Does courtesy bias affect how clients report on objective and subjective measures of family planning service quality? A comparison between facility- and home-based interviews

References

• AkachiYTarpFKelleyEAddisonTKrukMEMeasuring quality-of-care in the context of sustainable development goal 3: a call for papersBull World Health Organ2016943160160A27403474
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KrukMELarsonETwum-DansoNATime for a quality revolution in global healthLancet Glob Health201649e594e59627539798
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• JainAKFertility reduction and the quality of family planning servicesStud Fam Plann19892011162652381
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• TumlinsonKPenceBWCurtisSLMarshallSWSpeizerISQuality of care and contraceptive use in urban KenyaInt Perspect Sex Reprod Health2015412697926308259
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BlancAKCurtisSLCroftTNMonitoring contraceptive continuation: links to fertility outcomes and quality of careStud Fam Plann200233212714012132634
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KrukMEPateMMullanZIntroducing the lancet global health commission on high-quality health systems in the SDG eraLancet Glob Health201755e480e48128302563
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BruceJFundamental elements of the quality of care: a simple frameworkStud Fam Plann199021261912191476
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HuezoCDiazSQuality of care in family planning: clients’ rights and providers’ needsAdv Contracept1993921291398237566
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• HardeeKKumarJNewmanKVoluntary, human rights-based family planning: a conceptual frameworkStud Fam Plann201445111824615572
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• USAIDService Provision Assessment (SPA) Surveys. The DHS Program Available from: https://dhsprogram.com/pubs/pdf/OF25/OF25.pdfAccessed October 1, 2017
   Google Scholar
• World Health OrganizationService Availability and Readiness Assessment (SARA): An Annual Monitoring System for Service DeliveryGenevaWorld Health Organization2015
   Google Scholar
• MEASURE EvaluationQuick Investigation of Quality (QIQ): A User’s Guide for Monitoring Quality of Care in Family Planning2nd edChapel Hill, NCMEASURE Evaluation, University of North Carolina2016
   Google Scholar
• FisherAMenschBMillerRGuidelines and Instruments for a Family Planning Situation Analysis StudyNew York, NYPopulation Council1992
   Google Scholar
• InternationalAVSCCOPE: Client-Oriented Provider-Efficient Services. A Process and Tools for Quality Improvement in Family Planning and Other Reproductive Health ServicesNew York, NYAVSC International1995
   Google Scholar
• Management Sciences for Health MSHFamily Planning Management Development. Using CQI to strengthen family planning programsFam Plan Manag199321120
   Google Scholar
• WilliamsTSchutt-AineJCucaYMeasuring family planning service quality through client satisfaction exit-interviewsInt Fam Plan Perspect20002626371
   Google Scholar
• GlickPHow reliable are surveys of client satisfaction with healthcare services? Evidence from matched facility and household data in MadagascarSoc Sci Med200968236837919027216
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BessingerREBertrandJTMonitoring quality of care in family planning programs: a comparison of observations and client exit-interviewsInt Perspect Sex Reprod Health20072726370
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MathurMGoyalRCMudheyAClient’s level of satisfaction regarding quality of family planning sterilization services through exit-interviewsInnov J Med Health Sci201336263265
   Google Scholar
• SimmonsREliasCThe study of client-provider interactions: a review of methodological issuesStud Fam Plann19942511178209391
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AvisMBondMArthurAQuestioning patient satisfaction: an empirical investigation in two outpatient clinicsSoc Sci Med19974418592
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BrownLTyaneMBertrandJLauroDAbou-ouakilMdeMariaLQuality of care in family planning services in MoroccoStud Fam Plann19952631541687570765
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BitranREfficiency and quality in the public and private sectors in SenegalHealth Policy Plan199510327128310151844
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LindelowMWHealth Facility Surveys: An IntroductionWashington, DCThe World Bank2003
   Google Scholar
• LeonFRLundgrenRHuapayaASinaiIJenningsVChallenging the courtesy bias interpretation of favorable clients’ perceptions of family planning deliveryEval Rev2007311244217259574
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LeurentBReyburnHMuroFMbakilwaHSchellenbergDMonitoring patient care through health facility exit-interviews: an assessment of the Hawthorne effect in a trial of adherence to malaria treatment guidelines in TanzaniaBMC Infect Dis20161615926842751
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KimYMRimonJWinnardKImproving the Quality of Service Delivery in NigeriaStud Fam Plann19922321181271604458
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• TumlinsonKSpeizerISCurtisSLPenceBWValidity of Standard measures of family planning service quality: findings from the simulated client methodStud Fam Plann201445444347025469929
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DasJSohnesenTPPatient Satisfaction, Doctor Effort and Interview Location: Evidence from ParaguayReport No.: World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 40862006 Available from: https://doi.org/10.1596/1813-9450-4086Accessed October 1, 2017
   Google Scholar
• LundbergMClient satisfaction and the perceived quality of primary health care in UgandaAminSDasJGoldsteinMAre You Being Served? New Tools for Measuring Service DeliveryFirst editionWashington, DCThe World Bank2008313342
   Google Scholar
• SaeedRKhanFKCase Study: “Suraj” – A Private Provider PartnershipKarachiMarie Stopes International2010
   Google Scholar
• NgoTDEvaGMSI Mobile Outreach Services: Retrospective Evaluations from Ethiopia, Myanmar, Pakistan, Sierra Leone and Viet NamLondonMarie Stopes International2010
   Google Scholar
• Marie Stopes InternationalGlobal Impact Report 2013: The Client as Our CompassLondonMarie Stopes International2014
   Google Scholar
• Countdown to 2015 Core GroupA Decade of Tracking Progress for Maternal, Newborn and Child Survival: The 2015 ReportMexicoCountdown to 2015 Maternal, Newborn & Child Survival2015
   Google Scholar
• National Institute of Population Studies Pakistan, Macro International IncPakistan Demographic and Health Survey 2012–13IslamabadGovernment of Pakistan2014
   Google Scholar
• KhanAShaikhBTAn all time low utilization of intrauterine contraceptive device as a birth spacing method – a qualitative descriptive study in district Rawalpindi, PakistanReprod Health20131011023394188
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AghaSFareedAKeatingJClinical training alone is not sufficient for reducing barriers to IUD provision among private providers in PakistanReprod Health201184022208449
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marie Stopes InternationalAssessing Client Profile & Evaluating Client Satisfaction Through Exit-Interviews: GuidelinesLondonMarie Stopes Society2015
   Google Scholar
• DonabedianAThe quality of care: how can it be assessed?JAMA198826012174317483045356
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RutsteinSOJohnsonKDHS Comparative Reports 6: The DHS Wealth IndexCalverton, MDORC Macro2004
   Google Scholar
• GreeneWHEconometric Analysis5th edUpper Saddle River, NJPearson Education2002
   Google Scholar
• WilliamsRGeneralized ordered logit/partial proportional odds models for ordinal dependent variablesThe Stata Journal2006615882
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LaferriereRClient satisfaction with home health care nursingJ Community Health Nurs199310267768340800
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• IslamFRahmanAHalimAErikssonCRahmanFDalalKPerceptions of health care providers and patients on quality of care in maternal and neonatal health in fourteen Bangladesh government healthcare facilities: a mixed-method studyBMC Health Serv Res20151523726084893
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GryttenJCarlsenFSkauIServices production and patient satisfaction in primary careHealth Policy200989331232118656276
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar