Presbyopia – A Review of Current Treatment Options and Emerging Therapies

References

• Glasser A, Campbell MC. Biometric, optical and physical changes in the isolated human crystalline lens with age in relation to presbyopia. Vision Res. 1999;39(11):1991–2015. doi:10.1016/S0042-6989(98)00283-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heys K, Cram LS, Roger J. University of Wollongong. Massive increase in the stiffness of the human lens nucleus with age: the basis for presbyopia? Molecular Vision. 2004;10:956–963.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garner WH, Garner MH. Protein disulfide levels and lens elasticity modulation: applications for presbyopia. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2016;57(6):2851–2863. doi:10.1167/iovs.15-18413
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• David G, Pedrigi RM, Humphrey J. Accommodation of the human lens capsule using a finite element model based on nonlinear regionally anisotropic biomembranes. Computer Methods Biomechanics Biomed Eng. 2017;20(3):302–307. doi:10.1080/10255842.2016.1228907
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fricke TR, Tahhan N, Resnikoff S, et al. Global Prevalence of Presbyopia and Vision Impairment from Uncorrected Presbyopia: systematic Review, Meta-analysis, and Modelling. Ophthalmology. 2018;125(10):1492–1499. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2018.04.013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mancil G, Bailey I, Brookman K. Optometric clinical practice guideline care of the patient with presbyopia. Reference guide for clinicians. Am Optometric Assoc. 2011;1:458.
   Google Scholar
• Goertz AD, Stewart WC, Burns WR, Stewart JA, Nelson LA. Review of the impact of presbyopia on quality of life in the developing and developed world. Acta Ophthalmol. 2014;92(6):497–500. doi:10.1111/aos.12308
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan VF, MacKenzie GE, Kassalow J, Gudwin E, Congdon N. Impact of presbyopia and its correction in low-and middle-income countries. Asia Pacific J Ophthalmol. 2018;7(6):370–374. doi:10.22608/APO.2018449
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han X, Lee PY, Liu C, He M. Distribution and progression of add power among people in need of near correction. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol. 2018;46(8):882–887. doi:10.1111/ceo.13301
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holden BA, Fricke TR, Ho SM, et al. Global vision impairment due to uncorrected presbyopia. Arch Ophthalmol. 2008;126(12):1731–1739. doi:10.1001/archopht.126.12.1731
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gajapati CV, Pradeep A, Kakhandaki A, Praveenchandra R, Rao S. Awareness of Presbyopia among Rural Female Population in North Karnataka. J Clin Diagnostic Res. 2017;11(9):NC01. doi:10.7860/JCDR/2017/26125.10608
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patel I, Munoz B, Burke AG, et al. Impact of presbyopia on quality of life in a rural African setting. Ophthalmology. 2006;113(5):728–734. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2006.01.028
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reddy PA, Congdon N, MacKenzie G, et al. Effect of providing near glasses on productivity among rural Indian tea workers with presbyopia (PROSPER): a randomised trial. Lancet Global Health. 2018;6(9):e1019–e1027. doi:10.1016/S2214-109X(18)30329-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolffsohn JS, Davies LN. Presbyopia: effectiveness of correction strategies. Prog Retin Eye Res. 2019;68:124–143.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bilbao-Calabuig R, Gónzalez-López F, Llovet-Rausell A, Ortega-Usobiaga J, Fernández VT, Llovet-Osuna F. Lens-based surgical correction of presbyopia. Where are we in 2020? Arch de la Sociedad Española de Oftalmología. 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Carlson NB, Aurora Denial O. Hyperopia and presbyopia: a teaching case report. Optometric Educ. 2017;42(3):78.
   Google Scholar
• Weale RA. Epidemiology of refractive errors and presbyopia. Surv Ophthalmol. 2003;48(5):515–543. doi:10.1016/S0039-6257(03)00086-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stevens M, Bergmanson J. Does sunlight cause premature aging of the crystalline lens? J Am Optom Assoc. 1989;60(9):660–663.
   Google Scholar
• Sliney DH. Geometrical gradients in the distribution of temperature and absorbed ultraviolet radiation in ocular tissues. Dev Ophthalmol. 2002;35:40–59.
   Google Scholar
• Babu PS, Dhanunjaya A, Amaresh G. Demographic pattern of presbyopia in a tertiary teaching hospital. J Evolution Med Dental Sci. 2015;4:650–657. doi:10.14260/jemds/2015/95
   Google Scholar
• Hickenbotham A, Roorda A, Steinmaus C, Glasser A. Meta-analysis of sex differences in presbyopia. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2012;53(6):3215–3220. doi:10.1167/iovs.12-9791
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oriahi M. The Importance Of Epidemiology In Optometry. J Nigerian Optometric Assoc. 2009;15:48–51.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas D, Weegen L, Walendzik A, Wasem J, Jahn R Comparative analysis of delivery of primary eye care in three European countries. Available from: https://www.ecoo.info/wp-content/uploads/2012/07/WASEMstudyWebsite.pdf. Accessed 3 January, 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Wubben T, Wolfe G, Guerrero C, Korcz WJ, Ramsey DJ. Near visual acuity in an inner city Hispanic community: understanding the barriers and benefits of correction. Community Eye Health. 2014;27(86):41.
   Google Scholar
• Doan B, Lévy D, Pavot J. Demographic forecasts of medical workforce supply in France (2000–2050). What numerus clausus for what future? Cahiers De Sociologie et de Démographie Médicales. 2004;44(1):101–148.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Charman WN. Developments in the correction of presbyopia I: spectacle and contact lenses. Ophthalmic Physiol Optics. 2014;34(1):8–29. doi:10.1111/opo.12091
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charman WN. Non-surgical treatment options for presbyopia. Expert Rev Ophthalmol. 2018;13(4):219–231. doi:10.1080/17469899.2018.1506330
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sánchez-Brau M, Domenech-Amigot B, Brocal-Fernández F, Quesada-Rico JA, Seguí-Crespo M. Prevalence of Computer Vision Syndrome and Its Relationship with Ergonomic and Individual Factors in Presbyopic VDT Workers Using Progressive Addition Lenses. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(3):1003. doi:10.3390/ijerph17031003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chu BS, Wood JM, Collins MJ. Effect of presbyopic vision corrections on perceptions of driving difficulty. Eye Contact Lens. 2009;35(3):133–143. doi:10.1097/ICL.0b013e3181a1435e
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pérez‐Prados R, Piñero DP, Pérez‐Cambrodí RJ, Madrid‐Costa D. Soft multifocal simultaneous image contact lenses: a review. Clin Exp Optometry. 2017;100(2):107–127. doi:10.1111/cxo.12488
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett ES. Contact lens correction of presbyopia. Clin Exp Optometry. 2008;91(3):265–278. doi:10.1111/j.1444-0938.2007.00242.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jain S, Arora I, Azar DT. Success of monovision in presbyopes: review of the literature and potential applications to refractive surgery. Surv Ophthalmol. 1996;40(6):491–499. doi:10.1016/S0039-6257(96)82015-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirschen DG, Hung CC, Nakano TR. Comparison of suppression, stereoacuity, and interocular differences in visual acuity in monovision and acuvue bifocal contact lenses. Optom Vis Sci. 1999;76(12):832–837. doi:10.1097/00006324-199912000-00018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rajagopalan AS, Bennett ES, Lakshminarayanan V. Visual performance of subjects wearing presbyopic contact lenses. Optom Vis Sci. 2006;83(8):611–615. doi:10.1097/01.opx.0000232185.00091.45
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins MJ, Brown B, Bowman KJ. Contrast sensitivity with contact lens corrections for presbyopia. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 1989;9(2):133–138. doi:10.1111/j.1475-1313.1989.tb00832.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Owsley C, McGwin G. Vision and driving. Vision Res. 2010;50(23):2348–2361. doi:10.1016/j.visres.2010.05.021
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Remón L, Pérez-Merino P, Macedo-de-araújo RJ, Amorim-de-sousa AI, González-Méijome JM. Bifocal and Multifocal Contact Lenses for Presbyopia and Myopia Control. J Ophthalmol. 2020;2020:8067657. doi:10.1155/2020/8067657
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pérez-Prados R, Piñero DP, Pérez-Cambrodí RJ, Madrid-Costa D. Soft multifocal simultaneous image contact lenses: a review. Clin Exp Optometry. 2017;100(2):107–127.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan PB, Efron N, Woods CA. Consortium ICLPS. An international survey of contact lens prescribing for presbyopia. Clin Exp Optometry. 2011;94(1):87–92. doi:10.1111/j.1444-0938.2010.00524.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones D, Woods C, Jones L, Efron N, Morgan P. A sixteen year survey of Canadian contact lens prescribing. Contact Lens Anterior Eye. 2016;39(6):402–410. doi:10.1016/j.clae.2016.09.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Efron N, Nichols JJ, Woods CA, Morgan PB. Trends in US contact lens prescribing 2002 to 2014. Optometry Vision Sci. 2015;92(7):758–767. doi:10.1097/OPX.0000000000000623
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rueff EM, Varghese RJ, Brack TM, Downard DE, Bailey MD. A survey of presbyopic contact lens wearers in a university setting. Optometry Vision Sci. 2016;93(8):848–854. doi:10.1097/OPX.0000000000000881
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kandel H, Khadka J, Fenwick EK, et al. Constructing item banks for measuring quality of life in refractive error. Optometry Vision Sci. 2018;95(7):575–587. doi:10.1097/OPX.0000000000001246
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rueff EM, Bailey MD. Presbyopic and non-presbyopic contact lens opinions and vision correction preferences. Contact Lens Anterior Eye. 2017;40(5):323–328. doi:10.1016/j.clae.2017.03.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan PB, Efron N. Prescribing soft contact lenses for astigmatism. Contact Lens Anterior Eye. 2009;32(2):97–98. doi:10.1016/j.clae.2008.10.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Igras E, O’Caoimh R, O’Brien P, Power W. Patient experience of laser in situ keratomileusis and monocular small‐aperture corneal inlay implantation for the surgical compensation of presbyopia and additional ametropia. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol. 2016;44(8):728–730. doi:10.1111/ceo.12755
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geffen D. Presbyopia: the State of Surgical Correction. Rev Cornea Contact Lenses. 2018:20–24.
   Google Scholar
• Ahn JH, Kim DH, Shyn KH. Investigation of the changes in refractive surgery trends in Korea. Korean J Ophthalmol. 2018;32(1):8–15. doi:10.3341/kjo.2017.0010
   Google Scholar
• Hossain P, Barbara R. The future of refractive surgery: presbyopia treatment, can we dispense with our glasses? Eye. 2021;35:359–361. doi:10.1038/s41433-020-01172-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuo IC. Trends in refractive surgery at an academic center: 2007–2009. BMC Ophthalmol. 2011;11(1):1–6. doi:10.1186/1471-2415-11-11
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venter JA, Pelouskova M, Bull CE, Schallhorn SC, Hannan SJ. Visual outcomes and patient satisfaction with a rotational asymmetric refractive intraocular lens for emmetropic presbyopia. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2015;41(3):585–593. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2014.06.035
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levinger E, Trivizki O, Pokroy R, Levartovsky S, Sholohov G, Levinger S. Monovision surgery in myopic presbyopes: visual function and satisfaction. Optometry Vision Sci. 2013;90(10):1092–1097. doi:10.1097/OPX.0000000000000002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahrous A, Ciralsky JB, Lai EC. Revisiting monovision for presbyopia. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2018;29(4):313–317. doi:10.1097/ICU.0000000000000487
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steinert RF. Visual outcomes with multifocal intraocular lenses. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2000;11(1):12–21. doi:10.1097/00055735-200002000-00004
   Google Scholar
• Gundersen KG, Potvin R. Comparing Visual Acuity, Low Contrast Acuity and Contrast Sensitivity After Trifocal Toric and Extended Depth of Focus Toric Intraocular Lens Implantation. Clin Ophthalmol. 2020;14:1071. doi:10.2147/OPTH.S253250
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liang Y-L, Jia S-B. Clinical application of accommodating intraocular lens. Int J Ophthalmol. 2018;11(6):1028–1037. doi:10.18240/ijo.2018.06.22
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alió JL, Alió Del Barrio JL, Vega-Estrada A. Accommodative intraocular lenses: where are we and where we are going. Eye and Vision. 2017;4(1):16. doi:10.1186/s40662-017-0077-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American Academy of Ophthalmology. Light Adjustable Intraocular lenses - EyeWiki. Available from: https://eyewiki.aao.org/Light_Adjustable_Intraocular_lenses. Accessed 16 December, 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Levinger E, Levinger S, Mimouni M, et al. Unilateral refractive lens exchange with a multifocal intraocular lens in emmetropic presbyopic patients. Curr Eye Res. 2019;44(7):726–732. doi:10.1080/02713683.2019.1591460
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang JS, Ng JC, Lau SY. Visual outcomes and patient satisfaction after presbyopic lens exchange with a diffractive multifocal intraocular lens. J Refractive Surg. 2012;28(7):468–474. doi:10.3928/1081597X-20120612-01
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cochener B, Fernández-Vega L, Alfonso JF, Maurel F, Meunier J, Berdeaux G. Spectacle independence and subjective satisfaction of ReSTOR® multifocal intraocular lens after cataract or presbyopia surgery in two European countries. Clin Ophthalmol. 2010;4:81.
   Google Scholar
• Gibbons A, Ali TK, Waren DP, Donaldson KE. Causes and correction of dissatisfaction after implantation of presbyopia-correcting intraocular lenses. Clin Ophthalmol. 2016;10:1965. doi:10.2147/OPTH.S114890
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schmid R, Luedtke H. A Novel Concept of Correcting Presbyopia: first Clinical Results with a Phakic Diffractive Intraocular Lens. Clin Ophthalmol. 2020;14:2011. doi:10.2147/OPTH.S255613
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davidson RS, Dhaliwal D, Hamilton DR, et al. Surgical correction of presbyopia. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2016;42(6):920–930. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2016.05.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stahl JE. Conductive keratoplasty for presbyopia: 1-year results. J Refractive Surg. 2006;22(2):137–144. doi:10.3928/1081-597X-20060201-10
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDonald MB, Durrie D, Asbell P, Maloney R, Nichamin L. Treatment of presbyopia with conductive keratoplasty®: six-month results of the 1-year united states FDA clinical trial. Cornea. 2004;23(7):661–668. doi:10.1097/01.ico.0000126321.13143.a0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dexl AK, Seyeddain O, Riha W, et al. One-year visual outcomes and patient satisfaction after surgical correction of presbyopia with an intracorneal inlay of a new design. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2012;38(2):262–269. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2011.08.031
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American Academy of Ophthalmology. Updated To FDA Class 1 Device Recall: raindrop Near Vision Inlay may raise risk of corneal haze. Available from: https://www.aao.org/headline/fda-alert-raindrop-near-vision-inlay-may-raise-ris. Accessed 8 February, 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Dexl AK, Jell G, Strohmaier C, et al. Long-term outcomes after monocular corneal inlay implantation for the surgical compensation of presbyopia. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2015;41(3):566–575. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2014.05.051
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vukich JA, Durrie DS, Pepose JS, Thompson V, van de Pol C, Lin L. Evaluation of the small-aperture intracorneal inlay: three-year results from the cohort of the US Food and Drug Administration clinical trial. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2018;44(5):541–556. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2018.02.023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ayoubi MG, Leccisotti A, Goodall EA, McGilligan VE, Moore TC. Femtosecond laser in situ keratomileusis versus conductive keratoplasty to obtain monovision in patients with emmetropic presbyopia. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2010;36(6):997–1002. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2009.12.035
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lafosse E, Wolffsohn J, Talens-Estarelles C, García-Lázaro S. Presbyopia and the aging eye: existing refractive approaches and their potential impact on dry eye signs and symptoms. Contact Lens Anterior Eye. 2020;43(2):103–114. doi:10.1016/j.clae.2019.08.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farid M, Steinert RF. Patient selection for monovision laser refractive surgery. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2009;20(4):251–254. doi:10.1097/ICU.0b013e32832a0cdb
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alió JL, Amparo F, Ortiz D, Moreno L. Corneal multifocality with excimer laser for presbyopia correction. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2009;20(4):264–271. doi:10.1097/ICU.0b013e32832a7ded
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hipsley A, Hall B, Rocha KM. Scleral surgery for the treatment of presbyopia: where are we today? Eye and Vision. 2018;5(1):4. doi:10.1186/s40662-018-0098-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolffsohn JS, Leteneux-Pantais C, Chiva-Razavi S, et al. Social Media Listening to Understand the Lived Experience of Presbyopia: systematic Search and Content Analysis Study. J Med Internet Res. 2020;22(9):e18306. doi:10.2196/18306
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hutchins B, Huntjens B. Patients’ attitudes and beliefs to presbyopia and its correction. J Optom. 2020;14(2):127–132. doi:10.1016/j.optom.2020.02.001
   Google Scholar
• Greenhills WS. The quality of life in patients with non-surgical and surgical presbyopic corrections. Philipp J Ophthalmol. 2015;40:11–17.
   Google Scholar
• Brayton-Chung A, Tomashek D, Smith RO. Fall Risk Assessment: Development Of A Paradigm To Measure Multifocal Eyeglass Effects. Phys Occup Ther Geriatr. 2013;31(1):47–60. doi:10.3109/02703181.2012.763200
   Google Scholar
• Masud T, Morris RO. Epidemiology of falls. Age Ageing. 2001;30(suppl_4):3–7. doi:10.1093/ageing/30.suppl_4.3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elliott DB, The Glenn A. Fry award lecture 2013: blurred vision, spectacle correction, and falls in older adults. Optom Vis Sci. 2014;91(6):593–601. doi:10.1097/OPX.0000000000000268
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sander R. Multifocal glasses and falls. Nurs Older People. 2010;22(7):15.
   Google Scholar
• Lord SR, Dayhew J, Sc BA, Howland A. Multifocal glasses impair edge‐contrast sensitivity and depth perception and increase the risk of falls in older people. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2002;50(11):1760–1766. doi:10.1046/j.1532-5415.2002.50502.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vale A, Scally A, Buckley JG, Elliott DB. The effects of monocular refractive blur on gait parameters when negotiating a raised surface. Ophthalmic Physiol Optics. 2008;28(2):135–142. doi:10.1111/j.1475-1313.2008.00543.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elliott DB, Chapman GJ. Adaptive gait changes due to spectacle magnification and dioptric blur in older people. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2010;51(2):718–722. doi:10.1167/iovs.09-4250
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haran MJ, Cameron ID, Ivers RQ, et al. Effect on falls of providing single lens distance vision glasses to multifocal glasses wearers: VISIBLE randomised controlled trial. BMJ. 2010;340(may25 1):c2265. doi:10.1136/bmj.c2265
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elliott DB, Hotchkiss J, Scally AJ, Foster R, Buckley JG. Intermediate addition multifocals provide safe stair ambulation with adequate ‘short‐term’reading. Ophthalmic Physiol Optics. 2016;36(1):60–68. doi:10.1111/opo.12236
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Optometry Times. Treatments for presbyopia coming soon. Available from: https://www.optometrytimes.com/view/treatments-for-presbyopia-coming-soon. Accessed 9 February, 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Renna A, Vejarano LF, De la Cruz E, Alió JL. Pharmacological treatment of presbyopia by novel binocularly instilled eye drops: a pilot study. Ophthalmol Therapy. 2016;5(1):63–73. doi:10.1007/s40123-016-0050-x
   Google Scholar
• Abdelkader A. Improved presbyopic vision with miotics. Eye Contact Lens. 2015;41(5):323–327. doi:10.1097/ICL.0000000000000137
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Visus therapeutics launches and announces clinical development program for novel presbyopia eye drop. Available from: https://apnews.com/press-release/business-wire/products-and-services-ownership-changes-business-patent-acquisitions-product-testing-6b4e855ea0fd4a358b9c8a94379b50d3. Accessed 8 February, 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Allergan, an AbbVie Company, Announces Positive Phase 3 Topline Results for Investigational AGN-190584 for the Treatment of Presbyopia | abbVie News Center. Available from: https://news.abbvie.com/news/press-releases/allergan-an-abbvie-company-announces-positive-phase-3-topline-results-for-investigational-agn-190584-for-treatment-presbyopia.htm. Accessed 8 February, 2021.
   Google Scholar
• ClinicalTrials.gov. A Phase 3 Efficacy Study of AGN-190584 in Participants With Presbyopia. Available from: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03857542. Accessed 8 February, 2021.
   Google Scholar
• ClinicalTrials.gov. A Safety, Efficacy and Pharmacokinetic Study of AGN-199201 and AGN-190584 in Patients With Presbyopia. Available from: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02780115. Accessed 8 February, 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Presbyopia Therapies press release 2018; 2019. Available from: https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/presbyopia-therapies-announces-primary-safety-and-efficacy-endpoints-met-in-a-phase-iib-study-of-its-topical-prx-ophthalmic-solution-for-the-treatment-of-presbyopia-300688070.html. Accessed May 14, 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Ocuphire Pharma Nyxol® Eye Drops. Available from: https://www.ocuphire.com/product-pipeline/nyxol. Accessed 11 February, 2021.
   Google Scholar
• ClinicalTrials.gov. Safety and efficacy of nyxol with pilocarpine eye drops in subjects with presbyopia. Available from: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04675151. Accessed 8 February, 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Orasis Pharmaceuticals Announces CSF-1 Eye Drop Successfully Met Primary Endpoint in Phase 2b Clinical Study in Presbyopia. Available from: https://www.globenewswire.com/news-release/2019/10/10/1928125/0/en/Orasis-Pharmaceuticals-Announces-CSF-1-Eye-Drop-Successfully-Met-Primary-Endpoint-in-Phase-2b-Clinical-Study-in-Presbyopia.html. Accessed 8 February, 2021.
   Google Scholar
• ClinicalTrials.gov. A Multi-Center, Double-Masked Evaluation of the Efficacy and Safety of CSF-1 in the Treatment of Presbyopia. Available from: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03885011. Accessed 8 February, 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Eyewire News. FDA Approves Eyenovia’s IND Application for MicroLine for Presbyopia, Allowing for Phase 3 Trials. @eyewiretoday. Available from: https://eyewire.news/articles/fda-approves-eyenovias-ind-application-for-microline-for-presbyopia-allowing-for-phase-3-trials/. Accessed 11 February, 2021.
   Google Scholar
• ClinicalTrials.gov. Safety & efficacy of pilocarpine eye solutions for temporary improvement of near vision in presbyopic adults. Available from: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04657172. Accessed 8 February, 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Grzybowski A, Markeviciute A, Zemaitiene R. A review of pharmacological presbyopia treatment. Asia Pacific J Ophthalmol. 2020;9(3):226. doi:10.1097/APO.0000000000000297
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benozzi G, Perez C, Leiro J, Facal S, Orman B. Presbyopia treatment with eye drops: an eight year retrospective study. Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2020;9(7):25.
   Google Scholar
• Abdelkader A, Kaufman HE. Clinical outcomes of combined versus separate carbachol and brimonidine drops in correcting presbyopia. Eye Vis. 2016;3:31. doi:10.1186/s40662-016-0065-3
   Google Scholar
• Richdale K. UNR844 ophthalmic solution for the topical treatment of presbyopia: results of a Phase II randomised controlled trial. Presented Acad Home. 2020;7:2020.
   Google Scholar
• Korenfeld MS, Robertson SM, Stein JM, et al. Topical lipoic acid choline ester eye drop for improvement of near visual acuity in subjects with presbyopia: a safety and preliminary efficacy trial. Eye. 2021. doi:10.1038/s41433-020-01391-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ViewPoint Therapeutics press release 2018. Available from: https://www.viewpointtherapeutics.com/new-blog/2018/3/5/viewpoint-therapeutics-raises-35-million-in-series-b-financing. Accessed 8 September, 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Stival LR, Figueiredo MN, Santhiago MR. Presbyopic excimer laser ablation: a review. J Refractive Surg. 2018;34(10):698–710. doi:10.3928/1081597X-20180726-02
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schallhorn SC, Teenan D, Venter JA, et al. Monovision LASIK versus presbyopia-correcting IOLs: comparison of clinical and patient-reported outcomes. J Refractive Surg. 2017;33(11):749–758. doi:10.3928/1081597X-20170721-03
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waring GO, Waring GO. Correction of presbyopia with a small aperture corneal inlay. J Refractive Surg. 2011;27(11):842–845. doi:10.3928/1081597X-20111005-04
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torricelli AA, Junior JB, Santhiago MR, Bechara SJ. Surgical management of presbyopia. Clin Ophthalmol. 2012;6:1459. doi:10.2147/OPTH.S35533
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• ClinicalTrials.gov. A Study of Safety and Efficacy of UNR844 Chloride (UNR844-Cl) Eye Drops in Subjects With Presbyopia. Available from: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03809611. Accessed 24 February, 2021.
   Google Scholar