184
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Research

Clinical Comparison of a Silicone Hydrogel and a Conventional Hydrogel Daily Disposable Contact Lens

, &
Pages 4339-4345 | Published online: 29 Oct 2021

References

  • Nichols JJ, Willcox MD, Bron AJ, et al.; members of the TFOS International Workshop on Contact Lens Discomfort. The TFOS International workshop on contact lens discomfort: executive summary. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2013;54(11):TFOS7–TFOS13. doi:10.1167/iovs.13-13212.
  • Sulley A, Young G, Hunt C, McCready S, Targett MT, Craven R. Retention rates in new contact lens wearers. Eye Cont Lens. 2018;44(Suppl 1):S273–S282. doi:10.1097/ICL.0000000000000402
  • Dumbleton K, Woods C, Jones L, Fonn D, Sarwer DB. Patient and practitioner compliance with silicone hydrogel and daily disposable lens replacement in the United States. Eye Cont Lens. 2009;35(4):164–171. doi:10.1097/ICL.0b013e3181ac4a8d
  • Dumbleton K, Richter D, Woods C, Jones L, Fonn D. Compliance with contact lens replacement in Canada and the United States. Optom Vis Sci. 2010;87(2):131–139. doi:10.1097/OPX.0b013e3181ca32dc
  • Morgan PB, Efron N, Toshida H, Nichols JJ. An international analysis of contact lens compliance. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2011;34(5):223–228. doi:10.1016/j.clae.2011.08.001
  • Sulley A, Dumbleton K. Silicone hydrogel daily disposable benefits: the evidence. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2020;43(3):298–307. doi:10.1016/j.clae.2020.02.001
  • Morgan P, Woods CA, Tranoudis IG, et al. International contact lens prescribing in 2019. Cont Lens Spectrum. 2020;35(1):26–32.
  • Matthew J. Precision1® contact lenses with Smartsurface® technology: material properties, surface wettability and clinical performance; 2019. Available from: https://us.alconscience.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/1906A195-US-DP1-19-E-1306_DP1-White-Paper_singe_lr.pdf. Accessed January 6, 2020.
  • Cummings S, Giedd B, Pearson C. Clinical performance of a novel daily disposable spherical contact lens. J Cont Lens Res Sci. 2020;4(1):e23–e30. doi:10.22374/jclrs.v4i1.39
  • Chalmers RL, Hickson-Curran SB, Keay L, Gleason WJ, Albright R. Rates of adverse events with hydrogel and silicone hydrogel daily disposable lenses in a large post-market surveillance registry: the TEMPO Registry. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2015;56(1):654–663. doi:10.1167/iovs.14-15582
  • Grobe GL 3rd, Valint PL Jr, Ammon DM Jr. Surface chemical structure for soft contact lenses as a function of polymer processing. J Biomed Mater Res. 1996;32(1):45–54. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(199609)32:1<45::AID-JBM6>3.0.CO;2-P
  • Efron N, Brennan NA, Chalmers RL, et al. Thirty years of ‘quiet eye’ with etafilcon A contact lenses. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2020;43(3):285–297. doi:10.1016/j.clae.2020.03.015
  • Szczotka-Flynn LB, Debanne S, Benetz BA, Wilson T, Brennan N. Daily wear contact lenses manufactured in etafilcon A are noninferior to two silicone hydrogel lens types with respect to hypoxic stress. Eye Cont Lens. 2018;44(3):190–199. doi:10.1097/ICL.0000000000000335
  • Grant T, Tang A. A survey of contact lens wearers and eye care professionals on satisfaction with a new smart-surface silicone hydrogel daily disposable contact lens. Clin Optom. 2020;12:9–15. doi:10.2147/OPTO.S233328