Comparison of Goldmann and Pascal tonometry in relation to corneal hysteresis and central corneal thickness in nonglaucomatous eyes

References

• KassMAHeurDKHigginbothamEJThe ocular hypertension treatment study: a randomised trial determines that topical ocular hypotensive medication delays or prevents the onset of primary open-angle glaucomaArch Ophthalmol20021209670171312049574
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• LeskeMCHeijlAHusseinMBengtssonBHymanLKomaroffEEarly Manifest Glaucoma Trail Group. Factors for glaucoma progression and the effect of treatment: the early manifest glaucoma trialArch Ophthalmol20031211485612523884
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• GoldmannHSchmidtTApplanation tonometryOphthalmologica1957134422124213484216
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• EhlersNBramsenTSperlingSApplanation tonometry and central corneal thicknessActa Ophthalmol (Copenh)197553134431172910
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WesselsIFOhYTonometer utilization, accuracy, and calibration under field conditionsArch Ophthalmol199010812170917122256841
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• WhitacreMMSteinRSources of error with use of Goldmann-type tonometersSurv Ophthalmol19933811308235993
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WhitacreMMSteinRAHassaneinKThe effect of corneal thickness on applanation tonometryAm J Ophthalmol199311555925968488910
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BronAMCreuzot-GarcherCGoudeau-BoutillonSd’AthisPFalsely elevated intraocular pressure due to increased central corneal thicknessGraefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol1999237322022410090585
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DoughtyMJZamanMLHuman corneal thickness and its impact on intraocular pressure measures: a review and a meta-analysis approchSurv Ophthalmol200044536740810734239
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BrandtJDBeiserJAKassMAGordonMOCentral corneal thickness in the Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study (OHTS)Ophthalmology2001108101779178811581049
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DamjiKFMuniRHMungerRMInfluence of corneal variables on accuracy of intraocular pressure measurementJ Glaucoma2003121698012567117
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LiuJRobertsCJInfluence of corneal biomechanical properties on intraocular pressure messurments: quantitative analysisJ Cataract Refract Surg200531114615515721707
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BromanATCongdonNGBandeen-RocheKQuigleyHAInfluence of corneal structure, corneal responsiveness, and other ocular parameters on tonometric measurement of intraocular pressureJ Glaucoma200716758158818091174
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KumarNJivanSGoldmann applanation tonometer calibration error checks: current practice in the UKEye (Lond)200721673373416575417
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HerndonLWMeasuring intraocular pressure-adjustments for corneal thickness and new technologiesCurr Opin Ophthalmol200617211511916552245
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KanngiesserHEKniestedtCRobertYCDynamic contour tonometry: presentation of a new tonometerJ Glaucoma200514534435016148581
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LuceDADetermining in vivo biomechanical properties of the cornea with ocular analyzerJ Cataract Refract Surg200531115616215721708
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KaufmannCBachmannLMThielMAComparison of dynamic contour tonometry with goldmann applanation tonometryInvest Ophthalmol Vis Sci20044593118312115326129
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KniestedtCLinSChoeJBostromANeeMStamperRLClinical comparison of contour and applanation tonometry and their relationship to pachymetryArch Ophthalmol2005123111532153716286615
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• KuJYDanesh-MeyerHVCraigJPGambleGDMcGheeCNComparison of intraocular pressure measured by Pascal dynamic contour tonometry and Goldmann applanation tonometryEye (Lond)200620219119815803173
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martinez-de-la-CasaJMGarcia-FeijooJVicoEEffect of corneal thickness on dynamic contour, rebound, and goldmann tonometryOphthalmology2006113122156216216996599
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SchneiderEGrehnFIntraocular pressure measurement-comparison of dynamic contour tonometry and goldmann applanation tonometryJ Glaucoma20061512616378009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FrancisBAHsiehALaiMYLos Angeles Latino Eye Study Group. Effects of corneal thickness, corneal curvature, and intraocular pressure level on Goldmann applanation tonometry and dynamic contour tonometryOphthalmology20071141202617070592
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LanzaMBorrelliMDe BernardoMFilosaMLRosaNCorneal parameters and difference between goldmann applanation tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry in normal eyesJ Glaucoma200817646046418794680
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CerutiPMorbioRMarraffaMMarchiniGComparison of Goldmann applanation tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry in healthy and glaucomatous eyesEye (Lond)200923226226918219335
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LeeJLeeCHChoiJYoonSYSungKRComparison between dynamic contour tonometry and Goldmann applanation tonometryKorean J Ophthalmol2009231273119337476
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• KotechaAWhiteETShewryJMGarway-HeathDFThe relative effects of corneal thickness and age on Goldmann applanation tonometry and dynamic contour tonometryBr J Ophthalmol200589121572157516299132
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DoyleALachkarYComparison of dynamic contour tonometry with goldman applanation tonometry over a wide range of central corneal thicknessJ Glaucoma200514428829215990609
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SalvetatMLZeppieriMTosoniCBrusiniPComparisons between Pascal dynamic contour tonometry, the TonoPen, and Goldmann applanation tonometry in patients with glaucomaActa Ophthalmol Scand200785327227917488456
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• HalkiadakisIPatseaEChatzimichaliKComparison of dynamic contour tonometry with Goldmann applanation tonometry in glaucoma practiceActa Ophthalmol200987332332818631335
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RealiniTWeinrebRNHobbsGCorrelation of intraocular pressure measured with goldmann and dynamic contour tonometry in normal and glaucomatous eyesJ Glaucoma200918211912319225347
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HagerALogeKSchroederBFüllhasMOWiegandWEffect of central corneal thickness and corneal hysteresis on tonometry as measured by dynamic contour tonometry, ocular response analyzer, and Goldmann tonometry in glaucomatous eyesJ Glaucoma200817536136518703945
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PacheMWilmsmeyerSLautebachSFunkJDynamic contour tonometry versus Goldmann applanation tonometry: a comparative studyGraefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol2005243876376715756572
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BarleonLHoffmannEMBerresMPfeifferNGrusFHComparison of dynamic contour tonometry and goldmann applanation tonometry in glaucoma patients and healthy subjectsAm J Ophthalmol2006142458359017011849
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DuppsWJJrWilsonSEBiomechanics and wound healing in the corneaExp Eye Res200683470972016720023
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HjortdalJOJensenPKIn vitro measurement of corneal strain, thickness, and curvature using digital image processingActa Ophthalmol Scand19957315117627759
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• BooteCDennisSHuangYQuantockAJMeekKMLamellar orientation in human cornea in relation to mechanical propertiesJ Struct Biol200514911615629652
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DaxerAMisofKGrabnerBEttlAFratzlPCollagen fibrils in the human corneal stroma: structure and agingInvest Ophthalmol Vis Sci19983936446489501878
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KotechaAWhiteESchlottmannPGGarway-HeathDFIntraocular pressure measurement precision with the Goldmann applanation, dynamic contour, and ocular response analyzer tonometersOphthalmology2010117473073720122737
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MedeirosFAWeinrebRNEvaluation of the influence of corneal biomechanical properties on intraocular pressure measurements using the ocular response analyzerJ Glaucoma200615536437016988597
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MangouritsasGMorphisGMourtzoukosSFeretisEAssociation between corneal hysteresis and central corneal thickness in glaucomatous and non-glaucomatous eyesActa Ophthalmol200987890190518937814
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BurgoyneCFDownsJCBellezzaAJSuhJKHartRTThe optic nerve head as a biomechanical structure: a new paradigm for understanding the role of IOP-related stress and strain in the pathophysiology of glaucomatous optic nerve head damageProg Retin Eye Res2005241397315555526
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SigalIAFlanaganJGEthierCRFactors influencing optic nerve head biomechanicsInvest Ophthalmol Vis Sci200546114189419916249498
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KniestedtCNeeMStamperRLAccuracy of dynamic contour tonometry compared with applanation tonometry in human cadaver eyes of different hydration statesGraefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol2005243435936615864625
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KniestedtCNeeMStamperRLDynamic contour tonometry: a comparative study on human cadaver eyesArch Ophthalmol200412291287129315364707
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• La RosaFAGrossRLOrengo-NaniaSCentral corneal thickness of Caucasians and African Americans in glaucomatous and non-glaucomatous populationsArch Ophthalmol20011191232711146722
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• HahnSAzenSYing-LaiMVarmaRLos Angeles Latino Eye Study Group. Central corneal thickness in LatinosInvest Ophthalmol Vis Sci20034441508151212657586
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ShimmyoMRossAJMoyAMostafaviRIntraocular pressure, Goldmann applanation tension, corneal thickness and corneal curvature in Caucasians, Asians, Hispanics, and African AmericansAm J Ophthalmol2003136460361314516799
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PeposeJSFeigenbaumSKQaziMASandersonJPRobertsCJChanges in corneal biomechanics and intraocular pressure following LASIK using static, dynamic, and noncontact tonometryAm J Ophthalmol20071431394717188041
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SiganosDSPapastergiouGIMoedasCAssessment of the Pascal dynamic contour tonometer in monitoring intraocular pressure in unoperated eyes and eyes after LASIKJ Cataract Refract Surg200430474675115093634
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KaufmannCBachmannLMThielMAIntraocular pressure measurements using dynamic contour tonometry after laser in situ keratomileusisInvest Ophthalmol Vis Sci20034493790379412939293
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ShahSLaiquzzamanMCunliffeIMantrySThe use of the Reichert ocular response analyser to establish the relationship between ocular hysteresis, corneal resistance factor and central corneal thickness in normal eyesCont Lens Anterior Eye200629525726217085066
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• FeltgenNLeifertDFunkJCorrelation between central corneal thickness, applanation tonometry, and direct intracameral IOP readingsBr J Ophthalmol2001851858711133718
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GunvantPNewcombRDKirsteinEMMalinovskyVEMadonnaRJMeetzREMeasuring accurate IOPs: does correction factor help or hurt?Clin Ophthalmol201021461161620668723
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• AngGSNicholasSWellsAPPoor utility of intraocular pressure correction formulae in individual glaucoma and glaucoma suspect patientsClin Experiment Ophthalmol201039211111820973896
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• YooCEomYSKimYYGoldmann applanation tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry in eyes with elevated intraocular pressure (IOP): comparison in the same eyes after subsequent medical normalization of IOPGraefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol2010248111611161620652303
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BoehmAGWeberAPillunatLEKochRSpoerlEDynamic contour tonometry in comparison to intracameral IOP measurementsInvest Ophthalmol Vis Sci20084962472247718316699
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sullivan-MeeMGerhardtGHalversonKDQuallsCRepeatability and reproducibility for intraocular pressure measurement by dynamic contour, ocular response analyzer, and goldmann applanation tonometryJ Glaucoma200918966667320010245
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar