagnosis; “diagnostic” high brightness monochrome LCD, 3MP vs “clinical review” color LCD, 2MPAustralas Phys Eng Sci Med200730210110417682398
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
UsamiHIkedaMIshigakiTFukushimaHShimamotoKThe influence of liquid crystal display (LCD) monitors on observer performance for the detection of nodular lesions on chest radiographsEur Radiol200616372673216284772
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
KamitaniTYabuuchiHMatsuoYDiagnostic performance in differentiation of breast lesion on digital mammograms: comparison among hard-copy film, 3-megapixel LCD monitor, and 5-megapixel LCD monitorClin Imaging201135534134521872122
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
SameiERangerNTDelongDMA comparative contrast-detail study of five medical displaysMed Phys20083541358136418491530
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
KamitaniTYabuuchiHSoedaHDetection of masses and microcalcifications of breast cancer on digital mammograms: comparison among hard-copy film, 3-megapixel liquid crystal display (LCD) monitors and 5-megapixel LCD monitors: an observer performance studyEur Radiol20071751365137117093968
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
LangerSFetterlyKMandrekarJROC study of four LCD displays under typical medical center lighting conditionsJ Digit Imaging2006191304016249836
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
BacherKSmeetsPDe HauwereAImage quality performance of liquid crystal display systems: influence of display resolution, magnification and window settings on contrast-detail detectionEur J Radiol200658347147916442770
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
CrespiABonsignoreFParucciniNMacchiIGrayscale calibration and quality assurance of diagnostic monitors in a PACS systemRadiol Med2006111686387516896553
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
KawasumiYYamadaTOtaHHigh-resolution monochrome liquid crystal display versus efficient household color liquid crystal display: comparison of their diagnostic performance with unenhanced CT images in focal liver lesionsEur Radiol200818102148215418463876
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
SameiEBadanoAChakrabortyDAssessment of display performance for medical imaging systems: executive summary of AAPM TG18 reportMed Phys20053241205122515895604
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
ChapmanCRCaseyKLDubnerRFoleyKMGraceleyRHReadingAEPain measurement: an overviewPain19852211314011282
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
FetterlyKABlumeHRFlynnMJSameiEIntroduction to grayscale calibration and related aspects of medical imaging grade liquid crystal displaysJ Digit Imaging200821219320717333412
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
JungHKimHJKangWSAssessment of flat panel LCD primary class display performance based on AAPM TG 18 acceptance protocolMed Phys20043172155216415305470
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar

Share icon
Back to Top

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.

People also read
Recommended articles
Cited by

To cite this article:

Reference style: APA Chicago Harvard

Citation copied to clipboard

Reference styles above use APA (6th edition), Chicago (16th edition) & Harvard (10th edition)

Download citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by citation management software including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks and Reference Manager.

Choose format: RIS BibTex RefWorks Direct Export

Choose options: Citation Citation & abstract Citation & references

Technical and radiological image quality comparison of different liquid crystal displays for radiology

References

Information for

Open access

Opportunities

Help and information

Your download is now in progress and you may close this window

Login or register to access this feature

Technical and radiological image quality comparison of different liquid crystal displays for radiology

References

Related research

To cite this article:

Download citation

Information for

Open access

Opportunities

Help and information

Keep up to date