A comparison of NCT, Goldman application tonometry values with and without fluorescein

References

• Saenz-FrancesFJañezLBorrego-SanzLCharacterization of the thickness of different corneal zones in glaucoma: effect on dynamic contour, Goldmann and rebound tonometriesActa Ophthalmol2013918e620e62723764044
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• YilmazIAltanCAygitEDComparison of three methods of tonometry in normal subjects: Goldmann applanation tonometer, non-contact airpuff tonometer, and Tono-Pen XLClin Ophthalmol201481069107424944507
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• PatelKJJainSPKapadiaPRPatelNVPatelSPatelVCan higher end tonometers be used interchangeably in routine clinical practice?Indian J Ophthalmol201664213213527050348
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• JóhannessonGHallbergPEklundABehndigALindénCEffects of topical anaesthetics and repeated tonometry on intraocular pressureActa Ophthalmol201492211111523387522
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LeeMAhnJEffects of central corneal stromal thickness and epithelial thickness on intraocular pressure using goldmann applanation and non-contact tonometersPLoS One2016113e015186826998838
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AndreanosKKoutsandreaCPapaconstantinouDComparison of Goldmann applanation tonometry and Pascal dynamic contour tonometry in relation to central corneal thickness and corneal curvatureClin Ophthalmol2016102477248428003737
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• EraslanMÇermanESümmenSComparison of intraocular pressure measurements in healthy pediatric patients using three types of tonometersTurk J Ophthalmol20174711428182167
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• FarhoodQKComparative evaluation of intraocular pressure with an air-puff tonometer versus a Goldmann applanation tonometerClin Ophthalmol20137232723293511
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• TanSYuMBaigNHansapinyoLThamCCAgreement of patient-measured intraocular pressure using rebound tonometry with Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT) in glaucoma patientsSci Rep201774206728165028
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OttobelliLFogagnoloPFrezzottiPRepeatability and reproducibility of applanation resonance tonometry: a cross-sectional studyBMC Ophthalmol201515153625885814
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ClementCIParkerDGGoldbergIIntra-Ocular Pressure Measurement in a Patient with a Thin, Thick or Abnormal CorneaOpen Ophthalmol J201610354327014386
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• ÖzcuraFYıldırımNTambovaEŞahinAEvaluation of Goldmann applanation tonometry, rebound tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry in keratoconusJ Optom201710211712227402573
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• MccaffertySLimGDuncanWEnikovESchwiegerlingJGoldmann tonometer prism with an optimized error correcting applanation surfaceTransl Vis Sci Technol2016554
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American Academy of OphthalmologyGlaucoma. Basic and Clinical Science Course, Section 10, 2011–2012San FranciscoAmerican Academy of Ophthalmology20112729
   Google Scholar
• MohanSTiwariSJainAGuptaJSachanSKClinical comparison of Pulsair non-contact tonometer and Goldmann applanation tonometer in Indian populationJ Optom201472869024766865
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• RüferFSources of error in Goldmann applanation tonometryOphthalmologe2011108654655221533609
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ParkerVAHerrtageJSarkiesNJClinical comparison of the Keeler Pulsair 3000 with Goldmann applanation tonometryBr J Ophthalmol200185111303130411673293
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• TonnuPAHoTSharmaKWhiteEBunceCGarway-HeathDA comparison of four methods of tonometry: method agreement and interobserver variabilityBr J Ophthalmol200589784785015965164
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KaoSFLichterPRBergstromTJRoweSMuschDCClinical comparison of the Oculab Tono-Pen to the Goldmann applanation tonometerOphthalmology19879412154115443431824
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FrenkelREHongYJShinDHComparison of the Tono-Pen to the Goldmann applanation tonometerArch Ophthalmol198810667507533369998
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stabuc SilihMHawlinaMInfluence of corneal thickness on comparative intraocular pressure measurements with Goldmann and non-contact tonometers in keratoconusKlin Monbl Augenheilkd20032201284384714704941
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HerrARemkyAHirschTRenningsCPlangeNTonometry in corneal edema after cataract surgery: dynamic contour tonometry versus Goldmann applanation tonometryClin Ophthalmol2013781581923662041
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sánchez-TocinoHBringas-CalvoRIglesias-CortiñasDCorrelation between intraocular pressure, paquimetry and keratometry in a normal populationArch Soc Esp Oftalmol200782526727217516262
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• MatsumotoTMakinoHUozatoHSaishinMMiyamotoSThe influence of corneal thickness and curvature on the difference between intraocular pressure measurements obtained with a non-contact tonometer and those with a Goldmann applanation tonometerJpn J Ophthalmol200044669123
   Google Scholar
• NejabatMHeidaryFTalebnejadMRCorrelation between intraocular pressure and central corneal thickness in persian childrenOphthalmol Ther20165223524327709441
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• WhitacreMMSteinRSources of error with use of Goldmanntype tonometersSurv Ophthalmol19933811308235993
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HaradaYHiroseNKubotaTTawaraAThe influence of central corneal thickness and corneal curvature radius on the intraocular pressure as measured by different tonometers: noncontact and goldmann applanation tonometersJ Glaucoma200817861962519092456
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FukuokaSAiharaMIwaseAAraieMIntraocular pressure in an ophthalmologically normal Japanese populationActa Ophthalmol200886443443918039350
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BrightDCPotterJWAllenDCSpruanceRDGoldmann applanation tonometry without fluoresceinAm J Optom Physiol Opt19815812112011267325201
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• ArendNHirneissCKerntMDifferences in the measurement results of Goldmann applanation tonometry with and without fluoresceinOphthalmologe2014111324124623604252
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar