Comparison of Hanna and Hessburg-Barron trephine and punch systems using histological, anterior segment optical coherence tomography, and elliptical curve fitting models

Majid Moshirfar1 University of Utah, Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Salt Lake City, UT, USACorrespondence[email protected]

Charles M Calvo2 University of Nevada, School of Medicine, Las Vegas, NV, USA

Krista I Kinard1 University of Utah, Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Salt Lake City, UT, USA

Lloyd B Williams1 University of Utah, Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Salt Lake City, UT, USA

Shameema Sikder3 Wilmer Eye Institute, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA

Marcus C Neuffer1 University of Utah, Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Salt Lake City, UT, USA

References

WiffenSJMaguireLJBourneWMKeratometric results of penetrating keratoplasty with the Hessburg-Barron and Hanna trephine systems using a standard double-running suture techniqueCornea1997163063139143803
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
RadnerWSkorpikCHLoeweRMudrichCRadnerGMallingerREffect of trephination technique on the ultrastructure of corneal transplants: Guided trephine system vs posterior punch techniqueBr J Ophthalmol1999831172117710502581
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
SpadeaLBiancoGMastrofiniMCBalestrazziEPenetrating keratoplasty with donor and recipient corneas of the same diameterOphthalmic Surg Lasers1996274254308782254
PubMedGoogle Scholar
Van RijGWaringGOConfiguration of corneal trephine opening using 5 different trephines in human donor eyesArch Ophthalmol1988106122812333415548
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
FitzgibbonAPiluMFisherRBDirect least squares fitting of ellipsesIEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell199921476480
Web of Science ®Google Scholar
WilbanksGACohenSChipmanMRootmanDSClinical outcomes following penetrating keratoplasty using the Barron-Hessburg and Hanna corneal trephination systemsCornea1996155895988899271
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar