Matched population comparison of visual outcomes and patient satisfaction between 3 modalities for the correction of low to moderate myopic astigmatism

References

• KnorzMCWiesingerBLiermannASeiberthVLiesenhoffHLaser in situ keratomileusis for moderate and high myopia and myopic astigmatismOphthalmology199810559329409593400
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BarsamAAllanBDExcimer laser refractive surgery versus phakic intraocular lenses for the correction of moderate to high myopiaCochrane Database Syst Rev20121CD00767922258972
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HuangDSchallhornSCSugarAPhakic intraocular lens implantation for the correction of myopia: a report by the American Academy of OphthalmologyOphthalmology2009116112244225819883852
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SandersDVukichJAComparison of implantable collamer lens (ICL) and laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) for low myopiaCornea200625101139114617172886
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SariESPineroDPKubalogluAToric implantable collamer lens for moderate to high myopic astigmatism: 3-year follow-upGraefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol201325151413142223052720
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ReinsteinDZCarpGIArcherTJLong-term visual and refractive outcomes after LASIK for high myopia and astigmatism from −8.00 to −14.25 DJ Refract Surg201632529029727163613
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ReinsteinDZCarpGILewisTAArcherTJGobbeMOutcomes for myopic LASIK with the MEL 90 excimer laserJ Refract Surg201531531632125974970
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EliesDAlonsoTPuigJGrisOGüellJLCoretAVisian toric implantable collamer lens for correction of compound myopic astigmatismJ Refract Surg201026425125820415321
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LiuMChenYWangDClinical outcomes after SMILE and femtosecond laser-assisted LASIK for myopia and myopic astigmatism: a prospective randomized comparative studyCornea201635221021626684046
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ZhangYShenQJiaYZhouDZhouJClinical outcomes of SMILE and FS-LASIK used to treat myopia: a meta-analysisJ Refract Surg201632425626527070233
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ChanTCNgALChengGPVector analysis of astigmatic correction after small-incision lenticule extraction and femtosecond-assisted LASIK for low to moderate myopic astigmatismBr J Ophthalmol2016100455355926206791
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ZhangJWangYWuWXuLLiXDouRVector analysis of low to moderate astigmatism with small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE): results of a 1-year follow-upBMC Ophthalmol201515825618419
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BrarSGaneshSPandeyRIncidence & factors responsible for implantable collamer lens(ICL) explantation & outcomes of further management – 5 year retrospective studyEC Ophthalmol201531231239
   Google Scholar
• GaneshSGuptaRComparison of visual and refractive outcomes following femtosecond laser-assisted lasik with smile in patients with myopia or myopic astigmatismJ Refract Surg201430959059625250415
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HasegawaAKojimaTIsogaiNTamaokiANakamuraTIchikawaKAstigmatism correction: laser in situ keratomileusis versus posterior chamber collagen copolymer toric phakic intraocular lens implantationJ Cataract Refract Surg201238457458122321354
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ReinsteinDZGobbeMGobbeLArcherTJCarpGIOptical zone centration accuracy using corneal fixation-based SMILE compared to eye tracker-based femtosecond laser-assisted LASIK for myopiaJ Refract Surg201531958659226352563
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HashemANEl DanasouryAMAnwarHMAxis alignment and rotational stability after implantation of the toric implantable collamer lens for myopic astigmatismJ Refract Surg20092510 SupplS939S94319848375
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MoriTYokoyamaSKojimaTFactors affecting rotation of a posterior chamber collagen copolymer toric phakic intraocular lensJ Cataract Refract Surg201238456857322342008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AlióJLToffahaBTPeña-GarciaPSádabaLMBarraquerRIPhakic intraocular lens explantation: causes in 240 casesJ Refract Surg2015311303525486676
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PedersenIBIvarsenAHjortdalJThree-year results of small incision lenticule extraction for high myopia: refractive outcomes and aberrationsJ Refract Surg2015311171972426444906
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KamiyaKShimizuKSaitoAIgarashiAKobashiHComparison of optical quality and intraocular scattering after posterior chamber phakic intraocular lens with and without a central hole (hole ICL and conventional ICL) implantation using the double-pass instrumentPLoS One201386e6684623825575
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IgarashiAKamiyaKShimizuKKomatsuMVisual performance after implantable collamer lens implantation and wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis for high myopiaAm J Ophthalmol20091481164170.e119375059
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perez-VivesCDominguez-VicentAFerrer-BlascoTPonsÁMMontés-MicóROptical quality of the Visian implantable collamer lens for different refractive powersGraefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol201325151423142923142994
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MiaoHTianMXuYChenYZhouXVisual outcomes and optical quality after femtosecond laser small incision lenticule extraction: an 18-month prospective studyJ Refract Surg2015311172673126544559
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GyldenkerneAIvarsenAHjortdalJØComparison of corneal shape changes and aberrations induced By FS-LASIK and SMILE for myopiaJ Refract Surg201531422322925751842
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LazaridisADroutsasKSekundoWTopographic analysis of the centration of the treatment zone after SMILE for myopia and comparison to FS-LASIK: subjective versus objective alignmentJ Refract Surg2014301068068625291751
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar