Predictors of Photic Phenomena with a Trifocal IOL

References

• de Silva SR, Evans JR, Kirthi V, Ziaei M, Leyland M. Multifocal versus monofocal intraocular lenses after cataract extraction. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;12:Cd003169. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD003169.pub4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khandelwal SS, Jun JJ, Mak S, Booth MS, Shekelle PG. Effectiveness of multifocal and monofocal intraocular lenses for cataract surgery and lens replacement: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2019;257(5):863–875. doi:10.1007/s00417-018-04218-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buckhurst PJ, Naroo SA, Davies LN, Shah S, Drew T, Wolffsohn JS. Assessment of dysphotopsia in pseudophakic subjects with multifocal intraocular lenses. BMJ Open Ophthalmol. 2017;1(1):e000064. doi:10.1136/bmjophth-2016-000064
   Google Scholar
• Lee S, Choi M, Xu Z, Zhao Z, Alexander E, Liu Y. Optical bench performance of a novel trifocal intraocular lens compared with a multifocal intraocular lens. Clin Ophthalmol. 2016;10:1031–1038. doi:10.2147/OPTH.S106646
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tchah H, Nam K, Yoo A. Predictive factors for photic phenomena after refractive, rotationally asymmetric, multifocal intraocular lens implantation. Int J Ophthalmol. 2017;10(2):241–245. doi:10.18240/ijo.2017.02.10
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kohnen T. First implantation of a diffractive quadrafocal (trifocal) intraocular lens. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2015;41(10):2330–2332. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2015.11.012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kohnen T, Herzog M, Hemkeppler E, et al. Visual performance of a quadrifocal (trifocal) intraocular lens following removal of the crystalline lens. Am J Ophthalmol. 2017;184:52–62. doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2017.09.016
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Narang P, Agarwal A Chord mu: a new reference marker and its clinical relevance. Ocular Surgery News U.S. Edition; October 10, 2019. Available from: https://www.healio.com/ophthalmology/refractive-surgery/news/print/ocular-surgery-news/%7B61df24dc-e212-4f97-9b48-95ae4469aa2d%7D/chord-mu-a-new-reference-marker-and-its-clinical-relevance. Accessed January 7, 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Holladay JT. Apparent chord mu and actual chord mu and their clinical value. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2019;45(8):1198–1199. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2019.03.029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shakeel T, Dasgupta S. Comparative evaluation of posterior capsular opacification and Nd: YAG capsulotomy in children and adults. J Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2019;5:105–107.
   Google Scholar
• Chen Z, Lin X, Qu B, et al. Preoperative expectations and postoperative outcomes of visual functioning among cataract patients in Urban Southern China. PLoS One. 2017;12(1):e0169844. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0169844
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Vries NE, Webers CAB, Touwslager WRH, et al. Dissatisfaction after implantation of multifocal intraocular lenses. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2011;37(5):859–865. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2010.11.032
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Welch NR, Gregori N, Zabriskie N, Olson RJ. Satisfaction and dysphotopsia in the pseudophakic patient. Can J Ophthalmol. 2010;45(2):140–143. doi:10.3129/i09-266
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garcia-Perez JL, Gros-Otero J, Sanchez-Ramos C, Blazquez V, Contreras I. Short term visual outcomes of a new trifocal intraocular lens. BMC Ophthalmol. 2017;17(1):72. doi:10.1186/s12886-017-0462-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gundersen KG, Potvin R. Trifocal intraocular lenses: a comparison of the visual performance and quality of vision provided by two different lens designs. Clin Ophthalmol. 2017;11:1081–1087. doi:10.2147/OPTH.S136164
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bellucci R, Curatolo MC, New Extended A. Depth of focus intraocular lens based on spherical aberration. J Refract Surg. 2017;33(6):389–394. doi:10.3928/1081597X-20170329-01
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fu Y, Kou J, Chen D, et al. Influence of angle kappa and angle alpha on visual quality after implantation of multifocal intraocular lenses. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2019;45(9):1258–1264. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2019.04.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang R, Long T, Gu X, Ma T. Changes in angle kappa and angle alpha before and after cataract surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2020;46(3):365–371. doi:10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000000063
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moshirfar M, Hoggan RN, Muthappan V. Angle Kappa and its importance in refractive surgery. Oman J Ophthalmol. 2013;6(3):151–158. doi:10.4103/0974-620X.122268
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Prakash G, Prakash DR, Agarwal A, Kumar DA, Agarwal A, Jacob S. Predictive factor and kappa angle analysis for visual satisfactions in patients with multifocal IOL implantation. Eye (Lond). 2011;25(9):1187–1193. doi:10.1038/eye.2011.150
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karhanová M, Marešová K, Pluháček F, Mlčák P, Vláčil O, Sín M. The importance of angle kappa for centration of multifocal intraocular lenses. Cesk Slov Oftalmol. 2013;69(2):64–68.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Karhanová M, Pluháček F, Mlčák P, Vláčil O, Šín M, Marešová K. The importance of angle kappa evaluation for implantation of diffractive multifocal intra-ocular lenses using pseudophakic eye model. Acta Ophthalmol. 2015;93(2):e123–e128. doi:10.1111/aos.12521
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vryghem JC, Heireman S. Visual performance after the implantation of a new trifocal intraocular lens. Clin Ophthalmol. 2013;7:1957–1965. doi:10.2147/OPTH.S44415
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schallhorn SC, Schallhorn JM, Pelouskova M, et al. Refractive lens exchange in younger and older presbyopes: comparison of complication rates, 3 months clinical and patient-reported outcomes. Clin Ophthalmol. 2017;11:1569–1581. doi:10.2147/OPTH.S143201
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosa AM, Miranda AC, Patricio MM, et al. Functional magnetic resonance imaging to assess neuroadaptation to multifocal intraocular lenses. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2017;43(10):1287–1296. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2017.07.031
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar