360° ab-interno Schlemm’s canal viscodilation in primary open-angle glaucoma

References

• Quigley HA, Broman AT. The number of people with glaucoma worldwide in 2010 and 2020. Br J Ophthalmol. 2006;90(3):262–267. doi:10.1136/bjo.2005.081224
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grieshaber MC, Pienaar A, Olivier J, Stegmann R. Canaloplasty for primary open-angle glaucoma: long-term outcome. Br J Ophthalmol. 2010;94(11):1478–1482. doi:10.1136/bjo.2009.163170
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saheb H, Ahmed II. Micro-invasive glaucoma surgery: current perspectives and future directions. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2012;23(2):96–104. doi:10.1097/ICU.0b013e32834ff1e7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahmed K II. MIGS and the FDA: what’s in a name? Ophthalmology. 2015;122(9):1737–1738. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2015.06.022
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stegmann R. Visco-canalostomy: a new surgical technique for open angle glaucoma. Ann de Istituto Barraquer. 1995;25:229–232.
   Google Scholar
• Stegmann R, Pienaar A, Grieshaber MC. Schlemm’s canal surgery: restoring physiological aqueous outflow. In: Grieshaber MC, Orgul S, Flammer J, editors. Glaucoma Therapy—State of the Art. Basel, Switzerland: Association for Continuing Education in Ophthalmology; 2009:113–120.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis RA, von Wolff K, Tetz M, et al. Canaloplasty: three-year results of circumferential viscodilation and tensioning of Schlemm’s canal using a microcatheter to treat open-angle glaucoma. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2011;37(4):682–690. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2010.10.055
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brüggemann A, Despouy JT, Wegent A, Müller M. Intraindividual comparison of canaloplasty versus trabeculectomy with mitomycin C in a single-surgeon series. J Glaucoma. 2013;22(7):577–583. doi:10.1097/IJG.0b013e318255bb30
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klink T, Sauer J, Körber NJ, et al. Quality of life following glaucoma surgery: canaloplasty versus trabeculectomy. Clin Ophthalmol. 2014;18(9):7–16. doi:10.2147/OPTH.S72357
   Google Scholar
• Bull H, von Wolff K, Körber NJ, Tetz M. Three-year canaloplasty outcomes for the treatment of open-angle glaucoma: European study results. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2011;249(10):1537–1545. doi:10.1007/s00417-011-1728-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis RA, von Wolff K, Tetz M, et al. Canaloplasty: circumferential viscodilation and tensioning of Schlemm’s canal using a flexible microcatheter for the treatment of open-angle glaucoma in adults: interim clinical study analysis. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2007;33(7):1217–1226. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2007.03.051
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vastardis I, Fili S, Gatzioufis Z, Kohlhaas M. Ab externo canaloplasty results and efficacy: a retrospective cohort study with a 12-month follow-up. Eye Vis (Lond). 2019;6(1):9. doi:10.1186/s40662-019-0134-5
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gallardo MJ, Supnet RA, Ahmed IIK. Circumferential viscodilation of Schlemm’s canal for open-angle glaucoma: ab-interno vs ab externo canaloplasty with tensioning suture. Clin Ophthalmol. 2018;12:2493–2498. doi:10.2147/OPTH.S178962
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Körber N. Ab interno canaloplasty for the treatment of glaucoma: a case series study. Specktrum Augenheilkd. 2018;32:223–227. doi:10.1007/s00717-018-0416-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yook E, Vinod K, Panarelli JF. Complications of micro-invasive glaucoma surgery. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2018;29(2):147–154. doi:10.1097/ICU.0000000000000457
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lavia C, Dallorto L, Maule M, Ceccarelli M, Fea AM, Virgili G. Minimally-invasive glaucoma surgeries (MIGS) for open angle glaucoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2017;12(8):e0183142. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0183142
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Craven ER, Katz J, Wells J, Giamporcaro JE, iStent Study Group. Cataract surgery with trabecular micro-bypass stent implantation in patients with mild-moderate open-angle glaucoma and cataract: two-year follow-up. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2012;38(8):1339–1345. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2012.03.025
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bourne RR, Stevens GA, White RA, et al. Causes of vision loss worldwide, 1990-2010: a systematic analysis. Lancet Glob Health. 2013;1(6):339–349. doi:10.1016/S2214-109X(13)70113-X
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samuelson TW, Chang DF, Marquis R, et al. A Schlemm canal microstent for intraocular pressure reduction in primary open-angle glaucoma and cataract: the HORIZON study. Ophthalmology. 2019;126(1):29–37. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2018.05.012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang ML, Hirunyachote P, Jampel H. Combined surgery versus cataract surgery alone for eyes with cataract and glaucoma. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;7:CD008671.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vold S, Ahmed II, Craven ER, et al. Two-year COMPASS trial results: supraciliary microstenting with phacoemulsification in patients with open-angle glaucoma and cataracts. Ophthalmology. 2016;123(10):2103–2112. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2016.06.032
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Francis BA, Berke SJ, Dustin L, Noecker R. Endoscopic cyclophotocoagulation combined with phacoemulsification versus phacoemulsification alone in medically controlled glaucoma. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2014;40(8):1313–1321. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2014.06.021
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arthur SN, Cantor LB, WuDunn D, et al. Efficacy, safety, and survival rates of IOP-lowering effect of phacoemulsification alone or combined with canaloplasty in glaucoma patients. J Glaucoma. 2014;23(5):316–320. doi:10.1097/IJG.0b013e3182741ca9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Armstrong JJ, Wasiuta T, Kiatos E, Malvankar-Mehta M, Hutnik CML. The effects of phacoemulsification on intraocular pressure and topical medication use in patients with glaucoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 3-year data. J Glaucoma. 2017;26(6):511–522. doi:10.1097/IJG.0000000000000643
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moses RA. The effect of intraocular pressure on resistance to outflow. Surv Ophthalmol. 1977;22(2):88–100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brubaker RF. The effect of intraocular pressure on conventional outflow resistance in the enucleated human eye. Invest Ophthalmol. 1975;14(4):286–292.
   Google Scholar
• Lu Z, Overby DR, Scott PA, Freddo TF, Gong H. The mechanism of increasing outflow facility by rho-kinase inhibition with Y-27632 in bovine eyes. Exp Eye Res. 2008;86(2):271–281. doi:10.1016/j.exer.2007.10.018
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Battista SA, Lu Z, Hofmann S, Freddo T, Overby DR, Gong H. Reduction of the available area for aqueous humor outflow and increase in meshwork herniations into collector channels following acute IOP elevation in bovine eyes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2008;49(12):5346–5352. doi:10.1167/iovs.08-1707
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar