Comparison of successful outcome predictors for MicroPulse^® laser trabeculoplasty and selective laser trabeculoplasty at 6 months

References

• Wise J, Witter S. Argon laser therapy for open-angle glaucoma. A pilot study. Arh Opthalmol. 1979;97(2):319–322. doi:10.1001/archopht.1979.01020010165017
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahmed I. Sidebar: micropulse laser trabeculoplasty. Glucoma Today. 2014 Oct..
   Google Scholar
• Prum B Jr, Rosenberg L, Gedde S, et al. Primary open-angle glaucoma preferred practice pattern® guidelines. Ophthalmology. 2016;123(1):41–111. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2015.10.053
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hady S. 10 ways to optimize treatment with SLT. Rev Ophthalmol. 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Pate C, Deokule S. Review of current lasers in the management of glaucoma. J Curr Glaucoma Pract. 2008;2(3):4–7. doi:10.5005/jp-journals-10008-1034
   Google Scholar
• Noecker R. ALT, MLT, SLT. Glaucoma Today. 2009 Mar..
   Google Scholar
• Detry-Morel M, Muschart F, Pourjavan S. Micropulse diode laser (810 nm) versus argon laser trabeculoplasty in the treatment of open-angle glaucoma: comparative short-term safety and efficacy profile. Bull Soc Belge Ophthalmol. 2008;21–28.
   Google Scholar
• De León M, Ortega Santana JF, García López A. Selective laser trabeculoplasty vs micropulse laser trabeculoplasty for the treatment of open angle glaucoma and ocular hypertension. Int J Res Med Health Sci. 2017;14(1):30–34.
   Google Scholar
• Valera Cornejo D, Loayza Gamboa W, Herrera Quiroz J, et al. Micropulse laser trabeculoplasty as an adjuvant treatment for uncontrolled open angle glaucoma. New Front Ophthalmol. 2017;4(1). doi:10.15761/NFO.1000187
   Google Scholar
• Harasymowycz P, Papamatheakis D, Latina M, De Leon M, Lesk M, Damji K. Selective Laser Trabeculoplasty (SLT) complicated by intraocular pressure elevation in eyes with heavily pigmented trabecular meshworks. Am J Ophthalmol. 2005;139(6):1110–1113. doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2004.11.038
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haque M, Hughes BA, Juzych MS, et al. The effect of Selective Laser Trabeculoplasty (SLT) with heavy versus light pigmentation of the Trabecular Meshwork (TM). IOVS. 2009;50(13):161.
   Google Scholar
• Mills R, Budenz D, Lee P, et al. Categorizing the stage of glaucoma from pre-diagnosis to end-stage disease. Am J Ophthalmol. 2006;141(1):24–30. doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2005.07.044
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mattox C. Glaucoma stage definitions. 2014. Available from: https://www.aao.org/assets/68cdbc7d-35ba-47ce-b95e-726eb503fe3e/635577092075270000/how-to-code-for-different-stages-of-glaucoma-using-icd-10-codes-pdf?inline=1. Accessed January 30, 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Fellman R, Mattox C, Ross K. Know the new glaucoma staging codes. EyeNet Mag. 2011;65–66.
   Google Scholar
• Lee J, Lee Y, Moon J, Park M. Long-term outcomes and predictive factors for success of selective laser trabeculoplasty. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 2014;55(9):1347–1354. doi:10.3341/jkos.2014.55.9.1347
   Google Scholar
• Ayala M, Enping C. Predictive factors of success in selective laser trabeculoplasty (SLT) treatment. Clin Ophthalmol. 2011;5:573–576. doi:10.2147/OPTH.S19873
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bruen R, Lesk M, Harasymowycz P. Baseline factors predictive of SLT response: a prospective study. J Ophthalmol. 2012;642869.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee J, Lui C, Chan J, Lai J. Predictors of success in selective laser trabeculoplasty for chinese open-angle glaucoma. J Glaucom. 2014;23(5):321–325. doi:10.1097/IJG.0000000000000049
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chun M, Gracitelli C, Lopes F, Biteli L, Ushida M, Prata T. Selective laser trabeculoplasty for early glaucoma: analysis of success predictors and adjusted laser outcomes based on the untreated fellow eye. BMC Ophthalmol. 2016;16:206. doi:10.1186/s12886-016-0385-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mao A, Pan X, McIlraith I, Strasfeld M, Coley G, Kutnik C. Development of a prediction rule to estimate the probability of acceptable intraocular pressure reduction after selective laser trabeculoplasty in open-angle glaucoma and ocular hypertension. J Glaucoma. 2008;17(6):449–454. doi:10.1097/IJG.0b013e31815f52cb
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martow E, Hutnik C, Mao A. SLT and adjunctive medical therapy: a prediction rule analysis. J Glaucoma. 2011;20(4):266–270. doi:10.1097/IJG.0b013e3181e3d2c1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gracner T, Naji M, Hudovernik M, Gracner B, Pahor D. [Predictive factors of successful selective laser trabeculoplasty in open-angle glaucoma]. Klin Monbl Augenheikd. 2007;224(12):922–926.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koucheki B, Hashemi H. Selective laser trabeculoplasty in the treatment of open-angle glaucoma. J Glaucoma. 2012;21(1):65–70. doi:10.1097/IJG.0b013e3182027596
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee J, Liu C, Chang J, Wong R, Wong I, Lai J. Predictors of success in selective laser trabeculoplasty for primary open angle glaucoma in Chinese. Clin Ophthalmol. 2014;9:1787–1791. doi:10.2147/OPTH.S69166
   Google Scholar
• Gazzard G, Konstantakopoulou E, Garway-Heath D, et al; Laser in Glaucoma and Ocular Hypertension (LiGHT) trial. A multicentre, randomised controlled trial: design and methodology. Br J Ophthalmol. 2018;102(5):593–598. doi:10.1136/bjophthalmol-2017-310877
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abramowitz B, Chadha N, Kouchouk A, Alhabshan R, Belyea D, Lamba T. Selective laser trabeculoplasty vs micropulse laser trabeculoplasty in open-angle glaucoma. Clin Ophthalmol. 2018;12:1599–1604. doi:10.2147/OPTH.S167102
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahmed I. Excellent safety profile of Micropulse Laser Trabeculoplasty (MLT) for glaucoma. Glaucoma Today. 2014 Dec:1–2.
   Google Scholar
• Barkana Y, Belken M. Selective laser trabeculoplasty. Surv Ophthalmol. 2007;52:634–654. doi:10.1016/j.survophthal.2007.08.014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee J, Yau G, Yick D, Yuen C. MicroPulse laser trabeculoplasty for the treatment of open-angle glaucoma. Medicin. 2015;94(49):e2075. doi:10.1097/MD.0000000000002075
   Google Scholar
• Hirabayashi M, Ponnusamy V, An J. Predictive factors for outcomes of selective laser trabeculoplasty. Poster presented at the: American Glaucoma Society 29th Annual Meeting; March 16, 2019; San Francisco, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Leahy K, White A. Selective laser trabeculoplasty: current perspectives. Clin Ophthalmol. 2015;9:833–841. doi:10.2147/OPTH.S53490
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• L’Esperance F. Clinical photocoagulation with the organic dye laser. A preliminary communication. Arch Ophthalmol. 1985;103(9):1312–1316.
   Google Scholar
• Mainster M. Wavelength selection in macular photocoagulation. Tissue optics, thermal effects, and laser systems. Ophthalmology. 1986;93(7):952–958.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Keyser M, De Belder M, De Belder S, De Groot V. Where does selective laser trabeculoplasty stand now? A review. Eye Vis. 2016;3(1). doi:10.1186/s40662-016-0041-y
   Google Scholar
• Yujia Z, Ahmad A. A review of selective laser trabeculoplasty: recent findings and current perspectives. Ophthalmol Ther. 2017;6(1):19–32. doi:10.1007/s40123-017-0082-x
   Google Scholar
• Song J. Complications of selective laser trabeculoplasty: a review. Clin Ophthalmol. 2016;10:137–143. doi:10.2147/OPTH.S84996
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miki A, Kawashima R, Usui S, Matsushita K, Nishida K. Treatment outcomes and prognostic factors of selective laser trabeculoplasty for open-angle glaucoma receiving maximal-tolerable medical therapy. J Glaucoma. 2016;25(10):785–789. doi:10.1097/IJG.0000000000000411
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar