Long-Term Effect of Early Phacoemulsification in Primary Angle Closure Glaucoma Patients with Cataract: A 10-Year Follow-Up Study

References

• Quigelly HA, Broman AT. The number of people with glaucoma worldwide in 2010 and 2020. Br J Ophthalmol. 2006;90:262–267. doi:10.1136/bjo.2005.081224
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang F, Wu Z. Phacoemulsification versus combined phacotrabeculectomy in the treatment of chronic angle closure glaucoma with cataract: a meta-analysis. Int J Ophthalmol. 2016;9(4):597–603.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shiota R, Dada T, Gupta R, Kakshminarayan P, Pandey R. Ultrasound biomicroscopy in the subtypes of primary angle closure glaucoma. J Glaucoma. 2005;14:387–391. doi:10.1097/01.ijg.0000176934.14229.32
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mansori M, Ramezani F, Moghimi S, et al. Anterior segment optical coherence tomography parameters in phacomorphic angle closure and mature cataract risk factors in phacomorphic angle closure. IVOS. 2014;55:7403–7409.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Napier M, Azuara-Blanco A. Changing patterns in treatment of angle closure glaucoma. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2018;29(2):130–134. doi:10.1097/ICU.0000000000000453
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• George R, Paul P, Baskaran M, et al. Ocular biometry in occlude-able angles and angle closure glaucoma: a population based survey. Br J Ophthalmol. 2003;87:399–402. doi:10.1136/bjo.87.4.399
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taronogy P, Ho CL, Walton D. The role of the lens in the pathogenesis, prevention and treatment of angle closure glaucoma. Survey Ophthalmol. 2009;54(2):211–225. doi:10.1016/j.survophthal.2008.12.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mansoori T, Sarvepally V, Balakrishna N. Plateau iris in primary angle closure glaucoma: an ultrasound bio microscopy study. J Glaucoma. 2016;. 25(2):82–86. doi:10.1097/IJG.0000000000000263
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stefen C, Iliescu D, Batras M, Timaru C, Simone A. Plateau iris – diagnosis and treatment. Rom J Ophthalmol. 2015;59(1):14–18.
   Google Scholar
• Ng WT, Morgan W. Mechanisms and treatment of primary angle closure: a review. Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2012;40(4):218–228. doi:10.1111/j.1442-9071.2011.02604.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foster PJ, Buhrmann R, Quigely HA. The definition and classification of glaucoma in prevalence surveys. Br J Ophthalmol. 2002;86:238–242. doi:10.1136/bjo.86.2.238
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim YY, Yoo C, Cho SY, Lee TE. Anterior segment parameters measured by ultrasound bio microscopy in the subtypes of angle closure. Acta Ophthalmol. 2016;94:s 256. doi:10.1111/j.1755-3768.2016.0509
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ang GS, Wells AP. Factors influencing laser peripheral iridotomy outcomes in white eyes. An anterior segment optical coherence tomography study. J Glaucoma. 2011;20(9):577–583. doi:10.1097/IJG.0b013e3181f7b26f
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He M, Friedman DS, Ge J, et al. Laser peripheral iridotomy in eyes with narrow drainage angles. Ultrasound bio-microscopy outcomes. The Liwan eye study. Ophthalmology. 2007;114(8):1513–1519. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2006.11.032
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nonaka A, Kondo T, Kikuchi M, et al. Angle widening and alteration of ciliary process configuration after cataract surgery for primary angle closure. Diaz Core Med J. 2006;113(3):437–441.
   Google Scholar
• Yang CH, Hung PT. Intraocular lens position and anterior chamber angle changes after cataract extraction in eyes with primary angle closure glaucoma. J Cataract Refract Surge. 1997;23:1109–1113. doi:10.1016/S0886-3350(97)80089-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belluci R, Perfetti S, Babighian S, Morselli S, Banomi L. Filtration and complications after trabeculectomy and after phacotrabeculectomy. Acta Ophthalmol Scand Suppl. 1997;224:44–45.
   Google Scholar
• Aung T, Tow SL, Yap EU, Chan SP, Seah SK. Trabeculectomy in patients with chronic angle closure. Ophthalmol. 2000;107(7):1298–1302. doi:10.1016/S0161-6420(00)00137-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quigelly HA, Friedman DS, Congdon NG. Possible mechanisms of primary angle closure and malignant glaucoma. J Glaucoma. 2003;12(2):167–180. doi:10.1097/00061198-200304000-00013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moghimi S, Hashemian H, Chen R, Johari M, Mohammadi M, Lin SC. Early phacoemulsification in patients with primary angle closure. J Curr Ophthalmol. 2015;27(3–4):70–75. doi:10.1016/j.joco.2015.12.001
   Google Scholar
• Tham CY, Kwong YY, Baig N, Leung D, Li F, Lam D. Phacoemulsification versus trabeclectomy in medically uncontrolled chronic angle closure glaucoma without cataract. Ophthalmol. 2013;120(1):62–66. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2012.07.021
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhandari S, Pandyal I, Khanal SP, Thapa SS. Effect of phacoemulsification surgery on various parameters in patients with glaucoma. Nepal J Ophthalmol. 2014;6(11):46–55. doi:10.3126/nepjoph.v6i1.10772
   Google Scholar
• Eslami Y, Fakhraei G, Zaeri R, et al. Effect of cataract extraction on intraocular pressure in chronic angle closure glaucoma. J Curr Ophthmol. 2006;19(3):6–8.
   Google Scholar
• Latifi G, Moghimi S, Eslami EY, Fakhraie G, Zaeri R, Lin S. Effect of phacoemulsification on drainage angle status in angle closure eyes with or without extensive peripheral anterior synechia. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2013;23(1):70–79. doi:10.5301/ejo.5000191
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tham CC, Kwong YY, Leung DY. Phacoemulsification versus combined phacotrabeculectomy in medically controlled chronic angle closure glaucoma with cataract. Ophthalmol. 2008;115(12):2167–2173. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2008.06.016
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lam DS, Leung DY, Tham CY, et al. Randomized trial of early phacoemulsification versus peripheral iridotomy to prevent intraocular pressure rise after acute primary angle closure. Ophthalmology. 2008;115:1134–1140. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2007.10.033
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shams PN, Foster PJ. Clinical outcomes after lens extraction for visually significant cataract in eyes with primary angle closure. J Glaucoma. 2012;21:545–550. doi:10.1097/IJG.0b013e31821db1db
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Armstrong JJ, Wasiuta E, Kiatos M, Mehta M, Huntik ML. The effects of phacoemulsification on intraocular pressure and topical medication use in patients with glaucoma. J Glaucoma. 2017;26(6):511–522. doi:10.1097/IJG.0000000000000643
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nongpiur M, Verma S, Tun T, Wong T, Petrera S, Aung T. Plateau Iris and severity of primary angle closure glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol. 2020;220:1–8. doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2020.07.033
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glaucoma group ophthalmology branch of Chinese medical association. Expert consensus on diagnosis and treatment of primary glaucoma in China. Chin J Ophthalmol. 2014;5:382–383.
   Google Scholar
• Kaushik S, Kumar R, Jain R, Bansal R, Pandav S, Gupta A. Ultrasound biomicroscopic qualification of the change in anterior chamber angle following laser peripheral iridotomy in early chronic primary angle closure glaucoma. Eye. 2007;21:735–741. doi:10.1038/sj.eye.6702317
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang G, Gonzalez E, Peng PH, et al. Anterior chamber depth, iridocorneal angle width and intraocular pressure changes after phacoemulsification: narrow versus open iridocorneal angles. Arch Ophthalmol. 2011;129(11):1283–1290. doi:10.1001/archophthalmol.2011.272
   Google Scholar
• Ishikawa H, Schuman J. Anterior segment imaging: ultrasound bio-microscopy. Ophthalmol Clin North Am. 2004;17(1):7–20. doi:10.1016/j.ohc.2003.12.001
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Husain R, Gazzard G, Aung T, et al. Initial management of acute primary angle closure: a randomized trial comparing phacoemulsification with laser peripheral iridotomy. Ophthalmology. 2012;119:2274–2281. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2012.06.015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dada T, Mohan S, Bali SJ, Bhartiya S, Sobti A, Pnda A. Ultrasound biomicroscopic assessment of angle parameters in patients with primary closure glaucoma undergoing phacoemulsification. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2011;5:559–565. doi:10.5301/EJO.2011.6287
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Astushi N, Takehesia K, Kenji Y, Massahi F, Takuji I. Cataract surgery for residual angle closure after peripheral laser iridotomy. Ophthalmology. 2005;112(6):974–979. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2004.12.042
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayashi K, Hayashi H, Nakao F, Hayashi F. Effect of cataract surgery on intraocular pressure control in glaucoma patients. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2001;27(11):1779–1786. doi:10.1016/S0886-3350(01)01036-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bailifi S, Roure-Sobas C, Le -duff F, Kodjikian L. Aqueous humor contamination during phacoemulsification in a university teaching hospital. J Fr Ophthalmol. 2012;35(3):153–156. doi:10.1016/j.jfo.2011.05.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang G, Gonzalez E, Lee R, Chen YC, He ML, Lin SC. Association of biometric factors with anterior chamber angle widening and intraocular pressure reduction after uneventful phacoemulsification for cataract. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2012;38:108–116. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2011.06.037
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu CJ, Cheng CY, Ko YC, Lau LI. Determinants of long term intraocular pressure after phacoemulsification in primary angle closure glaucoma. J Glaucoma. 2011;20(9):566–570. doi:10.1097/IJG.0b013e3181efe1e9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nongpiur ME, He M, Amerasinghe N, et al. Lens vault, thickness, and position in Chinese subjects with angle closure. Ophthalmology. 2011;118(3):474–479. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2010.07.025
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mierzejeweski A, Eliks I, Kaluzny B, Zygulska M, Harasimowicz B, Kalunzy K. Cataract phacoemulsification and intraocular pressure in glaucoma patients. Klin Oczna. 2008;110(1–3):11–17.
   Google Scholar
• Villavicencio J, Arbelaez N, Lastra BR, et al. Primary outcomes of patients with chronic angle closure glaucoma treated with combined phacoemulsification, visco-goniosynechialysis and endocyclo-photocoagulation. J Ophthalmol. 2019. Id 6378489. doi:10.1155/2019/6378489
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Euswas A, Warrasak S. Intraocular pressure control following phacoemulsification in patients with chronic angle closure glaucoma. J Med Assoc Thai. 2005;88:S121–S125.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Qiu L, Yan Y, Wu L. Appositional angle closure and conversion of primary angle closure into glaucoma after laser peripheral iridotomy. Br J Ophthalmol. 2020;104(3):386–391. doi:10.1136/bjophthalmol-2018-312956
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Angmo D, Shakrawl J, Gupta B, Suresh Y, Pandey RM, Dada T. Comparative evaluation of phacoemulsification alone versus phacoemulsification with goniosynechialysis in primary angle closure glaucoma. A randomized controlled trial. Ophthalmol Glaucoma. 2019;2(5):346–356. doi:10.1016/j.ogla.2019.05.004
   Google Scholar
• Lee CK, Rho SS, Sung GJ, et al. Effect of goniosynechialysis during phacoemulsification on IOP in patients with medically well controlled chronic angle closure glaucoma. J Glaucoma. 2015;24(6):405–409. doi:10.1097/IJG.0000000000000043
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yudhasompop N, Wangsupadilok B. Effects of phacoemulsification and intraocular lens implantation on intraocular pressure in primary angle closure glaucoma (PACG) patients. J Med Assoc Thai. 2012;95:557–560.
   Google Scholar
• Lai JS, Tham CC, Chan JC. The clinical outcomes of cataract extraction by phacoemulsification in eyes with primary angle closure glaucoma and coexisting cataract, a prospective case series study. J Glaucoma. 2006;15(1):47. doi:10.1097/01.ijg.0000196619.34368.0a
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar