18
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Methodology

Utilizing a logic model to identify clinical research problems: a lesson from philosophy of science

Pages 43-49 | Published online: 15 Feb 2024

References

  • DiBartolo MC. Philosophy of science in doctoral nursing education revisited. J Prof Nurs. 1998;14(6):350–360.
  • Hernandez CA. Student articulation of a nursing philosophical statement: an assignment to enhance critical thinking skills and promote learning. J Nurs Educ. 2009;48(6):343–349.
  • Butts JB, Lundy KS. Teaching philosophy of science in nursing doctoral education. J Nurs Scholarsh. 2003;35(1):87–91.
  • MacIntyre A. God, Philosophy, Universities: A Selective History of the Catholic Philosophical Tradition. Maryland: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc.; 2009.
  • Polit DF, Beck CT. Nursing Research: Generating and Assessing Evidence for Nursing Practice, 9th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Wolters Kluwer Health/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2012.
  • Toulmin S. The Uses of Argument. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1958.
  • Toulmin S. The Uses of Argument (Updated Ed.), Cambridge University Press; 2003.
  • Toulmin S. Rhetorical force of personal argumentation: the recovery of practical philosophy. The American Scholar. 2001.
  • Rodgers BL. Developing Nursing Knowledge: Philosophical Traditions and Influences. Philadelphia, PA: Wolters Kluwer Health/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2005.
  • Toulmin S. Human Understanding (Vol. 1), Princeton, NJ; 1972.
  • Driver R, Newton P, Osborne J. Establishing the norms of scientific argumentation in classrooms. Science. 2000;84(2):403–424.
  • Alison L, Smith M, Eastman O, Rainbow L. Toulmin’s philosophy of argument and its relevance to offender profiling. Psychology, Crime and Law. 2003;9(2):173–183.
  • Hagler D, Brem S. Reaching agreement: the structure and pragmatics of critical care nurses’ informal argument. Contemp Educ Psychol. 2008;33(3):403–424.
  • Glynn S, Britton BK, Muth D, Dogan N. Writing and revising persuasive documents: cognitive demands. J Educ Psychol. 1982;74(4): 557–567.
  • Britt MA, Larson AA. Constructing representations of arguments. J Mem Lang. 2003;48(4):794–810.
  • Rodriquez T, Kotarba JA. Postmodern philosophies of science: pathways to nursing reality. Southern Online J Nurs Res. 2009;9(1);1–5.
  • Giuliano KK. Expanding the use of empiricism in nursing: can we bridge the gap between knowledge and clinical practice? Nurs Philos. 2003;4(1):44–52.
  • Byrne PH. Analysis and Science in Aristotle. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press; 1997.
  • Whelton B. Nursing as a practical science: some insights from classical Aristotelian science. Nurs Philos. 2000;1:57–63.
  • Reed PG, Lawrence LA. A paradigm for the production of practice-based knowledge. J Nurs Manag. 2008;16(4):422–432.
  • McGee G. (Editorial) Will bioethics take the life of philosophy? Am J Bioeth. 2006;6(5):1–2.
  • Sellman D. Editorial. Nurs Philos. 2008;9(3):151–153.
  • Kourany JA. Getting philosophy of science socially connected. Philos Sci. 2006;73:991–1002.