Shared decision making in psychiatric practice and the primary care setting is unique, as measured using a 9-item Shared Decision Making Questionnaire (SDM-Q-9)

Carlos De las Cuevas1 Department of Psychiatry, University of La Laguna, Tenerife, Spain;2 Health Services Research Network for Chronic Diseases (REDISSEC), Tenerife, SpainCorrespondence[email protected]

Wenceslao Peñate3 Department of Personality, Assessment and Psychological Treatments, University of La Laguna, Tenerife, Spain

Lilisbeth Perestelo-Pérez2 Health Services Research Network for Chronic Diseases (REDISSEC), Tenerife, Spain;4 Evaluation Unit, Canary Island Health Service, Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Spain

Pedro Serrano-Aguilar2 Health Services Research Network for Chronic Diseases (REDISSEC), Tenerife, Spain;4 Evaluation Unit, Canary Island Health Service, Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Spain

Pages 1045-1052 | Published online: 30 Jul 2013

Cite this article

Full Article
Figures & data
References
Citations
Metrics
Licensing
Reprints & Permissions
View PDF PDF

References

DeeganPEDrakeREShared decision making and medication management in the recovery processPsychiatr Serv200657111636163917085613
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
HamannJLeuchtSKisslingWShared decision making in psychiatryActa Psychiatr Scand2003107640340912752015
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
ElwynGEdwardsAKinnersleyPGrolRShared decision making and the concept of equipoise: the competences of involving patients in healthcare choicesBr J Gen Pract20005046089289911141876
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
HärterMShared decision making – from the point of view of patients, physicians and health politics is set in placeZ Arztl Fortbild Qualitatssich20049828992 German15106486
PubMedGoogle Scholar
ElwynGCharlesCShared Decision Making: From Conceptual Models to Implementation in Clinical PracticeShared Decision-Making in Health Care: Achieving evidence-based patient choiceEdwardsAElwynGOxford University pressNew York2009117121
Google Scholar
FentonWSShared decision making: a model for the physician-patient relationship in the 21st century?Acta Psychiatr Scand2003107640140212752014
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
PatelSRBakkenSRulandCRecent advances in shared decision making for mental healthCurr Opin Psychiatry200821660661218852569
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
SimonDWillsCEHärterMShared decision-making in mental healthShared Decision-Making in Health Care: Achieving evidence-based patient choiceEdwardsAElwynGOxford University pressNew York2009269276
Google Scholar
DrakeREDeeganPERappCThe promise of shared decision making in mental healthPsychiatr Rehabil J201034171320615839
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
Perestelo-PérezLGonzález-LorenzoMRivero-SantanaAJPérez-RamosJHerramientas de ayudapara la toma de decisiones de los pacientes con depresiónPlan de Calidad para el SNS del MSPSSESCS2010 Informes de ETS: SESCS N° 2007/04
Google Scholar
Perestelo-PerezLGonzalez-LorenzoMPerez-RamosJRivero-SantanaASerrano-AguilarPPatient involvement and shared decision-making in mental health careCurr Clin Pharmacol201162839021592063
PubMedGoogle Scholar
DuncanEBestCHagenSShared decision making interventions for people with mental health conditionsCochrane Database Syst Rev20101CD00729720091628
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
De las CuevasCRivero-SantanaAPerestelo-PérezLPérez-RamosJSerrano-AguilarPAttitudes toward concordance in psychiatry: a comparative, cross-sectional study of psychiatric patients and mental health professionalsBMC Psychiatry2012125322646974
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
De las CuevasCRiveroAPerestelo-PerezLGonzalezMPerezJPeñateWPsychiatric patients’ attitudes towards concordance and shared decision makingPatient Educ Couns2011853e245e25021454032
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
de Las CuevasCRivero-SantanaAPerestelo-PerezLMental health professionals’ attitudes to partnership in medicine taking: a validation study of the Leeds Attitude to Concordance Scale IIPharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf201221212312921956875
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
SimonDSchorrGWirtzMDevelopment and first validation of the shared decision-making questionnaire (SDM-Q)Patient Educ Couns200663331932716872793
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
KristonLSchollIHölzelLSimonDLohAHärterMThe 9-item Shared Decision Making Questionnaire (SDM-Q-9). Development and psychometric properties in a primary care samplePatient Educ Couns2010801949919879711
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
De las CuevasCPerestelo-PerezLRivero-SantanaACebolla-MartíASchollIHärterMValidation of the Spanish version of the 9-item Shared Decision Making QuestionnaireHealth Expect2013 (in press)
Web of Science ®Google Scholar
HamannJCohenRLeuchtSBuschRKisslingWDo patients with schizophrenia wish to be involved in decisions about their medical treatment?Am J Psychiatry2005162122382238416330606
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
AdamsJRDrakeREWolfordGLShared decision-making preferences of people with severe mental illnessPsychiatr Serv20075891219122117766569
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
O’NealELAdamsJRMcHugoGJVan CittersADDrakeREBartelsSJPreferences of older and younger adults with serious mental illness for involvement in decision-making in medical and psychiatric settingsAm J Geriatr Psychiatry2008161082683318827229
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
KendellRJablenskyADistinguishing between the validity and utility of psychiatric diagnosesAm J Psychiatry2003160141212505793
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
PatelSRBakkenSPreferences for participation in decision making among ethnically diverse patients with anxiety and depressionCommunity Ment Health J201046546647320556512
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
American Psychiatric AssociationDiagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders4th edWashingtonAmerican Psychiatric Association1994
Google Scholar
World Health OrganizationThe ICD-10 Classification of Mental and Behavioural Disorders. Clinical descriptions and diagnostic guidelinesGenevaWorld Health Organization1992 Available from: http://www.who.int/classifications/icd/en/bluebook.pdfAccessed September 1, 2012
Google Scholar
NevinRLLow validity of self-report in identifying recent mental health diagnosis among US service members completing Pre-Deployment Health Assessment (PreDHA) and deployed to Afghanistan, 2007: a retrospective cohort studyBMC Public Health2009937619811664
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
Delas CuevasCastresanaCGonzález de RiveraJLSelf-reports and Response BiasesAnPsiquiatría19928362366
Google Scholar

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.

People also read
Recommended articles
Cited by

To cite this article:

Reference style: APA Chicago Harvard

Citation copied to clipboard

Reference styles above use APA (6th edition), Chicago (16th edition) & Harvard (10th edition)

Download citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by citation management software including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks and Reference Manager.

Choose format: RIS BibTex RefWorks Direct Export

Choose options: Citation Citation & abstract Citation & references

Shared decision making in psychiatric practice and the primary care setting is unique, as measured using a 9-item Shared Decision Making Questionnaire (SDM-Q-9)

References

Information for

Open access

Opportunities

Help and information

Your download is now in progress and you may close this window

Login or register to access this feature

Shared decision making in psychiatric practice and the primary care setting is unique, as measured using a 9-item Shared Decision Making Questionnaire (SDM-Q-9)

References

Related research

To cite this article:

Download citation

Information for

Open access

Opportunities

Help and information

Keep up to date