Comparison of a hydrogel corneal inlay and monovision laser in situ keratomileusis in presbyopic patients: focus on visual performance and optical quality

References

• LindstromRLMacraeSMPeposeJSHoopesPCSrCorneal inlays for presbyopia correctionCurr Opin Ophthalmol201324428128723703461
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ReinsteinDZCarpGIArcherTJGobbeMLASIK for presbyopia correction in emmetropic patients using aspheric ablation profiles and a micro-monovision protocol with the Carl Zeiss Meditec MEL 80 and VisuMaxJ Refract Surg201228853154122869232
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arba MosqueraSAlioJLPresbyopic correction on the corneaEye Vis (Lond)20141526605352
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• ZheleznyakLSabesanROhJSMacRaeSModified monovision with spherical aberration to improve presbyopic through-focus visual performanceInvest Ophthalmol Vis Sci20135453157316523557742
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BraunEHLeeJSteinertRFMonovision in LASIKOphthalmology200811571196120218061266
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WhangWJYooYSJooCKYoonGChanges in keratometric values and corneal high order aberrations after hydrogel inlay implantationAm J Ophthalmol20171739810527697473
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GarzaEBGomezSChayetADishlerJOne-year safety and efficacy results of a hydrogel inlay to improve near vision in patients with emmetropic presbyopiaJ Refract Surg201329316617223446012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GuellJLBarradaOAIntracorneal inlays – special focus on the raindropEur Ophthalmic Rev2014812330
   Google Scholar
• PinskyPMThree-dimensional modeling of metabolic species transport in the cornea with a hydrogel intrastromal inlayInvest Ophthalmol Vis Sci20145553093310624833750
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SteinertRFSchwiegerlingJLangARange of refractive independence and mechanism of action of a corneal shape-changing hydrogel inlay: results and theoryJ Cataract Refract Surg20154181568157926432112
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ArltEKrallEMoussaSGrabnerGDexlAImplantable inlay devices for presbyopia: the evidence to dateClin Ophthalmol2015912913725609913
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• LangAJHollidayKChayetABarraga-GarzaEKathuriaNStructural changes induced by a corneal shape-changing inlay, deduced from optical coherence tomography and wavefront measurementsInvest Ophthalmol Vis Sci2016579OCT15416127409467
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WhitmanJHovanesianJSteinertRFKochDPotvinRThrough-focus performance with a corneal shape-changing inlay: One-year resultsJ Cataract Refract Surg201642796597127492093
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ChayetABarragan GarzaECombined hydrogel inlay and laser in situ keratomileusis to compensate for presbyopia in hyperopic patients: one-year safety and efficacyJ Cataract Refract Surg201339111713172124021565
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WhitmanJDoughertyPJParkhurstGDTreatment of presbyopia in emmetropes using a shape-changing corneal inlay: one-year clinical outcomesOphthalmology2016123346647526804761
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FrellickMCorneal inlays better than monovision, researchers sayMedscape Medical News10262016 Available at: http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/871004Accessed March 8, 2017
   Google Scholar
• GarzaEBChayetASafety and efficacy of a hydrogel inlay with laser in situ keratomileusis to improve vision in myopic presbyopic patients: one-year resultsJ Cataract Refract Surg201541230631225661123
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raindrop Near Vision Inlay Professional Use Information2017ReVision Optics, IncLake Forest, CA
   Google Scholar
• PieramiciSFeldmanBHAmerican Academy of OphthalmologyMonovision LASIK Available from: http://eyewiki.aao.org/Monovision_LASIK92014Accessed March 8, 2017
   Google Scholar
• AlarconAAneraRGVillaCJimenez del BarcoLGutierrezRVisual quality after monovision correction by laser in situ keratomileusis in presbyopic patientsJ Cataract Refract Surg20113791629163521752590
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garcia-GonzalezMTeusMAHernandez-VerdejoJLVisual outcomes of LASIK-induced monovision in myopic patients with presbyopiaAm J Ophthalmol2010150338138620542487
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ReillyCDLeeWBAlvarengaLCasparJGarcia-FerrerFMannisMJSurgical monovision and monovision reversal in LASIKCornea200625213613816371770
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DurrieDSThe effect of different monovision contact lens powers on the visual function of emmetropic presbyopic patients (an American Ophthalmological Society thesis)Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc200610436640117471352
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• GoldbergDBComparison of myopes and hyperopes after laser in situ keratomileusis monovisionJ Cataract Refract Surg20032991695170114522287
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KruhJNGarrettKAHuntingtonBRobinsonSMelkiSARisk factors for retreatment following myopic LASIK with femtosecond laser and custom ablation for the treatment of myopiaSemin Ophthalmol201732331632027049689
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GhanemRCde la CruzJTobaigyFMAngLPAzarDTLASIK in the presbyopic age group: safety, efficacy, and predictability in 40- to 69-year-old patientsOphthalmology200711471303131017382397
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EvansBJMonovision: a reviewOphthalmic Physiol Opt200727541743917718882
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• JainSAroraIAzarDTSuccess of monovision in presbyopes: review of the literature and potential applications to refractive surgerySurv Ophthalmol19964064914998724641
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SeyeddainOHohensinnMRihaWSmall-aperture corneal inlay for the correction of presbyopia: 3-year follow-upJ Cataract Refract Surg2012381354522018596
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• YooAKimJYKimMJTchahHHydrogel inlay for presbyopia: objective and subjective visual outcomesJ Refract Surg201531745446026158925
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LugerMHMcAlindenCBuckhurstPJWolffsohnJSVermaSArba MosqueraSPresbyopic LASIK using hybrid bi-aspheric micro-monovision ablation profile for presbyopic corneal treatmentsAm J Ophthalmol2015160349350526025425
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar