Intersession test–retest variability of 10-2 MAIA microperimetry in fixation-threatening glaucoma

Evan N Wong1 Centre for Ophthalmology and Visual Science (Incorporating Lions Eye Institute), The University of Western Australia;2 Department of Ophthalmology, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital

William H Morgan1 Centre for Ophthalmology and Visual Science (Incorporating Lions Eye Institute), The University of Western Australia;3 Department of Ophthalmology, Royal Perth Hospital, Perth, WA, Australia

Fred K Chen1 Centre for Ophthalmology and Visual Science (Incorporating Lions Eye Institute), The University of Western Australia;3 Department of Ophthalmology, Royal Perth Hospital, Perth, WA, AustraliaCorrespondence[email protected]

Pages 745-752 | Published online: 20 Apr 2017

Cite this article
CrossMark

Full Article
Figures & data
References
Citations
Metrics
Licensing
Reprints & Permissions
View PDF PDF

References

KamedaTTanabeTHangaiMOjimaTAikawaHYoshimuraNFixation behavior in advanced stage glaucoma assessed by the Micro-Perimeter MP-1Jpn J Ophthalmol200953658058720020235
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
GriffithJGoldbergJPrevalence of comorbid retinal disease in patients with glaucoma at an academic medical centerClin Ophthalmol201591275128426203217
PubMedGoogle Scholar
WongENMackeyDAMorganWHChenFKIntersession test-retest variability of conventional and novel parameters using the MP-1 microperimeterClin Ophthalmol201510294226730178
PubMedGoogle Scholar
RohrschneiderKBültmannSSpringerCUse of fundus perimetry (microperimetry) to quantify macular sensitivityProg Retin Eye Res200827553654818723109
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
ArricoLGiannottiRFratipietroMMalagolaRFascicular visual field defects in open-angle glaucoma: evaluation with microperimetryJ Ophthalmol20162016827495427366329
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
KulkarniSVCouplandSGStittDMHamiltonJBrownsteinJJDamjiKFEfficacy of SLO-Microperimetry and Humphrey for evaluating macular sensitivity changes in advanced glaucomaCan J Ophthalmol201348540641224093188
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
HuangPShiYWangXZhangSSZhangCUse of microperimetry to compare macular light sensitivity in eyes with open-angle and angle-closure glaucomaJpn J Ophthalmol201256213814422160406
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
SatoSHirookaKBabaTTenkumoKNittaEShiragaFCorrelation between the ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer thickness measured with cirrus HD-OCT and macular visual field sensitivity measured with microperimetryInvest Ophthalmol Vis Sci20135443046305123580483
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
HeijlALindgrenALindgrenGTest-retest variability in glaucomatous visual fieldsAm J Ophthalmol19891081301352757094
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
WallMWoodwardKRDoyleCKArtesPHRepeatability of automated perimetry: a comparison between standard automated perimetry with stimulus size III and V, matrix, and motion perimetryInvest Ophthalmol Vis Sci200950297437918952921
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
ArtesPHIwaseAOhnoYKitazawaYChauhanBCProperties of perimetric threshold estimates from Full Threshold, SITA Standard, and SITA Fast strategiesInvest Ophthalmol Vis Sci20024382654265912147599
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
SpenceleySEHensonDBVisual field test simulation and error in threshold estimationBr J Ophthalmol19968043043088703878
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
JeffreyBGCukrasCAVitaleSTurriffABowlesKSievingPATest–retest intervisit variability of functional and structural parameters in X-linked retinoschisisTransl Vis Sci Technol2014355
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
ChenFKPatelPJXingWTest-retest variability of microperimetry using the Nidek MP1 in patients with macular diseaseInvest Ophthalmol Vis Sci20095073464347219324853
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
AnastasakisAMcAnanyJJFishmanGASeipleWHClinical value, normative retinal sensitivity values, and intrasession repeatability using a combined spectral domain optical coherence tomography/scanning laser ophthalmoscope microperimeterEye (Lond)201125224525121178993
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
CideciyanAVSwiderMAlemanTSMacular function in macular degenerations: repeatability of microperimetry as a potential outcome measure for ABCA4-associated retinopathy trialsInvest Ophthalmol Vis Sci201253284185222247458
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
WuZAytonLNGuymerRHLuuCDIntrasession test-retest variability of microperimetry in age-related macular degenerationInvest Ophthalmol Vis Sci201354127378738524135753
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
WuZJungCJAytonLNLuuCDGuymerRHTest-retest repeatability of microperimetry at the border of deep scotomasInvest Ophthalmol Vis Sci20155642606261125813990
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
IsmailSASharanjeet-KaurSMutalibHANgahNFMacular retinal sensitivity using MP-1 in healthy Malaysian subjects of different agesJ Optom20158426627226025808
PubMedGoogle Scholar
Molina-MartínAPiñeroDPPérez-CambrodíRJReliability and intersession agreement of microperimetric and fixation measurements obtained with a new microperimeter in normal eyesCurr Eye Res201641340040925859613
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
BlandJMAltmanDGAgreement between methods of measurement with multiple observations per individualJ Biopharm Stat200717457158217613642
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
University of York [webpage on the Internet]What is the standard error of the wihin-subject stand deviation, sw? Available from http://www-users.york.ac.uk/~mb55/meas/seofsw.htmAccessed February 23, 2017
Google Scholar
BlandJMAltmanDGStatistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurementLancet1986184763073102868172
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
BlandJMAltmanDGMeasuring agreement in method comparison studiesStat Methods Med Res19998213516010501650
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
WuZMcKendrickAMHadouxXTest-retest variability of fundus-tracked perimetry at the peripapillary region in open angle glaucomaInvest Ophthalmol Vis Sci20165783619362527391552
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar

Share icon
Back to Top

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.

People also read
Recommended articles
Cited by

To cite this article:

Reference style: APA Chicago Harvard

Citation copied to clipboard

Reference styles above use APA (6th edition), Chicago (16th edition) & Harvard (10th edition)

Download citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by citation management software including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks and Reference Manager.

Choose format: RIS BibTex RefWorks Direct Export

Choose options: Citation Citation & abstract Citation & references

Intersession test–retest variability of 10-2 MAIA microperimetry in fixation-threatening glaucoma

References

Information for

Open access

Opportunities

Help and information

Your download is now in progress and you may close this window

Login or register to access this feature

Intersession test–retest variability of 10-2 MAIA microperimetry in fixation-threatening glaucoma

References

Related research

To cite this article:

Download citation

Information for

Open access

Opportunities

Help and information

Keep up to date