Refinement of rigid-body protein–protein docking using backbone and side-chain minimization with a coarse-grained model

References

• Ritchie D. Recent progress and future directions in protein-protein docking. Cur Prot Pept Sci. 2008;9(1):1–15.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janin J. Welcome to capri: A Critical Assessment of PRedicted Interactions. Proteins. 2002;47(4):257–257.
   Google Scholar
• Mendez R, Leplae R, DeMaria L, Wodak S. Assessment of blind predictions of protein-protein interactions: Current status of docking methods. Proteins. 2003;52(1):51–67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lensink MF, Mendez R, Wodak SJ. Docking and scoring protein complexes: Capri 3rd edition. Proteins. 2007;69(4):704–718.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tozzini V Coarse-grained models for proteins. Curr Opin Struc Biol. 2005;15(2):144–150.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taketomi H, Ueda Y, Go N. Studies on protein folding, unfolding and fluctuations by computer simulations. Int J Pept Prot Res. 1975;7:445–459.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Liwo A, Oldziej S, Pincus MR, et al. A united-residue force field for off-lattice protein-structure simulations: I. Functional forms and parameters of long-range side-chain interaction potentials from protein crystal data. J Comput Chem. 1997;18(7):849–873.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liwo A, Pincus MR, Wawak RJ, et al. A united-residue force field for off-lattice protein-structure simulations: II. Parameterization of local interactions and determination of the weights of energy terms by z-score optimization. J Comput Chem. 1997;18(7):874–887.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liwo A, Kazmierkiewicz R, Czaplewski C, et al. United-residue force field for off-lattice protein-structure simulations: III. Origin of backbone hydrogen-bonding cooperativity in united-residue potentials. J Compu Chem. 1998;19(3):259–276.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liwo A, Czaplewski C, Pillardy J, Scheraga HA. Cumulant-based expressions for the multibody terms for the correlation between local and electrostatic interactions in the united-residue force field. J Chem Phys. 2001;115(5):2323–2347.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee J, Ripoll DR, Czaplewski C, et al. Optimization of parameters in macromolecular potential energy functions by conformational space annealing. J Phys Chem B. 2001;105(30):7291–7298.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pillardy J, Czaplewski C, Liwo A, et al. Development of physics-based energy functions that predict medium-resolution structures for proteins of the alpha, beta, and alpha/beta structural classes. J Phys Chem B. 2001;105(30):7299–7311.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oldziej S, Kozlowska U, Liwo A, Scheraga HA. Determination of the potentials of mean force for rotation about Ca-Ca virtual bonds in polypeptides from the ab initio energy surfaces of terminally blocked glycine, alanine, and proline. J Phys Chem A. 2003;107(40):8035–8046.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liwo A, Oldziej S, Czaplewski C, Kozlowska U, Scheraga HA. Param- etrization of backbone-electrostatic and multibody contributions to the UNRES force field for protein-structure prediction from ab initio energy surfaces of model systems. J Phys Chem B. 2004;108(27):9421–9438.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liwo A, Arlukowicz P, Oldziej S, et al. Optimization ofthe UNRES force field by hierarchical design of the potential-energy landscape. 1. Tests of the approach using simple lattice protein models. J Phys Chem B. 2004;108(43):16918–16933.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oldziej S, Liwo A, Czaplewski C, Pillardy J, Scheraga HA. Optimization of the UNRES force field by hierarchical design of the potential-energy landscape. 2. Off-lattice tests of the method with single proteins. J Phys Chem B. 2004;108(43):16934–16949.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oldziej S, Łągiewka J, Liwo A, et al. Optimization of the UNRES force field by hierarchical design of the potential-energy landscape. 3. Use of many proteins in optimization. J Phys Chem B. 2004;108(43):16950–16959.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oldziej S, Czaplewski C, Liwo A, et al. Physics-based protein-structure prediction using a hierarchical protocol based on the UNRES force field: Assessment in two blind tests. PNAS. 2005;102(21):7547–7552.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rojas AV Liwo A, Scheraga HA. Molecular dynamics with the united- residue force field: Ab initio folding simulations of multichain proteins. J Phys Chem B. 2007;111(1):293–309.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nanias M, Czaplewski C, Scheraga H. Replica exchange and multica- nonical algorithms with the coarse-grained united-residue (UNRES) force field. J Chem Theory Comput. 2006;2(3):513–528.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alberts R. 1975 Equilibrium and Nonequilibrium statistical mechanics. New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Kubo R. Generalized cumulant expansion method. J Phys Soc Jpn. 1962;17:1100–1120.
   Google Scholar
• Bernstein F, Koetzle T, Williams G, et al. The Protein Data Bank: A computer-based archival file for macromolecular structures. J Mol Biol. 1977;112:535–542.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liwo A, Khalili M, Scheraga HA. Ab initio simulations of protein- folding pathways by molecular dynamics with the united-residue model of polypeptide chains. PNAS. 2005;102(7):2362–2367.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liwo A, Khalili M, Czaplewski C, et al. Modification and optimization of the United-Residue (UNRES) potential energy function for canonical simulations. I. Temperature dependence of the effective energy function and tests of the optimization method with single training proteins. J Phys Chem B. 2007;111(1):260–285.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shen H, Liwo A, Scheraga HA. An improved functional form for the temperature scaling factors of the components of the mesoscopic UNRES force field for simulations of protein structure and dynamics. J Phys Chem B. 2009;113(25):8738–8744.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilbert J, Lemarechal C. The module M1QN3. INRIA Rocquencourt and Rhone-Alpes. 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Gabb H, Jackson R, Sternberg M. Modelling protein docking using shape complementarity, electrostatics and biochemical information. J Mol Biol. 1997;272(1):106–120.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pons C, Grosdidier S, Solernou A, Perez-Cano L, Fernandez-Recio J. Present and future challenges and limitations in protein-protein docking. Proteins. 2010;78(1):95–108.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng TK, Blundell TL, Fernandez-Recio J. pyDock: Electrostatics and desolvation for effective scoring of rigid-body protein-protein docking. Proteins. 2007;68(2):503–515.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernandez-Recio J, Totrov M, Abagyan R. Identification of proteinprotein interaction sites from docking energy landscapes. J Mol Biol. 2004;335(3):843–865.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mintseris J, Wiehe K, Pierce B, et al. Protein-protein docking benchmark 2.0: An update. Proteins. 2005;60(2):214–216.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar