Success of Primary Trabeculectomy in Advanced Open Angle Glaucoma

References

• Flaxman SR, Bourne RRA, Resnikoff S, et al. Global causes of blindness and distance vision impairment 1990-2020: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Glob Health. 2017;5(12):E1221–E1234.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayro EL, Wang M, Elze T, Pasquale LR. The impact of artificial intelligence in the diagnosis and management of glaucoma. Eye (Lond). 2020;34(1):1–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wurster P, Harris A, Gonzalez AC, et al. Risk factors for open-angle glaucoma in persons of latin american descent. J Glaucoma. 2020;29(3):217–225.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cairns JE. Trabeculectomy. Preliminary report of a new method. Am J Ophthalmol. 1968;66(4):673–679.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kansal V, Armstrong JJ, Hutnik CM. Trends in glaucoma filtration procedures: a retrospective administrative health records analysis over a 13-year period in Canada. Clin Ophthalmol. 2020;14:501–508.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Glaucoma Society. European Glaucoma Society Terminology and Guidelines for Glaucoma, 4th Edition - Chapter 2: classification and terminologySupported by the EGS Foundation: part 1: foreword; Introduction; Glossary; Chapter 2 Classification and Terminology. Br J Ophthalmol. 2017;101(5):73–127.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lavia C, Dallorto L, Maule M, Ceccarelli M, Fea AM. Minimally-invasive glaucoma surgeries (MIGS) for open angle glaucoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2017;12(8):e0183142.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhartiya S, Dhingra D, Shaarawy T. Revisiting results of conventional surgery: trabeculectomy, glaucoma drainage devices, and deep sclerectomy in the era of MIGS. J Curr Glaucoma Pract. 2019;13(2):45–49.
   Google Scholar
• Vinod K, Gedde SJ, Feuer WJ, et al. Practice preferences for glaucoma surgery: a survey of the American glaucoma society. J Glaucoma. 2017;26(8):687–693.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arriola-Villalobos P, Martinez-de-la-casa JM, Diaz-Valle D, Morales-Fernandez L, Fernandez-Perez C, Garcia-Feijoo J. Glaukos iStent inject(R) trabecular micro-bypass implantation associated with cataract surgery in patients with coexisting cataract and open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension: a long-term study. J Ophthalmol. 2016;2016:1056573.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Francis BA, Berke SJ, Dustin L, Noecker R. Endoscopic cyclophotocoagulation combined with phacoemulsification versus phacoemulsification alone in medically controlled glaucoma. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2014;40(8):1313–1321.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bloom P, Au L. “Minimally Invasive Glaucoma Surgery (MIGS) is a poor substitute for trabeculectomy”The great debate. Ophthalmol Ther. 2018;7(2):203–210.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gabai A, Cimarosti R, Battistella C, Isola M, Lanzetta P. Efficacy and safety of trabeculectomy versus nonpenetrating surgeries in open-angle glaucoma: a meta-analysis. J Glaucoma. 2019;28(9):823–833.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HaiBo T, Xin K, ShiHeng L, Lin L. Comparison of Ahmed glaucoma valve implantation and trabeculectomy for glaucoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2015;10(2):e0118142.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Namavari A, Hyde RA, Wang D, Vajaranant TS, Aref AA. Primary Baerveldt Shunt implantation: outcomes and complications. Ophthalmol Ther. 2016;5(2):253–262.
   Google Scholar
• Agrawal P, Bradshaw SE. Systematic literature review of clinical and economic outcomes of Micro-Invasive Glaucoma Surgery (MIGS) in primary open-angle glaucoma. Ophthalmol Ther. 2018;7(1):49–73.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heuer DK, Barton K, Grehn F, Shaarawy T, Sherwood M. Consensus on definitions of success. In: Shaarawy T, Sherwood M, Grehn F, editors. Guidelines on Design and Reporting of Surgical Trials. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Kugler Publications; 2009:15–24.
   Google Scholar
• Stead RE, King AJ. Outcome of trabeculectomy with mitomycin C in patients with advanced glaucoma. Br J Ophthalmol. 2011;95(7):960–965.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bojikian KD, Stein AL, Slabaugh MA, Chen PP. Incidence and risk factors for traumatic intraocular pressure elevation and traumatic glaucoma after open-globe injury. Eye (Lond). 2015;29(12):1579–1584.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hefetz L, Keren T, Naveh N. Early and late postoperative application of 5-fluorouracil following trabeculectomy in refractory glaucoma. Ophthalmic Surg. 1994;25(10):715–719.
   Google Scholar
• Mattox C. Glaucoma filtration surgery and antimetabolites. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers. 1995;26(5):473–480.
   Google Scholar
• Pantalon AD, Barata ADO, Georgopoulos M, Ratnarajan G. Outcomes of phacoemulsification combined with two iStent inject trabecular microbypass stents with or without endocyclophotocoagulation. Br J Ophthalmol. 2020;104(10):1378–1383.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ehrnrooth P, Lehto I, Puska P, Laatikainen L. Long-term outcome of trabeculectomy in terms of intraocular pressure. Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 2002;80(3):267–271.
   Google Scholar
• Casson R, Rahman R, Salmon JF. Long term results and complications of trabeculectomy augmented with low dose mitomycin C in patients at risk for filtration failure. Br J Ophthalmol. 2001;85(6):686–688.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landers J, Martin K, Sarkies N, Bourne R, Watson P. A twenty-year follow-up study of trabeculectomy: risk factors and outcomes. Ophthalmology. 2012;119(4):694–702.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dulku S. Trabeculectomy success rates. Ophthalmology. 2012;119(10):2194–2195;author reply 2195–2196.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nguyen NX, Kuchle M, Martus P, Naumann GO. Quantification of blood–aqueous barrier breakdown after trabeculectomy: pseudoexfoliation versus primary open-angle glaucoma. J Glaucoma. 1999;8(1):18–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lim SH, Cha SC. Long-term outcomes of Mitomycin-C trabeculectomy in exfoliative glaucoma versus primary open-angle glaucoma. J Glaucoma. 2017;26(4):303–310.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li F, Tang G, Zhang H, Yan X, Ma L, Geng Y. The effects of trabeculectomy on pseudoexfoliation glaucoma and primary open-angle glaucoma. J Ophthalmol. 2020;2020:1723691.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hollo G, Katsanos A, Konstas AG. Management of exfoliative glaucoma: challenges and solutions. Clin Ophthalmol. 2015;9:907–919.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Popovic V, Sjostrand J. Course of exfoliation and simplex glaucoma after primary trabeculectomy. Br J Ophthalmol. 1999;83(3):305–310.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Konstas AG, Jay JL, Marshall GE, Lee WR. Prevalence, diagnostic features, and response to trabeculectomy in exfoliation glaucoma. Ophthalmology. 1993;100(5):619–627.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landa G, Pollack A, Rachmiel R, Bukelman A, Marcovich A, Zalish M. Results of combined phacoemulsification and trabeculectomy with mitomycin C in pseudoexfoliation versus non-pseudoexfoliation glaucoma. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2005;243(12):1236–1240.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwartz AL, Van Veldhuisen PC, Gaasterland DE, Ederer F, Sullivan EK, Cyrlin MN. The Advanced Glaucoma Intervention Study (AGIS): 5. Encapsulated bleb after initial trabeculectomy. Am J Ophthalmol. 1999;127(1):8–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shetty RK, Wartluft L, Moster MR. Slit-lamp needle revision of failed filtering blebs using high-dose mitomycin C. J Glaucoma. 2005;14(1):52–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mardelli PG, Lederer CM Jr., Murray PL, Pastor SA, Hassanein KM. Slit-lamp needle revision of failed filtering blebs using mitomycin C. Ophthalmology. 1996;103(11):1946–1955.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rotchford AP, King AJ.Moving the goal posts definitions of success after glaucoma surgery and their effect on reported outcome. Ophthalmology. 2010;117(1):18–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Veldhuisen PC, Ederer F, Gaasterland DE, et al. The advanced glaucoma intervention study (AGIS): 7. The relationship between control of intraocular pressure and visual field deterioration. Am J Ophthalmol. 2000;130(4):429–440.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sihota R, Angmo D, Ramaswamy D, Dada T. Simplifying “target” intraocular pressure for different stages of primary open-angle glaucoma and primary angle-closure glaucoma. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2018;66(4):495–505.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quigley HA. 21st century glaucoma care. Eye (Lond). 2019;33(2):254–260.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Issa de Fendi L, Cena de Oliveira T, Bigheti Pereira C, Pereira Bigheti C, Viani GA. Additive effect of risk factors for trabeculectomy failure in glaucoma patients: a risk-group from a cohort study. J Glaucoma. 2016;25(10):e879–e883.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romero P, Hirunpatravong P, Alizadeh R, et al. Trabeculectomy with Mitomycin-C: outcomes and risk factors for failure in primary angle-closure glaucoma. J Glaucoma. 2018;27(2):101–107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pathak-Ray V, Choudhari N. Rescue of failing or failed trabeculectomy blebs with slit-lamp needling and adjunctive mitomycin C in Indian eyes. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2018;66(1):71–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bland JM, Altman DG. The logrank test. BMJ. 2004;328(7447):1073.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hosmer D, Lemeshow S, May S. Applied Survival Analysis: Regression Modeling of Time to Event Data. 2 ed., Vol. 1. Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons; 2008.
   Google Scholar