Changes of Neuroretinal Rim and Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness Assessed by Optical Coherence Tomography After Filtration Surgery in Glaucomatous Eyes

References

• Jampel HD, Friedman D, Quigley H, et al. Agreement among glaucoma specialists in assessing progressive disc changes from photographs in open-angle glaucoma patients. Am J Ophthalmol. 2009;147(1):39–44.e1. doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2008.07.023
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keltner JL, Johnson CA, Anderson DR, et al. The association between glaucomatous visual fields and optic nerve head features in the ocular hypertension treatment Study. Ophthalmology. 2006;113(9):1603–1612. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2006.05.061
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garway-Heath DF, Holder GE, Fitzke FW, et al. Relationship between electrophysiological, psychophysical, and anatomical measurements in glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2002;43(7):2213–2220.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muth DR, Hirneiss CW. Structure-Function relationship between bruch’s membrane opening-based optic nerve head parameters and visual field defects in glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2015;56(5):3320–3328. doi:10.1167/iovs.14-15845
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Medeiros FA, Zangwill LM, Alencar LM, et al. Detection of glaucoma progression with stratus OCT retinal nerve fiber layer, optic nerve head, and macular thickness measurements. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2009;50(12):5741–5748. doi:10.1167/iovs.09-3715
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wessel JM, Horn FK, Tornow RP, et al. Longitudinal analysis of progression in glaucoma using spectral-domain optical coherence tomography. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2013;54(5):3613–3620. doi:10.1167/iovs.12-9786
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chauhan BC, O’Leary N, AlMobarak FA, et al. Enhanced detection of open-angle glaucoma with an anatomically accurate optical coherence tomography-derived neuroretinal rim parameter. Ophthalmology. 2013;120(3):535–543. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2012.09.055
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Enders P, Adler W, Kiessling D, et al. Evaluation of two-dimensional Bruch’s membrane opening minimum rim area for glaucoma diagnostics in a large patient cohort. Acta Ophthalmol. 2019;97(1):60–67. doi:10.1111/aos.13698
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Enders P, Schaub F, Adler W, et al. Bruch’s membrane opening-based optical coherence tomography of the optic nerve head: a useful diagnostic tool to detect glaucoma in macrodiscs. Eye (Lond). 2018;32(2):314–323. doi:10.1038/eye.2017.306
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gardiner SK, Ren R, Yang H, et al. A method to estimate the amount of neuroretinal rim tissue in glaucoma: comparison with current methods for measuring rim area. Am J Ophthalmol. 2014;157(3):540–9 e1–2. doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2013.11.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gardiner SK, Boey PY, Yang H, et al. Structural measurements for monitoring change in glaucoma: comparing retinal nerve fiber layer thickness with minimum rim width and area. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2015;56(11):6886–6891. doi:10.1167/iovs.15-16701
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leung CK. Diagnosing glaucoma progression with optical coherence tomography. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2014;25(2):104–111. doi:10.1097/ICU.0000000000000024
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Townsend KA, Wollstein G, Schuman JS. Imaging of the retinal nerve fibre layer for glaucoma. Br J Ophthalmol. 2009;93(2):139–143. doi:10.1136/bjo.2008.145540
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gardiner SK, Demirel S, Reynaud J, et al. Changes in retinal nerve fiber layer reflectance intensity as a predictor of functional progression in glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2016;57(3):1221–1227. doi:10.1167/iovs.15-18788
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gardiner SK, Fortune B, Demirel S. Localized changes in retinal nerve fiber layer thickness as a predictor of localized functional change in glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol. 2016;170:75–82. doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2016.07.020
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Enders P, Bremen A, Schaub F, et al. Intraday repeatability of bruch’s membrane opening-based neuroretinal rim measurements. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2017;58(12):5195–5200. doi:10.1167/iovs.17-22812
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang R, Xu L, Liu X, et al. Optic nerve head changes after short-term intraocular pressure elevation in acute primary angle-closure suspects. Ophthalmology. 2015;122(4):730–737. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2014.11.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waisbourd M, Ahmed OM, Molineaux J, et al. Reversible structural and functional changes after intraocular pressure reduction in patients with glaucoma. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2016;254(6):1159–1166. doi:10.1007/s00417-016-3321-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yildirim E, Bilge AH, Ilker S. Improvement of visual field following trabeculectomy for open angle glaucoma. Eye (Lond). 1990;4(1):103–106. doi:10.1038/eye.1990.12
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gietzelt C, Lemke J, Schaub F, et al. Structural reversal of disc cupping after trabeculectomy alters bruch membrane opening-based parameters to assess neuroretinal rim. Am J Ophthalmol. 2018;194:143–152. doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2018.07.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gietzelt C, von Goscinski C, Lemke J, et al. Dynamics of structural reversal in Bruch’s membrane opening-based morphometrics after glaucoma drainage device surgery. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2020;258(6):1227–1236. doi:10.1007/s00417-020-04621-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hodapp EAD. Clinical Decisions in Glaucoma. St. Louis: Mosby; 1993.
   Google Scholar
• European Glaucoma Society EE. Terminology and Guidelines for Glaucoma. 4th ed. 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Topouzis F, Peng F, Kotas-Neumann R, et al. Longitudinal changes in optic disc topography of adult patients after trabeculectomy. Ophthalmology. 1999;106(6):1147–1151. doi:10.1016/S0161-6420(99)90248-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vianna JR, Danthurebandara VM, Sharpe GP, et al. Importance of normal aging in estimating the rate of glaucomatous neuroretinal rim and retinal nerve fiber layer loss. Ophthalmology. 2015;122(12):2392–2398. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2015.08.020
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Danthurebandara VM, Sharpe GP, Hutchison DM, et al. Enhanced structure-function relationship in glaucoma with an anatomically and geometrically accurate neuroretinal rim measurement. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2014;56(1):98–105. doi:10.1167/iovs.14-15375
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• El Chehab H, Delbarre M, Marechal M, et al. [New neuroretinal rim analysis with spectral domain optical coherence tomography, Spectralis (Heidelberg Engineering, Germany). Preliminary study]. J Fr Ophtalmol. 2015;38(1):46–52. doi:10.1016/j.jfo.2014.10.004. [Indonesian]
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gmeiner JM, Schrems WA, Mardin CY, et al. Comparison of Bruch’s membrane opening minimum rim width and peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer thickness in early glaucoma assessment. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2016;57(9):575–584. doi:10.1167/iovs.15-18906
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reis ASC, Zangalli CES, Abe RY, et al. Intra- and interobserver reproducibility of Bruch’s membrane opening minimum rim width measurements with spectral domain optical coherence tomography. Acta Ophthalmol. 2017;95(7):e548–e55. doi:10.1111/aos.13464
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta L, Rahmatnejad K, Gogte P, et al. Reproducibility of minimum rim width and retinal nerve fibre layer thickness using the anatomic positioning system in glaucoma patients. Can J Ophthalmol. 2019;54(3):335–341. doi:10.1016/j.jcjo.2018.05.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma S, Tun TA, Baskaran M, et al. Effect of acute intraocular pressure elevation on the minimum rim width in normal, ocular hypertensive and glaucoma eyes. Br J Ophthalmol. 2018;102(1):131–135. doi:10.1136/bjophthalmol-2017-310232
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jonas JB, Budde WM, Panda-Jonas S. Ophthalmoscopic evaluation of the optic nerve head. Surv Ophthalmol. 1999;43:293–320.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang D, Chopra V, Lu AT, et al. Does optic nerve head size variation affect circumpapillary retinal nerve fiber layer thickness measurement by optical coherence tomography? Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2012;53(8):4990–4997. doi:10.1167/iovs.11-8214
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts MD, Grau V, Grimm J, et al. Remodeling of the connective tissue microarchitecture of the lamina cribrosa in early experimental glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2009;50(2):681–690. doi:10.1167/iovs.08-1792
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arthur SN, Smith SD, Wright MM, et al. Reproducibility and agreement in evaluating retinal nerve fibre layer thickness between stratus and spectralis OCT. Eye (Lond). 2011;25(2):192–200. doi:10.1038/eye.2010.178
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Serbecic N, Beutelspacher SC, Aboul-Enein FC, et al. Reproducibility of high-resolution optical coherence tomography measurements of the nerve fibre layer with the new Heidelberg Spectralis optical coherence tomography. Br J Ophthalmol. 2011;95(6):804–810. doi:10.1136/bjo.2010.186221
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu H, de Boer JF, Chen TC. Reproducibility of retinal nerve fiber layer thickness measurements using spectral domain optical coherence tomography. J Glaucoma. 2011;20(8):470–476. doi:10.1097/IJG.0b013e3181f3eb64
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aydin A, Wollstein G, Price LL, et al. Optical coherence tomography assessment of retinal nerve fiber layer thickness changes after glaucoma surgery. Ophthalmology. 2003;110(8):1506–1511. doi:10.1016/S0161-6420(03)00493-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yamada N, Tomita G, Yamamoto T, et al. Changes in the nerve fiber layer thickness following a reduction of intraocular pressure after trabeculectomy. J Glaucoma. 2000;9(5):371–375. doi:10.1097/00061198-200010000-00005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang PT, Sekhon N, Budenz DL, et al. Effect of lowering intraocular pressure on optical coherence tomography measurement of peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer thickness. Ophthalmology. 2007;114(12):2252–2258. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2007.02.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim WJ, Kim KN, Sung JY, et al. Relationship between preoperative high intraocular pressure and retinal nerve fibre layer thinning after glaucoma surgery. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):13901. doi:10.1038/s41598-019-50406-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu X, Li M, Zhong Y, et al. The damage patterns of retinal nerve fiber layer in acute and chronic intraocular pressure elevation in primary angle closure glaucoma. Eye Sci. 2011;26(3):154–160. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4432.2011.03.006
   Google Scholar
• Wu N, Chen Y, Yang Y, et al. The changes of corneal biomechanical properties with long-term treatment of prostaglandin analogue measured by Corvis ST. BMC Ophthalmol. 2020;20(1):422. doi:10.1186/s12886-020-01693-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu N, Chen Y, Yu X, et al. Changes in corneal biomechanical properties after long-term topical prostaglandin therapy. PLoS One. 2016;11(5):e0155527. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0155527
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mansberger SL, Menda SA, Fortune BA, et al. Automated segmentation errors when using optical coherence tomography to measure retinal nerve fiber layer thickness in glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol. 2017;174:1–8. doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2016.10.020
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• La Bruna S, Tsamis E, Zemborain ZZ, et al. A Topographic Comparison of OCT Minimum Rim Width (BMO-MRW) and Circumpapillary Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer (cRNFL) thickness measures in eyes with or suspected glaucoma. J Glaucoma. 2020;29(8):671–680. doi:10.1097/IJG.0000000000001571
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chauhan BC, Danthurebandara VM, Sharpe GP, et al. Bruch’s membrane opening minimum rim width and retinal nerve fiber layer thickness in a normal white population: a multicenter Study. Ophthalmology. 2015;122(9):1786–1794. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2015.06.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar