Clinical Outcomes, Contrast Sensitivity, Reading Performance and Patient Satisfaction Following Bilateral Implantation of AT LARA 829MP EDoF IOLs

References

• MacRae S, Holladay JT, Glasser A, et al. Special report: American Academy of Ophthalmology Task Force consensus statement for extended depth of focus intraocular lenses. Ophthalmology. 2017;124(1):139–141. PMID: 27743644. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2016.09.039
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shetty V, Haldipurkar SS, Gore R, Dhamankar R, Paik A, Setia MS. A comparison of visual outcomes in three different types of monofocal intraocular lenses. Int J Ophthalmol. 2015;8(6):1173–1178. doi:10.3980/j.issn.2222-3959.2015.06.17
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borkenstein AF, Borkenstein EM. Long-term clinical results and scanning electron microscopic analysis of the aspheric, hydrophobic, acrylic intraocular lens CT LUCIA 611P(Y). Clin Ophthalmol. 2018;12:1219–1227. doi:10.2147/OPTH.S167895
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ganesh S, Brar S, Pawar A. Long-term visual outcomes and patient satisfaction following bilateral implantation of trifocal intraocular lenses. Clin Ophthalmol. 2017;11:1453–1459. PMID: 28860693; PMCID: PMC5558567. doi:10.2147/OPTH.S125921
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doroodgar F, Niazi F, Sanginabadi A, et al. Visual performance of four types of diffractive multifocal intraocular lenses and a review of articles. Int J Ophthalmol. 2021;14(3):356–365. PMID: 33747809; PMCID: PMC7930542. doi:10.18240/ijo.2021.03.04
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coassin M, Di Zazzo A, Antonini M, Gaudenzi D, Gallo Afflitto G, Kohnen T. Extended depth-of-focus intraocular lenses: power calculation and outcomes. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2020;46(11):1554–1560. PMID: 32590481. doi:10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000000293
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kohnen T, Suryakumar R. Extended depth-of-focus technology in intraocular lenses. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2020;46(2):298–304. PMID: 32126045. doi:10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000000109
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rampat R, Gatinel D. Multifocal and extended depth-of-focus intraocular lenses in 2020. Ophthalmology. 2020;S0161-6420(20)30931–3. PMID: 32980397. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2020.09.026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akella SS, Juthani VV. Extended depth of focus intraocular lenses for presbyopia. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2018;29(4):318–322. PMID: 29697436. doi:10.1097/ICU.0000000000000490
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paik DW, Park JS, Yang CM, Lim DH, Chung TY. Comparing the visual outcome, visual quality, and satisfaction among three types of multi-focal intraocular lenses. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):14832. PMID: 32908159; PMCID: PMC7481789. doi:10.1038/s41598-020-69318-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song JE, Khoramnia R, Son HS, Knorz MC, Choi CY. Comparison between bilateral implantation of a trifocal IOL and mix-and-match implantation of a bifocal IOL and an extended depth of focus IOL. J Refract Surg. 2020;36(8):528–535. PMID: 32785726. doi:10.3928/1081597X-20200616-01
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Black S. A clinical assessment of visual performance of combining the TECNIS® Symfony Extended Range of Vision IOL (ZXR00) with the +3.25 D TECNIS multifocal 1-piece IOL (ZLB00) in subjects undergoing bilateral cataract extraction. Clin Ophthalmol. 2018;12:2129–2136. PMID: 30425448; PMCID: PMC6205142. doi:10.2147/OPTH.S175901
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schojai M, Schultz T, Jerke C, Böcker J, Dick HB. Visual performance comparison of 2 extended depth-of-focus intraocular lenses. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2020;46(3):388–393. PMID: 32142039. doi:10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000000068
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schallhorn SC, Teenan D, Venter JA, Hannan SJ, Schallhorn JM. Initial clinical outcomes of a new extended depth of focus intraocular lens. J Refract Surg. 2019;35(7):426–433. PMID: 31298722. doi:10.3928/1081597X-20190530-01
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schallhorn SC, Hettinger KA, Teenan D, Venter JA, Hannan SJ, Schallhorn JM. Predictors of patient satisfaction after refractive lens exchange with an extended depth of focus IOL. J Refract Surg. 2020;36(3):175–184. PMID: 32159822. doi:10.3928/1081597X-20200211-01
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kretz TA, Tarib I, Kaiser I, Herbers C, Hagen P, Breyer D. Postoperative results in patients implanted with a novel enhanced depth of focus intraocular lens. EC Ophthalmol. 2018;4:192–202.
   Google Scholar
• Wolffsohn JS, Davies LN. Presbyopia: effectiveness of correction strategies. Prog Retin Eye Res. 2019;68:124–143. PMID: 30244049. doi:10.1016/j.preteyeres.2018.09.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reinhard T, Maier P, Böhringer D, et al. Comparison of two extended depth of focus intraocular lenses with a monofocal lens: a multi-centre randomised trial. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2021;259(2):431–442. PMID: 32915276; PMCID: PMC7843553. doi:10.1007/s00417-020-04868-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ganesh S, Brar S, Pawar A, Relekar KJ. Visual and refractive outcomes following bilateral implantation of extended range of vision intraocular lens with micromonovision. J Ophthalmol. 2018;2018:7321794. PMID: 29545954; PMCID: PMC5818926. doi:10.1155/2018/7321794
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chae SH, Son HS, Khoramnia R, Lee KH, Choi CY. Laboratory evaluation of the optical properties of two extended-depth-of-focus intraocular lenses. BMC Ophthalmol. 2020;20(1):53. PMID: 32059666; PMCID: PMC7023787. doi:10.1186/s12886-020-1332-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Domínguez-Vicent A, Esteve-Taboada JJ, Del Águila-carrasco AJ, Ferrer-Blasco T, Montés-Micó R. In vitro optical quality comparison between the mini WELL ready progressive multifocal and the TECNIS symfony. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2016;254(7):1387–1397. PMID: 26671689. doi:10.1007/s00417-015-3240-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mencucci R, Favuzza E, Caporossi O, Savastano A, Rizzo S. Comparative analysis of visual outcomes, reading skills, contrast sensitivity, and patient satisfaction with two models of trifocal diffractive intraocular lenses and an extended range of vision intraocular lens. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2018;256(10):1913–1922. PMID: 29980919. doi:10.1007/s00417-018-4052-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whittaker SG, Lovie-Kitchin J. Visual requirements for reading. Optom Vis Sci. 1993;70(1):54–65. PMID: 8430009. doi:10.1097/00006324-199301000-00010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirnschall N, Motaabbed JK, Dexl A, Grabner G, Findl O. Evaluation of an electronic reading desk to measure reading acuity in pseudophakic patients. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2014;40(9):1462–1468. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2013.12.02
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dexl AK, Schlögel H, Wolfbauer M, Grabner G. Device for improving quantification of reading acuity and reading speed. J Refract Surg. 2010;26(9):682–688. doi:10.3928/1081597X-20091119-01
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song JS, Yoon DY, Hyon JY, Jeon HS. Comparison of ocular biometry and refractive outcomes using IOL master 500, IOL master 700, and lenstar LS900. Korean J Ophthalmol. 2020;34(2):126–132. PMID: 32233146; PMCID: PMC7105785. doi:10.3341/kjo.2019.0102
   Google Scholar
• Srivannaboon S, Chirapapaisan C. Comparison of refractive outcomes using conventional keratometry or total keratometry for IOL power calculation in cataract surgery. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2019;257(12):2677–2682. PMID: 31486917. doi:10.1007/s00417-019-04443-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoshikawa R, Kamiya K, Fujimura F, Shoji N. Comparison of conventional keratometry and total keratometry in normal eyes. Biomed Res Int. 2020;2020:8075924. PMID: 32352009; PMCID: PMC7178464. doi:10.1155/2020/8075924
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar