110
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Research

Accuracy, speed and repeatability of the voice assisted subjective refractor (VASR)

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon &
Pages 1807-1813 | Published online: 12 Sep 2019

References

  • Collins G. The electronic refractionometer. Br J Physiol Optics. 1937;11:30–42.
  • Collins G. The electronic refractionometer. Aust J Optom. 1939;22:122–132.
  • Knoll HA, Mohrman R. The ophthalmetron, principles and operation. Am J Optom Arch Am Acad Optom. 1972;49:122–128. doi:10.1097/00006324-197202000-00006
  • Floyd RP, Garcia G. The ophthalmetron: a clinical trial of accuracy. Arch Ophthalmol. 1974;92:10–14. doi:10.1001/archopht.1974.01010010014004
  • Sloan PG, Poise KA. Preliminary clinical evaluation of the Dioptron. Am J Optom Physiol Opt. 1974;51(3):189–197. doi:10.1097/00006324-197403000-00004
  • Polse DA, Kerr KE. An automatic objective optometer. Description and clinical evaluation. Arch Ophthalmol. 1975;93:225–231. doi:10.1001/archopht.1975.01010020233013
  • Pappas CJ, Anderson DR, Briese FW. Clinical evaluation of the 6600 Autorefractor. Arch Ophthalmol. 1978;96:993–996. doi:10.1001/archopht.1978.03910050517001
  • Humphrey WE. Automatic retinoscopy: the humphrey vision analyzer. Optician. 1977;173:17–27.
  • Elmstrom G. Humphrey vision analyzer. J Am Optom Assoc. 1976;47:973–974.
  • Efron N. Instrument review: the humphrey vision analyser. Aust J Optom. 1981;64:149–153.
  • Al-Rashidi SH, Albahouth AA, Althwini WA, et al. Prevalence refractive errors among Medical Students of Qassim University, Saudi Arabia: cross-sectional descriptive study. Open Access Maced J Med Sci. 2018;6:940–943. doi:10.3889/oamjms.2018.221
  • Mountjoy E, Davies NM, Plotnikov D, et al. Education and myopia: assessing the direction of causality by mendelian randomisation. BMJ. 2018;361:k2022. doi:10.1136/bmj.k2022
  • Dave T, Fukuma Y. Clinical evaluation of the Topcon BV-1000 automated subjective refraction system. Optom Vis Sci. 2004;81:323–333.
  • Trattler WB. Comparative evaluation of subjective point-spread function refraction results with subjective phoropter results on keratoconus patients. Poster presented at ASCRS; April 17; 2015; San Diego, CA.
  • Momeni-Moghaddam H, Goss DA. Comparison of four different binocular balancing techniques. Clin Exp Optom. 2014;97:422–425. doi:10.1111/cxo.2014.97.issue-5
  • Geffen D, Brujic M. Is binocular balancing with subjective refraction a thing of the past? Poster presented at Optometry’s Meeting (American Optometric Association), June 27, 2015. Seattle, WA.