Expulsion and continuation rates after postabortion insertion of framed IUDs versus frameless IUDs – review of the literature

References

• LähteenmäkiPLuukkainenTReturn of ovarian function after abortionClin Endocrinol (Oxf)19788123132630723
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• JonesRDarrochJHenshawSContraceptive use among US women having abortions in 2000–2001Perspect Sex Reprod Health20023429430312558092
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health OrganizationFacts and Figures about Abortion in the European Region Available from: http://www.euro.who.int/en/health-topics/Life-stages/sexual-and-reproductive-health/activities/abortion/facts-and-figures-about-abortion-in-the-european-regionAccessed June 1, 2015
   Google Scholar
• GilletPGLeeNHYuzpeAACerskusIA comparison of the efficacy and acceptability of the copper-7 intrauterine device following immediate or delayed insertion after first trimester therapeutic abortionFertil Steril1980341211247409230
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GoodmanSHendlishSKReevesMFFoster-RosalesAImpact of immediate postabortal insertion of intrauterine contraception on repeat abortionContraception20087814314818672116
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GoodmanSHendlishSKBenedictCReevesMFPera-FloydMFoster-RosalesAIncreasing intrauterine contraception use by reducing barriers to post-abortal and interval insertionContraception20087813614218672115
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GrimesDALopesLMSchulzKFStanwoodNLImmediate post-abortal insertion of intrauterine devicesCochrane Database Syst Rev20106CD001777
   Google Scholar
• FialaCGemzell-DanielsonKReview of medical abortion using mifepristone in combination with a prostaglandine analogueContraception200674668616781264
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• JonesRZolnaMRHenshawSKFinerLBAbortion in the United States: incidence and access to services, 2005Perspect Sex Reprod Health200840616
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• TrussellJLallaAMDoanQVReyesEPintoLGricarJCost effectiveness of contraceptives in the United StatesContraception20097951419041435
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ReevesMFSmithKJCreiningMDContraceptive effectiveness of immediate compared with delayed insertion of uterine devices after abortionObstet Gynecol20071091286129417540799
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organization Task Force on Intrauterine Devices for Fertility RegulationIUD insertion following termination of pregnancy: a clinical trial of the TCu 220C, Lippes loop D, and copper 7Stud Fam Plann198314991086351364
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organization Task Force on Intrauterine Devices for-Fertility RegulationIUD insertion following spontaneous abortion: a clinical trial of the TCu 220C, Lippes loop D, and copper 7Stud Fam Plann1983141091146351363
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NielsenNCNygrenKGAllonenHThree years of experience after post-abortal insertion of Nova-T and copper-T-200Acta Obstet Gyne-col Scand198463261264
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LimLSMcCarthyTGYongYMRatnamSSPost-abortion insertion of MLCu 250 and MLCu 375: a comparative trialContraception1985314714774028724
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCarthyTRamachandranLHuangHSRatnamSPostabortion insertion of the Nova T and MLCu250: preliminary results of a comparative studyAdv Contracept198511611653842217
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• PakarinenPToivonenJLuukkainenTRandomized comparison of levonorgestrel- and copper-releasing intrauterine systems immediately after abortion, with 5 years’ follow-upContraception200368313412878284
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DreyEReevesMOgawaDSokoloffADarneyPSteinauerJInsertion of intrauterine contraceptives immediately following first and second-trimester abortionsContraception20097939740219341854
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BednarekPHCreininMDReevesMFCwiakCEspeyEJensenJImmediate versus delayed insertion after uterine aspirationN Engl J Med20113642208221721651392
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ShimoniNDavisARamosMERosarioLWesthoffCTiming of copper intrauterine device insertion after medical abortionObstet Gynecol201111862362821860292
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SäävIStephanssonOGemzell-DanielssonKEarly versus delayed insertion of intrauterine contraception after medical abortion – a randomized controlled trialPLoS One2012711e4894823155432
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• TimonenHLuukkainenTImmediate post-abortal insertion of copper T (TCu-200) with eighteen months follow-upContraception197491531604607830
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BetstadtSJTurokDKKappNFengK-TBorgattaLIntrauterine device insertion after medical abortionContraception20118351752121570548
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BatárIWildemeerschDVrijensMTemmermanMGboladeBAPreventing abortion and repeat abortion with the GyneFix® intrauterine implant system – preliminary resultsAdv Contracept199814291969820927
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• GboladeBAImmediate insertion of the postabortion version of GyneFix® intrauterine implant systemContemporary Rev Obstet Gynecol1999112933
   Google Scholar
• CaoXZhangWGaoYImmediate post-abortal insertion of the frameless GyneFix IUD: further experienceBr J Fam Plan20002628588
   Google Scholar
• GoldstuckNWildemeerschDRole of uterine forces in intrauterine device embedment, perforation, and expulsionInt J Womens Health2014673574425143756
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• BenacerrafBRShippTDBromlyBThree-dimensional ultrasound detection of abnormally located intrauterine contraceptive devices which are the source of pelvic pain and abnormal bleedingUltrasound Obstet Gynecol20093411011519565532
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AntebyERevelABen-ChetritARosenBTadmorOYagelSIntrauterine device failure: relation to its location within the uterine cavityObstet Gynecol1993811121148416443
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PettaCAFaundesDPimentelEDiazJBahamondesLThe use of vaginal ultrasound to indentify copper T IUDs at high risk of expulsionContraception1996542872898934062
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WuSCLiLZouYDongJLeiZWClinical effect comparison of seven types of IUD placement during intermenstruumChin J Fam Plann200816552556
   Google Scholar
• HubacherDCopper intrauterine device used by nulliparous women: review of side effectsContraception200775S8S1117531622
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PatersonHAshtinJHarisson-WoolrychMA nationwide cohort study of the use of the levonorgestrel intrauterine device in New Zealand adolescentsContraception20097943343819442778
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SuhonenSHaukkamaaMJakobssonTRauramoIClinical performance of a levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system and oral contraceptives in young nulliparous women: a comparative studyContraception20046940741215105064
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WildemeerschDPettAJandiSHasskampTRowePVrijensMPrecision intrauterine contraception may significantly increase continuation of use: a review of long-term clinical experience with frameless copper-releasing intrauterine contraception devicesInt J Womens Health2013521522523658502
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• WildemeerschDJandiSPettANolteKHasskampTVrijensMUse of frameless intrauterine devices and systems in young nulliparous and adolescent women: results of a multicenter studyInt J Womens Health2014672773425125987
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• WildemeerschDPettAJandiSNolteKAlbrechtWThe anchor of the frameless intrauterine device does not migrate over time: an analysis in over 300 womenJ Contraception201459196
   Google Scholar
• HeikinheimoOGisslerMSuhonenSAge, parity, history of abortion and contraceptive choices affect the risk of repeat abortionContraception20087814915418672117
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KaislasuoJHeikinheimoOLähteenmäkiPPredicting painful or difficult intrauterine device insertion in nulliparous womenObstet Gynecol201412434535325004340
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WildemeerschDSabbePJDowsettMGAssessment of copper corrosion from frameless copper IUDs after long-term in utero residenceContraception20149045445925015534
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLaurinKESenenayakePToubiaNLapidoOAPost-abortion family planning: reversing a legacy of neglectLancet199334210998105318
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SalcedoJSorensenARodriguezMICost analysis of immediate post-abortal IUD insertion compared to planned IUD insertion at the time of abortion follow-upContraception20138740440823312934
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar