Measuring and monitoring quality of care in family planning: are we ignoring negative experiences?

References

• BruceJThe fundamental elements of Quality of Care: a simple frameworkStud Fam Plann199021261912191476
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• JainAKFertility reduction and the quality of family planning servicesStud Fam Plann19892011162652381
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SimmonsRPhillipsJFThe proximate operational determinants of fertility regulation behaviourPhillipsJFRossJAFamily Planning Programs and FertilityNew YorkOxford University Press1992181201
   Google Scholar
• EvaluationMEASUREQuick Investigation of Quality (QIQ). A user’s guide for monitoring quality of care in family planningMEASURE Evaluation Manual Series, No. 2. MEASURE EvaluationCarolina Population CenterUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill2001
   Google Scholar
• BlancAKCurtisSLCroftTNMonitoring contraceptive continuation: links to fertility outcomes and quality of careStud Fam Plann200233212714012132634
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• JainAKRamaraoSKimJCostelloMEvaluation of an intervention to improve quality of care in family planning programme in the PhilippinesJ Biosoc Sci2012441274121933467
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MinnisAMMavedzengeSNLueckeEDehlendorfCProvider counseling to young women seeking family planning servicesPerspect Sex Reprod Health201446422323124786186
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• TumlinsonKPenceBWCurtisSLMarshallSWSpeizerISQuality of care and contraceptive use in urban KenyaInt Perspect Sex Reprod Health2015412697926308259
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HardeeKHarrisSRodriguezMAchieving the goal of the London Summit on Family Planning by adhering to voluntary, rights-based family planning: What can we learn from past experiences with coercion?Int Perspect Sex Reprod Health201440420621425565348
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SchulerSRHossainZFamily planning clinics through women’s eyes and voices: a case study from rural BangladeshInt Fam Plann Perspect1998244170175
   Google Scholar
• TumlinsonKSpeizerISArcherLHBehetsFSimulated clients may reveal factors that may limit contraceptive use in KenyaGlob Health Sci Pract20131340741624683525
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• NalwaddaGMirembeFTumwesigyeNMByamugishaJFaxelidEConstraints and prospects for contraceptive service provision to young people in Uganda: providers’ perspectivesBMC Health Serv Res20111122021923927
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Open Society FoundationAgainst Her Will: Forced and Coerced Sterilization of Women WorldwideOSF201112
   Google Scholar
• KimYMKolsABonninCRichardsonPRoterDClient communication behaviors with healthcare providers in IndonesiaPatient Educ Couns2001451596811602369
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KimYMRimonJWinnardKImproving the quality of service delivery in NigeriaStud Fam Plann19922321181271604458
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SimmonsREliasCThe study of client-provider interactions: a review of methodological issuesStud Fam Plann19942511178209391
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MurphyNDBest Practices in Client-Provider Interactions in Reproductive Health Services: A Review of the LiteratureWashington, DCPopulation Reference Bureau Available from: http://www.prb.org/pdf/NewPerspQOC-LitRev.pdfAccessed July 31, 2014
   Google Scholar
• ErdmanJNCookRJReproductive Rights International Encyclopedia of Public HealthKrisOxfordOxford Academic Press2008532538
   Google Scholar
• WHOEnsuring Human Rights in the Provision of Contraceptive Information and ServicesGenevaWHO2014
   Google Scholar
• FreedmanLPKrukMEDisrespect and abuse of women in childbirth: challenging the global quality and accountability agendasLancet20143849948e42e4424965825
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McMahonSAGeorgeASChebetJJMoshaIHMpembeniRNWinchPJExperiences of and responses to disrespectful maternity care and abuse during childbirth: a qualitative study with women and men in Morogoro Region, TanzaniaBMC Pregnancy Childbirth20141426828125112432
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FreedmanLRamseyKAbuyaTDefining disrespect and abuse of women in childbirth: a research, policy and rights agendaBull World Health Organ2014921291591725552776
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WarrenCNjukiRAbuyaTStudy protocol for promoting respectful maternity care initiative to assess, measure and design interventions to reduce disrespect and abuse during childbirth in KenyaBMC Pregnancy Childbirth20131312123347548
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AbuyaTWarrenCEMillerNExploring the prevalence of disrespect and abuse in childbirth in KenyaPLOS One2015104e012360625884566
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BowserDHillKExploring Evidence for Disrespect and Abuse in Facility-based Childbirth: Report of a Landscape AnalysisCambridge, MAHarvard School of Public Health University Research Corporation, LLC2010
   Google Scholar
• AnonymousOur family secretsAnn Intern Med2015163432126280420
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• URC-CHS TRAction Project Systematic Review of Disrespect and Abuse Report, Forthcoming.
   Google Scholar
• Performance Monitoring and Accountability 2020. Glossary of Family Planning Indicators Available from http://www.PMA2020.org/Glossary-family-planning-indicatorsAccessed February 23, 2016
   Google Scholar
• Government of Ontario, CanadaHealth Care Consent Act 1996 Available from: http://www.e-laws.gov.on.ca/html/statutes/english/elaws_statutes_96h02_e.htm#BK1Accessed August 22, 2014
   Google Scholar
• Bord DeJBurkeWDudzinskyDM2013Ethics in medicine: confidentialityUniversity of Washington School of Medicine Available from: http://depts.washington.edu/bioethx/topics/confiden.htmlAccessed August 17, 2014
   Google Scholar
• National Research CouncilMeasuring Racial DiscriminationWashington, DCNational Academies Press2004
   Google Scholar
• Performance Monitoring and Accountability 2020Publications: family planning briefs. MA2020.org/publications Available from http://www.pma2020.org/publicationsAccessed February 22, 2015
   Google Scholar
• BeckerDTsuiAOReproductive health service preferences and perceptions of quality among low-income women: racial, ethnic and language group differencesPerspect Sex Reprod Health200840420221119067933
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BirdSTBogartLMBirth control conspiracy beliefs, perceived discrimination, and contraception among African Americans: an exploratory studyJ Health Psychol20038226327622114130
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MorrisonVContraceptive need among Cambodian refugees in Khao Phlu campInt Fam Plann Perspect2000264188192
   Google Scholar
• ValdesPRAlarconAMMunozSREvaluation of informed choice for contraceptive methods among women attending a family planning program: conceptual development; a case study in ChileJ Clin Epidemiol201366330230723157984
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SchulerSRMcIntoshENGoldsteinMCPandeBRBarriers to effective family planning in NepalStud Fam Plann19851652602704060211
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GrahamAMooreLSharpDProvision of emergency contraception in general practice and confidentiality for the under 16’s: results of a postal survey by general practitioners in AvonJ Fam Plann Reprod Health Care200127419319612457466
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• BetheaJHippisley-CoxJCouplandCPringleMGeneral practitioner’s attitudes towards provision of services to young people aged under 16: a cross-sectional surveyQual Prim Care20071511119
   Google Scholar
• DennySFarrantBCosgriffJAccess to private and confidential health care among secondary school students in New ZealandJ Adolesc Health201251328529122921140
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AnandSSinhaRKQuality differentials and reproductive health service utilisation determinants in IndiaInt J Health Qual Assur2010238718729
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• HallerDMMeynardAPejicDYFHS-WHO+ questionnaire: validation of a measure of youth friendly primary care servicesJ Adolesc Health201251542243023084162
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AskewIMenschBAdewuyiAIndicators for measuring the quality of family planning services in NigeriaStud Fam Plann19942552682837871552
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SchoenJChoice and Coercion: Birth Control, Sterilization, and Abortion in Public Health and WelfareChapel Hill, NCThe University of North Carolina Press2005
   Google Scholar
• Associated PressBurmese Muslims given two-child limitThe Guardian5252013 Available from: http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2013/may/25/burma-muslims-two-child-limitAccessed July 5, 2013
   Google Scholar
• JohnsonCG201377Female inmates sterilized in California prisons without approvalThe Center for Investigative Reporting Available from: http://cironline.org/reports/female-inmates-sterilized-california-prisons-without-approval-4917Accessed November 30, 2014
   Google Scholar
• Contraceptive CHOICE Projectn.d.Test 3: GATHER Process Observation Form Available from: http://www.larcfirst.com/resources/counseling/quality_assurance/Test_3_GATHER_Process_Observation_Form.pdfAccessed January 1, 2016
   Google Scholar
• LawrenceRECurlinFAPhysicians’ beliefs about conscience in medicine: a national surveyAcad Med20098491276128219707071
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BorreroSSchwarzEBCreininMIbrahimSThe impact of race and ethnicity on receipt of family planning services in the United StatesJ Womens Health20091819196
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DowningRALaVeistTABullockHEIntersections of ethnicity and social class in provider advice regarding reproductive healthAm J Public Health200797101803180717761569
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NakhaeeNMirahmadizadehARIranian women’s perceptions of family-planning services quality: a client-satisfaction surveyEur J Contracept Reprod Health Care200510319219816318967
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EntwistleEWattISGilhoolyKAssessing patients’ participation and quality of decision-making: insights from a study of routine practice in diverse settingsPatient Educ Couns200455110511315476997
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ElwynGEdwardsAWensingMShared decision making: developing the OPTION scale for measuring patient involvementQual Saf Health Care2003122939912679504
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• KimYMKolsAPutjukFParticipation by clients and nurse midwives in family planning decision making in IndonesiaPatient Educ Couns20035029530212900103
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BoydellVKeesburyJSocial accountability: what are the lessons for improving family planning and reproductive health programs? A review of the literature, Working PaperWashington, DCPopulation Council Evidence Project2014
   Google Scholar