16
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Research

Team learning and context; assessing the relationship between team-learning activities and contextual factors of team-learning environment and team-configurations

, , &
Pages 1-8 | Published online: 10 Oct 2011

References

  • Salas E, Cooke NJ, Rosen MA. On teams, teamwork, and team performance: discoveries and developments. Hum Factors. 2008;50(3):540–547.
  • Van Achterberg T, Schoonhoven L, Grol R. Nursing implementation science: how evidence-based nursing requires evidence-based implementation. J Nurs Sch. 2008;40(4):302–310.
  • Berta W, Teare GF, Gilbart E. et al. The contingencies of organizational learning in long-term care: factors that affect innovation adoption. Health Care Manage Rev. 2005;30(4):282–292.
  • Lemieux-Charles L, McGuire WL. What do we know about health care team effectiveness? a review of the literature. Med Care Res Rev. 2006; 63(3):263–300.
  • Carman JM, Shortell SM, Foster RW. et al. Keys for successful implementation of total quality management in hospitals. Health Care Manage Rev. 2010;35(4):283–293.
  • Blakeney B, McCarthy C, Coakley E. Unlocking the power of innovation. Online J Issues Nurs. 2009;14(2). doi: 10.3912/0JIN. V0l14No02Man01.
  • Van Linge R. Innoveren in de gezondheidszorg, theorie, prak-tijk en onderzoek (Innovation in health care, theory, practice and research). Maarssen, the Netherlands; Elsevier Gezondheidszorg; 2006.
  • Raisch S, Birkinshaw J. Organizational ambidexterity: antecedents, outcomes, and moderators. J Manage. 2008;34(3):375–409.
  • Holleman G, Poot E, Mintjes-de Groot J, Van Achterberg T. The relevance of team characteristics and team directed strategies in the implementation of nursing innovations: A literature review. Int J Nurs Stud. 2009;46(9):1256–1264.
  • Timmermans O, Van Linge R, Van Petegem P, Elseviers M, Denekens J. Team learning and team composition in Nursing. The Journal ofWorkplace Learning. 2011;23(4):258–275.
  • Kang SC, Snell SA. Intellectual capital architectures and ambidextrous learning: a framework for human resource management. Journal of Management Studies. 2009;46(1):65–92.
  • Sessa VL, London M. Work Group Learning: Understanding, Improving and Assessing how Groups Learn in Organizations. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 2007.
  • Miller DA. A preliminary typology of organizational learning: synthesizing the literature. J Manage. 1996;22(3):485–505.
  • Erdem M. Effects of learning style profile of team on quality of materials developed in collaborative learning processes. Active Learning in Higher Education. 2009;10(2):154–171.
  • Argyris C. On Organizational Learning. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing; 1999.
  • Edmondson AC, Dillon JR, Roloff KS. Chapter 6: Three Perspectives on Team Learning – Outcome Improvement, Task Mastery, and Group Process. Acad Manag Ann. 2007;1(1):269–314.
  • Heinemann GD, Zeiss AM. Team performance in health care: assessment and development. 1st ed. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers; 2002.
  • Edmondson AC, Bohmer RM, Pisano GP Disrupted routines: team learning and new technology implementation in hospitals. Adm Sci Q. 2001;46(4):685–716.
  • Bennett J. The relationship between team and organisational learning. Int J Health Care Qual Assur. 2001;14(1):14–21.
  • Van Wetten H, Kok I, Wagner CG. [Measurement of Outc ome s in Mental Health Care; study of implementation in mental health organizations]. Utrecht, the Netherlands: Nivell; 2005. Dutch.
  • Scheinn EH. Organizational culture and leadership. San Fransisco, CA: Jossey-Bass; 1992.
  • Quinn RE, Cameron K. Organizational life cycles and shifting criteria of effectiveness: some preliminary evidence. Manage Sci. 1983;29(1): 33–51.
  • Fox-Wasylyshyn SM, El-Masri MM. Handling missing data in self-report measures. Res Nurs Health. 2005;28(6):488–495.
  • Polit DF, Beck CT. Nursing Research: Principles and Methods. 7th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams and Wilkens; 2003.
  • Klein KJ, Kozlowski SWJ. From Micro to Meso: Critical Steps in Conceptualizing and Conducting Multilevel Research. Organizational Research Methods. 2000;3(3):211–236.
  • Van Woerkom M, Croon M. The relationships between team learning activities and team performance. Personnel Review. 2009;38(5):560–577.
  • Van Woerkom M, van Engen ML. Learning from conflicts? The relations between task and relationship conflicts, team learning and team performance. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology. 2009;18(4):381–404.
  • Bliese PD. Within-group agreement, non-independence, and reliability: Implications for data aggregation and analysis. In: Klein KJ, Kozlowski WJ, editors. Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass; 2000:349–381.
  • Nimon K, Lewis M, Kane R, Haynes RM. An R package to compute commonality coefficients in the multiple regression case: An introduction to the package and a practical example. Beha Res Methods. 2008; 40(2):457–466.
  • Argyris C. A life full of learning. Organization Studies. 2003;24(7): 1178–1192.
  • Nonaka I, Takeuchi H. The Knowledge Creating Company. New York: Oxford University Press; 1995.
  • Kalisch BJ, Lee H. Nursing teamwork, staff characteristics, work schedules, and staffing. Health Care Manage Rev 2009;34(4):323–333.
  • Illeris K. Contemporary theories of learning: Learning theorists ... in their own words. New York: Routledge; 2009.
  • Edmondson AC. Learning from failure in health care: frequent opportunities, pervasive barriers. Qual Saf Health Care. 2004;13(Suppl 2): ii3-ii9. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2003.009597.
  • Homan T, Radstake D. Teamleren, theorie en facilitatie [Team learning: Theory and Facilitation]. Schoonhoven, the Netherlands: Academic Service; 2001. Dutch.
  • Luby M, Riley JK, Towne G. Nursing research journal clubs: bridging the gap between practice and research. Medsurg Nurs. 2006;15(2):100–102.