87
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Clinical Trial Report

Multifocal ERG and Microperimetry Changes in Response to Ranibizumab Treatment of Neovascular AMD: Randomized Phase 2 Open-Label Study

ORCID Icon, , , & ORCID Icon
Pages 3599-3610 | Published online: 29 Oct 2020

References

  • Pennington KL, DeAngelis MM. Epidemiology of age-related macular degeneration (AMD): associations with cardiovascular disease phenotypes and lipid factors. Eye Vis (Lond). 2016;3(34):1–20.
  • Congdon N, O’Colmain B, Klaver CC, et al. Causes and prevalence of visual impairment among adults in the United States. Arch Ophthalmol. 2004;122(4):477–485.
  • Ferrara N, Damico L, Shams N, et al. Development of ranibizumab, an anti-vascular endothelial growth factor antigen binding fragment, as therapy for neovascular age-related macular degeneration. Retina. 2006;26(8):859–870. doi:10.1097/01.iae.0000242842.14624.e7
  • Rosenfeld PJ, Brown DM, Heier JS, et al. Ranibizumab for neovascular age-related macular degeneration. N Engl J Med. 2006;355(14):1419–1431. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa054481
  • Brown DM, Kaiser PK, Michels M, et al. Ranibizumab versus verteporfin for neovascular age-related macular degeneration. N Engl J Med. 2006;355(14):1432–1444. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa062655
  • Martin DF, Maguire MG, Fine SL, et al. Ranibizumab and bevacizumab for treatment of neovascular age-related macular degeneration: two-year results. Ophthalmology. 2012;119(7):1388–1398. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2012.03.053
  • Busbee BG, Ho AC, Brown DM, et al. Twelve-month efficacy and safety of 0.5 mg or 2.0 mg ranibizumab in patients with subfoveal neovascular age-related macular degeneration. Ophthalmology. 2013;120(5):1046–1056. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2012.10.014
  • Chakravarthy U, Harding SP, Rogers CA, et al. Ranibizumab versus bevacizumab to treat neovascular age-related macular degeneration: one-year findings from the IVAN randomized trial. Ophthalmology. 2012;119(7):1399–1411. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2012.04.015
  • Krebs I, Schmetterer L, Boltz A, et al. A randomised double-masked trial comparing the visual outcome after treatment with ranibizumab or bevacizumab in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration. Br J Ophthalmol. 2013;97(3):266–271. doi:10.1136/bjophthalmol-2012-302391
  • Gupta OP, Shienbaum G, Patel AH, et al. A treat and extend regimen using ranibizumab for neovascular age-related macular degeneration clinical and economic impact. Ophthalmology. 2010;117(11):2134–2140.
  • Danyliv A, Glanville J, McCool R, et al. The clinical effectiveness of ranibizumab treat and extend regimen in nAMD: systematic review and network meta-analysis. Adv Ther. 2017;34(3):611–619. doi:10.1007/s12325-017-0484-0
  • Thavikulwat AT, Jacobs-El N, Kim JS, et al. Evolution of geographic atrophy in participants treated with ranibizumab for neovascular age-related macular degeneration. Ophthalmol Retina. 2017;1(1):34‐41. doi:10.1016/j.oret.2016.09.005
  • Ferris FL 3rd, Kassoff A, Bresnick GH, Bailey I. New visual acuity charts for clinical research. Am J Ophthalmol. 1982;94(1):91–96. doi:10.1016/0002-9394(82)90197-0
  • Alexander P, Mushtaq F, Osmond C, Amoaku W. Microperimetric changes in neovascular age-related macular degeneration treated with ranibizumab. Eye (Lond). 2012;26(5):678–683. doi:10.1038/eye.2012.7
  • Gerth C. The role of the ERG in the diagnosis and treatment of age-related macular degeneration. Doc Ophthalmol. 2009;118(1):63–68. doi:10.1007/s10633-008-9133-x
  • Ho AC, Busbee BG, Regillo CD, et al. Twenty-four-month efficacy and safety of 0.5 mg or 2.0 mg ranibizumab in patients with subfoveal neovascular age-related macular degeneration. Ophthalmology. 2014;121(11):2181–2192. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2014.05.009
  • Dirani A, Mantel I. Ranibizumab treatment history as predictor of the switch-response to aflibercept: evidence for drug tolerance. Clin Ophthalmo. 2018;12:593–600. doi:10.2147/OPTH.S160367
  • Eghoj MS, Sorensen TL. Tachyphylaxis during treatment of exudative age-related macular degeneration with ranibizumab. Br J Ophthalmol. 2011;96(1):21–23. doi:10.1136/bjo.2011.203893
  • Gasperini JL, Fawzi AA, Khondkaryan A, et al. Bevacizumab and ranibizumab tachyphylaxis in the treatment of choroidal neovascularisation. Br J Ophthalmol. 2012;96(1):14‐20. doi:10.1136/bjo.2011.204685
  • Holz FG, Figueroa MS, Bandello F, et al. Ranibizumab treatment in treatment-naive neovascular age-related macular degeneration: results from luminous, a global real-world study. Retina. 2019:10.1097/IAE.0000000000002670. doi:10.1097/IAE.0000000000002670.
  • Chakravarthy U, Harding SP, Rogers CA, et al. Alternative treatments to inhibit VEGF in age-related choroidal neovascularisation: 2-year findings of the IVAN randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2013;382(9900):1258–1267. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(13)61501-9
  • The CATT Research Group. Ranibizumab and bevacizumab for neovascular age-related macular degeneration. N Engl J Med. 2011;364(20):1897–1908. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1102673
  • Young B, Eggenberger E, Kaufman D. Current electrophysiology in ophthalmology: a review. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2012;23(6):497–505. doi:10.1097/ICU.0b013e328359045e
  • Vincent A, Robson AG, Holder GE. Pathognomonic (diagnostic) ERGs. A review and update. Retina. 2013;33(1):5–12. doi:10.1097/IAE.0b013e31827e2306
  • Hood DC, Frishman LJ, Saszik S, Viswanathan S. Retinal origins of the primate multifocal ERG: implications for the human response. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2002;43(5):1673–1685.
  • Gerth C, Garcia SM, Ma L, Keltner JL, Werner JS. Multifocal electroretinogram: age-related changes for different luminance levels. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2002;240(3):202–208. doi:10.1007/s00417-002-0442-6
  • Gerth C, Delahunt PB, Alam S, Morse LS, Werner JS. Cone-mediated multifocal electroretinogram in age-related macular degeneration: progression over a long-term follow-up. Arch Ophthalmol. 2006;124(3):345–352. doi:10.1001/archopht.124.3.345
  • Reinsberg M, Hilgers R, Ludeke I, et al. Testing the clinical value of multifocal electroretinography and microperimetry and the effects of intravitreal therapy with ranibizumab on macular function in the course of wet age-related macular degeneration: a 1-year prospective study. Clin Ophthalmol. 2017;11:621–629. doi:10.2147/OPTH.S123513
  • Gemenetzi M, Lotery AJ, Patel PJ. Risk of geographic atrophy in age-related macular degeneration patients treated with intravitreal anti-VEGF agents. Eye (Lond). 2017;31(1):1–9. doi:10.1038/eye.2016.208
  • Grunwald JE, Daniel E, Huang J, et al. The CATT research group risk factors for the development of GA in CATT. Ophthalmology. 2014;121(1):150–161. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2013.08.015
  • Cohen SY, Oubraham H, Uzzan J, et al. Causes of unsuccessful ranibizumab treatment in exudative age-related macular degeneration in clinical settings. Retina. 2012;32(8):1480–1485.
  • Campa C, Hagan R, Sahni JN, et al. Early multifocal electroretinogram findings during intravitreal ranibizumab treatment for neovascular age-related macular degeneration. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011;52:3446–3451.
  • Dinc UA, Yeneral M, Gorgun E, Oncel M. Assessment of macular function by microperimetry in intermediate age-related macular degeneration. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2008;18(4):595–600.
  • Parravano M, Oddone F, Tedeschi M, et al. Retinal functional changes measured by microperimetry in neovascular age-related macular degeneration treated with ranibizumab: 24-month results. Retina. 2010;30(7):1017‐1024. doi:10.1097/IAE.0b013e3181cfd3c6
  • Wu Z, Ayton LN, Guymer RH, Luu CD. Intrasession test-retest variability of microperimetry in age-related macular degeneration. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2013;54(12):7378–7385. doi:10.1167/iovs.13-12617
  • Chen FK, Patel PJ, Xing W, et al. Test–retest variability of microperimetry using the nidek MP1 in patients with macular disease. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2009;50(7):3464–3472. doi:10.1167/iovs.08-2926
  • Vujosevic S, Pucci P, Casciano M, et al. Long-term longitudinal modifications in mesopic microperimetry in early and intermediate age-related macular degeneration. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2017;255(2):301–309. doi:10.1007/s00417-016-3466-z