90
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Research

The Clinical Course of Patients with Idiopathic Epiretinal Membranes and Good Visual Acuity Managed Without Surgery

, , , , , ORCID Icon & show all
Pages 2469-2475 | Published online: 12 Dec 2019

References

  • Allen AW Jr., Gass JD. Contraction of a perifoveal epiretinal membrane simulating a macular hole. Am J Ophthalmol. 1976;82(5):684–691. doi:10.1016/0002-9394(76)90002-7
  • Aung KZ, Makeyeva G, Adams MK, et al. The prevalence and risk factors of epiretinal membranes: the Melbourne Collaborative Cohort Study. Retina. 2013;33(5):1026–1034. doi:10.1097/IAE.0b013e3182733f25
  • Ng CH, Cheung N, Wang JJ, et al. Prevalence and risk factors for epiretinal membranes in a multi-ethnic United States population. Ophthalmology. 2011;118(4):694–699. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2010.08.009
  • Folk JC, Adelman RA, Flaxel CJ, et al. Idiopathic epiretinal membrane and vitreomacular traction preferred practice pattern((R)) guidelines. Ophthalmology. 2016;123(1):P152–P181. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2015.10.048
  • Thompson JT. Epiretinal membrane removal in eyes with good visual acuities. Retina. 2005;25(7):875–882. doi:10.1097/00006982-200510000-00010
  • Suh MH, Seo JM, Park KH, Yu HG. Associations between macular findings by optical coherence tomography and visual outcomes after epiretinal membrane removal. Am J Ophthalmol. 2009;147(3):473–80.e3. doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2008.09.020
  • Rice TA, De Bustros S, Michels RG, et al. Prognostic factors in vitrectomy for epiretinal membranes of the macula. Ophthalmology. 1986;93(5):602–610. doi:10.1016/S0161-6420(86)33689-3
  • Lum F, Feder RS, McLeod SD, Parke DW 2nd. The preferred practice pattern guidelines in ophthalmology. Ophthalmology. 2016;123(5):928–929. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2016.01.024
  • Haouchine B, Massin P, Tadayoni R, et al. Diagnosis of macular pseudoholes and lamellar macular holes by optical coherence tomography. Am J Ophthalmol. 2004;138(5):732–739. doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2004.06.088
  • Lehpamer BP, Carvounis PE. Pars plana vitrectomy for symptomatic epiretinal membranes in eyes with 20/50 or better preoperative visual acuity. Retina. 2015;35(9):1822–1827. doi:10.1097/IAE.0000000000000541
  • Fraser-Bell S, Guzowski M, Rochtchina E, et al. Five-year cumulative incidence and progression of epiretinal membranes: the blue mountains eye study. Ophthalmology. 2003;110(1):34–40. doi:10.1016/S0161-6420(02)01443-4
  • Falkner-Radler CI, Glittenberg C, Hagen S, et al. Spectral-domain optical coherence tomography for monitoring epiretinal membrane surgery. Ophthalmology. 2010;117(4):798–805. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2009.08.034
  • Kim J, Rhee KM, Woo SJ, et al. Long-term temporal changes of macular thickness and visual outcome after vitrectomy for idiopathic epiretinal membrane. Am J Ophthalmol. 2010;150(5):701–9.e1. doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2010.05.037
  • Parke DW 3rd, Lum F. Return to the operating room after macular surgery: IRIS registry analysis. Ophthalmology. 2018;125(8):1273–1278. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2018.01.009
  • Vaziri K, Schwartz SG, Kishor KS, et al. Rates of reoperation and retinal detachment after macular hole surgery. Ophthalmology. 2016;123(1):26–31. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2015.09.015
  • Sidd RJ, Fine SL, Owens SL, Patz A. Idiopathic preretinal gliosis. Am J Ophthalmol. 1982;94(1):44–48. doi:10.1016/0002-9394(82)90189-1
  • Wong JG, Sachdev N, Beaumont PE, Chang AA. Visual outcomes following vitrectomy and peeling of epiretinal membrane. Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2005;33(4):373–378. doi:10.1111/ceo.2005.33.issue-4
  • Greven CM, Slusher MM, Czyz CN. The natural history of macular pseudoholes. Am J Ophthalmol. 1998;125(3):360–366. doi:10.1016/S0002-9394(99)80147-0
  • Michalewska Z, Michalewski J, Odrobina D, Nawrocki J. Non-full-thickness macular holes reassessed with spectral domain optical coherence tomography. Retina. 2012;32(5):922–929. doi:10.1097/IAE.0b013e318227a9ef
  • Walter SD, Flynn HW Jr. Spectral domain optical coherence tomography documentation of macular pseudohole evolution and spontaneous resolution. Retin Cases Brief Rep. 2016;10(4):377–381. doi:10.1097/ICB.0000000000000268