References
- KimEKJoKJJooCKComparison of tips in coaxial microincision cataract surgery with the bevel-down techniqueJ Cataract Refract Surg201137112028203321907535
- JoshiRSPrimary posterior capsular opacification in Indian rural population undergoing cataract surgery for hypermature senile cataractClin Ophthalmol201371605160823966767
- KhannaRPujariSSangwanVCataract surgery in developing countriesCurr Opin Ophthalmol2011221101421107261
- ChylackLTJrWolfeJKSingerDMThe lens opacities classification system IIIArch Ophthalmol199311168318368512486
- JoshiRSA single drop 0.5% proparacaine hydrochloride for uncomplicated clear corneal phacoemulsificationMiddle East Afr J Ophthalmol201320322122424014985
- HaripriyaAChangDFReenaMShekharMComplication rates of phacoemulsification and manual small-incision cataract surgery at Aravind Eye HospitalJ Cataract Refract Surg20123881360136922814042
- LeeJSHouCHYangMLKuoJZLinKKA different approach to assess resident phacoemulsification learning curve: analysis of both completion and complication ratesEye (Lond)200923368368718239676
- FineIHPackerMHoffmanRSPower modulations in new phacoemulsification technology: improved outcomesJ Cataract Refract Surg20043051014101915130637
- RekasMMontés-MicóRKrix-JachymKKluśAStankiewiczAFerrer-BlascoTComparison of torsional and longitudinal modes using phacoemulsification parametersJ Cataract Refract Surg200935101719172419781466
- RaskinEPaulaJSCruzAACoelhoRPEffect of bevel position on the corneal endothelium after phacoemulsificationArq Bras Oftalmol201073650851021271025
- ParkJHLeeSMKwonJWUltrasound energy in phacoemulsification: a comparative analysis of phaco-chop and stop-and-chop techniques according to the degree of nuclear densityOphthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging201041223624120307043
- MaalejAKhallouliAWathekCRannenROzil® versus conventional ultrasound phacoemulsification: a randomized comparative studyInt Ophthalmol201535456556825155201
- DoorsMBerendschotTTTouwslagerWWebersCANuijtsRMPhacopower modulation and the risk for postoperative corneal decompensation: a randomized clinical trialJAMA Ophthalmol2013131111443145024030086
- KimDHWeeWRLeeJHKimMKThe comparison between torsional and conventional mode phacoemulsification in moderate and hard cataractsKorean J Ophthalmol201024633634021165231
- WangYXiaYZengMTorsional ultrasound efficiency under different vacuum levels in different degrees of nuclear cataractJ Cataract Refract Surg200935111941194519878827
- ReuschelABogatschHBarthTWiedemannRComparison of endothelial changes and power settings between torsional and longitudinal phacoemulsificationJ Cataract Refract Surg201036111855186121029892
- ChenMSweeneyHWLukeBChenMBrownMA retrospective randomized study to compare the energy delivered using CDE with different techniques and OZil® settings by different surgeons in phacoemulsificationClin Ophthalmol2009340140319688027
- ChenMChenMComparison of CDE data in phacoemulsification between an open hospital-based ambulatory surgical center and a free-standing ambulatory surgical centerClin Ophthalmol201041287128921151334
- FakhryMAEl ShazlyMITorsional ultrasound mode versus combined torsional and conventional ultrasound mode phacoemulsification for eyes with hard cataractClin Ophthalmol2011597397821792288
- JooCKKimYHPhacoemulsification with a bevel-down phaco tip: phaco-drillJ Cataract Refract Surg1997238114911529368156
- KohlhaasMKlemmMKammannJRichardGEndothelial cell loss secondary to two different phacoemulsification techniquesOphthalmic Surg Lasers199829118908959824860
- JooCKKimYHPhacoemulsification with a bevel-down phaco tip: phaco-drillJ Cataract Refract Surg1997238114911529368156 Comment in: J Cataract Refract Surg1998242147