Corneal Ectasia Risk And Percentage Tissue Altered In Myopic Patients Presenting For Refractive Surgery

References

• Sugar A, Rapuano CJ, Culbertson WW, et al. Laser in situ keratomileusis for myopia and astigmatism: safety and efficacy: a report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology. Ophthalmology. 2002;109:175–187. doi:10.1016/s0161-6420(01)00966-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dupps WJ Jr., Wilson SE. Biomechanics and wound healing in the cornea. Exp Eye Res. 2006;83:709–720. doi:10.1016/j.exer.2006.03.015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santhiago MR, Wilson SE. Cellular effects after laser in situ keratomileusis flap formation with femtosecond lasers: a review. Cornea. 2012;31:198–205. doi:10.1097/ICO.0b013e3182068c42
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smolek MK, McCarey BE. Interlamellar adhesive strength in human eyebank corneas. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1990;31:1087–1095.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muller LJ, Pels E, Vrensen GF. The specific architecture of the anterior stroma accounts for maintenance of corneal curvature. Br J Ophthalmol. 2001;85:437–443. doi:10.1136/bjo.85.4.437
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dawson DG, Grossniklaus HE, McCarey BE, Edelhauser HF. Biomechanical and wound healing characteristics of corneas after excimer laser keratorefractive surgery: is there a difference between advanced surface ablation and sub-Bowman’s keratomileusis? J Refract Surg. 2008;24:S90–6. doi:10.3928/1081597X-20080101-16
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Randleman JB, Dawson DG, Grossniklaus HE, McCarey BE, Edelhauser HF. Depth-dependent cohesive tensile strength in human donor corneas: implications for refractive surgery. J Refract Surg. 2008;24:S85–9. doi:10.3928/1081597X-20080101-15
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts CJ, Dupps WJ Jr. Biomechanics of corneal ectasia and biomechanical treatments. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2014;40:991–998. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2014.04.013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Randleman JB, Russell B, Ward MA, Thompson KP, Stulting RD. Risk factors and prognosis for corneal ectasia after LASIK. Ophthalmology. 2003;110:267–275. doi:10.1016/S0161-6420(02)01727-X
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Randleman JB, Trattler WB, Stulting RD. Validation of the ectasia risk score system for preoperative laser in situ keratomileusis screening. Am J Ophthalmol. 2008;145:813–818. doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2007.12.033
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Randleman JB, Woodward M, Lynn MJ, Stulting RD. Risk assessment for ectasia after corneal refractive surgery. Ophthalmology. 2008;115:37–50. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2007.03.073
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pallikaris IG, Kymionis GD, Astyrakakis NI. Corneal ectasia induced by laser in situ keratomileusis. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2001;27:1796–1802. doi:10.1016/s0886-3350(01)01090-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rad AS, Jabbarvand M, Saifi N. Progressive keratectasia after laser in situ keratomileusis. J Refract Surg. 2004;20:S718–22.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bohac M, Koncarevic M, Pasalic A, et al. Incidence and clinical characteristics of post LASIK ectasia: a review of over 30,000 LASIK cases. Semin Ophthalmol. 2018;33:869–877. doi:10.1080/08820538.2018.1539183
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amoils SP, Deist MB, Gous P, Amoils PM. Iatrogenic keratectasia after laser in situ keratomileusis for less than −4.0 to −7.0 diopters of myopia. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2000;26:967–977. doi:10.1016/s0886-3350(00)00434-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seo KY, Lee JH, Kim MJ, et al. Effect of suturing on latrogenic keratectasia after laser in situ keratomileusis. J Refract Surg. 2004;20:40–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parmar D, Claoue C. Keratectasia following excimer laser photorefractive keratectomy. Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 2004;82:102–105.
   Google Scholar
• Santhiago MR, Smadja D, Gomes BF, et al. Association between the percent tissue altered and post-laser in situ keratomileusis ectasia in eyes with normal preoperative topography. Am J Ophthalmol. 2014;158:87–95 e1. doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2014.04.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santhiago MR, Smadja D, Wilson SE, Krueger RR, Monteiro ML, Randleman JB. Role of percent tissue altered on ectasia after LASIK in eyes with suspicious topography. J Refract Surg. 2015;31:258–265. doi:10.3928/1081597X-20150319-05
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santhiago MR. Percent tissue altered and corneal ectasia. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2016;27:311–315. doi:10.1097/ICU.0000000000000276
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santhiago MR, Wilson SE, Smadja D, Chamon W, Krueger RE, Randleman JB. Validation of the Percent Tissue Altered as a Risk Factor for Ectasia after LASIK. Ophthalmology. 2019;126:908–909. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2019.01.018
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garcia-Gonzalez M, Drake Rodriguez-Casanova P, Rodriguez-Perez I, Rodero A, Teus MA. Long-term follow-up of LASEK with mitomycin C performed to correct myopia in thin corneas. J Refract Surg. 2017;33:813–819. doi:10.3928/1081597X-20171004-06
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sekundo W, Kunert KS, Blum M. Small incision corneal refractive surgery using the small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) procedure for the correction of myopia and myopic astigmatism: results of a 6 month prospective study. Br J Ophthalmol. 2011;95:335–339. doi:10.1136/bjo.2009.174284
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shah R, Shah S, Sengupta S. Results of small incision lenticule extraction: all-in-one femtosecond laser refractive surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2011;37:127–137. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2010.07.033
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reinstein DZ, Archer TJ, Randleman JB. Mathematical model to compare the relative tensile strength of the cornea after PRK, LASIK, and small incision lenticule extraction. J Refract Surg. 2013;29:454–460. doi:10.3928/1081597X-20130617-03
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sinha Roy A, Dupps WJ Jr., Roberts CJ. Comparison of biomechanical effects of small-incision lenticule extraction and laser in situ keratomileusis: finite-element analysis. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2014;40:971–980. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2013.08.065
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang D, Liu M, Chen Y, et al. Differences in the corneal biomechanical changes after SMILE and LASIK. J Refract Surg. 2014;30:702–707. doi:10.3928/1081597X-20140903-09
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu D, Wang Y, Zhang L, Wei S, Tang X. Corneal biomechanical effects: small-incision lenticule extraction versus femtosecond laser-assisted laser in situ keratomileusis. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2014;40:954–962. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2013.07.056
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osman IM, Helaly HA, Abdalla M, Shousha MA. Corneal biomechanical changes in eyes with small incision lenticule extraction and laser assisted in situ keratomileusis. BMC Ophthalmol. 2016;16:123. doi:10.1186/s12886-016-0304-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pedersen IB, Bak-Nielsen S, Vestergaard AH, Ivarsen A, Hjortdal J. Corneal biomechanical properties after LASIK, ReLEx flex, and ReLEx smile by scheimpflug-based dynamic tonometry. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2014;252:1329–1335. doi:10.1007/s00417-014-2667-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sefat SM, Wiltfang R, Bechmann M, Mayer WJ, Kampik A, Kook D. Evaluation of changes in human corneas after femtosecond Laser-Assisted LASIK and Small-Incision Lenticule Extraction (SMILE) using non-contact tonometry and ultra-high-speed camera (Corvis ST). Curr Eye Res. 2016;41:917–922. doi:10.3109/02713683.2015.1082185
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shen Y, Chen Z, Knorz MC, Li M, Zhao J, Zhou X. Comparison of corneal deformation parameters after SMILE, LASEK, and femtosecond laser-assisted LASIK. J Refract Surg. 2014;30:310–318.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sachdev G, Sachdev MS, Sachdev R, Gupta H. Unilateral corneal ectasia following small-incision lenticule extraction. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2015;41:2014–2018. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2015.08.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mastropasqua L. Bilateral ectasia after femtosecond laser-assisted small-incision lenticule extraction. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2015;41:1338–1339. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2015.05.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang Y, Cui C, Li Z, et al. Corneal ectasia 6.5 months after small-incision lenticule extraction. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2015;41:1100–1106. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2015.04.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• El-Naggar MT. Bilateral ectasia after femtosecond laser-assisted small-incision lenticule extraction. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2015;41:884–888. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2015.02.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mattila JS, Holopainen JM. Bilateral ectasia after femtosecond laser-assisted Small Incision Lenticule Extraction (SMILE). J Refract Surg. 2016;32:497–500. doi:10.3928/1081597X-20160502-03
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moshirfar M, Albarracin JC, Desautels JD, Birdsong OC, Linn SH, Hoopes PC Sr. Ectasia following small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE): a review of the literature. Clin Ophthalmol. 2017;11:1683–1688. doi:10.2147/OPTH.S147011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muftuoglu O, Ayar O, Ozulken K, Ozyol E, Akinci A. Posterior corneal elevation and back difference corneal elevation in diagnosing forme fruste keratoconus in the fellow eyes of unilateral keratoconus patients. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2013;39:1348–1357. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2013.03.023
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ang M, Tan D, Mehta JS. Small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) versus laser in-situ keratomileusis (LASIK): study protocol for a randomized, non-inferiority trial. Trials. 2012;13:75. doi:10.1186/1745-6215-13-75
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ang M, Mehta JS, Chan C, Htoon HM, Koh JC, Tan DT. Refractive lenticule extraction: transition and comparison of 3 surgical techniques. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2014;40:1415–1424. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2013.12.026
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Armstrong RA. Statistical guidelines for the analysis of data obtained from one or both eyes. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2013;33:7–14. doi:10.1111/opo.2012.33.issue-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tan DK, Tay WT, Chan C, Tan DT, Mehta JS. Postoperative ocular higher-order aberrations and contrast sensitivity: femtosecond lenticule extraction versus pseudo small-incision lenticule extraction. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2015;41:623–634. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2014.07.032
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wong JX, Wong EP, Htoon HM, Mehta JS. Intraoperative centration during small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE). Medicine. 2017;96:e6076. doi:10.1097/MD.0000000000006076
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pillar A, Krueger R. Advances in refractive surgery: june 2014 to july 2015. Asia Pac J Clin Oncol. 2016;5:212–222. doi:10.1097/APO.0000000000000200
   Google Scholar
• Klein SR, Epstein RJ, Randleman JB, Stulting RD. Corneal ectasia after laser in situ keratomileusis in patients without apparent preoperative risk factors. Cornea. 2006;25:388–403. doi:10.1097/01.ico.0000222479.68242.77
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saad A, Gatinel D. Bilateral corneal ectasia after laser in situ keratomileusis in patient with isolated difference in central corneal thickness between eyes. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2010;36:1033–1035. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2010.03.023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ambrosio R Jr., Dawson DG, Salomao M, Guerra FP, Caiado AL, Belin MW. Corneal ectasia after LASIK despite low preoperative risk: tomographic and biomechanical findings in the unoperated, stable, fellow eye. J Refract Surg. 2010;26:906–911. doi:10.3928/1081597X-20100428-02
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goncalves FA, Goncalves JM. Corneal ectasia after LASIK in a patient with normal scheimpflug evaluation but a high ectasia risk score. J Refract Surg. 2013;29:792–795. doi:10.3928/1081597X-20130813-01
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alio JL, Muftuoglu O, Ortiz D, et al. Ten-year follow-up of laser in situ keratomileusis for high myopia. Am J Ophthalmol. 2008;145:55–64. doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2007.08.035
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maeda N, Klyce SD, Smolek MK, Thompson HW. Automated keratoconus screening with corneal topography analysis. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1994;35:2749–2757.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maeda N, Klyce SD, Tano Y. Detection and classification of mild irregular astigmatism in patients with good visual acuity. Surv Ophthalmol. 1998;43:53–58.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maeda N, Klyce SD, Smolek MK. Comparison of methods for detecting keratoconus using videokeratography. Arch Ophthalmol. 1995;113:870–874. doi:10.1001/archopht.1995.01100070044023
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rabinowitz YS. Videokeratographic indices to aid in screening for keratoconus. J Refract Surg. 1995;11:371–379.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rabinowitz YS, Rasheed K. KISA% index: a quantitative videokeratography algorithm embodying minimal topographic criteria for diagnosing keratoconus. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1999;25:1327–1335. doi:10.1016/s0886-3350(99)00195-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smadja D, Touboul D, Cohen A, et al. Detection of subclinical keratoconus using an automated decision tree classification. Am J Ophthalmol. 2013;156:237–46 e1. doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2013.03.034
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ambrosio R Jr., Alonso RS, Luz A, Coca Velarde LG. Corneal-thickness spatial profile and corneal-volume distribution: tomographic indices to detect keratoconus. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2006;32:1851–1859. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2006.06.025
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ambrosio R Jr., Caiado AL, Guerra FP, et al. Novel pachymetric parameters based on corneal tomography for diagnosing keratoconus. J Refract Surg. 2011;27:753–758. doi:10.3928/1081597X-20110721-01
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan C, Ang M, Saad A, et al. Validation of an objective scoring system for forme fruste keratoconus detection and post-LASIK ectasia risk assessment in Asian eyes. Cornea. 2015;34:996–1004. doi:10.1097/ICO.0000000000000529
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smadja D, Santhiago MR, Mello GR, Krueger RR, Colin J, Touboul D. Influence of the reference surface shape for discriminating between normal corneas, subclinical keratoconus, and keratoconus. J Refract Surg. 2013;29:274–281. doi:10.3928/1081597X-20130318-07
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buhren J, Kook D, Yoon G, Kohnen T. Detection of subclinical keratoconus by using corneal anterior and posterior surface aberrations and thickness spatial profiles. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2010;51:3424–3432. doi:10.1167/iovs.09-4960
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahmoud AM, Nunez MX, Blanco C, et al. Expanding the cone location and magnitude index to include corneal thickness and posterior surface information for the detection of keratoconus. Am J Ophthalmol. 2013;156:1102–1111. doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2013.07.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gomes JA, Tan D, Rapuano CJ, et al. Global consensus on keratoconus and ectatic diseases. Cornea. 2015;34:359–369. doi:10.1097/ICO.0000000000000408
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Labiris G, Giarmoukakis A, Gatzioufas Z, Sideroudi H, Kozobolis V, Seitz B. Diagnostic capacity of the keratoconus match index and keratoconus match probability in subclinical keratoconus. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2014;40:999–1005. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2013.08.064
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fontes BM, Ambrosio R Jr., Jardim D, Velarde GC, Nose W. Corneal biomechanical metrics and anterior segment parameters in mild keratoconus. Ophthalmology. 2010;117:673–679. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2009.09.023
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vinciguerra R, Ambrosio R Jr., Elsheikh A, et al. Detection of keratoconus with a new biomechanical index. J Refract Surg. 2016;32:803–810. doi:10.3928/1081597X-20160629-01
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ambrosio R Jr., Lopes BT, Faria-Correia F, et al. Integration of scheimpflug-based corneal tomography and biomechanical assessments for enhancing ectasia detection. J Refract Surg. 2017;33:434–443. doi:10.3928/1081597X-20170426-02
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Talamo JH, Meltzer J, Gardner J. Reproducibility of flap thickness with intraLase FS and Moria LSK-1 and M2 microkeratomes. J Refract Surg. 2006;22:556–561.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patel SV, Maguire LJ, McLaren JW, Hodge DO, Bourne WM. Femtosecond laser versus mechanical microkeratome for LASIK: a randomized controlled study. Ophthalmology. 2007;114:1482–1490. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2006.10.057
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kanellopoulos AJ, Asimellis G. Three-dimensional LASIK flap thickness variability: topographic central, paracentral and peripheral assessment, in flaps created by a mechanical microkeratome (M2) and two different femtosecond lasers (FS60 and FS200). Clin Ophthalmol. 2013;7:675–683. doi:10.2147/OPTH.S40762
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Reinstein DZ, Srivannaboon S, Archer TJ, Silverman RH, Sutton H, Coleman DJ. Probability model of the inaccuracy of residual stromal thickness prediction to reduce the risk of ectasia after LASIK part I: quantifying individual risk. J Refract Surg. 2006;22:851–860.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sorkin N, Kaiserman I, Domniz Y, Sela T, Munzer G, Varssano D. Risk assessment for corneal ectasia following photorefractive keratectomy. J Ophthalmol. 2017;2017:2434830. doi:10.1155/2017/2434830
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knox Cartwright NE, Tyrer JR, Jaycock PD, Marshall J. Effects of variation in depth and side cut angulations in LASIK and thin-flap LASIK using a femtosecond laser: a biomechanical study. J Refract Surg. 2012;28:419–425. doi:10.3928/1081597X-20120518-07
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lazreg S, Mesplie N, Praud D, et al. Comparison of corneal thickness and biomechanical properties between North African and French patients. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2013;39:425–430. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2012.09.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar