Presbyopia Treatments by Mechanism of Action: A New Classification System Based on a Review of the Literature

References

• Waring GO, Rocha KM. Characterization of the dysfunctional lens syndrome and a review of the literature. Curr Ophthalmol Rep. 2018;6(4):249–255. doi:10.1007/s40135-018-0190-3
   Google Scholar
• Fricke TR, Tahhan N, Resnikoff S, et al. Global prevalence of presbyopia and vision impairment from uncorrected presbyopia: systematic review, meta-analysis, and modelling. Ophthalmology. 2018;125(10):1492–1499. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2018.04.013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pointer JS. The presbyopic add. II. Age-related trend and a gender difference. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 1995;15(4):241–248. doi:10.1046/j.1475-1313.1995.9400022r.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holden BA, Fricke TR, Ho SM, et al. Global vision impairment due to uncorrected presbyopia. Arch Ophthalmol. 2008;126(12):1731–1739. doi:10.1001/archopht.126.12.1731
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Burke AG, Patel I, Munoz B, et al. Population-based study of presbyopia in rural Tanzania. Ophthalmology. 2006;113(5):723–727. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2006.01.030
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pointer JS. The presbyopic add. III. Influence of the distance refractive type. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 1995;15(4):249–253. doi:10.1046/j.1475-1313.1995.9400023s.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pointer JS. Gender-related optical aspects of the onset of presbyopia. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2002;22(2):126–129. doi:10.1046/j.1475-1313.2002.00012.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frick KD, Joy SM, Wilson DA, Naidoo KS, Holden BA. The global burden of potential productivity loss from uncorrected presbyopia. Ophthalmology. 2015;122(8):1706–1710. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2015.04.014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charman WN. Developments in the correction of presbyopia I: spectacle and contact lenses. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2014;34(1):8–29. doi:10.1111/opo.12091
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goertz AD, Stewart WC, Burns WR, Stewart JA, Nelson LA. Review of the impact of presbyopia on quality of life in the developing and developed world. Acta Ophthalmol. 2014;92(6):497–500. doi:10.1111/aos.12308
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patel I, Munoz B, Burke AG, et al. Impact of presbyopia on quality of life in a rural African setting. Ophthalmology. 2006;113(5):728–734. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2006.01.028
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolffsohn JS, Leteneux-Pantais C, Chiva-Razavi S, et al. Social media listening to understand the lived experience of presbyopia: systematic search and content analysis study. J Med Internet Res. 2020;22(9):e18306. doi:10.2196/18306
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American Optometric Association. Care of the Patient with Presbyopia. St. Louis (MO): American Optometric Association; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Atchison DA, Charman WN. Thomas Young’s contribution to visual optics: the Bakerian Lecture “on the mechanism of the eye. J Vis. 2010;10(12):16. doi:10.1167/10.12.16
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ovenseri-Ogbomo GO, Oduntan OA. Mechanism of accommodation: a review of theoretical propositions. Afr Vision Eye Health. 2015;74(1):6. doi:10.4102/aveh.v74i1.28
   Google Scholar
• Southall JPC, ed. Helmholtz’s Treatise on Physiological Optics. Translated from the 3rd German Ed. New York: Dover Publications; 1962.
   Google Scholar
• Glasser A, Kaufman PL. The mechanism of accommodation in primates. Ophthalmology. 1999;106(5):863–872. doi:10.1016/s0161-6420(99)00502-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldberg DB. Computer-animated model of accommodation and presbyopia. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2015;41(2):437–445. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2014.07.028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harvard Health Publishing. Medical dictionary of health terms; 2021. Available from: https://www.health.harvard.edu/medical-dictionary-of-health-terms/j-through-p#P-terms. Accessed March 10, 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Croft MA, Glasser A, Kaufman PL. Accommodation and presbyopia. Int Ophthalmol Clin. 2001;41(2):33–46. doi:10.1097/00004397-200104000-00005
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lichtinger A, Rootman DS. Intraocular lenses for presbyopia correction: past, present, and future. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2012;23(1):40–46. doi:10.1097/ICU.0b013e32834cd5be
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torricelli AA, Junior JB, Santhiago MR, Bechara SJ. Surgical management of presbyopia. Clin Ophthalmol. 2012;6:1459–1466. doi:10.2147/opth.s35533
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chang DH. Multifocal spectacle and monovision treatment of presbyopia and falls in the elderly. J Refract Surg. 2021;37(S1):S12–S16. doi:10.3928/1081597X-20210408-02
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Korenfeld MS, Robertson SM, Stein JM, et al. Topical lipoic acid choline ester eye drop for improvement of near visual acuity in subjects with presbyopia: a safety and preliminary efficacy trial. Eye (Lond). 2021. doi:10.1038/s41433-020-01391-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gualdi L, Gualdi F, Rusciano D, et al. Ciliary muscle electrostimulation to restore accommodation in patients with early presbyopia: preliminary results. J Refract Surg. 2017;33(9):578–583. doi:10.3928/1081597x-20170621-05
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lubatschowski H, Schumacher S, Fromm M, et al. Femtosecond lentotomy: generating gliding planes inside the crystalline lens to regain accommodation ability. J Biophoton. 2010;3(5–6):265–268. doi:10.1002/jbio.201000013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schumacher S, Oberheide U. Femtosecond lentotomy: a prospect for a treatment to regain the accommodation ability. In: Nolte S, Schrempel F, Dausinger F, editors. Ultrashort Pulse Laser Technology. Springer Series in Optical Sciences. Vol. 195. Cham: Springer; 2016: 285–309. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-17659-8_13
   Google Scholar
• Hipsley A, Hall B, Rocha KM. Scleral surgery for the treatment of presbyopia: where are we today? Eye Vis (Lond). 2018;5:4. doi:10.1186/s40662-018-0098-x
   Google Scholar
• Alió JL, Alió Del Barrio JL, Vega-Estrada A. Accommodative intraocular lenses: where are we and where we are going. Eye Vis (Lond). 2017;4:16. doi:10.1186/s40662-017-0077-7
   Google Scholar
• Liang YL, Jia SB. Clinical application of accommodating intraocular lens. Int J Ophthalmol. 2018;11(6):1028–1037. doi:10.18240/ijo.2018.06.22
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ossma IL, Galvis A, Vargas LG, Trager MJ, Vagefi MR, McLeod SD. Synchrony dual-optic accommodating intraocular lens. Part 2: pilot clinical evaluation. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2007;33(1):47–52. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2006.08.049
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alió JL, Ben-nun J, Rodríguez-Prats JL, Plaza AB. Visual and accommodative outcomes 1 year after implantation of an accommodating intraocular lens based on a new concept. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2009;35(10):1671–1678. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2009.04.043
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Studeny P, Krizova D, Urminsky J. Clinical experience with the WIOL-CF accommodative bioanalogic intraocular lens: Czech National Observational Registry. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2016;26(3):230–235. doi:10.5301/ejo.5000653
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pérez-Merino P, Birkenfeld J, Dorronsoro C, et al. Aberrometry in patients implanted with accommodative intraocular lenses. Am J Ophthalmol. 2014;157(5):1077–1089. doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2014.02.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Letocha CE. The invention and early manufacture of bifocals. Surv Ophthalmol. 1990;35(3):226–235. doi:10.1016/0039-6257(90)90092-a
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alió JL, Piñero DP, Plaza-Puche AB, Chan MJ. Visual outcomes and optical performance of a monofocal intraocular lens and a new-generation multifocal intraocular lens. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2011;37(2):241–250. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2010.08.043
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheedy JE, Campbell C, King-Smith E, Hayes JR. Progressive powered lenses: the Minkwitz theorem. Optom Vis Sci. 2005;82(10):916–922. doi:10.1097/01.opx.0000181266.60785.c9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lord SR, Dayhew J, Howland A, Howland A. Multifocal glasses impair edge-contrast sensitivity and depth perception and increase the risk of falls in older people. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2002;50(11):1760–1766. doi:10.1046/j.1532-5415.2002.50502.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charman WN, Saunders B. Theoretical and practical factors influencing the optical performance of contact lenses for the presbyope. J Br Contact Lens Ass. 1990;13:67–75. doi:10.1016/0141-7037(90)80012-Q
   Google Scholar
• Woods RL. The aging eye and contact lenses – a review of ocular characteristics. J Br Contact Lens Ass. 1991;14:115–127. doi:10.1016/0141-7037(91)80004-6
   Google Scholar
• Chu BS, Wood JM, Collins MJ. The effect of presbyopic vision corrections on nighttime driving performance. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2010;51(9):4861–4866. doi:10.1167/iovs.10-5154
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cochener B, Lafuma A, Khoshnood B, Courouve L, Berdeaux G. Comparison of outcomes with multifocal intraocular lenses: a meta-analysis. Clin Ophthalmol. 2011;5:45–56. doi:10.2147/opth.s14325
   Google Scholar
• Maxwell WA, Lane SS, Zhou F. Performance of presbyopia-correcting intraocular lenses in distance optical bench tests. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2009;35(1):166–171. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2008.10.026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qian N. Binocular disparity and the perception of depth. Neuron. 1997;18(3):359–368. doi:10.1016/s0896-6273(00)81238-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans BJ. Monovision: a review. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2007;27(5):417–439. doi:10.1111/j.1475-1313.2007.00488.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blake R, Logothetis N. Visual competition. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2002;3(1):13–21. doi:10.1038/nrn701
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polonsky A, Blake R, Braun J, Heeger DJ. Neuronal activity in human primary visual cortex correlates with perception during binocular rivalry. Nat Neurosci. 2000;3(11):1153–1159. doi:10.1038/80676
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charman WN. Developments in the correction of presbyopia II: surgical approaches. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2014;34(4):397–426. doi:10.1111/opo.12129
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finkelman YM, Ng JQ, Barrett GD. Patient satisfaction and visual function after pseudophakic monovision. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2009;35(6):998–1002. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2009.01.035
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenbaum S. Monovision pseudophakia. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2002;28(8):1439–1443. doi:10.1016/s0886-3350(02)01218-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ito M, Shimizu K. Reading ability with pseudophakic monovision and with refractive multifocal intraocular lenses: comparative study. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2009;35(9):1501–1504. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2009.03.051
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marques FF, Sato RM, Chiacchio BB, Marques DM, Barreiro J, Caetano RL. Evaluation of visual performance and patient satisfaction with pseudophakic monovision technique. Arq Bras Oftalmol. 2009;72(2):164–168. doi:10.1590/s0004-27492009000200006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schor C, Landsman L, Erickson P. Ocular dominance and the interocular suppression of blur in monovision. Am J Optom Physiol Opt. 1987;64(10):723–730. doi:10.1097/00006324-198710000-00002
   Google Scholar
• Vale A, Buckley JG, Elliott DB. Gait alterations negotiating a raised surface induced by monocular blur. Optom Vis Sci. 2008;85(12):1128–1134. doi:10.1097/OPX.0b013e31818e8d2a
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vale A, Scally A, Buckley JG, Elliott DB. The effects of monocular refractive blur on gait parameters when negotiating a raised surface. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2008;28(2):135–142. doi:10.1111/j.1475-1313.2008.00543.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayashi K, Yoshida M, Manabe S, Hayashi H. Optimal amount of anisometropia for pseudophakic monovision. J Refract Surg. 2011;27(5):332–338. doi:10.3928/1081597x-20100817-01
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durrie DS. The effect of different monovision contact lens powers on the visual function of emmetropic presbyopic patients (an American Ophthalmological Society thesis). Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 2006;104:366–401.
   Google Scholar
• Kollbaum PS, Bradley A. Correction of presbyopia: old problems with old (and new) solutions. Clin Exp Optom. 2020;103(1):21–30. doi:10.1111/cxo.12987
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burge J, Rodriguez-Lopez V, Dorronsoro C. Monovision and the misperception of motion. Curr Biol. 2019;29(15):2586–2592.e4. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2019.06.070
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Felson DT, Anderson JJ, Hannan MT, Milton RC, Wilson PW, Kiel DP. Impaired vision and hip fracture. The Framingham Study. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1989;37(6):495–500. doi:10.1111/j.1532-5415.1989.tb05678.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nishi T, Taketani F, Ueda T, Ogata N. Comparisons of amplitude of pseudoaccommodation with aspheric yellow, spheric yellow, and spheric clear monofocal intraocular lenses. Clin Ophthalmol. 2013;7:2159–2164. doi:10.2147/opth.s52771
   Google Scholar
• Patel R, Wang L, Koch DD, Yeu E. Pseudoaccommodation. Int Ophthalmol Clin. 2011;51(2):109–118. doi:10.1097/IIO.0b013e31820f2748
   Google Scholar
• Charman WN. Pinholes and presbyopia: solution or sideshow? Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2019;39(1):1–10. doi:10.1111/opo.12594
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seyeddain O, Hohensinn M, Riha W, et al. Small-aperture corneal inlay for the correction of presbyopia: 3-year follow-up. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2012;38(1):35–45. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2011.07.027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dick HB, Piovella M, Vukich J, Vilupuru S, Lin L. Prospective multicenter trial of a small-aperture intraocular lens in cataract surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2017;43(7):956–968. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2017.04.038
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vargas V, Vejarano F, Alió JL. Near vision improvement with the use of a new topical compound for presbyopia correction: a prospective, consecutive interventional non-comparative clinical study. Ophthalmol Ther. 2019;8(1):31–39. doi:10.1007/s40123-018-0154-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benozzi J, Benozzi G, Orman B. Presbyopia: a new potential pharmacological treatment. Med Hypothesis Discov Innov Ophthalmol. 2012;1(1):3–5.
   Google Scholar
• Abdelkader A. Improved presbyopic vision with miotics. Eye Contact Lens. 2015;41(5):323–327. doi:10.1097/icl.0000000000000137
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terwee T, Weeber H, van der Mooren M, Piers P. Visualization of the retinal image in an eye model with spherical and aspheric, diffractive, and refractive multifocal intraocular lenses. J Refract Surg. 2008;24(3):223–232. doi:10.3928/1081597x-20080301-03
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vargas-Fragoso V, Alió JL. Corneal compensation of presbyopia: presbyLASIK: an updated review. Eye Vis (Lond). 2017;4:11. doi:10.1186/s40662-017-0075-9
   Google Scholar
• Davison JA, Simpson MJ. History and development of the apodized diffractive intraocular lens. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2006;32(5):849–858. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2006.02.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ding L, Knox WH, Bühren J, Nagy LJ, Huxlin KR. Intratissue refractive index shaping (IRIS) of the cornea and lens using a low-pulse-energy femtosecond laser oscillator. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2008;49(12):5332–5339. doi:10.1167/iovs.08-1921
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu X, Zhu MM, Zou HD. Refractive versus diffractive multifocal intraocular lenses in cataract surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Refract Surg. 2014;30(9):634–644. doi:10.3928/1081597x-20140814-04
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charman WN. The eye in focus: accommodation and presbyopia. Clin Exp Optomet. 2008;91:207–225. doi:10.1111/j.1444-0938.2008.00256.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar