Repeatability of OCT-Based versus Scheimpflug- and Reflection-Based Keratometry in Patients with Hyperosmolar and Normal Tear Film

References

• Haigis W. Intraocular lens calculation after refractive surgery for myopia: haigis-L formula. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2008;34(10):1658–1663.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olsen T. Calculation of intraocular lens power: a review. Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 2007;85(5):472–485. doi:10.1111/j.1755-3768.2007.00879.x
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hoffer KJ. Intraocular lens power calculation after previous laser refractive surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2009;35(4):759–765. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2009.01.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Savini G, Hoffer KJ. Intraocular lens power calculation in eyes with previous corneal refractive surgery. Eye Vis (Lond). 2018;5(1):18. doi:10.1186/s40662-018-0110-5
   Google Scholar
• Epitropoulos AT, Matossian C, Berdy GJ, Malhotra RP, Potvin R. Effect of tear osmolarity on repeatability of keratometry for cataract surgery planning. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2015;41(8):1672–1677. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2015.01.016
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montes-Mico R. Role of the tear film in the optical quality of the human eye. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2007;33(9):1631–1635. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2007.06.019
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Versura P, Profazio V, Campos EC. Performance of tear osmolarity compared to previous diagnostic tests for dry eye diseases. Curr Eye Res. 2010;35(7):553–564. doi:10.3109/02713683.2010.484557
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lemp MA, Bron AJ, Baudouin C, et al. Tear osmolarity in the diagnosis and management of dry eye disease. Am J Ophthalmol. 2011;151(5):792–798e791. doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2010.10.032
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sullivan BD, Whitmer D, Nichols KK, et al. An objective approach to dry eye disease severity. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2010;51(12):6125–6130. doi:10.1167/iovs.10-5390
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Potvin R, Makari S, Rapuano C. Tear film osmolarity and dry eye disease: a review of the literature. Clin Opthalmol. 2015;2039. doi:10.2147/OPTH.S95242
   Google Scholar
• Wolffsohn JS, Arita R, Chalmers R, et al. TFOS DEWS II diagnostic methodology report. Ocul Surf. 2017;15(3):539–574. doi:10.1016/j.jtos.2017.05.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tomlinson A, Khanal S, Ramaesh K, Diaper C, McFadyen A. Tear film osmolarity: determination of a referent for dry eye diagnosis. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2006;47(10):4309–4315. doi:10.1167/iovs.05-1504
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solomon R, Donnenfeld ED, Perry HD. The effects of LASIK on the ocular surface. Ocul Surf. 2004;2(1):34–44. doi:10.1016/S1542-0124(12)70022-8
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ambrósio R, Tervo T, Wilson SE. LASIK-associated dry eye and neurotrophic epitheliopathy: pathophysiology and strategies for prevention and treatment. J Refract Surg. 2008;24(4):396–407. doi:10.3928/1081597X-20080401-14
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen E, Spierer O. Dry eye post-laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis: major review and latest updates. J Ophthalmol. 2018;2018:4903831. doi:10.1155/2018/4903831
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gjerdrum B, Gundersen KG, Lundmark PO, Potvin R, Aakre BM. Prevalence of signs and symptoms of dry eye disease 5 to 15 years after refractive surgery. Clin Ophthalmol. 2020;14:269–279. doi:10.2147/OPTH.S236749
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olsen T. On the calculation of power from curvature of the cornea. Br J Ophthalmol. 1986;70(2):152–154. doi:10.1136/bjo.70.2.152
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Konstantopoulos A, Hossain P, Anderson DF. Recent advances in ophthalmic anterior segment imaging: a new era for ophthalmic diagnosis? Br J Ophthalmol. 2007;91(4):551–557. doi:10.1136/bjo.2006.103408
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Savini G, Schiano-Lomoriello D, Hoffer KJ. Repeatability of automatic measurements by a new anterior segment optical coherence tomographer combined with Placido topography and agreement with 2 Scheimpflug cameras. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2018;44(4):471–478. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2018.02.015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wylegala E, Teper S, Nowinska AK, Milka M, Dobrowolski D. Anterior segment imaging: fourier-domain optical coherence tomography versus time-domain optical coherence tomography. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2009;35(8):1410–1414. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2009.03.034
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ortiz S, Perez-Merino P, Duran S, et al. Full OCT anterior segment biometry: an application in cataract surgery. Biomed Opt Express. 2013;4(3):387–396. doi:10.1364/BOE.4.000387
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shammas HJ, Ortiz S, Shammas MC, Kim SH, Chong C. Biometry measurements using a new large-coherence-length swept-source optical coherence tomographer. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2016;42(1):50–61. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2015.07.042
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cole ED, Duker JS. OCT technology: will we be “swept” away? Rev Opthalmol. 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Wylegala A, Mazur R, Bolek B, Wylegala E. Reproducibility, and repeatability of corneal topography measured by Revo NX, Galilei G6 and Casia 2 in normal eyes. PLoS One. 2020;15(4):e0230589. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0230589
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lim SH. Clinical applications of anterior segment optical coherence tomography. J Ophthalmol. 2015;2015:605729. doi:10.1155/2015/605729
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oculus. Pentacam HR: Interpretation Guide. 3rd ed. Wetzlar, Germany: Oculus Optikergerâte; 2018
   Google Scholar
• Tomey. Casia SS-1000 Instruction Manual for Analysis. Nishi-ku, Nagoya, Japan: Tomey Corporation; 2012
   Google Scholar
• Heidelberg. Anterion User Manual, Software Version 1.1. Heidelberg, Germany: Heidelberg Engineering GmbH; 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Chen SY, Feng Z, Yi X. A general introduction to adjustment for multiple comparisons. J Thorac Dis. 2017;9(6):1725–1729. doi:10.21037/jtd.2017.05.34
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levin B. On the Holm, Simes, and Hochberg multiple test procedures. Am J Public Health. 1996;86(5):628–629. doi:10.2105/AJPH.86.5.628
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bland JM, Altman DG. Measurement error. BMJ. 1996;312(7047):1654. doi:10.1136/bmj.312.7047.1654
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaz S, Falkmer T, Passmore AE, Parsons R, Andreou P. The case for using the repeatability coefficient when calculating test-retest reliability. PLoS One. 2013;8(9):e73990. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0073990
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bates DM, Mächler M, Bolker B, Walker S. Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. J Stat Softw. 2015;67(1):1–48. doi:10.18637/jss.v067.i01
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wickham H. Ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis. New York: Springer-Verlag; 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Craig JP, Nelson JD, Azar DT, et al. TFOS DEWS II report executive summary. Ocul Surf. 2017;15(4):802–812. doi:10.1016/j.jtos.2017.08.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stapleton F, Alves M, Bunya VY, et al. TFOS DEWS II epidemiology report. Ocul Surf. 2017;15(3):334–365. doi:10.1016/j.jtos.2017.05.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bron AJ, de Paiva CS, Chauhan SK, et al. TFOS DEWS II pathophysiology report. Ocul Surf. 2017;15(3):438–510. doi:10.1016/j.jtos.2017.05.011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willcox MDP, Argueso P, Georgiev GA, et al. TFOS DEWS II tear film report. Ocul Surf. 2017;15(3):366–403. doi:10.1016/j.jtos.2017.03.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dogan AS, Gurdal C, Koylu MT. Does dry eye affect repeatability of corneal topography measurements? Turk J Ophthalmol. 2018;48(2):57–60. doi:10.4274/tjo.10179
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jensen MN, Sondergaard AP, Pommerencke C, Moller F. Variations in keratometric values (K-value) after administration of three different eye drops – effects on the intraocular lens calculations in relation to cataract surgery. Acta Ophthalmol. 2020;98(6):613–617. doi:10.1111/aos.14408
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kunert KS, Peter M, Blum M, et al. Repeatability and agreement in optical biometry of a new swept-source optical coherence tomography-based biometer versus partial coherence interferometry and optical low-coherence reflectometry. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2016;42(1):76–83. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2015.07.039
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang J, Savini G, Li J, et al. Evaluation of a new optical biometry device for measurements of ocular components and its comparison with IOLMaster. Br J Ophthalmol. 2014;98(9):1277–1281. doi:10.1136/bjophthalmol-2014-305150
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shajari M, Sonntag R, Ramsauer M, et al. Evaluation of total corneal power measurements with a new optical biometer. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2020;46(5):675–681. doi:10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000000136
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schröder S, Mäurer S, Eppig T, Seitz B, Rubly K, Langenbucher A. Comparison of corneal tomography: repeatability, precision, misalignment, mean elevation, and mean pachymetry. Curr Eye Res. 2018;43(6):709–716. doi:10.1080/02713683.2018.1441873
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koch DD, Ali SF, Weikert MP, Shirayama M, Jenkins R, Wang L. Contribution of posterior corneal astigmatism to total corneal astigmatism. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2080–2087;38(12).
   Google Scholar
• Abulafia A, Barrett GD, Kleinmann G, et al. Prediction of refractive outcomes with toric intraocular lens implantation. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2015;41(5):936–944. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2014.08.036
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar