Artificial urinary sphincters for male stress urinary incontinence: current perspectives

References

• LandefeldCSBowersBJFeldADNational Institutes of Health state-of-the-science conference statement: prevention of fecal and urinary incontinence in adultsAnn Intern Med2008148644945818268289
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MarklandADGoodePSReddenDTBorrudLGBurgioKLPrevalence of urinary incontinence in men: results from the national health and nutrition examination surveyJ Urol201018431022102720643440
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FoleyFEAn artificial sphincter; a new device and operation for control of enuresis and urinary incontinenceJ Urol194758425025920266239
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LeibovichBCBarrettDMUse of the artificial urinary sphincter in men and womenWorld J Urol19971553163199372584
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LightJKReynoldsJCImpact of the new cuff design on reliability of the AS800 artificial urinary sphincterJ Urol199214736096111538439
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HudakSJMoreyAFImpact of 3.5 cm artificial urinary sphincter cuff on primary and revision surgery for male stress urinary incontinenceJ Urol201118651962196621944140
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SimhanJMoreyAFSinglaN3.5 cm artificial urinary sphincter cuff erosion occurs predominantly in irradiated patientsJ Urol2015193259359725106901
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ElliottDSBarrettDMMayo Clinic long-term analysis of the functional durability of the AMS 800 artificial urinary sphincter: a review of 323 casesJ Urol19981594120612089507835
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MoreyAFCefaluCAHudakSJHigh submuscular placement of urologic prosthetic balloons and reservoirs via transscrotal approachJ Sex Med201310260361023216955
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SinglaNSiegelJASimhanJDoes pressure regulating balloon location make a difference in functional outcomes of artificial urinary sphincter?J Urol2015194120220625711196
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BiardeauXAharonySAUS Consensus GroupCampeauLCorcosJArtificial urinary sphincter: report of the 2015 consensus conferenceNeurourol Urodyn201635suppl 2S8S2427064055
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LeeRTeAEKaplanSASandhuJSTemporal trends in adoption of and indications for the artificial urinary sphincterJ Urol200918162622262719375102
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FicarraVNovaraGRosenRCSystematic review and meta-analysis of studies reporting urinary continence recovery after robot-assisted radical prostatectomyEur Urol201262340541722749852
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CrivellaroSMorlaccoABodoGSystematic review of surgical treatment of post radical prostatectomy stress urinary incontinenceNeurourol Urodyn Epub2015923
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ComiterCVDobberfuhlADThe artificial urinary sphincter and male sling for postprostatectomy incontinence: which patient should get which procedure?Investig Clin Urol2016571313
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RamsayAKGranitsiotisPConnIGThe use of the artificial urinary sphincter in the West of Scotland: a single centre 10-year experienceScott Med J2007522141717536635
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WalshIKWilliamsSGMahendraVNambirajanTStoneARArtificial urinary sphincter implantation in the irradiated patient: safety, efficacy and satisfactionBJU Int200289436436811872025
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’ConnorRCLyonMBGuralnickMLBalesGTLong-term followup of single versus double cuff artificial urinary sphincter insertion for the treatment of severe postprostatectomy stress urinary incontinenceUrology2008711909318242372
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ImamogluMATuygunCBakirtasHYigitbasiOKiperAThe comparison of artificial urinary sphincter implantation and endourethral macroplastique injection for the treatment of postprostatectomy incontinenceEur Urol200547220921315661416
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AaronsonDSElliottSPMcAninchJWTranscorporal artificial urinary sphincter placement for incontinence in high-risk patients after treatment of prostate cancerUrology200872482582718752838
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MottetNBoyerCChartier-KastlerEBen NaoumKRichardFCostaPArtificial urinary sphincter AMS 800 for urinary incontinence after radical prostatectomy: the French experienceUrol Int199860suppl 22529 discussion 359607555
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’ConnorRCNanigianDKPatelBNGuralnickMLEllisionLMStoneARArtificial urinary sphincter placement in elderly menUrology200769112612817270633
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van der AaFDrakeMJKasyanGRPetrolekasACornuJNYoung Academic Urologists Functional Urology GroupThe artificial urinary sphincter after a quarter of a century: a critical systematic review of its use in male non-neurogenic incontinenceEur Urol201363468168923219375
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GousseAEMadjarSLambertMMFishmanIJArtificial urinary sphincter for post-radical prostatectomy urinary incontinence: long-term subjective resultsJ Urol200116651755175811586217
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LitwillerSEKimKBFonePDWhiteRWStoneARPost-prostatectomy incontinence and the artificial urinary sphincter: a long-term study of patient satisfaction and criteria for successJ Urol19961566197519808911369
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MontagueDKArtificial urinary sphincter: long-term results and patient satisfactionAdv Urol2012201283529022536227
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• MontagueDKAngermeierKWPaoloneDRLong-term continence and patient satisfaction after artificial sphincter implantation for urinary incontinence after prostatectomyJ Urol2001166254754911458065
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SantucciRAParkCHMayoMELangePHContinence and urodynamic parameters of continent urinary reservoirs: comparison of gastric, ileal, ileocolic, right colon, and sigmoid segmentsUrology199954225225710443720
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HautmannREde PetriconiRGottfriedHWKleinschmidtKMattesRPaissTThe ileal neobladder: complications and functional results in 363 patients after 11 years of followupJ Urol19991612422427 discussion 427–4289915417
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• VainribMSimma-ChiangVBoydSDGinsbergDAPotential risk factors and outcomes of artificial urinary sphincter placement after radical cystectomy and orthotopic neobladder urinary diversionNeurourol Urodyn20133271010101323595916
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de CogainMRElliottDSThe impact of an antibiotic coating on the artificial urinary sphincter infection rateJ Urol2013190111311723313209
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BordenaveMRoupretMTaksinLRésultats à long terme du traitement de l’incontinence urinaire masculine par implantation de sphincter artificiel urinaire (AMS 800) en position bulbaire: expérience monocentrique [Long-term results of the treatment of urinary incontinence with bulbar implantation of artificial urinary sphincter in men: a single-center experience]Prog Urol2011214277282 French21482403
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MontagueDKAngermeierKWPostprostatectomy urinary incontinence: the case for artificial urinary sphincter implantationUrology20005512410654883
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SuarezOAMcCammonKAThe artificial urinary sphincter in the management of incontinenceUrology201692141926845050
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HajivassiliouCAA review of the complications and results of implantation of the AMS artificial urinary sphincterEur Urol199935136449933793
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RajGVPetersonACTohKLWebsterGDOutcomes following revisions and secondary implantation of the artificial urinary sphincterJ Urol200517341242124515758761
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RajGVPetersonACWebsterGDOutcomes following erosions of the artificial urinary sphincterJ Urol2006175621862190 discussion 219016697836
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MageraJSJrElliottDSArtificial urinary sphincter infection: causative organisms in a contemporary seriesJ Urol200818062475247818930496
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LinderBJPiotrowskiJTZiegelmannMJRiveraMERangelLJElliottDSPerioperative complications following artificial urinary sphincter placementJ Urol2015194371672025776908
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LaiHHHsuEITehBSButlerEBBooneTB13 years of experience with artificial urinary sphincter implantation at Baylor College of MedicineJ Urol200717731021102517296403
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BrantWOEricksonBAElliottSPRisk factors for erosion of artificial urinary sphincters: a multicenter prospective studyUrology201484493493825109562
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGeadyJBMcAninchJWTruesdaleMDBlaschkoSDKenfieldSBreyerBNArtificial urinary sphincter placement in compromised urethras and survival: a comparison of virgin, radiated and reoperative casesJ Urol201419261756176125014577
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SinglaNSinglaAKReview of single-surgeon 10-year experience with artificial urinary sphincter with report of sterile cuff erosion managed nonsurgicallyUrology201585125225625530393
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RozanskiATTauschTJRamirezDSimhanJScottJFMoreyAFImmediate urethral repair during explantation prevents stricture formation after artificial urinary sphincter cuff erosionJ Urol2014192244244624512955
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BatesASMartinRMTerryTRComplications following artificial urinary sphincter placement after radical prostatectomy and radiotherapy: a meta-analysisBJU Int2015116462363325601072
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RavierEFassi-FehriHCrouzetSGeletAAbidNMartinXComplications after artificial urinary sphincter implantation in patients with or without prior radiotherapyBJU Int2015115230030724731208
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LinderBJRiveraMEZiegelmannMJElliottDSLong-term outcomes following artificial urinary sphincter placement: an analysis of 1082 cases at mayo clinicUrology201586360260726135815
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EswaraJRChanRVetterJMLaiHHBooneTBBrandesSBRevision techniques after artificial urinary sphincter failure in men: results from a multicenter studyUrology201586117618026142602
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KavoussiLNovickACPartinAWPetersCACampbell-Walsh Urology10th edPhiladelphia, PAElsevier Saunders2011
   Google Scholar
• LeonPChartier-KastlerERoupretMAmbrogiVMozerPPheVLong-term functional outcomes after artificial urinary sphincter implantation in men with stress urinary incontinenceBJU Int2015115695195724958004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• VennSNGreenwellTJMundyARThe long-term outcome of artificial urinary sphinctersJ Urol20001643 pt 1702706 discussion 706–70710953129
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KimSPSarmastZDaignaultSFaerberGJMcGuireEJLatiniJMLong-term durability and functional outcomes among patients with artificial urinary sphincters: a 10-year retrospective review from the University of MichiganJ Urol200817951912191618353376
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LaiHHBooneTBComplex artificial urinary sphincter revision and reimplantation cases – how do they fare compared to virgin cases?J Urol2012187395195522264456
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LinderBJde CogainMElliottDSLong-term device outcomes of artificial urinary sphincter reimplantation following prior explantation for erosion or infectionJ Urol2014191373473824018241
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ChertackNChaparalaHAngermeierKWMontagueDKWoodHMFoley or fix: a comparative analysis of reparative procedures at the time of explantation of artificial urinary sphincter for cuff erosionUrology20169017317826743390
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BritoCGMulcahyJJMitchellMEAdamsMCUse of a double cuff AMS800 urinary sphincter for severe stress incontinenceJ Urol199314922832858426402
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KabalinJNAddition of a second urethral cuff to enhance performance of the artificial urinary sphincterJ Urol19961564130213048808859
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KowalczykJJSpicerDLMulcahyJJErosion rate of the double cuff AMS800 artificial urinary sphincter: long-term followupJ Urol19961564130013018808858
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DiMarcoDSElliottDSTandem cuff artificial urinary sphincter as a salvage procedure following failed primary sphincter placement for the treatment of post-prostatectomy incontinenceJ Urol20031704 pt 11252125414501735
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’ConnorRCGerberGSAvilaDChenAABalesGTComparison of outcomes after single or DOUBLE-CUFF artificial urinary sphincter insertionUrology200362472372614550451
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MankaMGWrightEJDoes use of a second cuff improve artificial urinary sphincter effectiveness? Evaluation using a comparative cadaver modelJ Urol201519461688169126165585
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KowalczykJJSpicerDLMulcahyJJLong-term experience with the double-cuff AMS 800 artificial urinary sphincterUrology19964768958978677584
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GuralnickMLMillerETohKLWebsterGDTranscorporal artificial urinary sphincter cuff placement in cases requiring revision for erosion and urethral atrophyJ Urol2002167520752078 discussion 207911956443
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WiedemannLCornuJNHaabETranscorporal artificial urinary sphincter implantation as a salvage surgical procedure for challenging cases of male stress urinary incontinence: surgical technique and functional outcomes in a contemporary seriesBJU Int201311281163116824053170
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BlahMCaremelRSibertLBugelHGrisePTraitement de l’incontinence urinaire masculine par sphincter urinaire artificiel avec manchette intracaverneuse [Treatment of male urinary incontinence by artificial urinary sphincter with intracavernous cuff]Prog Urol2008182114119 French18396239
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LeeDZafirakisHShapiroAWestneyOLIntermediate outcomes after transcorporal placement of an artificial urinary sphincterInt J Urol201219986186622571275
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MageraJSJrElliottDSTandem transcorporal artificial urinary sphincter cuff salvage technique: surgical description and resultsJ Urol2007177310151019 discussion 1019–102017296400
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ComiterCSurgery for postprostatectomy incontinence: which procedure for which patient?Nat Rev Urol2015122919925558839
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ComiterCVSurgery insight: surgical management of postprostatectomy incontinence – the artificial urinary sphincter and male slingNat Clin Pract Urol200741161562417982438
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• ChristineBKnollLDTreatment of recurrent urinary incontinence after artificial urinary sphincter placement using the AdVance male slingUrology20107661321132420709374
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AbdouACornuJNSebePThérapie de sauvetage par implantation d’un sphincter artificiel urinaire après échec de bandelette Advance™ pour incontinence urinaire après prostatectomie: une expérience monocentrique [Salvage therapy with artificial urinary sphincter after advance male sling failure for post-prostatectomy incontinence: a first clinical experience]Prog Urol20122211650656 French22999090
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KnightSLSusserJGreenwellTMundyARCraggsMDA new artificial urinary sphincter with conditional occlusion for stress urinary incontinence: preliminary clinical resultsEur Urol200650357458016720077
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• VakalopoulosIKampantaisSLaskaridisLChachopoulosVKoptsisMToutziarisCNew artificial urinary sphincter devices in the treatment of male iatrogenic incontinenceAdv Urol2012201243937222567002
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• CraggsMDChaffeyNJMundyARA preliminary report on a new hydraulic sphincter for controlling urinary incontinenceJ Med Eng Technol199115258621875383
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RodriguezDAAscanioEFVicensVAGarcia-MontesFFour years experience with the FlowSecure Artificial Urinary Sphincter. Problems and SolutionsProceedings of the 41st Annual Meeting of the International Continence Society (ICS ‘11)Glasgow, UKAugust 2011
   Google Scholar
• SchiaviniJLDamiaoRde Resende JuniorJADornasMCCruz Lima da CostaDSBarrosCBTreatment of post-prostate surgery urinary incontinence with the periurethral constrictor: a retrospective analysisUrology20107561488149220399484
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IntroiniCNaselliAZaninettaGSafety and efficacy of periurethral constrictor implantation for the treatment of post-radical prostatectomy incontinenceUrology20127951175117822546396
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• StaermanFG-LlorensCLeonPLeclercYZSI 375 artificial urinary sphincter for male urinary incontinence: a preliminary studyBJU Int20131114 pt BE202E20622937774
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MalaebBSElliottSPLeeJAndersonDWTimmGWNovel artificial urinary sphincter in the canine model: the tape mechanical occlusive deviceUrology201177121121621067799
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar